Upload README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
| 6 |
+
tags:
|
| 7 |
+
- nvidia
|
| 8 |
+
- AceMath
|
| 9 |
+
- math
|
| 10 |
+
- pytorch
|
| 11 |
+
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
## Introduction
|
| 15 |
+
We introduce AceMath, a family of frontier models designed for mathematical reasoning. The models in AceMath family, including AceMath-1.5B/7B/72B-Instruct and AceMath-7B/72B-RM, are <b>Improved using Qwen</b>.
|
| 16 |
+
The AceMath-1.5B/7B/72B-Instruct models excel at solving English mathematical problems using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, while the AceMath-7B/72B-RM models, as outcome reward models, specialize in evaluating and scoring mathematical solutions.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
The AceMath-1.5B/7B/72B-Instruct models are developed from the Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B/7B/72B-Base models, leveraging a multi-stage supervised fine-tuning (SFT) process: first with general-purpose SFT data, followed by math-specific SFT data. We are releasing all training data to support further research in this field.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
For more information about AceMath, check our [website](https://research.nvidia.com/labs/adlr/acemath/) and [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15084).
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
## All Resources
|
| 23 |
+
[AceMath-1.5B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/AceMath-1.5B-Instruct)   [AceMath-7B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/AceMath-7B-Instruct)   [AceMath-72B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/AceMath-72B-Instruct)
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
[AceMath-7B-RM](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/AceMath-7B-Instruct)   [AceMath-72B-RM](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/AceMath-1.5B-Instruct)
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
[AceMath-Instruct Training Data](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/AceMath-Instruct-Training-Data)   [AceMath-RM Training Data](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/AceMath-RM-Training-Data)
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
[AceMath-RewardBench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/AceMath-RewardBench)   [AceMath Evaluation Script](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/AceMath-Evaluation-Script)
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
## Benchmark Results
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
<p align="center">
|
| 34 |
+
<img src="https://research.nvidia.com/labs/adlr/images/acemath/acemath.png" alt="AceMath Benchmark Results" width="800">
|
| 35 |
+
</p>
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
Greedy decoding (pass@1) results on a variety of math reasoning benchmarks. AceMath-7B-Instruct significantly outperforms the previous best-in-class Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct (67.2 vs. 62.9) and comes close to the performance of 10× larger Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct (67.2 vs. 68.2). Notably, our AceMath-72B-Instruct outperforms the state-of-the-art Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct (71.8 vs. 68.2), GPT-4o (67.4) and Claude 3.5 Sonnet (65.6) by a margin.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
## How to use
|
| 42 |
+
```python
|
| 43 |
+
import torch
|
| 44 |
+
from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
model_name = "nvidia/AceMath-7B-RM" # Path to the model
|
| 47 |
+
device = "auto" # the device to load the model onto
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
|
| 50 |
+
model_name,
|
| 51 |
+
device_map=device,
|
| 52 |
+
num_labels=1,
|
| 53 |
+
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
|
| 54 |
+
trust_remote_code=True,
|
| 55 |
+
).eval()
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name, trust_remote_code=True)
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
prompt = """Compute
|
| 61 |
+
\[\sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac{F_{n + 1}}{F_n F_{n + 2}},\]where $F_n$ denotes the $n$th Fibonacci number, so $F_0 = 0$ and $F_1 = 1.$"""
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
resp_1 = """To compute \[\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n F_{n+2}},\] where \( F_n \) is the \(n\)-th Fibonacci number, we will use the recurrence relation \( F_{n+2} = F_{n+1} + F_n \) and properties of Fibonacci numbers.\n\n---\n\n### Step 1: Simplify the General Term\n\nThe given term is\n\[\frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n F_{n+2}}.\]\n\nUsing the Fibonacci recurrence relation \( F_{n+2} = F_{n+1} + F_n \), we rewrite \( \frac{1}{F_{n+2}} \) as\n\[\frac{1}{F_{n+2}} = \frac{1}{F_{n+1} + F_n}.\]\n\nThus, the term becomes\n\[\frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n F_{n+2}} = \frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n (F_{n+1} + F_n)}.\]\n\nNow, separate the fraction into partial fractions:\n\[\frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n (F_{n+1} + F_n)} = \frac{1}{F_n} - \frac{1}{F_{n+1}}.\]\n\n---\n\n### Step 2: Write the Series\n\nThe series becomes\n\[\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n F_{n+2}} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{F_n} - \frac{1}{F_{n+1}} \right).\]\n\nThis is a **telescoping series**, where most terms cancel out. Writing the first few terms explicitly:\n\[\sum_{n=1}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{F_n} - \frac{1}{F_{n+1}} \right) = \left( \frac{1}{F_1} - \frac{1}{F_2} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{F_2} - \frac{1}{F_3} \right) + \left( \frac{1}{F_3} - \frac{1}{F_4} \right) + \cdots.\]\n\nAll intermediate terms cancel, leaving:\n\[\frac{1}{F_1} - \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{F_{n+1}}.\]\n\n---\n\n### Step 3: Evaluate the Remaining Terms\n\n- The first Fibonacci number \( F_1 = 1 \), so \( \frac{1}{F_1} = 1 \).\n- As \( n \to \infty \), \( F_{n+1} \to \infty \), so \( \frac{1}{F_{n+1}} \to 0 \).\n\nThus, the sum is:\n\[\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n F_{n+2}} = 1 - 0 = 1.\]\n\n---\n\n### Final Answer:\n\n\[\boxed{1}\]"""
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
chat = [
|
| 66 |
+
{"role": "system", "content": "Please reason step by step, and check your final answer within \\boxed{}."},
|
| 67 |
+
{"role": "user", "content": prompt},
|
| 68 |
+
{"role": "assistant", "content": resp_1}
|
| 69 |
+
]
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
conversation_str = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
|
| 73 |
+
chat,
|
| 74 |
+
tokenize=False,
|
| 75 |
+
add_generation_prompt=False
|
| 76 |
+
)
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
input_ids = tokenizer.encode(
|
| 79 |
+
conversation_str,
|
| 80 |
+
return_tensors="pt",
|
| 81 |
+
add_special_tokens=False
|
| 82 |
+
).to(model.device)
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
outputs = model(input_ids=input_ids)
|
| 85 |
+
print(outputs[0][0])
|
| 86 |
+
```
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
## Correspondence to
|
| 90 |
+
Zihan Liu (zihanl@nvidia.com), Yang Chen (yachen@nvidia.com), Wei Ping (wping@nvidia.com)
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
## Citation
|
| 94 |
+
If you find our work helpful, we’d appreciate it if you could cite us.
|
| 95 |
+
<pre>
|
| 96 |
+
@article{acemath2024,
|
| 97 |
+
title={AceMath: Advancing Frontier Math Reasoning with Post-Training and Reward Modeling},
|
| 98 |
+
author={Liu, Zihan and Chen, Yang and Shoeybi, Mohammad and Catanzaro, Bryan and Ping, Wei},
|
| 99 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint},
|
| 100 |
+
year={2024}
|
| 101 |
+
}
|
| 102 |
+
</pre>
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
## License
|
| 106 |
+
All models in the AceMath family are for non-commercial use only, subject to [Terms of Use](https://openai.com/policies/row-terms-of-use/) of the data generated by OpenAI. We put the AceMath models under the license of [Creative Commons Attribution: Non-Commercial 4.0 International](https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-NC-4.0).
|