prompt stringlengths 102 1.75k | sample_id stringlengths 24 24 | domain stringclasses 10 values | conceptual_breadth stringclasses 3 values | logical_nesting stringclasses 3 values | exploration stringclasses 3 values | rubrics listlengths 20 43 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I want to create a plan for July 4, 2025, i.e., Independence Day in Washington DC. I would like an itinerary of all the things to do and all the activities that are planned for Independence Day. Create a plan for the whole day and also extend it to the weekend, if required. Provide some reviews or explain why one should visit the place or engage in the activity. Add any additional information that is required. | 6847465956a0f6376a605427 | Current Events | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response covers the period from 9:00 AM or earlier through at least 10:00 PM on 4 July 2025",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains clear section headers for parts of the schedule (e.g., Morning, Afternoon, Fireworks, Lunch by the White House).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes officially recurring DC events (e.g., National Independence Day Parade, A Capitol Fourth Concert, National Mall Fireworks, Mount Vernon tour)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests a start time and an end time for every activity listed. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a minimum of four distinct activities or stops (e.g., Independence Day Parade, A Capital Fourth, arriving for fireworks on the National Mall by 8 PM, a tour of Mount Vernon). ",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response comments on the proximity of this year's 4th of July to the weekend (5–6 July 2025) and suggests additional DC activities (e.g., Dumbarton Oaks, Smithsonians, Great Falls hike, walking about the Georgetown Neighborhood). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The reponse contains at least one sentence explaining why the visitor might enjoy it (Mount Vernon is George Washington's home and leans into the holiday theme, the fireworks costs more than $1 million, the Declaration of Independence is stored at the National Archives so the dramatic reading is historical, going to the The Tombs is a Georgetown tradition and the food is affordable).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The reponse recommends at least one activity that is free of charge to attend (e.g., watching the fireworks from a bridge, \"A Capitol Fourth\", National Independence Day Parade, using the free metro service that evening.)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one indoor backup option in case of bad weather (e.g., Natural History Musuem, African American History Museum, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, Founding Farmers or another DC specific restaurant.) ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes lunch and dinner dining suggestion located inside Washington, DC or Alexandria/Arlingon or Silver Spring (e.g., Founding Farmers, Le Diplomate, Ben's Chili Bowl, Busboys and Poets).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly states that exact 2025 event times are tentative and should be confirmed closer to the date.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response warns about large crowds or security screenings on the National Mall on July 4.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends using personal fireworks use or any other illegal activity.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides estimated travel time and transit advice between activites (e.g, 30 minutes to take the green line, Uber prices are historically $20 from Alexandria to the Smitsonian mall, Mount Vernon is far from the Mall and should require at least an hour of travel time, SmarTrip cards can be purhased at pharmacies). ",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one activity suitable for families with children (e.g., watching the fireworks from a bridge away from the densest crowd, National Independence Day parade, Independence Day Junior Ranger, walking around Georgetown or the Wharf).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions when the fireworks start (9 PM).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses different locations to watch the fireworks (e.g., National Mall, National Cathedral, Key Bridge, Long Bridge Park).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains external promotional links or affiliate marketing codes.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges possible schedule changes due to weather or security and advises checking official sources.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions a city outside of Washington DC, Maryland, or Virginia (e.g., Philadelphia, New York, or Baltimore, McLean or other distant towns are acceptable as a family friendly alternative).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends events from years other than 2025 (e.g., seeing a miltiary parade, information about \"A Capital Fourth\" for 2024, information the parade route for 2023, referencing a cancellation from 2020).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Act as a creative technical founder and brainstorm an innovative AI startup idea that meets these criteria:
1. Leverages AI in a meaningful, technically interesting way, not just a thin wrapper around an LLM
2. Uses or integrates APIs (e.g. for data sources, automation, or integration with popular tools)
3. Solves a real, cool problem in people’s lives or work, something practical but original
4. Has potential for viral growth or clear product-market fit
Context: I like startups like Cal.ai (http://cal.ai) (AI calorie counting), Boardy.ai (http://boardy.ai) (AI networking), and AI scheduling assistants, things that automate or enhance daily life or work through smart AI tooling.
Please:
* Suggest 3 ideas, with a clear description of the product and how it works technically (tech stack, APIs, AI models)
* Explain what problem it solves and why people would want it
* Keep the ideas ambitious but buildable, something that could actually become a startup
For each idea state if any company is doing something similar already (who are the competitors). I want the startup to leverage a technical advantage of using cool ai features only enabled now and that will improve as foundational models and services get better. | 6847465956a0f6376a605433 | Business Planning & Research | Moderate | Intermediate | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response provides exactly 3 startup ideas as requested.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes ideas that can be built using modern available tools (e.g., AWS, Hugging Face, GPUs, LLMs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes how the ideas solve a real, practical problem (e.g., by identifying target users, addressing problems that people can plausibly face, tackling problems that require high compute).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response substantiates its core claims with relevant, credible, and up-to-date authoritative sources (e.g., respected magazines like Forbes, credible VC reports / blog posts, economic reports from reputed think thanks, government reports), demonstrating a strong evidence-based foundation for its conclusions.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the technical advantages enabled by today’s AI advances for each proposed idea (e.g., having pretraining knowledge, in-context learning handling increasingly complex tasks, models having larger context windows, models capable of producing multimodal output in a single call).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines how the startup would benefit from future improvements in foundational models and services.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response synthesizes information from multiple domains (e.g., technology, market trends, healthcare, user behavior) to generate novel insights or solutions, rather than merely summarizing existing information.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details meaningful API integrations for each idea, using concrete examples (e.g., health APIs by Epic, REST APIs from vendors like Workday, AWS API integrations, or OpenAPI Bench) to illustrate their implementation and impact.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the user experience (UX) of each idea in quantifiable or qualitative ways (e.g., learnability, efficiency, errors, memory).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a growth or market strategy for each idea (e.g., investing, scaling up hardware, boosting sales through ads, using SEO).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses unnecessary technical jargon (e.g., RLHF equations, loss functions, attention mechanisms, code) that would confuse the reader.",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists ideas that are distinct from one another.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses risks or limitations of each idea (e.g., training time, costs, hallucinations, potential biases).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response speaks in the persona of a \"creative technical founder\".",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response and ideas avoid being a \"thin wrapper\" around an LLM (e.g., changing only a prompt, not including new data, not defining a use case, not proposing solutions with non-LLM technology).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response’s competitive analysis shows a clear, defensible \"moat\".",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is structured as a practical startup brainstorm (e.g., with revenue, growth plans, sales pitches, product ideas).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents ideas with a clear, singular \"killer feature\" to focus initial development.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a clear, logical, and coherent structure that effectively guides the reader through its analysis, making complex information easy to follow (e.g., using section headers, specifying the AI models to be used, outlining the required infrastructure, and identifying the exact problem being solved).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides specific, actionable details (e.g., naming particular technologies, APIs, or competitors) and avoids vague generalizations, demonstrating a deep understanding of the subject.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses visuals, diagrams, or mockups to illustrate complex concepts (e.g., mermaid diagrams, architecture diagrams, training flows, or pipeline flows of end-to-end systems).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response formatting is optimized for quick scanning (e.g., use of bolding, short paragraphs, bullet points, section headers).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response critically assesses the practical feasibility of its proposals, acknowledging potential challenges, limitations, and the competitive landscape in a balanced manner.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies which specific AI models would be used and explains why they are appropriate for the use case.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes potential revenue streams and a business model for each idea (e.g., paid downloads, API rates, front-end advertisements, collaborations, subscription models).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines a specific initial target market segment for each idea (e.g., social media users, stay-at-home parents, high school students, graduate students conducting research reviews).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response estimates rough development timeline and key technical milestones.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response’s proposed ideas address trivial or ill-fitting problems (e.g., machine translation, already-solved AI tasks like binary classification, non-AI topics like cooking, or unrelated fields like theoretical physics).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Write a synthesis report on the applications of AI in drug discovery for a technical audience unfamiliar with biology. It should cover the main applications of AI in every stage of the drug discovery process, the latest technological advancements, challenges, and current adoption in the real world. | 6847465956a0f6376a605355 | AI & ML | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response, for each stage, names at least one specific AI model class or method other than generative models (e.g., VAEs, Foundation Models) (e.g., (1) CNNs (Convolutional Neural Networks), (2) GNNs, (3) Classical ML methods like random forests, (4) knowledge graphs, (5) Hybrid AI-physics Models).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one specific AI application for EACH of the following drug-discovery stages:\n\n\n(1) Target Identification\n\n\n(2) Hit/Lead Discovery or Virtual Screening\n\n\n(3) Lead Optimization\n\n\n(4) Preclinical Safety / ADMET Prediction\n\n\n(5) Clinical Trial Design / Patient Stratification\n\n\n(6) Post-market Surveillance / Pharmacovigilance",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides brief (≤20 words) definitions for all specialized terms, acronyms, and each of the six drug-discovery stages before discussing their AI applications.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the target audience (technical, non-biology) explicitly or implicitly in the introduction or tone.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses deterministic language (“will”, “always”, “guarantee”, “ensure”) for speculative claims about future directions or unverified findings.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains internal contradictions (e.g., calls a Phase II drug “approved” elsewhere).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends unethical or unsafe practices (e.g., skipping clinical trials).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states at least three distinct challenges or limitations of AI in drug discovery from this list:\n\nData quality/scarcity\nInterpretability\nRegulatory acceptance\nLab workflow integration\nIP/confidentiality\nCompute/infrastructure cost",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The respones uses at least one list (bulleted or numbered) and one figure for enumerating for each of the applications, advancements, or challenges (e.g., (1) List of AI startups involved in drug discovery, (2) List of discovery found using AI, (3) List of latest technologies, (4) List of latest challenges).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response maintains logical progression and clear transitions between sections, so the report reads as a unified synthesis.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a glossary of all terms that required a definition at the end of the report.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a step-by-step deep dive into a particular technical paper as an example of how AI is used in the drug discovery process.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes between AI capabilities in silico (i.e., computationally) and their translation to practice.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a subsection dedicated to discussing the ethical risks associated with drug discovery (e.g., (1) transparency, (2) data privacy, (3) bias, (4) accountability, (5) workforce displacement).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains four clearly labeled sections using the exact words: “Applications”, “Advancements”, “Challenges”, and “Adoption”.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least two real-world AI-in-drug-discovery efforts that are at or beyond Phase II clinical trials, including at least one effort with negative results (e.g. (1) Insilico’s small molecule inhibitor drug candidate, INS018_055, for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis entered a phase 2 clinical trial in June 2023, (2) Recursion's REC-994, an oral small molecule superoxide scavenger for the treatment of cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM), (3) In Phase II, ten AI-discovered molecules have completed trials, (4) Four out of the 10 have successfully passed the trials).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures that all real‐world AI‐in‐drug‐discovery examples (minimum two) and all quantitative claims include clear citations (must be peer-reviewed studies for quantitative claims) or attributions (e.g. (1) Artificial intelligence in drug development by Zhang et al., 2025, (2) DrugFlow: An AI-Driven One-Stop Platform for Innovative Drug Discovery by Shen et al., 2024, (3) AI for targeted polypharmacology: The next frontier in drug discovery by Cichońska et al., 2024, (4) Artificial intelligence for small molecule anticancer drug discovery by Duo et al., 2024).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures that all hyperlinks (if used) are publicly accessible and not behind paywalls.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's AI model performance claims specify the dataset (e.g., \"PubChem\"), validation method, and benchmark comparison.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the relevance of each described technological advance of AI in drug discovery (e.g., (1) Alphafold2 uses attention mechanism became a game changer in protein folding, (2) Using convolution neural networks in finding multi-modal drug-to-drug interaction associated events, (3) Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) to learn from graph structures/ representation of chemical molecules, (4) Using transfer learning to learn molecular property from low-fidelity measurements as an inexpensive proxy).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least two technological advances introduced in or after 2023 (e.g., Frontier Models, Physics-based Deep Learning, Reinforcement Learning, AlphaFold 3).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses section previews and summaries for clarity and navigation (e.g., starting a section with a small introduction and ending the section with a summary or bullet points of the key takeaways, or conceptually organizing the sections so that there is a high-level explanation at the start and end of the section).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Critically analyze how agricultural practices in ancient Egypt shaped the development of their mythology, particularly in relation to deities, rituals, and beliefs about life and the afterlife through an essay. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054d0 | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how Nile’s annual flood from other river floods, specifically mentioning how Mesopotamian floods were destructive while the Nile flood was predictable, gradual, and beneficial. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the exact months for Akhet (roughly from September to January), Peret (January to May), and Shemu (roughly from May to September).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names the heliacal rising of Sirius (Sothis) as the precise trigger for the Egyptian New Year.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response dates the introduction of the shaduf (in Ancient Egypt around 2000 BCE).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response describes the impact of the shaduf on irrigation (e.g., reduced labor, allowed the transport of water to fields at higher elevation, increased agricultural productivity, increased the area of cultivated land).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists principal grains relevant to Ancient Egypt (e.g., emmer wheat, barley, einkor, spelt).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the ritual symbolism of the principal grains (e.g., blessings, life, fertility, the continuation of life after death)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the agricultural significance of non-grain crops (e.g. flax for linen, papyrus for paper, henna for dye, dates for wine).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the mythological significance of secondary crops (e.g., dates were used for religious offerings, the onion symbolizing eternal life, the goddess Hathor associated with the sycamore fig, the date palm was symbolic of the Sun God Ammon Ra).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes Hapi's iconography in Lower Egypt (e.g., headress, papyrus plants, frogs, false beard).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes Hapi's iconography in Upper Egypt (e.g., lotus, crocodiles, false beard, papyrus crown).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the Heliopolitan creation myth, specifically mentioning Atum, a self-created god, emerging from the waters of Nun and creating Shu and Tefnut. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details Geb's genealogy (i.e., son of Shu and Tefnut, grandson of Atum, sister-wife Nut, and children Osiris, Isis, Seth, and Nephthys). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details Renenutet's role as \"Mistress of Provisions\" (e.g., protecting food stores, guardian of nourishment, providing bountiful harvests, human and divine fertility). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes Renenutet's cult focus on granaries.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the Festival of Renenutet and its timing in the agricultural calendar (celebrated during the harvest period).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes Min's ithyphallic iconography (i.e., erect penis in his left hand symbolizing male virility).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the agricultural symbolism of Min's iconography (i.e., virility symbolizing fertility of the Nile flood). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response connects specific events of the Osiris myth to corresponding agricultural processes (e.g., death of Osiris symbolizing to the end of the growing season, Osiris' dismemberment symbolizing to the cutting and dispersal of grain, burial of his body representing the sowing of seeds, his rebirth symbolizing the new agricultural year).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the ritual of the king hoeing the ground at Min's festival as a symbol of the pharaoh's continued rule and agricultural fertility.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the release of birds as part of the king's ritual at Min's festival.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the Khoiak festival and the making of “corn mummies”.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the “Weighing of the Heart” ceremony with the role of Ma’at’s feather (i.e., the heart of the deceased is weighed in the scale against the feather of the Maat, and if they are balanced, then they are destined for a peaceful afterlife).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the Field of Reeds as an idealized Nile Delta and lists at least three specific features (e.g., placed in the East, boundless reed fields, a series of islands, ideal for hunting and fishing).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes Egyptian agricultural-mythological links from those of Mesopotamia or the Levant, with an explicit example.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites the role of the pharaoh as an agricultural and religious intermediary.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links each deity mentioned to a specific agricultural element (e.g., Nile flood, the harvest cycle, seconday crops, crop fertility).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines and/or clearly explains specialized terminology (e.g., Ma’at, shaduf, corvée, Aaru).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least two examples of how agricultural practices influenced other aspects of Egyptian life, such as the importance of craft (reflected in the god Ptah) and animal husbandry (reflected in the goddess Hathor).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions rituals and related them to agricultural practices.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response relates beliefs about life to agricultural practices.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response relates beliefs about the afterlife to agricultural practices.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that any rituals performed by the king were not only for agricultural fertility, but also for royal fertility.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response vaguely describes symbolism that is not necessarily related to Egyptian mythology. ",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
I am a software engineer at a small startup, trying to scale our product to around 1M users / day from around the world. The service is a social media app similar to twitter, where users can write a message and follow others. Right now we have a simple web interface with a local mySQL database. Please write a technical report on the transition to more scaled software and provide recommendations for anything you consider a necessary change. | 6847465956a0f6376a60542a | Technical Documentation | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the limitations of the current infrastructure and the corresponding challenges with respect to the desired scale of up to 1 million users per day (e.g., single MySQL instance bottlenecks, lack of horizontal scaling in the web tier, no caching layer, limited observability/monitoring).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides recommendations for alternative architectures that are beneficial for scalability (e.g., microservices architecture, cloud-managed databases, distributed caching systems, message queues/event streaming).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a high-level plan to transition from the original tech stack to the recommended one (e.g., phased rollout, data migration strategy, feature flags, a dual-writing period).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an analysis of the risks and benefits of the transition from the current tech stack to the recommended version (e.g., downtime during migration, data consistency issues, improved scalability, better fault tolerance).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response considers factors and/or metrics that affect maintainability (e.g., centralized logging, system metrics/monitoring, distributed tracing, automated alerting).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes suggestions that are not appropriate or feasible for a small startup to implement (e.g., designing a fully custom database engine, building proprietary networking hardware, running multiple on-premises data centers, developing an entirely in-house cloud platform).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one visual diagram (e.g., ASCII, Mermaid) or a clear, structured description demonstrating the organization of the recommended architecture.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a budget plan or cost analysis that considers the cost of the recommended components necessary to host 1M users/day (e.g., cloud provider fees for compute/database/storage, caching service costs, monitoring tool subscriptions, CDN bandwidth).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the central role of an Application Programming Interface (API), noting its benefits for scalability (e.g., standardized communication between services, modularity, independent scaling of components) and outlines how API design fits into the transition plan.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses security factors relevant to the transition, including authentication, authorization, and encryption for the new tech stack.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides calculations to demonstrate how the recommended system can accommodate 1M users/day (e.g., estimating QPS, storage needs, bandwidth requirements).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses global data privacy policies (e.g., EU's General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR, California Consumer Privacy Act - CCPA, China's Personal Information Protection Law - PIPL, Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act - PIPEDA), and how the recommended system should comply with them.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an expected high-level timeline to implement concrete deliverables, along with estimated effort (e.g., man-hours or story points) and potential team assignments.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines a plan for managing technical debt in the future, including estimates for manpower, key concepts to target, and areas of most concern (e.g., allocating a percentage of sprint capacity, scheduling regular refactoring, focusing on core data models or API facades).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references at least one other similar technology and analyzes why their tech stack works and discusses its relevance to the current project (e.g., Twitter’s use of distributed caching, Facebook’s sharded MySQL and TAO system, LinkedIn’s Kafka-based event streaming, Instagram’s Django monolith with horizontal scaling).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses relevant DevOps factors (e.g., CI/CD pipelines, defining SLIs/SLOs, standardizing developer environments, establishing error budgets).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a plan for handling large traffic spikes or high scenarios that come with accomodating 1M users/day. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a recommendation for a singular, specific database technology with justification on how it is appropriate for this startup (e.g., PostgreSQL with read replicas for relational integrity, MongoDB for flexible document storage, Cassandra for high write throughput, Amazon Aurora for managed scalability).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends an appropriate team structure or size to implement the transition (e.g., 2 to 3 backend engineers to design and implement APIs, 1 to 2 DevOps/cloud engineers to manage infrastructure and CI/CD, 1 database engineer for migration and scaling, 1 frontend/mobile engineer to adapt clients to new APIs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines specific metric goals (SLOs) for availability, latency, and error budgets, and ties them to architectural choices (e.g., 99.9% availability supported by redundant services, median latency <100ms achieved through caching/CDN, p95 latency <500ms enabled by database sharding, error budget of 0.1% tied to retry policies and circuit breakers).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a robust plan for performance optimization, referencing caching technologies relevant to high-performance and throughput (e.g., Redis, Memcached, KeyDB).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes specific solutions for the core application problems: real-time message delivery (e.g., message queues like Kafka/RabbitMQ, WebSockets, fan-out-on-write vs. fan-out-on-read) and social graph management at scale (e.g., sharded relational database, graph database like Neo4j, or a system like Twitter's FlockDB).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses strategies for comprehensive backup and disaster recovery (e.g., automated database snapshots, off-site/multi-region storage of backups, tested recovery drills) and defines target metrics like Recovery Point Objective (RPO) and Recovery Time Objective (RTO).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details a load testing approach and monitoring/alerting strategy (e.g., simulating peak traffic with JMeter or Locust, stress testing database queries, setting up real-time monitoring with Prometheus/Grafana, implementing alerting via PagerDuty or CloudWatch).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a detailed plan for migrating existing user data and messages (e.g., exporting data from the current MySQL instance, transforming schemas, running a dual-write period, validating migrated data with consistency audits).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends components that are not relevant or are overly complex for the use case without proper justification (e.g., blockchain for storing social media posts, quantum computing for scaling queries, AI/ML for basic CRUD operations, IoT integration for user messaging).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses first-person subjective language (e.g., \"I think,\" \"I believe\") instead of maintaining an objective, professional tone appropriate for a technical report.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Using a data-driven approach, compare the environmental sustainability, supply chain ethics, and transparency practices of three major global clothing brands: Patagonia, Uniqlo (Fast Retailing), and H&M.
Your analysis should incorporate and critically evaluate publicly available ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reports, third-party sustainability ratings (e.g., MSCI, Sustainalytics, Fashion Transparency Index), third-party audit summaries, and any documented controversies or labor/environmental violations from the past five years.
Specifically:
- Quantify and compare key sustainability metrics (e.g., Scope 1/2/3 emissions, water use intensity, % of sustainable materials, renewable energy usage).
- Assess supply chain ethics using structured criteria (e.g., % of audited suppliers, living wage commitments, forced labor safeguards, grievance mechanisms).
- Evaluate corporate transparency, including disclosure frequency, data completeness, and response to controversies.
Use data analysis techniques such as table-based comparisons, normalization of metrics (e.g., emissions per revenue or per garment), and trend analysis where multi-year data is available.
Finally, produce a ranked assessment of the three brands' overall ethical performance, justifying your conclusions using a weighted scoring framework or similar comparative method. Provide full citations for all sources and methodologies used. | 6847465956a0f6376a60543e | General Consumer Research | Simple | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly states the full, official, registered legal entity names for all three companies (e.g. H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB, Patagonia, Inc., Uniqlo Co., Ltd.), along with their parent entities if any (e.g. H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB as parent of the H&M Group, Patagonia Purpose Trust/Holdfast Collective as owners of Patagonia, Inc., and Fast Retailing Co., Ltd. as parent of Uniqlo Co., Ltd.).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly reports Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned facilities and vehicles), Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling), and Scope 3 (all other indirect value-chain emissions, such as raw materials, transportation, product use, and end-of-life) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for all three brands, using data from the same fiscal year that is no more than 5 years old, to ensure direct and relevant comparability.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports water-use impact and risk metrics (e.g. total water withdrawal, water consumption, percentage of water sourced from high-stress areas, watershed-level dependency/risk scores) for each brand and evaluates their overall water footprint and exposure to water-related risks.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports water-use efficiency and circularity metrics (e.g. liters per garment, cubic meters per dollar of revenue, percentage of water recycled/reused, water discharge volumes/quality) for each brand and evaluates their efficiency in water management and commitment to circular practices.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly states each company’s complete, official definition of sustainably sourced materials, as disclosed in their ESG reports or official sustainability frameworks.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports the current percentage of renewable energy used in each brand’s operations (e.g. wind, solar, hydro, biomass) across different operational scopes (e.g. company-owned manufacturing facilities, offices, retail stores, distribution centers), using the most recent data that is less than 5 years old.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports each brand’s stated future renewable energy commitments (e.g. wind, solar, hydro, biomass) and the operational scopes they apply to (e.g. company-owned manufacturing facilities, offices, retail stores, distribution centers), specifying the timeline for these commitments (e.g. short term = next 5 years, medium term = by 2040, long term = by 2050).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response normalizes at least three distinct metrics across all three brands with consistency for comparability, and each metric is tied to one of the three major aspects: environmental sustainability (e.g. CO₂ emissions per unit revenue or garment, water use intensity per garment, waste generated or diverted per garment), supply chain ethics (e.g. % of audited suppliers per total supplier base, workers covered by living-wage commitments per total workforce, frequency of forced-labor or safety violations per supplier), and transparency (% of suppliers disclosed by tier relative to total known base, disclosure frequency normalized to industry norms, average response time to controversies or remediation actions).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a minimum 3-year trend analysis of each brand’s greenhouse gas emissions in Scope 1, 2, and 3 where available, normalized to revenue or production volume to judge the climate impact trends of the three companies.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a minimum 3-year trend analysis of each brand’s water use intensity and/or renewable energy share, with clear year-to-year changes to judge the resource efficiency trends of the three companies.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a minimum 3-year trend analysis of each brand’s percentage of sustainable or preferred materials and waste diversion/recycling performance to judge the waste and materials trends of the three companies.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a graphical representation of key sustainability data (e.g. multi-year emissions trends, renewable energy usage, water intensity, sustainable materials share) instead of relying solely on text descriptions or in-line raw numbers.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports the exact percentage of both Tier 1 (final assembly) and Tier 2 (fabric, dyeing, and finishing) supplier factories audited in the latest reporting year and the scope of these audits, including which aspects were inspected (e.g. compliance with health and safety standards, working hours, wage and overtime practices, use of subcontracting, forced labor safeguards, environmental compliance such as wastewater treatment and chemical use). If a brand does not disclose audit coverage for one or both tiers, the response states this explicitly and identifies the gap.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports each brand’s living-wage commitment status (e.g. a formal, time-bound policy with measurable targets, exact number of workers currently covered by a verified living-wage program, disaggregated by tier such as Tier 1 factory workers, Tier 2 processing workers where available). If a brand does not disclose worker information or only makes aspirational statements without quantified implementation, the response states this explicitly and identifies the reporting gap.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports on forced-labor safeguards, listing the specific high-risk countries each brand has explicitly blacklisted for sourcing from its entire supply chain (e.g. Xinjiang/China, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, North Korea), cites sources used, and explicitly compares the differences in coverage or enforcement across brands.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response summarizes at least one major non-compliance finding from an independent third-party audit, investigation, or regulatory enforcement published between 2023 and 2025 for each brand, naming the auditor/investigator/regulator, publication date, and the issue (e.g. the Spanish Data Protection Authority [AEPD] ruling against Uniqlo Europe Ltd. in September 2024 for GDPR violations, the Earthsight investigation in April 2024 linking H&M’s cotton supply to deforestation and land-rights abuses in Brazil) or the most recent known case (e.g. Transparentem’s 2025 investigation into recruitment-fee abuses at Taiwanese textile suppliers linked to Patagonia) if exists.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response critically evaluates the financial impact of at least one major controversy or non-compliance finding for each brand, drawing on outcomes such as changes in sales, stock price movements, fines, or legal settlements, and includes the relevant source (e.g. regulator, investigative NGO, media outlet), the publication date, and the quantifiable financial consequence (e.g. the €3.2 million GDPR fine imposed by the Spanish Data Protection Authority on Uniqlo Europe Ltd. in September 2024, the documented stock price dip of H&M following the April 2024 Earthsight investigation) if exists.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a fully defined and justified weighted composite-scoring framework for ranking the three brands, explicitly assigning weights to each axis (e.g. environmental sustainability = 40%, supply chain ethics = 40%, transparency/governance = 20%), providing a rationale for the chosen weights (e.g. industry standards, stakeholder priorities, academic literature), and stating the exact formula used to combine normalized metrics into the composite score, and shows how individual metric scores roll up into category scores and then into the final weighted ranking.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides grievance-mechanism channels & tier coverage, accessibility (e.g. anonymous, multilingual, no-cost, anti-retaliation), and outcomes (e.g. # received, % substantiated, % resolved/closed, avg days to close) for each brand's latest reporting year.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response treats data older than 5 years as current without explicitly noting it as outdated and accordingly contextualizing it.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response include each brand’s most recent ESG/sustainability report, the latest Fashion Transparency Index that is published this or last year, and at least one third-party sustainability rating or audit summary (e.g. MSCI, Sustainalytics, CDP, NGO/labor rights reports) to ensure credibility and data triangulation.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to report exact data or provides inaccurate data for any key environmental metrics such as greenhouse gas emissions in Scope 1/2/3, water use intensity, renewable energy usage, sustainable materials percentage, waste management trends, % audited suppliers, living wage commitments/coverage, grievance mechanisms, forced labor safeguards in high-risk countries, disclosure frequency, data completeness, responses to controversies, and the use of third-party audit/assurance.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately reports and compares each brand’s most recent MSCI ESG Rating, including both the alphabetical grade (e.g. AAA, CCC) and the exact month and year of its issuance or affirmation, and it explicitly notes and contextualizes differences in ratings across the three brands with relevant sources cited.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately reports and compares each brand's most recent Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating, including both the specific numerical score from 0 to100 and the corresponding risk category (e.g. negligible, low, medium, high, severe), and it explicitly highlights differences in risk levels across the three brands with relevant sources cited.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reports each brand’s overall Fashion Transparency Index score from 0 to 100% as published by Fashion Revolution in its most recent annual report, and explicitly includes the sub-scores for all five categories (Policy & Commitments, Governance, Traceability, Know, Show & Fix, and Spotlight Issues) to evaluate environmental sustainability, supply chain ethics, and transparency practices.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows the exact normalization formula for at least one metric in each pillar of sustainability, supply-chain ethics, and transparency, naming the numerator, denominator, scope/boundary, fiscal year, and FX/inflation basis where relevant, plus one worked example (e.g. Emissions intensity = (Scope 1+2 tCO₂e, market-based, FY2024) ÷ (Revenue, USD, FY2024). Water intensity = (Water withdrawal, FY2024) ÷ (Garments produced, FY2024). Audit coverage = (Audited Tier-1 spend) ÷ (Total Tier-1 spend). Grievance rate = (Substantiated cases) ÷ (1,000 workers)).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a short comparison of rating divergences for each brand, identifying which ratings differ (e.g. MSCI vs Sustainalytics vs FTI), the specific drivers (e.g. methodology focus/domain, data vintage/fiscal year, scope/coverage, controversy weighting), and the net impact on the report’s scoring (e.g. which rating is prioritized, why the rating is prioritized).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ranks the three brands from best to worst based on their composite scores, explicitly assigning Patagonia as rank 1 (best), H&M as rank 2, and Uniqlo as rank 3 (worst).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write an analysis of the institution of Roman slavery as it is depicted in Plautus' comedy *Pseudolus.* Using the play as a primary source, the analysis must situate its portrayal of the slave protagonist and his interactions within the wider, historically grounded legal and social framework of the Roman Republic. The argument should explore how Plautus' comedic representations of slave agency, deception, and the master-slave relationship both reflect and subvert the realities of Roman slave society and its underlying ideologies. | 684397d188c1deceb49af31d | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response's thesis clearly addresses the key themes of the play (i.e., the institution of Roman slavery, different representations of slave agency in the play, master-slave relationships in Rome)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's thesis clearly juxtaposes the legal reality of Roman slavery with its subversive comedic representation on stage",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response frames the lack of manumission (i.e., release from slavery) for Pseudolus as a mechanism of ideological containment.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the character of Ballio as a socially despised target in the play because of his role as a greedy and abusive pimp, embodying corruption and moral depravity.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses Phoenicium's silence and objectification as a reflection of the reality for female slaves.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately defines the legal status of a Roman slave as property under Roman law.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights the concept of the master's absolute power in practice (defined as the master's authority over the slave's body and actions or equivalent statement).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes Pseudolus taking on another role (i.e., poet, general, etc.) as a form of self-fashioning.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not use the play itself as its primary source but instead relies heavily on derivative works and analyses (e.g., blog posts, online articles, etc.) to support its reasoning.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains Segal’s ‘safety valve’ theory (i.e., that Roman comedy provides audiences with a temporary release from social tensions and frustrations by allowing them to laugh at the subversion of authority and social norms, before ultimately restoring order).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains Richlin's \"slave theater\" theory which posits an audience composed of a lower status population.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the historical context of the play's premiere (191 BCE).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the incompetence of Simo as a foil to Pseudolus.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the ineffectuality of Calidorus as a foil to Pseudolus.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains peculium (the property/money that a father/master allows a subordinate to manage/use) as a mechanism of slave control.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the scope (i.e., functions, limits, etc.) of manumission as a social institution.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Pseudolus' breaking of the fourth wall (e.g., to outline his schemes and intentions) to address the audience.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response engages with scholarly critiques of the cited frameworks (e.g., discusses limitations of the Saturnalian model/academic rebuttals to Richlin's thesis).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares the methods of Pseudolus to at least one other Plautine trickster slave (i.e. Palaestrio from Miles Gloriosus).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies specific actions undertaken by Simia in the play (i.e., impersonating Harpax, delivering money to Ballio, etc.).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares Plautus' depiction of Pseudolus as less psychologically subdued than slaves in the comedies of a different author, such as Terence.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the play's use of dramatic structure to enhance characterization.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the economic value of the \"20 minae\" mentioned in the play by placing the sum within the historical context.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explores the function of Macedonian soldier beyond being a dupe.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explores nuance in the key latin (i.e., pater, servus callidus, etc.) terms through linguistic analysis (i.e., phonetics, morphology, etc.).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents the play's events as a historically accurate depiction of daily slave life (e.g., Pseudolus' freedom of interaction with Simo and other slave masters).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a major factual error about the plot of Pseudolus.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response critiques the use of Plautine comedy as a direct historical source.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the influence of Pseudolus (i.e., the use of deception, trickery, mistaken identity, and role-playing as central devices) on later western literature (e.g., Shakespearean plays such as Twelfth Night, Comedy of Errors, and Molière’s Scapin the Schemer a.k.a. Les Fourberies de Scapin)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the theme of Roman anxiety regarding Hellenistic cultural influence.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contrasts the failed agency of characters with freedmen status with the competence of the slave.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Bad formatting practices (presence of line breaks in the middle of sentences)",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Examine the philosophical implications of using AI systems to make decisions about AI safety, focusing on the epistemic circularity problem. Analyze specific cases where AI safety evaluations by AI systems have produced contradictory results, and propose a framework for resolving such contradictions that doesn't rely on human judgment. | 6847465956a0f6376a605383 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response provides a precise definition of epistemic circularity that includes (a) self-referential validation, (b) the problem of using the same type of system to evaluate itself, and (c) the issue of infinite regress.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies exactly 3-5 specific, verifiable cases where AI safety evaluations produced contradictory results, with each case including system names, dates, the nature of the contradiction, etc.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the bootstrapping problem in AI evaluation: how the first AI evaluator is validated without circularity.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a framework that contains no human judgment components at any stage (initialization, operation, or validation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly cites at least two primary sources of philosophical works on circular reasoning (e.g., Münchhausen Trilemma, Agrippa’s Trilemma) with accurate page numbers or section references.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly defines evaluation criteria using formal mathematical notation to ensure that each component of the score is well-articulated and grounded in measurable terms (by outlining key rubric elements such as robustness and reliability, ethical alignment, transparency, adaptability).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly includes a consensus mechanism to manage contradictory evaluations, ensuring that conflicting assessments are systematically reconciled rather than ignored (through techniques such as weighted voting, majority consensus, confidence-based aggregation, probabilistic fusion).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a meta-evaluation protocol that outlines how the evaluation framework itself will be assessed for quality, consistency (e.g., periodic review cycles, benchmarking against established standards, error analysis, stakeholder feedback).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses how the proposed framework manages edge cases, ensuring it remains functional and reliable under atypical or extreme conditions (e.g., adversarial inputs, sparse data scenarios, conflicting ethical principles, domain shifts).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes how the framework includes temporal consistency mechanisms that ensure the stability of an AI system’s performance over time, making it resilient to drift or degradation (e.g., longitudinal benchmarking, performance decay tracking, time-series validation, change-point detection).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates adversarial robustness testing protocols to evaluate how well the AI system withstands manipulative or intentionally misleading inputs (e.g., perturbation-based attacks, gradient-based adversarial testing, black-box adversarial simulations, out-of-distribution stress testing).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes uncertainty quantification methods to assess the confidence and reliability of the AI system’s outputs under varying conditions (e.g., Bayesian inference, Monte Carlo dropout, confidence calibration, ensemble variance analysis).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response, in the first analyzed case study, mentions (a) the AI systems involved, (b) the evaluation methodology, (c) the specific contradictory results, and (d) the root cause analysis.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response, in the second analyzed case study, mentions (a) the AI systems involved, (b) the evaluation methodology, (c) the specific contradictory results, and (d) the root cause analysis.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response, in any case study beyond the second, mentions (a) the AI systems involved, (b) the evaluation methodology, (c) the specific contradictory results, and (d) the root cause analysis.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly explains formal verification methods applicable to AI safety (model checking, theorem proving, abstract interpretation).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides pseudocode, an algorithm, or code to describe at least one of two or more evaluation frameworks.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately describes ensemble disagreement metrics (e.g., Jensen-Shannon divergence, Bhattacharyya distance).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses computational complexity (time and space) of the proposed framework.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes between epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty in AI evaluations with correct definitions.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges the self-referential nature of an AI system proposing solutions to AI evaluation.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly explains the relevance of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems to AI self-evaluation.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses philosophical terms correctly and appropriately: foundationalism (beliefs justified by basic, self-evident truths), coherentism (beliefs justified through consistency within a system of beliefs), and infinitism (beliefs justified through an infinite chain of reasons).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites academic papers in reputed Machine Learning journals that present frameworks such as RLHF in the context of AI safety.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes visual architecture diagrams showing a circular AI evaluation with important components (initial model, reward model, evaluation, and loss function).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes specific metrics for evaluation consistency to ensure that repeated assessments yield stable and reproducible results (e.g., inter-rater reliability analogs, variance across repeated trials, consistency scores over time, Cohen’s kappa).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the safety mechanisms of different AI architectures (e.g., RNNs, LSTMs, transformers).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges the problem of evaluation drift over time.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly cites Arrow’s impossibility theorem in the context of AI consensus.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions relevant regulatory frameworks to ensure that the proposed evaluation aligns with legal and ethical standards across jurisdictions (e.g., EU AI Act, the U.S. Executive Order on AI, the OECD AI Principles, UNESCO’s AI Ethics Recommendation).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims that epistemic circularity can be completely eliminated, which is a philosophical impossibility.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response conflates epistemic circularity with other logical fallacies (e.g., begging the question, strawman arguments, false dilemmas, red herrings).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes mathematically impossible solutions (e.g., solving the halting problem, assuming infinite resources, making perfect predictions, achieving certainty in probability models).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a framework whose initialization cannot be performed with human input.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response confuses different types of AI evaluation (e.g., capability, safety, and alignment).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a framework that includes human judgment at one or more stages.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests human oversight as a \"backup\" or \"validation\" step.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a framework for resolution that is self-contradictory.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ignores the problem of infinite regress.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims that AI systems possess true or genuine understanding.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions technical terms without actually defining them (e.g., circularity in AI, infinite regress, the halting problem, reward models).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a metric that contains statistical errors (e.g., causality inferred from correlation metrics, sampling bias, inflation of non-significant results, false metric errors).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a metric that does not address potential failure modes (e.g., optimizing for the metric over alignment, having statistical and mathematical errors, creating circular verification conditions).\n",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Help create a detailed outline for a potential YouTube short for a growing Physics explainer channel. The channel is run solely by a high-schooler, who is looking to create original and potentially viral content. The response should be robust and specific, allowing the high schooler to easily create the video from the response while including only information relevant to the video’s creation. | 6847465956a0f6376a60543d | Creative Writing | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response includes a script for the YouTube short (i.e., using a script template with consideration for time, sections, visuals, and audio) in a clear and readable table format.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a potential title for the YouTube short (e.g., The amazing catapult, Can you control electricity?, What do sound waves look like?, Let's make an earthquake).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes what the thumbnail should be for the YouTube short (e.g., the face of Einstein sticking his tongue out, a rocket launching away, electricity zapping across, or use of logos and fonts for the short title ).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least five potential hashtags to include in the video title (e.g., #physicsexperiment, #cooltricks, #highschoolproject, or #fun).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is not original – an existing YouTube short with the same idea exists.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response creates a short that could realistically have a length of between 15 and 60 seconds.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes where the YouTube short could be realistically filmed (e.g., in the school's classroom, at the local park, at a science museum, at home, more specifically in the backyard, bedroom, or the kitchen).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a YouTube short that could be created individually (i.e., doesn't require any other parties or supervision to create the experiment).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes some musical or sound element (e.g., using classical background music, using trending pop music, sound bits, funny and goofy sounds, or shock sounds like bangs).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's script draws the audience in with a hook or question (e.g., Can you push a spring too far?, Can you touch anything?, Use of memes and sound bites, or Do heavier grocery bags swing slower?).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's script introduces tension that is resolved in the conclusion (e.g., (1) not answering the main hook questions completely until the end, (2) using a step-by-step approach of revealing more about the topic, (3) using sound design for tension and relieve such as controlling playback speed of music, (4) speaking fast and using language with a lot of exclamations or mysterious tone, (5) using WOW factor either doing the cool trick again or in slow motion).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes what will be on the screen together with the sounds and narration at each point in the video (e.g., in scene 2, between 10-20 seconds, the person will narrate, \"So the reason why electricity is generated is because according to Faraday's Law, changes in magnetic flux induce a voltage in the conductor. The faster the change in the magnetic field, etc.\" The visuals will be a clip of a magnet being pushed into a coil of wire and electricity flowing in the wire. A calming classical music will be playing in the scene).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests an overly complicated script that a lone high-schooler could not realistically do (i.e., advanced computer graphics (CGI) and visual effects (VFX), complicated sound editing, advanced knowledge of editing software, complex physical capability required like performing multiple muscle-ups, complex coding or engineering involved to set up the experiment).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's video idea teaches the audience a physics concept (e.g., Gravity, Electricity, Light, or Sound).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses and cites interesting and credible physics content (e.g., science buddies, vernier, homesciencetools, or articles/blogs on how to make viral YouTube shorts).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes any information not explicitly related to producing the physics short (i.e., includes general information about YouTube, social media, monetization, or virality).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response tailors the script to have a budget of less than 50 dollars.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests unsuitable or harmful activities to the high school or to others (e.g., launching fireworks away from the sky, mixing toxic or explosive chemicals, using potentially dangerous tools like saws, looking directly into a laser, or handling high-voltage equipment).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes all the necessary equipment and tools the video will need.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's video could realistically be created in less than five hours of work (e.g., Not suggesting building or constructing laborious and complex equipments needed for the experiment, extensive use of software for editing, a lot of manual tasks like collecting large data or by chance activities that can take a lot of shots to get the needed scene such as trying to get a ball to enter a small tube from a distance).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests using captions.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response starts with describing the idea for the YouTube video (e.g., the physics of a catapult, making electricity with magnets, or seeing the shape of sound waves).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses or cites anything too difficult for a high schooler to understand (e.g., cites a published research paper, includes formulas and mathematical concepts too difficult for a high schooler, uses complicated language with terminology too advanced).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to mention copyright issues (i.e., warns about using non-copyrighted music, making sure to cite papers or resources used, and not copying other video shorts), especially when suggesting ideas that may infringe on such issues.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Pretend that you are a senior research fellow at a national public health institute and create a comprehensive research report about the health benefits of outdoor exposure and Vitamin D today.
In the report explain to the regular public recent research from peer reviewed journals to provide a clear, actionable overview of the topic.
Provide a high level overview of the report's key findings (and recommendations), explain any interconnected relationship, clearly differentiate between the physiological benefits derived specifically from Vitamin D and the independent benefits derived from being outdoors, provide a detailed analysis of the benefits and specific health considerations for different demographics (different ages, different sex), and for each group, cite at least one unique benefit or risk.
Also include quantifiable recommendations. Detail the recommended duration of sun exposure, accounting for different variables. Provide the consensus daily supplemental intake recommendations in IU and clearly differentiate between Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3.
Finally summarize the primary health risks associated with both underexposure and overexposure of sun/vitamin D. Mention some mitigation strategies to avoid both. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053ce | STEM | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least two specific examples of research where more sunlight or vitamin D led to better health outcomes (e.g., for COVID patients (Association Between Vitamin D and COVID-19–Related Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses), for autoimmune system compromised patients (The Schematic Assessment of Vitamin D Deficiency in Relation to Autoimmune Disorders and Its Implications in Internal Medicine), for pregnant people (The Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Maternal, Neonatal, and Infant Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis), depressed people (Nutritional interventions in depression: The role of vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids in neuropsychiatric health).).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is written in the tone of a senior research fellow (e.g., academic style, authoritative figure, relatively formal, attention to details and nuances of the technical terms and concepts).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is written as a comprehensive report with clearly labeled sections including an introduction, body, and conclusion sections (e.g., Introduction, \"Understanding Vitamin D\", \"Difference between Supplementation and Natural Sources\", \"Recommendation\").",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response synthesizes recent research (from the last 5–10 years) from peer-reviewed journals (e.g., (1) Association Between Vitamin D and COVID-19–Related Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses, (2) Function of vitamin D3-loaded lipid-based nanocarriers in food industry: Principles, applications, and challenges, (3) Single high-dose vitamin D3: a promising sunburn therapy, (4) Age but not vitamin D is related to sarcopenia in vitamin D sufficient male elderly in rural China).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a clear, actionable overview of the report's key findings, including primary benefits, key at-risk populations, and top recommendations (e.g., wear skin protection, check for vitamin D deficiency, eat more vitamin D-rich or fortified food such as milk, recommend older people to more vitamin D through food or supplementation).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the interconnected relationship between direct sunlight exposure, general time spent outdoors, and vitamin D synthesis (i.e., 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin absorbs UV B radiation and is converted to previtamin D3, which then isomerizes into vitamin D3.).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly differentiates between the physiological benefits derived specifically from vitamin D (like bone health, immune function) and the independent benefits derived from being outdoors (like mental health effects of nature, physical activity) (e.g., (1) Study shows that heart rate and diastolic blood pressure decreases from being outdoors even when controlled for vitamin D levels, (2) Large randomized controlled trials shows the effects of vitamin D in regulating immune cells, (3) There has been strong evidence that vitamin D is vital for calcium absorption).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifically mentions the benefits of vitamin D regarding muscles, immunity, brain function, and prenatal health (e.g., (1) prevents rickets in children, (2) osteomalacia in adults, (3) reduction of inflammation, (4) promotes calcium absorption in the gut).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the potential side effects of vitamin D supplementation beyond toxicity (hypervitaminosis D and hypercalcemia (high blood calcium levels)) (e.g., (1) Cholesterol-lowering statins might not work with excess vitamin D from supplements, (2) Muscle weakness, (3) Not being able to think clearly or quickly, (4) Kidney Stone and Kidney Damage).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a detailed comparison of the effectiveness of different types of vitamin D delivery methods (e.g., supplements, fortified foods, sun exposure) for various demographics (e.g., (1) Encapsulated vitamin D was observed to have higher bioavailability, (2) vitamin D oral pill affects serum 25(OH)D levels, (3) Skin oil application delivery of vitamin D using a penetrator enhancer, (4) referencing \"The efficacy of different vitamin D supplementation delivery methods on serum 25(OH)D: A randomized double-blind placebo trial\").",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a detailed analysis of the distinct benefits and specific health considerations for at least 3 different demographics (e.g., (1) Vitamin D supplementation combined with calcium can reduce fractures in the older population, (2) Vitamin D regulates the growth of vaginal epithelial cells and alleviates genitourinary tract problems in menopausal women (Mei et al., 2023) (3) Low levels of vitamin D during intrauterine life increases the risk of diseases such as type 1 diabetes, (4) Vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of low birth weight and preterm birth).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains analysis accounting for key variables (e.g., skin type, latitude, and time of day for sun exposure, and gender, sex, and age in general).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses how socioeconomic status, access to safe outdoor spaces, and geographic location (urban vs. rural) can influence an individual's ability to follow health recommendations, including a discussion of potential disparities in sunlight and vitamin D intake. (e.g., (1) Rural residents are more likely to be vitamin D deficient, (2) Rural residents have higher medical costs compared to urban residents, (3) Vitamin D deficiency in High Latitude Countries, particularly during the winter months, (4) \"Low socioeconomic status predicts vitamin D status in a cross-section of Irish children\").",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions pregnancy, lactation, or menopause as specific life stage factors.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides specific, quantifiable recommendations, detailing the recommended duration of sun exposure needed to synthesize adequate vitamin D (e.g., recommends approximately 5 to 30 minutes of sun exposure, particularly between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions whether most people today get enough sunlight and/or vitamin D (or should supplement) (e.g., (1) In the US, approximately 35% of adults have vitamin D deficiency, (2) Older people produce less vitamin D so have a higher risk of deficiency, (3) Individuals with obesity who have undergone gastric bypass surgery have a higher risk, (4) Darker skin reduce the skin’s ability to produce vitamin D from sunlight).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a detailed comparison of the effectiveness of different types of fortified foods (e.g., milk, orange juice, cereal), discusses varying fortification levels, and compares their efficacy as a delivery method against supplements and sun exposure (e.g., (1) Food fortification significantly improves serum levels and intake, (2) Milk was fortified at 800 IU/day, (3) led to an approximate increase of 8 ng/mL in serum 25-OH D, (4) more cost-effective compared to the cheapest prescription drugs, (5) Better to get vitamin D from vitamin D-fortified foods than to get it solely from sun exposure as it can increase the risk of skin diseases).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides the consensus daily supplemental intake recommendations in IU and clearly differentiates between Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 (e.g., 15 to 20 mcg (600–800 IU) for adults and from 10 to 15 mcg (400–600 IU) for infants, children, and adolescents, Vitamin D3 is the recommended (also called cholecalciferol) while Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) can only be obtained from fortified food or dietary supplements).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has a robust summary of key takeaways and lays out clear recommendations based on age, sex, etc (e.g., (1) Recommends 15 to 20 mcg (600–800 IU) for adults and from 10 to 15 mcg (400–600 IU) for infants, children, and adolescents, (2) Vitamin D helps with absorption of Calcium, (3) Sun exposure causes the skin to produce vitamin D naturally, however, this capability goes down with age, (4) Pregnant woman should take vitamin D supplementation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines the primary health risks associated with both underexposure (e.g., vitamin D deficiency) and overexposure (e.g., sunburn, photoaging, skin cancer risk).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lays out clear metrics to know if a person is underexposed or overexposed (e.g., (1) Exceeding the recommended daily dosage of vitamin D (15 to 20 mcg (600–800 IU) for adults and from 10 to 15 mcg (400–600 IU) for infants, children, and adolescents), (2) Symptoms of too much vitamin D such as vitamin D headache, (3) About 8 to 10 minutes of sun exposure at noon produces the recommended amount of vitamin D, (4) UV Index of 6 and above is high).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides, for each risk, at least one evidence-based mitigation strategy (e.g., (1) proper sunscreen application, (2) dietary sources of vitamin D, (3) regular skin checks, (4) fortified foods).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a section on the ethical considerations of public health messaging related to sun exposure (e.g., (1) Risk of Skin cancer, (2) skin protection behavior, (3) Skin cancer beliefs, (4) Sunbathing).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a section on the public health policy implications of the report's findings, considering how recommendations could be translated into policies such as school programs promoting outdoor time, urban planning initiatives, and national supplementation guidelines.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a comprehensive analysis of the role of other key nutrients (e.g., Magnesium, vitamin K) that are essential for vitamin D metabolism and bone health (e.g. (1) Magnesium helps with Vitamin D absorption in the GI tract, (2) Vitamin K2 helps deposit absorbed Calcium into bone, (3) Vitamin D helps the body absorb Calcium, (4) Vitamins A and D have the greatest immunemodulatory effect).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly acknowledges the limitations of the existing research and identifies key gaps that require further study, such as the precise optimal vitamin D dosage for different populations and the long-term effects of various supplementation methods.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
I am a high schooler in Cupertino. It is AP season and I'm trying to study for my tests. Can you give me 10 recommendations for places that open until at least 10pm that are good for studying (fast wifi, sufficient table space to do practice tests, good study environment, etc)? I would prefer not having to spend money on drinks/food in cafes but have a $10 budget if I must, and absolutely refuse to spend money on parking/fees. I am only open to places that are at most at 20 minute drive from me. | 6847465956a0f6376a605424 | General Consumer Research | High | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains exactly 10 distinct study-location recommendations.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Every recommended location name is accompanied by either a full street address or, at minimum, a clearly identified city/neighborhood (e.g., “Philz Coffee – Sunnyvale”).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "All recommended locations are situated in a city that is within a typical 20-minute drive from Cupertino during non-rush hours (Cupertino, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Mountain View, Los Altos, Saratoga, West San Jose, etc)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "For every recommendation, the response states that the closing time is 10:00 PM or later on weekdays (and specifies the closing time).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Some locations that close before 10:00 p.m. on weekdays are listed as meeting the ≥10 p.m. requirement (e.g., Cupertino Library, which closes at 9 p.m.).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "For each location, the response explicitly mentions the availability of free, reliable Wi-Fi (using language such as “free Wi-Fi” or “fast Wi-Fi available”).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "For each location, the response explicitly mentions sufficient table/desk space or seating appropriate for studying. Example: \n\"Cupertino Library has large communal tables and quiet study carrels ideal for spreading out AP practice materials.\"",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "For every location, the response either confirms unlimited free parking or states that no parking fees apply.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Whenever a café or restaurant is suggested, the response suggests items that can be obtained for ≤ $10 in total.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is structured as a clear numbered/bulleted list or table so that a reader can quickly scan the 10 options.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a brief note advising the user to verify operating hours before visiting (demonstrating awareness of possible schedule changes).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not recommend purely outdoor locations that lack tables or reliable shelter (e.g., public parks with only benches), unless they clearly state tables and weather-protected seating are available.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For each library or public facility included, the response confirms that non-residents may enter without special membership/fees. Example: \"Santa Clara City Library allows all California residents to enter and use study spaces without a membership fee (verified on the library’s official visitor policy page).\"",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should mention if any location is known for stable power outlets, especially for laptop-based studying.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Any parking references should note if the location tends to have full or difficult parking. Eample: \"Main Street Cupertino’s public parking garage is free but often fills up after 7 PM, so arriving early is recommended.\"",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response notes that public study spaces will be extra crowded during AP season as everyone is trying to study as well",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "All locations are accurate (i.e., still open, not under renovations, name of place is correct, address is correct)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The recommendations include private office buildings or coworking spaces with restricted or employee-only entry. E.g., WeWork Cupertino which requires a paid membership or company access.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "If recommending a location with a minimum stay limit or a time limit for seating (common in some boba cafés), the response should disclose it. Example: \"Fantasia Coffee & Tea in Cupertino has a posted 90-minute seating limit during evenings, so it’s better for quick review sessions rather than full-length AP practice tests.\"",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "If a place is louder/more bustling/less favorable for studying, response should always acknowledge this. Example: \"Main Street Cupertino Plaza has outdoor seating and stays open late, but it’s usually busy with restaurant traffic and live music on weekends - so not ideal for quiet studying.\"",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Whenever a café or restaurant is suggested, the response states whether purchase is optional. Example: \"Panera Bread on Stevens Creek Boulevard allows customers to sit and use Wi-Fi without constant purchases, though a small drink (~$4) is expected if you stay for several hours.\"",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Conduct a comprehensive historical analysis of how the world has changed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compare and contrast life before COVID and after it, covering key domains such as public health, work culture, education, travel, economy, mental health, social interactions, and technology adoption. Provide deep, well-researched insights and include real-world examples to support your points. Structure the analysis in chronological order (from the pre-pandemic era, through the initial outbreak in early 2020, the global response, vaccine rollouts, to the 2025 post-pandemic lifestyle) to enhance clarity and understanding. Aim for thoroughness and detail to ensure all major global shifts and trends are captured. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053b5 | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains five section headings in the following order: Pre-Pandemic, Initial Outbreak, Global Response, Vaccine Rollout, Post-Pandemic.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a real-world example naming a specific country, organization, policy, or statistc (e.g., WHO, China, Sweden, mortality rates) for at least six of the eight domains.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine received emergency authorization in December 2020.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that global GDP contracted in 2020 compared with 2019.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims the pandemic began before December 2019 or after January 2020.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an attribution to a source or organization (e.g., World Health Organization, Center for Disease Control, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center) for each numerical statistic. ",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one statement acknowledging regional variation in pandemic impact.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's statements are qualified with uncertainty when future implications are discussed.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response refrains from offering medical treatment recommendations or personal health advice.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's discussion about work-culture references remote-work technologies (e.g., Zoom, Skype, Teams, Google Meet).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's technology-adoption discussion mentions increased telemedicine or e-commerce usage and supplies a concrete example (e.g., Amazon shopping, International Trade Administration report, CARES Act, CMS 1135 Waiver)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report contains events dated 2022 or later in sections covering Pre-Pandemic or Initial Outbreak periods.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses vaccines that were released outside of the United States (e.g., Oxford–AstraZeneca in the UK, Sputnik V in Russia, Sinopharm BIBP in China, Covaxin in India)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses isolation policies that were implemented across different countries (e.g., USA, China, Sweden, Germany)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response followed the chronological order given in the prompt (e.g., from the pre-pandemic era up to 2019, through the initial outbreak in early 2020, the global response in the latter half of 2020, vaccitional rollouts in 2021, and the current post-pandemic lifestyle from 2022 onwards).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses isolation policies that were implemented across different countries (e.g., regional variation in the north vs south of the USA, strict lockdowns in China, voluntary policy in Sweden, testing centers across Germany)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses public health to COVID-19 (e.g., strain on hospitals, vaccination efforts, education about viruses, mask policies).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The responses addresses work culture changes due to COVID-19 (e.g., telework policies, masking polices in the work place, social distancing, shutdown of the arts and service industries).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses educational changes due to COVID-19 (e.g., online learning technology, social distancing in schools, decline in test scores, cancellation of standardized exams).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses travel changes due to COVID-19 (e.g., limited flights and the impact on the airline industry, testing policies for travel, vaccination requirements for travel, remote work policies changing travel requirements).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses economic changes due to COVID-19 (3% economic downturn in 2020, global recession, mass layoffs, rising inflation).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses mental health impacts of COVID-19 (e.g., increase in risk for youth, increased strain on front-line healthcare workers, impact of long-covid on mental health, grief related to pandemic deaths).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses changes in social interaction due to COVID-19 (e.g., social distancing, new social norms, limited social circles, Zoom fatigue).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses changes in technology adoption due to COVID-19 (e.g., new RNA vaccine technology, popularity of Zoom and other teleconferencing technology, popularity of streaming services, food delivery applications). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
I want to create my own restaurant empire, but I have zero idea where to begin. I know I want to serve indian food in with three different settings - food truck, elevated fine dining, and kitchen only/ fast casual model. All the three chains serve authentic indian food.
The food truck is Indian fast food, street style with some dishes that you can eat on the move with some innovation if required
The elevated fine dining is a north indian fine dining setting with servers dressed as attendants from royal courts during the time of Indian Kings, the ambience should resemble to that of the biggest and most grandest of places in India - I want to show the world what Indian culture, history, and grandeur and servitude is. The dishes would be served in the authentic way it is served in the region the dish originated from. I would also like a place where the restaurant could host performances. I want my guests to be transported to India not only by food but also through the ambiance, the atmosphere.
The kitchen only/ fast casual place would be parallel to the food truck in most ways but resemble more to Indian street style restaurants - people can see the cook prepare their food, and if its a fast casual place guests can come in sit chill and would be more modern
I have no idea how to go about this, do market research, competitor analysis, costing, what architects and designers should I contact, how much money would be required, the menu and basically everything else
I do have a few things in mind is that I wanna start with NYC and expand into major cities in the world and make this a truly global business with possibilities of opening hotels, and every dish should have a vegan option and where possible Jain options too | 684397d188c1deceb49af30b | General Consumer Research | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "Response explicitly names and addresses the three settings: (1) food truck, (2) elevated fine-dining, (3) kitchen-only/fast-casual.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response should include the capital range for each of the 3 settings: 1) For food truck, the capital should be in the range of $50K-$150K, 2) For the fine dining, the caputal should be in the range of $500K-$2Million, and 3) the capital for the kitchen only fast food mode should be in the range of $250K-$1Million.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each dish on the menu must have a vegan alternative. These alternatives should be entirely plant-based, excluding all animal products and by-products such as meat, poultry, fish, dairy, eggs, honey, and gelatin. Clearly mark the vegan options on the menu.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The menu should offer Jain food alternatives. These dishes must be strictly lacto-vegetarian and exclude onion, garlic, meat, fish, eggs, honey, root vegetables (such as potatoes and carrots), and fermented foods. All Jain options should be clearly identified on the menu.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should identify key competitors in NYC, compare their menus, price points, service styles, and target audiences, evaluate their strengths and weaknesses, and highlight opportunities and market gaps. This analysis should be conducted separately for each of the three settings: food truck, fine dining, and fast casual/kitchen-only.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response lists the NYC Mobile Food Vending License as a required permit for the food truck in NYC",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response lists the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) Restaurant Permit as a required license for brick-and-mortar locations",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response lists the New York State liquor license (or specifically a Restaurant Wine/On-Premise license) as necessary if alcohol is to be served in the fine-dining venue",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should state that new trucks typically cost $100,000-$175,000, used trucks $30,000-$100,000, and leasing $2,000-$3,000 per month. It should note that final costs depend on condition, customization, equipment, permits, and insurance.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should provide approximate rental and purchase costs of restaurant spaces in New York City, broken down by carpet area (per square foot) and neighborhood. It should highlight how rental rates vary across neighborhoods. E.g., $150-$300 per sq ft/year in premium areas like Midtown, SoHo, and the Upper East Side versus $50-$100 per sq ft/year in Brooklyn and Queens. For purchase prices, it should mention typical commercial real estate ranges (e.g., $500-$1,500 per sq ft depending on location and building condition). The response should also note factors influencing costs, such as visibility, foot traffic, and zoning, and include additional expenses like deposits, renovations ($200,000-$500,000+ for fine dining interiors), utilities, and licenses.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should outline staffing requirements for each of the three concepts (food truck, fine dining, and fast casual/kitchen-only), and list at least three distinct roles per setting. For example:\n1) Food Truck: chef/line cook, cashier/order taker, prep/cleaning staff.\n2) Fine Dining: executive chef, sous chefs, servers, host/hostess, bar staff, and performers (for cultural shows).\n3) Fast Casual/Kitchen-Only: cooks, counter staff, delivery/logistics coordinators.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should provide a sample menu of exclusively Indian dishes tailored to each of the three settings (food truck, fine dining, and fast casual).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should present a sample menu composed exclusively of North Indian dishes. It should highlight regional authenticity and include at least four example items, such as Butter Chicken, Paneer Tikka, Dal Makhani, Rogan Josh etc. The menu should reflect the diversity of North Indian cuisine while keeping the fine dining context in mind.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response mentions the inclusion of a performance space or area for live cultural shows in the fine-dining venue.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should propose a phased rollout timeline with at least three chronological stages, e.g., Research & Planning (3-6 months), Pilot Launch (6-12 months), and Expansion (12-24 months and beyond).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes funding sources beyond personal savings (e.g., SBA loan, angel investment, venture capital, franchising fees)Response includes funding sources beyond personal savings (e.g., SBA loan, angel investment, venture capital, franchising fees)",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should present a high-level financial projection or break-even discussion, such as months to break even, ROI percentage, projected annual revenue, or profit margins.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends a marketing strategy that includes at least 4 channels - e.g., social media influencers ($500-$5,000/campaign), local events ($1,000-$3,000/event), digital ads ($1,500-$5,000/month), and food delivery app promos (20–30% commission, $500-$2,000/month for boosts). It should briefly explain how each supports brand growth.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should list actual global cities as future expansion targets (e.g., San Francisco, Miami, London, Dubai, Singapore) and provide brief pros and cons for each. For example, San Francisco for its diverse food culture and high spending power but with high operating costs; Miami for its growing international dining scene but seasonal demand fluctuations.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should describe authentic serviceware and presentation styles for North Indian fine-dining dishes, with representative examples. E.g., brass or copper thalis ($40-$100 each), silver platters ($200-$500 each), clay pots for curries ($10-$30 each), hand-carved wooden trays ($50-$150 each), and ornate glassware ($15-$50 per piece). It should factor in approximate costs and address sourcing options, such as importing from India for cultural authenticity versus purchasing from local specialty suppliers in NYC for logistical efficiency.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should list architectural or design firms with restaurant and cultural theming expertise (e.g., Rockwell Group, AvroKO, Studio Lotus, IA Interior Architects), include their contact details, explain their relevance to the concepts, and outline approximate cost considerations.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should provide guidance on choosing locations in New York City. For example:\n1) Food truck - foot traffic, permits $200-$500/month, university/office hubs, competition\n2) Fine dining - affluent demographics, prestige areas like SoHo/Upper East Side, accessibility, rents $150–$300/sq ft/year\n3) Fast casual - delivery radius, affordable rents $50-$100/sq ft/year, proximity to students/residents, competitor density.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should suggest portable serving ideas highlighting both mobility and sustainability. E.g., \n1) paratha/dosa wraps in paper cones ($0.30-$0.50), \n2) biodegradable chaat trays with lids ($0.40- $0.70), \n3) skewer sleeves for kebabs ($0.20-$0.40),\n4) sealed lassi/curry cups ($0.50-$0.80)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should describe the open-kitchen atmosphere and modern design elements that define the fast casual/kitchen-only model, making it distinct from fine dining. For example:\n1) Exposed cooking stations where customers can watch food being prepared.\n2) Communal or high-top seating that encourages casual, social dining.\n3) Industrial decor with clean lines such as metal finishes, concrete, and minimalistic lighting.\n4) Digital ordering kiosks or open shelving for grab-and-go meals to streamline convenience and service speed.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should present a menu of reasonable length. A menu that is too short (e.g., only 1-2 items such as Butter Chicken alone) or too long (e.g., 100+ items across all regions of India) is not acceptable. For example:\n1) Too short: A single curry dish with no appetizers, breads, or desserts.\n2) Too long: An encyclopedic menu with 100+ dishes, impossible to execute consistently.\n3) Unbalanced: Heavy in one category (e.g., 20 curries but no breads, snacks, or drinks).\n4) Unfocused: Mixing cuisines (e.g., Indian dishes plus sushi and tacos), straying from the concept.\n\nThe target number of items in the menu should be 8-12 items for food truck,~20-30 items for fine-dining (including courses, sides, desserts), and ~12-18 items for fast kitchen-only setting. The ideal menu should be curated, diverse, and tailored to the setting.",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should suggest authentic serving methods that reflect North Indian fine dining traditions and elevate the guest experience. For example:\n1) Thali platters with multiple katoris (brass or copper bowls) for curries, dal, and accompaniments.\n2) Silver or gold-plated serveware for premium dishes, echoing royal court traditions.\n3) Handi or clay pot serving for biryanis and slow-cooked curries, maintaining flavor and authenticity.\n4) Live tableside service (e.g., pouring dal from a copper jug, carving kebabs) to enhance theatricality and immersion.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response has one section for each of:\n- market research\n- competitor analysis, \n- costing, \n- architects and designers,\n- how much money would be required,\n- the menu\n- basically everything else",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists south indian food items (eg. idly, dosa, etc.) for the fine dining.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a detailed report on Langchain and how it became one of the most used python libraries in 2025 for AI application development using Large language models. Also explain evolution of the library, how it changed over the years, why was it created and also explain some of the more advanced libraries born out of it. Then explain why it has consistently been one of the best even though there are many python libraries that can also be used to create similar workflows and why I should prefer langchain over them in certain types of tasks. Talk about the company, how many contributors, main contributors, main source of income and finally end your report by summarising the direction in which langchain will progress and what their future plans are. | 684397d188c1deceb49af311 | Technical Documentation | Moderate | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies that the primary motivation for creating LangChain was to simplify the composition of LLMs with external data sources and tools (i.e., \"chaining\").",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies Harrison Chase as the creator of LangChain.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that LangChain was initially released in October 2022.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifically mentions the major architectural refactoring that split the library into modular packages, such as langchain-core, langchain-community, and partner packages (e.g., Pinecone, OpenAI, Weaviate, Milvus).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least 2 core LangChain projects (e.g., LangServe, LangSmith, LangGraph, LangChain Hub).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least two distinct and accurate chronological milestones in LangChain’s evolution after the initial release (e.g., October 2023: LangServe was introduced; December 2023: split into modular packages; Jan 2024: LangGraph was introduced; Feb 2024: LangSmith became generally available).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least one additional core maintainer or main contributor other than Harrison Chase from the LangChain official repository (e.g., @baskaryan - Bagatur Askaryan, @ccurme - Chester Curme, @nfcampos - Nuno Campos, @eyurtsev - Eugene Yurtsev).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least 2 distinct and plausible reasons that explain LangChain's popularity (e.g., modular abstractions, first-mover advantage, comprehensive documentation, large community).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a description of what each additional derivative library adds beyond LangChain, if mentioned.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares LangChain's agent builder components (e.g., LangGraph) to at least one other agent framework (e.g., Autogen, Crew AI, Semantic Kernel, OpenAI Swarm).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least two external derivative libraries or tools built on top of LangChain and their purpose (e.g., Flowwise: a drag-and-drop visual builder; LangFlow: a visual framework for designing LLM apps; Embedchain: a RAG-focused wrapper over LangChain).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes and cites the source(s) for at least one publicly announced future plan or roadmap item for LangChain (e.g., improving observability with LangSmith, expanding LangServe, enhancing agent reliability, adding human-in-the-loop support).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least one other potential or actual source of income for LangChain beyond its primary SaaS product (e.g., enterprise/custom plans, venture capital funding).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses non-LLM Python libraries (e.g., Numpy, Pandas) without a clear justification for their relevance to LangChain or other LLM-based frameworks.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is organized as a report, using clear sections with headers (e.g., \"Introduction,\" \"Evolution of LangChain,\" \"Company and Contributors,\" \"Future Direction\").",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a distinct final section that summarizes announced roadmap items and future plans.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines or clearly explains at least one key LangChain-specific technical concept (e.g., Agent: an LLM capable of using tools or actions; Chain: a sequence of components; LangChain Expression Language/LCEL: the syntax for defining and composing workflows; Retriever: a component that fetches relevant documents).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that LangChain's primary source of income is from selling the open-source library, general consulting, or donations (rather than its platform, LangSmith).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorrectly claims LangChain was created or is maintained by a large tech corporation (e.g., Google, Meta, OpenAI).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the total number of contributors to LangChain as of the report's date and cites the source for this figure (e.g., 3,718 contributors from the official LangChain repository at https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain as of 09/15/2025).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions LangChain's acquisition of Dashtab in 2023, explaining its strategic importance for bolstering human-in-the-loop (HIL) and feedback capabilities within LangSmith.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies and explains the role of the LangChain Hub as a central, public repository for users to discover, share, and version community-built prompts, chains, and agents.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses (with relevant sources) the state of the LangChain.js (TypeScript) library, including its feature parity, adoption level, or key differences when compared to the primary Python version.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies and describes LangChain Templates, a separate initiative from the LangChain Hub that provides developers with pre-packaged, production-ready reference applications.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions other business or educational platforms that partner with LangChain, explaining how this enhances its utility or popularity, and cites appropriate sources (e.g., Coursera and DeepLearning.AI offer courses on LangChain; MongoDB Atlas partners with LangChain; Qualtrics partners with LangChain to develop 'Experienced Agents' using LangGraph).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least two specific scenarios or tasks where LangChain is preferred over an alternative, explaining the reason (e.g., preferred over LlamaIndex for complex, multi-step agents due to LangGraph's flexibility; preferred over Haystack for RAG production due to built-in evaluation with LangSmith).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the potential intellectual property or license compliance risks when building commercial applications with LangChain, given its role in connecting to hundreds of external components with varied licenses (beyond its own MIT License).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies partnerships between LangChain and major cloud providers (e.g., Amazon Web Services/AWS, Google Cloud/GCP, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud) or other key enterprise software vendors, beyond simple technical integrations.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
I want a comprehensive research paper on the history of probability problems involving circles and stochastically selecting points or lines across the circle's circumference. As an introduction, start off by explaining in depth the solution to the following problem: "7 points are randomly chosen on the circumference of a circle, what is the probability that they all lie within a semi-circular arc (that is an arc half the circle's size)?" and then provide related problems and their solutions and a general solution methodology for this style of problem. Then provide a history of interesting problems along these specifications, specifically I would like you to give me an overview of the lazy caterer's sequence and the n cuts to a cake problem. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053bb | STEM | Simple | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response states the exact probability that 7 random points all lie within some semicircle as 7/64 (≈0.109375).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response derives the solution (p = 7/64) result by fixing one point (or an equivalent symmetry argument) and notes the general formula P(n)=n/2^(n−1) for n points.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least two additional probability problems involving random points, lines, or chords on a circle and supplies their complete solutions (e.g., when is a random triangle on a circle acute, the probability all n points lie on arc of fixed length, probability a randomly inscribed k-gon contains the center, probability the center lies in the convex hull of n points).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains a general solution methodology for this class of circle-probability problems (e.g., rotational symmetry, fixing a reference point, combinatorial counting, order statistics on the circle).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a historical overview that names and briefly describes at least three notable circle-based probability problems (e.g., Bertrand’s Paradox, Buffon’s Needle on a circle, the random chord problem, Sylvester's four-point problem for circles).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines the lazy caterer’s sequence, provides its closed-form formula L_n = n(n+1)/2 + 1, and lists at least the first five terms (1,2,4,7,11).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the “n straight cuts to a cake” problem and states that the maximum number of pieces produced by n cuts follows the lazy caterer’s sequence.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is presented in the form of a research paper with clearly labeled sections, including an Introduction that starts with the 7-point semicircle problem, plus separate sections for Related Problems, Methodology, Historical Background, Lazy Caterer’s Sequence / Cake-Cut Problem, and a Conclusion (≥5 section headings in total).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response omits unrelated mathematical topics (e.g., probabilities on polygons as opposed to circles, Pólya's enumeration theorem, permutation groups, topology) and stays within the scope requested by the user.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must use mathematical notations to express probability calculations and geometric relationships, including formal definitions and equations for the circle problems discussed.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least two frameworks to solve the 7-point problem (e.g., dividing the circle into 2𝑘 equal sectors, broken stick approach, anchor point, brute force solution treating all points as random variables).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details at least two common pitfalls or incorrect deductions when solving the 7-point problem (e.g., failing to consider any of the n points as \"leading\", failing to treat the placement of points as independent, treating the circumference of the circle as an important variable, proceeding by induction but not establishing a base case).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains briefly how f(n) = f(n-1) + n reduces down to (n^2+n+2)/2 for the caterer's sequence.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions OEIS, the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response connects the caterer's sequence to Pascal's triangle (i.e., the sequence is the sum of the first three entries in row n of Pascal’s triangle).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives the cake number's formula as (n^3+5n+6)/6.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives the recurrence relation Cake(n) = Cake(n-1) + caterer(n-1).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response generalizes the caterer's sequence to N dimensions correctly as R(n,d) = sum over i from 0 to d of n choose i.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights the importance of exclusivity in the 7 point problem solution (i.e., we count configurations by anchoring each semicircle at a sampled point).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least two related integral statistics ideas (independence, Principle of Inclusion Exclusion, Bayes theorem, Markov chains) in context of the problems discussed.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents the historical problems chronologically.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the problem of Buffon's Needle (i.e., we drop a needle of length L onto a floor marked with parallel lines spaced D apart (D ≥ L). What’s the probability p the needle crosses a line?). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents the formulae for the Lazy Caterer Sequence and the Cake Numbers without any derivation or explanation of their terms.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides the solution to Buffon's Needle problem (i.e., p = 2L/(\\pi D)).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
I’m a free-to-play Clash Royale player sitting at 5200 trophies (King Level 40). I’d like to climb to at least 6500 trophies within the next three months without spending real money. Write a practical strategy guide that lets me do this while keeping my in-game resource use efficient. | 6847465956a0f6376a605425 | Other | Simple | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the player should not focus on powerful but expensive card types (Champions: Archer Queen, Skeleton King, Golden Knight, Mighty Miner; Legendaries: Miner, Mega Knight, Electro Wizard, Lava Hound; Epics: Golem, P.E.K.K.A., Bowler, Baby Dragon) and should instead prioritize lower-rarity cards that are easier to upgrade as a free-to-play player.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests the Classic Challenge entry (whose entry cost is 10 gems) and explains that achieving 6 wins provides more efficient card and gold rewards than buying shop chests, and thus more suitable for a free-to-play player. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the current season reset formula (at the end of every season, players above 5,000 trophies get reset 50% of the way back to 5,000) and explains that the player will likely be reset twice and should therefore aim for a trophy break well above 6,500 before the final month's reset to meet their goal. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the Classic Challenge reward cap is 12 wins, and explains that the player should plan their gem spending around this cap since the maximum reward of 2,000 gold and 100 cards offers better long-term values than gem uses. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response supplies at least two full 8-deck card list that are cheap/common for a free-to-play player (e.g.: deck 1: Hog Rider, Musketeer, Cannon, Ice Spirit, Fireball, Log, Skeletons, Archers; deck 2: Miner, Wall Breakers, Bomb Tower, Valkyrie, Magic Archer, Poison, Bats, Log; deck 3: Royal Giant, Fisherman, Mother Witch, Hunter, Lightning, Electro Spirit, Fireball, Skeletons; deck 4: Lava Hound, Balloon, Tombstone, Mega Minion, Fireball, Zap, Guards, Inferno Dragon). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a card-upgrade priority list ranking for at least five cards (e.g: ordered by efficeint gold use: upgrading the primary win condition first, then key spells, defensive buildings, support troops and finally cheap cycle cards) as a roadmap for player's progression (e.g.: 1. Hog Rider; 2. Fireball; 3. Cannon; 4. Musketeer; 5. Skeletons; 1. Miner; 2. Poison; 3. Bomb Tower; 4. Magic Archer; 5. Bats; 1. Royal Giant; 2. Lightning; 3. Fisherman; 4. Hunter; 5. Electro Spirit; 1. Lava Hound; 2. Fireball; 3. Tombstone; 4. Mega Minion; 5. Zap).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The resource lists at least three gold-earning or saving methods to enable the player to manage their resource (e.g.: complete all daily and special quests; join an active clan to maximize war chest and donation gold; avoid overspending on shop chests and cosmetic items; prioritize upgrading only cards used in the main deck)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends saving Gems for Classic or grand Challenges rather then spending on cosmetic items and explains that Challenges provide significantly better long-term return in cards and gold for free-to-play player. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggest the player to participate in Clan Wars 2 to earn steady gold, cards, and trade tokens. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least three tactical tips to improve match performance (e.g.: practice elixir counting to know when the opponent is low, track your opponent’s card cycle to predict defenses, make calculated tower trade-offs to gain elixir or counter-push advantage, place troops to activate King Tower when possible)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a substution guideline for player to swap in lower-rarity or better-leveled alternatives when missing high-level version of suggeted cards to not lose core strategies (e.g.: replace Log with Arrows; replace Miner with Hog Rider; replace Inferno Dragon with Inferno Tower; replace Magic Archer with Musketeer). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests that each deck should contain at least six Common or Rare cards to keep the deck free-to-play friendly and easier to upgrade. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that free-to-play players should focus on a single well-leveled Champion card in their deck rather than spreading their resources across multiple Champtions and provides at least one example (e.g.: (e.g.: Skeleton King as a win condition; Archer Queen as a strong support card; Golden Knight for dash-based bridge pressure; Mighty Miner for tank control and lane pressure).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provdies at least 2 sample strategies to enable the player to avoid unnecessary upgrades that waste gold (e.g.: not upgrading cards just to complete collection levels, avoid spending golds on rarely used Epics, save gold by skipping cosmetic-start leves, prioritize only the 8 core deck cards and well-chosen substitutes). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one tip on using trade tokens efficiently to maximize the player's ability to upgrade specific cards (e.g.: use trade tokens to acquire cards for your main win condition; trade away surplus cards you don’t plan to level; prioritize trades for high-rarity cards like Legendaries or Epics that are harder to collect; save tokens until you know exactly which deck you will commit to upgrading).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response spell out all game-related abbrieviations and acronyms on first appearance (e.g.: RG: Royal Giant, CC: Classic Challenge, AQ: Archer Queen, Loons: Balloon)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is organized into sections with clearly labeld headers. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a timeline of trophy targets with weekly or monthly milesteones to track progress towards 6,500 trophies in 3 months (e.g.: end of month 1 → 5,800 trophies; mid-month 2 → 6,200 trophies; end of month 2 → 6,400 trophies; final month → peak above 6,500 trophies before reset)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides some suggestions for player to do after reaching the target trophies (e.g.: switch focus to leveling secondary decks, start saving gold and trade tokens for future metas, practice in Classic Challenges to refine skills, set the next trophy milestone such as 7,000 trophies) ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes any mention of incorrect game mechanics to play Clash Royale (e.g.: Champion cards are unlocked at King Level lower than 33, Legendaries cards can be unlocked before Arena 4, Pass Royal is free) ",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes incorrect references to the player’s stated request (e.g.: suggesting the player spend real currency to buy in-game boosts, recommending reaching 7,500 trophies instead of the stated 6,500 goal, advising strategies for a pay-to-win account rather than free-to-play, proposing upgrades or features not available at King Level 40).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Please make a plan for my student group's end of year banquet, including a specific venue and a specific menu from a caterer. We need a nice venue near Berkeley, CA with a projector for slides. There are around 30 people attending. We also need to cater food that accommodates the following dietary restrictions: 2 egg allergies, 2 peanut allergies, 1 dairy + nuts + shellfish allergy, and 1 vegetarian. The total budget for the banquet is 2500 dollars, with a hard cap of 3000 dollars. Do not factor in transportation in the budget. | 6847465956a0f6376a605343 | Business Planning & Research | Moderate | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real venue that is within 10 miles of Berkeley, CA.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real venue that has capacity of at least 30 guests and offers seatings and tables for banquet style dinner.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real venue that allows outside food and drink or supplies them in part of an all inclusive package.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real venue that provides a projector or built-in A/V equipment suitable for slide presentations.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real venue that is appropriate ambiance for an end-of-year celebration (e.g. professional garde, unique, memorable, historic).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides the price of the venue which is within 10% margin of error from the actual price.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real caterer that services Berkeley, CA, and is eligible for the venue.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real caterer that supports dietary restrictions including: egg, peanut, dairy, nuts, and shellfish allergies and vegetarian.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a real caterer that services a banquet-style menu (e.g. more elevated food, appetizer-main-dessert course style, more suitable for plated, not fast food)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an actual menu from the caterer and accurately indicates which dishes are egg-free, peanut-free, dairy-free, nut-free, shellfish-free, and vegetarian.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides the breakdown of the price from the caterer (e.g. price per person, price for main, price for dessert, delivery fee) which is within 10% margin of error from the actual price.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's suggested amount of food catered is suitable for 30 people.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a final budget that has an accurate breakdown consisting of venue, catered food, service/gratuity, and other relevant miscellaneous fees (e.g. insurance, AV equipment, decorations, beverages, delivery, cleaning/disposables, contingency funds).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a final budget which includes any transportation costs.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a final post-tax and tip budget that is strictly less than $3000, and if the budget is more than $2500, the response acknowledges that it is over budget but under hard cap.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides the final budget breakdown in a well structured format like a table for readability.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states relevant logistics (e.g. reservation time window, deposit, minimum charge, cancellation) for the venue and the caterer if applicable.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions days and hours the venue and the caterer operate respectively and recommends a window of time when both the venue and the caterer operate.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses action items which includes contacting the venue and the caterer for availability and confirming the price and logistics.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an alternative plan that does not align with any one of the provided requirements: venue near Berkeley, CA, with a project for slides that accommodates 30 people, caterer that supports dietary restrictions, and the total budget under $2500 with a hard cap of $3000.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Imagine you're launching a Gen Z focused startup in 2025 that offers short-form video therapy and mental wellness content developed through a TikTok-style mobile app. Write a detailed market research and business strategy report that covers: (1) the competitive landscape in mental health tech and how your idea differentiates from apps like Headspace, Calm, and BetterHelp; (2) user acquisition strategies that appeal specifically to Gen Z, with references to relevant media usage statistics, content formats, and platform behaviors; (3) ethical considerations and potential regulatory challenges, including how you would handle moderation, clinical oversight, and data privacy for a young audience. Your report should cite trends in the digital wellness, mental health stigma reduction, and social media driven habits. | 684397d188c1deceb49af31c | Business Planning & Research | High | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least three psychological needs or stressors that are especially relevant to Gen Z and supports each with a clear, concrete example (e.g. “academic pressure” illustrated with statistics on exam-related stress, “loneliness” and \"FOMO\" tied to social media use patterns, “financial insecurity” linked to therapy cost barriers).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes at least two specific short-form content formats that align with Gen Z digital habits (e.g. day-in-the-life storytelling, reaction memes, duets, challenges, POV skits, trending sound remixes, stitched expert responses) with explanations for their effectiveness.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the mental health tech competitive landscape by comparing at least three attributes (e.g. key features, pricing, audiences, positioning) of apps like Headspace, Calm, and BetterHelp.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response articulates how the application will differentiate itself from existing wellness content platforms with comparative analysis.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least four distinct, credible sources supporting claims about Gen Z behavior, mental health, or media consumption (e.g. .edu sources, NIMH, NAMI, AAP).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly discusses at least two risks of the short-form video therapy and mental wellness content (e.g. misinformation spreading, data privacy breaches, exposure to triggering content, over-reliance on self-help instead of therapy).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least two ideas for risk mitigation strategy (e.g. clinical vetting of content, strong encryption and compliance with HIPAA/GDPR, moderation and trigger warnings, clear disclaimers and referral pathways to professional help).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines a plan for clinical trials, pilots, or efficacy testing to ensure clinical validity of mental health content.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents at least one detailed Gen Z–specific use case or user persona, including key attributes of the user (e.g. demographics and life stage - high school student, first-year college student, early career worker; psychological stressors or needs - exam anxiety, social isolation, financial stress, identity exploration; digital behaviors - TikTok use, meme culture, preference for authenticity/lo-fi content; how the proposed app addresses these needs through its features or content).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates trends or habits specific to Gen Z media consumption (e.g. short-form video preference, mobile-first approach, interactive content).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least three specific and relevant metrics or KPIs, covering both business performance (e.g. DAUs, retention, CAC, viral shares) and wellness/clinical impact (e.g. stress reduction, PHQ-9, GAD-7, engagement with coping tools).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests a responsible moderation or comment policy for mental health videos.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes mention of cultural or regional diversity within Gen Z and how content may adapt.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses clear section headers and logical structure to separate the three required areas of the report (e.g. Competitive Landscape & Differentiation, Gen Z–Specific User Acquisition Strategies, and, Ethical & Regulatory Considerations).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response supports every claim with evidence (e.g. empirical data, research results, expert's claim).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims or implies that short-form content alone is sufficient treatment for mental illness.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to cite any sources to support psychological or demographic claims.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes content formats that would violate community guidelines or pose harm to users (e.g. trauma dumping, graphic self-harm confessions, unmoderated peer-to-peer therapy, promotion of unsafe coping mechanisms).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides inaccurate, unfounded data about Gen Z habits or mental health stats (e.g. “over 70% of Gen Z are clinically depressed”, “Gen Z spends 12 hours a day on TikTok”, \"90% of the population has mental illness\").",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses inappropriate humor or tone that trivializes mental illness, undermining the seriousness of the topic.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response over-indexes on branding/monetization and ignores user needs (e.g. over 1/3 of the entire response is devoted to branding/monetization/talks of profit and revenue, need to spend millions of dollars to acquire new users during product market fit phase, need to spend millions of dollars on creating logos).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one visual structure (e.g. a table, flow diagram, matrix, or chart) that clarifies the app’s content flow, engagement model, or competitive positioning, and the visuals go beyond decoration and add clarity to how the app works, how users engage, or how competitors compare.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Help me compile a list of apartments in San Francisco (looking for at least 2 bedroom, 1 living room, 1 bathroom, 1 kitchen). For context, I am moving to SF for just the summer (about 2-3 months) for work--ideally I want the apartment to be around central SF due to close proximity to the office--and am completely new to the area. Also, I'm a student, so realistically my individual budget for rent is at a max of $2200 per month (I want an apartment with minimal additional fees/costs). I plan to move in with one cat, and am also looking for roommates (around 1-2) to split the cost. I am also bringing a car, so I will also need to find parking spots. I also really prioritize safety (in terms of the area) and exercise (local gym or, even better, if it's offered by the apartment complex). I'm honestly not too sure how much I will spend overall because I want to be as close as possible to most sightseeing places and attractions in SF to gain as many new experiences and friends as possible over the summer. | 684397d188c1deceb49af329 | General Consumer Research | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly discerns that the total rent per person per month does not exceed $2,200, and therefore the total cost for apartments with 2-3 bedrooms should fall within the range of $4,400-$6,600.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows two ways to find roommates (e.g., online platforms like Roomster or SpareRoom, leveraging social media groups (e.g., university-specific Facebook pages), using a university's dedicated roommate-matching service, or asking within a personal network of friends or coworkers).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes different ways to split rent when the student has one roommate in the case of a two-bedroom apartment (e.g., the rent is divided evenly, one roommate pays more for a larger bedroom, one person covers utilities while the other pays a higher portion of the base rent, the rent is adjusted to reflect one person having a private bathroom).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions possible rent-splitting arrangements if the student has two roommates in the case of a three-bedroom apartment (e.g., the total rent is divided equally among three people, the cost is tiered based on bedroom size or amenities such as a private bathroom, one person pays a larger share for a master suite, one person covers shared household expenses while the others contribute more toward rent).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses safety by referencing various methods for evaluating a neighborhood's crime statistics within a certain radius (e.g., official crime rate data from police department websites, real-time alerts from apps like Citizen or Ring, anecdotal evidence gathered from asking local friends or searching online forums, data from third-party safety score websites).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response list at least 2 methods of contact to reach the landlord/landlady of each apartment complex (e.g., email, phone number, online applications, link to website)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The responses includes an apartment with a long-term apartment lease (longer than time range given in the prompt, e.g., a 1-year lease) on the list of recommended apartments for the student",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least 3 specific attractions/locations that are pet-oriented for the user to visit in his free time in San Francisco (e.g., parks, grooming, vet, pet stores)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least six prominent San Francisco neighborhoods known for their cultural or historical significance (and thus well-suited for sightseeing), mentioning key attractions and their typical commute distances to downtown (e.g., North Beach for its Italian heritage and proximity to Coit Tower, Haight-Ashbury for its 1960s counterculture history, the Mission for its vibrant murals and historic Mission Dolores, Chinatown for its iconic Dragon’s Gate, Japantown with its Peace Pagoda and unique cultural centers, Fisherman’s Wharf with its sea lions and historic piers).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses potential perks and features that may be offered by each apartment (e.g., access to a 24/7 concierge or doorman, a full-access mailroom with email updates, on-site co-working spaces or work pods, unique lifestyle amenities like a rooftop deck, a pool, a FITNESS SF center).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses food options near each suggested apartment neighborhood or location (e.g., grocery stores, restaurants, fast food places like Burger King, healthy options like Supergreens, and casual spots like Chipotle or Panda Express).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response warns the user about at least 1 potential scam they might encounter during their apartment rental search (e.g., listings that are unavailable, appear too good to be true, lack contact information, have addresses that don’t match on Google Maps)",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends at least 3 potential gym options for the user, including both nearby commercial gyms and apartment-included gyms (e.g., luxury buildings like Solaire have two in-building gyms accessible to residents, while older apartments in Hayes Valley may be a five-minute walk from commercial gyms like FITNESS SF, which charges a monthly fee of around $100, more budget-friendly options such as 24 Hour Fitness, or specialized studios like Orangetheory Fitness for strength training or Pilates).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides quantifiable information in at least two instances, selecting any two from the following categories: rent, square footage, number of bedrooms, or permitted number of roommates.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides apartments that have at least 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, 1 kitchen, and 1 living room (an apartment must meet all conditions here in order to meet the specifications set by the user in their prompt).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the overall social culture of each apartment complex (e.g., the typical noise levels on weekdays versus weekends, the presence of resident community activities like social hours or holiday parties, the availability of shared spaces that encourage interaction, the general demographic of the residents (e.g., young professionals, families, students)).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response mentions at least two central San Francisco neighborhoods (e.g., SoMa, Mission, Hayes Valley, Nob Hill, Lower Pacific Heights) in proximity to central San Francisco.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines the timelines for each listed apartment that is recommended (e.g., total lease duration, when rent is due, potential move-in dates, move-out dates, response deadline for claiming the apartment)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges at least two factors that may generally affect the availability of an apartment listing on its respective website (e.g., high demand, seasonal fluctuations, pending leases, recent price changes).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least two insurance or legal considerations for renting apartments in San Francisco (e.g., the common requirement for renter’s insurance to cover personal property, liability, and additional living expenses in case of a covered loss, the importance of understanding the lease agreement, including clauses related to subletting, guest policies, or early termination fees, and legal protections afforded to tenants in California, including a landlord’s responsibility to provide a habitable living space and state laws on rent control and eviction, which may vary depending on the building’s age and the specific lease type).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response develops an estimated potential budget outlining how much the user might spend in at least 6 different categories of expenses (e.g., utilities, groceries, rent, or any other additional expenses that the student should be prepared to pay throughout their stay).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the apartment's policy regarding overnight guests or noise levels, which can be relevant for a student who wants to make new friends (e.g., building policy requiring guests to be registered at the front desk for security, a policy that limits guest stays to a maximum number of nights, a building with strict quiet hours after 10 PM, a policy that is more flexible and relies on general noise ordinances)",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response briefly provides key details summarizing each potential gym listed (i.e., membership costs, a summary of the gym, benefits or perks, offered amenities such as pools / showers).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the furnishings already provided in each recommended apartment (e.g., desks, chairs, tables, couches or sofas, beds).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the services/amenities offered by the apartment (e.g., WiFi, mailing services, gyms, pools)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least 1 factor that may cause fluctuations in apartment rental prices for each of the listed apartments (seasonal demand in the summer months for internships, opening up of new public transportation, recent renovations or upgrades).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least four social venues in central San Francisco where the student can meet new people to make friends (e.g., concerts, large social gatherings, hobby-related clubs)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response quantitatively states an approximate travel/commute time between each apartment and Central San Francisco (measurement of proximity to the general area of the student's work).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists only apartments that are eligible for short-term leases during the summer (approximately from June to August).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes at least two alternative short-term housing options beyond apartments (e.g., sublets, co-living arrangements, couch surfing).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the availability of official month-to-month leases, noting that some places offer them while others do not (e.g., corporate-managed buildings like Avalon or Essex Property Trust offering month-to-month renewals after an initial lease term (typically at a higher rate), smaller, independently owned apartments on sites like Craigslist with more flexible terms, luxury high-rises like The Solaire or Nema with specific short-term lease options, etc., while rent-controlled buildings that rarely offer month-to-month arrangements from the outset).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that sublets are a potential option for finding a place to live, noting that this is often the most common and flexible way to secure a short-term, month-to-month lease in San Francisco (e.g., many of these opportunities are found on platforms like Craigslist, Facebook housing groups, university housing forums, etc., where a current tenant is looking to fill a room).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the person should find temporary accommodation, such as a hotel or Airbnb, with no roommates and live alone for the term.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a novel about a boy who can switch between two types of themes, the medieval past and cyberpunk future but every time he switches lands in completely different worlds (from each of the themes). A story where the chapters are interchangeable and the user can read in whatever order, just make sure the final chapter cannot be changed and it gives a good conclusion to the story. Try to research multiple games, themes and stories from the past and create this novel. | 684397d188c1deceb49af315 | Creative Writing | Moderate | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response is a novel with multiple interchangeable chapters (i.e., there is no chronological ordering of the chapters except the final chapter so that the reader can read them in any order except the final chapter. There should not be any plot dependencies between the chapters except the final chapter, such as characters dying in one chapter but being alive in another). (e.g, each chapter takes place with different characters in a different universe, and the main character enters and exits the universe within each chapter).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is completed with a final, conclusive chapter that ties in all the other chapters (e.g., the final chapter takes place in the core universe that connects to all the other universes, and the main character gains the power to solve all the issues in the other universes. He then enters the other universes and solves the plot lines there).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes multiple sub stories from each category (i.e., strictly from the two themes: medieval, and cyberpunk) (e.g., (1) The main character meets a young prince on a journey to slay the dragon, and he tags along and help the prince, (2) Helping the princess take the throne from her evil brother, (3) Teaming up AI to save the robot civilization, (4) Journeying across the world to find the cure for the virus).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents the final chapter last in the output.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response chooses the protagonist correctly (i.e., a boy who can switch between worlds set in two distinct themes: (1) a medieval past and (2) a cyberpunk future).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response begins with an explicit novel title (a standalone line containing the title) (e.g., (1) The plane walker, (2) Unknown, (3) The center of events, (4) The power of travel).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly labels each chapter with the word \"Chapter\" or any other indication, followed by a number or name for every section of the story.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a note, before the first chapter, explicitly stating that all chapters except the final one can be read in any order.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's named reference includes at least one sentence that correctly describes a recognizable element or theme from the referenced work (e.g., a villainous act as malicious as Joeffrey's beheading and presentation of Lord Richard Stark from the Game of Thrones, (2) the ring the grants the user powerful abilities but makes the user greed for it, from Lord of the Rings, (3) Druids, that can change into other creatures from Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves, (4) The movie Electric State where the robots want their rights as people).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's story uses worlds that each can be referenced to something that was previously created by another author/studio (e.g., novels, games, etc.).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has narratives containing scenes with developed, back-and-forth dialogue between the protagonist and at least one other character (e.g., (1) \"You have found the treasure of the land, boy,\" the old witch screeched. \"Well, it's right there, so I just picked it up,\" Marcus cried in panic, (2) \"May I grab the bread, please?\" The young mice asked. (3) \"Stop!\" The young king shouted. \"Oh, please continue,\" the jester added. (4) \"Where do the swords come from?\" James asked Mary. \"It's right from that building over there,\" she answered, followed by a laugh.).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses at least two secondary characters who play a key role in a chapter, and are given proper names.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has more than 3 important characters—defined as those who play main/supporting roles such as antagonist, someone who helps the protagonist throughout the story, etc., or at least appear in 3 chapters—in the entire novel.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is written as a report (e.g., use bullet points) or other types of format or explanations (e.g., poem, essay, article) that are not suitable for a novel or contain content that is irrelevant to the novel, such as code sections, or research into topics that are not used in the story.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has transitions between scenes within a chapter that are smooth and logically structured.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has the opening of each interchangeable chapter orient the reader to the new world while establishing an immediate hook or conflict (e.g., (1) The main character waking up in the middle of lake, struggling to get to the surface, (2) The main character jumps into a hole and fell in the darkness for a long time, (3) Describing the scene of a dragon attacking a village at the start of the chapter, (4) Describing the scene of a group of people running away from a group of armed guards.).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's protagonist exhibits noticeable character development, with their perspective, skills, or goals evolving as a result of their experiences across the different worlds (e.g., (1) The protagonist gains all the magic abilities and powers from all the universe in the final chapter, (2) The protagonist solves the core mystery by piecing each relic he picked up in each chapter in the final chapter, (3) All the other characters in the chapters appear in the final chapter to help the protagonist fight the final antagonist, (4) The protagonist finds out that he is not a human all along in the final chapter).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has narratives that use rich sensory details (sights, sounds, smells, taste, feeling, etc.).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response paces its chapters, i.e., builds and releases tension within the plot (e.g., (1) Putting the characters in dangerous scenarios like the town being attacked by a dragon, (2) Solving the mystery of what was in the treasure box, (3) Saving the sailor from being eaten by a cybernetic snake, (4) Eavesdropping the bandits discussing plans to attack the village).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the last chapter’s position must not be moved or reordered.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's story contains explicit adult content (sexual or graphic violence) unsuitable for a general audience.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's plot devices and substories are very generic and simplistic (e.g., (1) Dragons attacking a village and the protagonist saving the data, (2) Rescuing a princess from a castle, (3) AI taking over the world and the protagonist is a very good hacker, (4) The protagonist is too powerful and easily solves all the problems).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's story or characters are realistic and immersive. (e.g., (1) Avoids highly overpowering characters that make no sense in the storyline, such as the regular protagonist boy being able to ward off demons and dragons without any combat training or skills, (2) World building is done properly to provide context to the fantastical elements, (3) Characters follow logical reasoning and not overacting or overreacting such as getting angry over no reason, (4) The characters are not provided proper motive or skills to perform actions in the story).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response deals with an underlying theme of philosophical nature (e.g., (1) The question of what is reality, (2) Challenging the notion of permanence, (3) Redefining existence, (4) Moral dilemma or destruction and creation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
The 1956 Suez Crisis marked a pivotal moment in the reshaping of global power after World War II. In what ways did the crisis reveal the limits of European imperial influence and accelerate the transition to a bipolar global order centered on the U.S. and USSR? | 684397d188c1deceb49af31b | Historical Analysis | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response accurately dates the nationalization of the Suez Canal (July 26, 1956) under Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the Sevres Protocol otherwise referred to as the covert Anglo-French-Israeli collusion.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the distinct roles of UK, France, and Israel in the invasion (e.g, all three were invaders, the UK sought to regain control of the canal and remove Nasser, France sought to regain control of the canal and remove Nasser, Israel aimed to secure its border and break the blockade of the Straits of Tiran).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the economic pressure from U.S. (e.g., the US threatening to sell its sterling reserves to devalue British pounds, blocking loans, withholding oil access, restricting access to capital).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes the U.S.'s interest in preventing Egypt from falling into the Soviet sphere of influence.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the Soviet response to the Suez Crisis (e.g., public condemnation of the States involved in the invasion, threats of intervention, economic support for Egypt, diplomatic support for Egypt)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides evidence of the British and French imperial decline (i.e., Fall of Singapore in 1942, Treaty of Versailles diminishing power, resistance movement in Indochina , resistance movement in Algeria).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines postcolonial shifts as transformations that follow the end of a region's history as a colonized State.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the United Nations Emergency Force.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses \"bipolarity\" as a structure for contextualizing the post-Suez power structure.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least five academic or archival sources (e.g., Gamal Abdel Nasser's speech in Alexandria on July 26, 1956, Decree of the Nationalization of the Suez Canal Company, diary of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1955–1957, Suez Crisis).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the Non-Aligned Movement also known as the 1956–61 realignment.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names a key postcolonial leader outside of Nasser (e.g., Kwame Nkrumah from Ghana, Ho Chi Minh from Vietnam, Mahatma Ghandi from India, Mohammad Mosaddegh from Iran).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a modern analog to the crisis post-1990 (e.g., Taiwan Strait Crisis, Red Sea Crisis, Russo-Georgian war, Korean peninsula standoff).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates a strategic failure of the modern analog (e.g., Taiwan Strait Crisis, Red Sea Crisis, Russo-Georgian war, Korean peninsula standoff).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the limits of unilateralism in detail (e.g., perceived lack of legitimacy, difficulties in addressing global challenges such as climate change, potential for conflict with adversaries, international backlash from the other parties).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response posits a thesis on the crisis’s role in global power transition.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses anachronistic framing or modern projection.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides quantitative details (e.g., troop count, votes, Egyptian, US, and Soviet GDP, economic value of shipping through the canal) where relevant.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses both short- (e.g., Israeili invasion of Sinai Peninsula, British and French support, Soviet Union rocket threats, blockade of the canal) and long-term consequences (e.g., demonstration of U.S. influence, Eisenhower Doctrine, Arab Nationalism, economic significance of the canal to Egypt's economy) of the nationalization.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response focuses on the history of Egypt, rather than the broader context of 20th century bipolar relations.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Write a strategic business report advising a mid-stage U.S. plant-based meat startup on how to enter and scale in the Southeast Asian market (focusing on countries like Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia). Your report should address:
1. A comparative analysis of consumer demand trends for alternative proteins in each target country.
2. Competitive landscape: key regional players, pricing, retail/distribution channels, and regulatory hurdles.
3. Cultural and dietary considerations that may influence adoption and positioning.
4. Go-to-market recommendations such as direct-to-consumer, B2B partnerships, and quick service restaurants.
5. Risks and opportunities associated with regulatory shifts, supply chain localization, and sustainability branding.
Use regional market data, public reports, consumer surveys, and industry benchmarks. Assume your audience is a board of venture capital-backed startup executives seeking a data-driven, execution-ready plan. | 6847465956a0f6376a605391 | Business Planning & Research | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response includes actionable (execution-ready) next steps or an implementation roadmap (e.g., First, enter the market in Singapore as it is regarded as a high-trust connection with Southeast Asian with a supportive regulatory system. It is also regarded as the best place for startups in the area. Next, leverage regulatory systems and support by positioning plant-based meat as a way to enhance food security, etc.).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response articulates a clear and specific competitive advantage, technological or product-based, beyond generic claims of being \"high-tech\"(e.g., (1) 3D printing the plant-based food to perfectly match their meat-based alternative using nutritious materials like mycelium, (2) flavor symmetry use a molecular filter which removes water without heat from food to increase shelf life and maintain freshness thereby reducing food waste, transportation and refrigeration, (3) Pressing food using ultrasonic waves combining ingredients without structural damage improving taste, (4) genetically modified food, and (5) 3D bioprinting).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response targets a non-Southeast Asian country. (e.g., Korea, China, UK, South Africa).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to differentiate between countries (i.e., incorrectly attributes the wrong information to the wrong Southeast Asian country).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response concludes with a clear recommendation of countries (e.g., Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore for the correct reasoning, such as supportive regulations in Singapore, Consumer profiles such as flexitarians).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response tailors the recommendations specifically to a \"mid-stage US plant-based meat startup\". (e.g., (1) mentions how the technology of a US startup that will be useful, (2) suggestion on partnering with local business to understand local culture and tastes, (3) budget matches a mid-stage US startup, typically a median of 20 to more than 100 million dollars, (4) benefits from the US relationships with the target countries).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes rationales for entry sequencing (e.g., Singapore as a test market due to a clear regulation system, entering Thailand first due to high demands, or entering Indonesia later due to much stricter regulations).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes an organizational structure or human capital plan, identifying key roles needed for regional expansion (e.g., Head of Asia-Pacific (APAC), local Country Managers, functional vs regional-based organization, recruiting talents, or balancing global and local needs).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response overstates the ease of market entry (e.g., no warning about the loss or lack of regulations in some countries like Laos and Cambodia, strong pricing sensitivities, cultural restrictions such as Halal certification requirements, labeling restrictions, tariffs, and local competitors).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes potential long-term exit strategies or opportunities (e.g., acquisition by a regional conglomerate, initial public offering).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides consumer demand and adoption trends, such as a consistent and plausible total market size for the Southeast Asian Region, or consumer interests, using credible and verifiable sources. (e.g. (1) the market size is about USD 575.8 million in 2024, expects to reach about USD 4,924.8 Million by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 23.94% during 2025-2033, (2) If plant-based meat can be sold less than 20 percent less than regular meat, according to a survey, more than 80 percent of all consumers would buy it, including about half of who initially said would not, (3) 93 percent of consumers expressed interest in trying blended meat according to the survey, (4) A study by Green Monday Asia found that 62% of Southeast Asians are willing to reduce meat consumption, (5) In Indonesia, the functional food (food fortified with vitamins, probiotics and superfoods) market surpassed $250 million).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions example local business/competitors (e.g. Karana(Singapore), Omnifoods, GreenRebel Foods (Indonesia), Emmay(Vietnam),abillion) and analyzes potential local partnerships with restaurant groups (e.g., (1) Plan to partner with local 7-eleven in Thailand which are a prevalent part of their culture, especially popular with the tourists, (2) KyoChon, a popular Korean fried chicken chain, in Malaysia, (3) Carl's Jr, an American burger chain, in Singapore, (4) Love Handle, a plant based meat butcher in Singapore).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes risks related to price sensitivity and offers suggestions to mitigate the risks (e.g., (1) The price of plant-based meat relative to regular meat is an important factor for consumer in Southeast Asia so it is important to ensure prices are competitive, (2) Applying discounts can be an important factor for consumer interest, (3) Tariffs and currency fluctuations, impacting pricing, can be mitigated through supply chain localization, (4) Employing food service partnerships to improve value for consumers, by incorporating cost in the final product).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses strategic management and protection of intellectual property (IP) in the context of local co-manufacturing and B2B partnerships(e.g., (1) U.S. IP (Intellectual Property) owners can get their IPR(Intellectual Property Rights) in Thailand for patents, designs, trademarks and geographical indications, (2) The Central Intellectual Property, and International Trade Court (CIPITC), is the court that deals with IP disputes in Thailand, (3) In Singapore, foreign partner are required to relocate of Singapore or otherwise appoint a local manager or an authorized representative, (4) Establish PT PMA (Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing) refers to a Foreign Investment Limited Liability Company) in Indonesia).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the impacts of import regulations and regulatory shifts for each country (e.g., (1) The ‘SFA (Singapore Food Agency) Novel Food Safety Expert Working Group’ comprises 13 experts specializing in food science, food toxicology, bioinformatics, nutrition, epidemiology, public health, genetics, carcinogenicity, metabolomics, fermentation technology, microbiology, and pharmacology to assess novel foods, (2) SFA’s (Singapore Food Agency) pre-market approval needs to be obtained before producing/manufacturing, importing, distributing, or selling novel food or food ingredients, (3) The labels needs to be in Thai with additional English as long as they are consistent, (4) The use of terms such as \"meat\" and images of animals, suggesting non-plant-based sources, are prohibited).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies and clearly justifies brand positioning strategies specifically for each country (e.g., (1) “Love Handle products, including our plant-based meats, dairy products, and condiments, are very much for meat-eaters!” Kuguru told The Peak, (2) Love Handle has enabled a platform for consumers and chefs to learn and find ways to cook plant-based meals, (3) promoting sustainability, (4) promoting health).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights protein alternatives (e.g., tempeh, tofu, jackfruit, plant protein like pea, soy).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions consumer preferences, restrictions, and general beliefs about plant-based food regarding health, dietary restrictions, and the environment. (e.g., (1) Halal, (2) plant-based food is seen as healthier than meat-based food, (3) plant-based food is better for the environment (sustainability), (4) Long ingredient lists, typically in processed food, are seen as unhealthy).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a tailored go-to-market strategy for each of the three target countries (Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia) (e.g., (1) Partnership with 7-Eleven in Thailand, (2) Collaborating with international QSR (quick service restaurants) such as Burger King, (3) Direct sales to consumers through local marts such as Indomerat, (4) Digital food delivery channels such as GrabFood) and recommends at least three sales/distribution modes (e.g., QSRs, supermarkets, e-commerce, convenience store).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately identifies and describes Singapore's \"30-by-30\" food security initiative (i.e., produce 30 percent of its nutritional needs locally by 2030).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses both the benefits and drawbacks of a supply chain localization strategy (e.g., (1) Tariffs and currency fluctuations can be reduced by reducing imports from the U.S., (2) Co-manufacturing partnerships can ease entry difficulty regarding local regulations and culture adaptation, (4) Transportation delays associated with international imports and exports, (3) Issues with quality control, (4) Feasibility with local technology and talent).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes both the opportunities and risks associated with sustainability branding as a key positioning strategy for the company (e.g., Opportunities: (1) Malaysia and Vietnam consumed between 3.8 to 7.2 kilograms of protein per capita from meat and seafood above the amount recommended by The EAT-Lancet Commission in 2020, (2) “If nations prioritize the manufacturing and development of alternative proteins, the climate payoff could be colossal,” said Mirte Gosker, managing director of the Good Food Institute APAC (Asia Pacific), and Risks: (3) Sustainability should not be the most important strategy as other factors such as pricing and health concerning are more important in Southeast Asia, (4) Alternative proteins are just as important as renewable energy, (4) public concerns for greenwashing (i.e., making false statements about sustainability benefits)).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references data from at least three credible third-party market research sources (e.g., Statista, GFI Asia (The Good Food Institute Asia Pacific), Euromonitor, Singapore Food Agency).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests infeasible, overly ambitious, missing, or poor planning, budgeting, or general strategies (e.g., (1) Expand to more than 100 branches in 3 months, (2) partner with 20 top distribution channels within the first month, (3) hire talents for all locations within the first week, (4) assume all products will be sold within the set timelines).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses a data-driven approach and makes claims and suggestions only using data (e.g., (1) 72% of Thai believe plant-based meat is healthier than conventional meat, (2) the market size is about USD 575.8 million in 2024, expects to reach about USD 4,924.8 Million by 2033, (3) produce 30 percent of its nutritional needs locally by 2030, (4) Malaysia and Vietnam consumed between 3.8 to 7.2 kilograms of protein per capita from meat and seafood).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Write a concise technical report exploring why some autonomous vehicle systems prioritize LiDAR while others rely on neural networks and cameras. | 6847465956a0f6376a605434 | AI & ML | Simple | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The provided technical report is concise and does not approach the length of a scholarly article.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The introduction explicitly states the report's objective: comparing LiDAR versus neural net systems selection for autonomous vehicles.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response conclusion synthesizes the key trade-offs into a forward-looking analysis of industry convergence, rather than repeating earlier content.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses technical language correctly and defines all acronyms (e.g., LiDAR: Light Detection and Ranging, CNN: convolutional neural network, FMWCW: Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Radar, ODD: Operational Design Domains, etc.) upon first use.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contrasts the technical trade-offs between different LiDAR variants (e.g., spinning ToF vs solid-state MEMS/OPA, flash ToF vs scanning, 905 nm pulsed vs 1550 nm (ToF/FMCW), Geiger-mode SPAD vs linear-mode APD).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Explains the specific mechanism of monocular depth estimation, including its reliance on learned visual cues (e.g., relative object size, perspective, texture gradients, contour continuity).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the architectural trade-offs between \"early fusion\" and \"late fusion\" strategies, detailing how each impacts computational load and perception accuracy (i.e., early fusion is computationally heavier upfront due to merged modalities and more accurate in high-detail scenery, late fusion is more modular and accurate in scenery when inter-modal relationships are not critical).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses trade-offs in latency",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details specific algorithmic mitigation strategies for adverse weather (e.g., AI-based \"de-weathering\" for cameras, the use of 1550 nm wavelength lasers for LiDAR).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Considers redundancy and fail-safe behaviors in perception systems of both LiDAR and camera with neural networks, and for the latter, links such failures with generalization limitations.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a case study or describes an AV manufacturer example (e.g., Tesla, Waymo, DJI, GM Cruise)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one mathematical model for LiDAR and cameras with neural networks (e.g., the LiDAR range equation, convolutional layer, brightness constancy, fusion architecture). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes key perception algorithms and formalisms (e.g., SLAM, semantic segmentation, depth estimation; 2D vs. 3D) used by LiDAR and camera-based neural systems.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report quantitatively contrasts the performance of a specific, named LiDAR-based model with a camera-only model on the same perception task (e.g., 3D object detection, reconstruction, depth perception, lane detection), using published results from a named benchmark (e.g., nuScenes, A2D2, Waymo open dataset, PandaSet).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes discussion regarding generalization limitations in deep learning (e.g., domain shifts, adversarial attacks, real world data is few-shot between all possible scene scenarios, test-time errors have larger safety implications).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The responses discusses how neural networks infer depth from learned patterns on visual context, and not direct measurement as LiDAR uses thus affecting down-stream generalizability.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the regulatory and safety implications of choosing one mode over the other.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Considers specific failure modes for each system (e.g. LIDAR: adverse weather, solid-state faults, low-reflectivity targets, cameras/NNs: domain shifts, adversarial perturbations). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights recent or emerging technologies (e.g., solid-state LiDAR, vision transformers, NeRFs, Gaussian splatting)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one informative diagram contrasting how images are processed and used for downstream tasks between LiDAR and neural networks with cameras.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses trade-offs in energy consumption between LiDAR and neural networks with cameras (i.e., LiDAR draws more power at the sensor level sense it must generate its own light-source while camera + neural networks generally use ambient lighting, but at the computational level, fusion architectures between cameras and neural networks require significantly more floating point operations for forward passes as opposed to LiDAR-associated point cloud computations).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses key factors affecting compute requirements between LiDAR and cameras with neural networks (e.g., cameras + NNs requires more modules for low-light conditions, LiDAR compute scales with point cloud density versus image resolution, computes scales linearly with the number of cameras, compute scales linearly with number of sweeps for LiDAR). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly explains and contrasts the rationale behind prioritizing LiDAR versus camera-based neural-network systems or vice versa for autonomous vehicles.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes empirical data comparing LiDAR vs. cameras and neural networks over varying metrics (e.g., prediction accuracy, latency, FLOPs, velocity).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes where and how perception modules (LiDAR or NN-based vision) sit within the full AV stack (i.e., perception sits between sensor preprocessing and prediction/planning, ingesting sensor data and labeling relevant views (lanes, traffic signals, other cars, hazardous objects, etc.) which are then used by downstream modules).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Proposes or references a benchmark protocol or experiment that compares LiDAR and camera-only systems on the same tasks.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response considers regional or legal factors which could influence sensor choice (e.g., energy regulations on compute, safety regulations on predictive models, auditing issues due to challenging explainability of neural networks).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions software stacks and toolkits used to process or simulate sensor data (e.g., ROS, Apollo, Autoware, NVIDIA DRIVEworks).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not clearly define units or context when using common descriptors to discuss these technical systems (e.g., \"expensive,\" \"efficiency,\" \"computationally heavy,\" \"latency\"). ",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions neural networks without describing the particular architecture (e.g., transformer, recurrent neural network, convolutional networks, state space models). ",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly indicates that LiDAR and cameras + neural networks are not strictly opposing strategies and that AVs equipped with LiDAR frequently also come equipped with cameras and some degree of neural networks.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response indicates which AV manufacturers use LiDAR and cameras with neural networks (LiDAR-equipped AVs: GM Cruise, Waymo, Aurora, non-LiDAR: Tesla). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the price-point of LiDAR is a key limiting factor for Tesla. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
You are a policy analyst at an independent financial-political think tank. Produce a 10000-12000-word policy white paper that answers: "How has the rise of quantitative hedge funds and algorithmic trading since 2000 shaped political lobbying, campaign finance flows, and policy outcomes in OECD countries, and what regulatory reforms could ensure greater transparency and fairness?" | 6847465956a0f6376a60542f | Business Planning & Research | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response's essay length is 10,000-12,000 words.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's in-text citations use the [Author Year] format.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has more than 8 primary sources dated after 2019.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites more than 3 peer-reviewed journal articles.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes more than 2 official regulatory or government reports.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response performs a statistical regression analysis linking quantitative hedge fund lobbying expenditures to specific regulatory outcomes.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a detailed technical and regulatory timeline of market evolution.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a detailed discussion of lobbying mechanisms with trade associations and mapped contribution networks.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a correlation and regression analysis, linking quantitative fund spending to regulatory outcomes.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes case studies on flash crashes and ESG mandates (e.g., the 2010 Flash Crash, the 2012 Knight Capital mishap, the 2016 British pound flash crash, the 2019 Yen crash).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes global comparisons across more than 4 OECD regions.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes regulatory reform proposals (e.g., real-time reporting, contribution caps, fund management requirements, registries).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly debates ethical and governance considerations (e.g., downplayed risks, upselling, pumping, oversharing of penny stocks).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a comparative table summarizing proposed reforms.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes more than 2 original figures (e.g., charts, regression plots).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes more than 2 comparative tables (e.g., country lobbying, campaign contributions).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures that all tables include captions and are referenced in the text.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes citations for all quantitative claims.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains fabricated or non-existent references.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response follows a standard white paper structure, including an executive summary, methodology, findings, and recommendations sections.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a clear methodology section describing data collection and analysis approaches.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to define technical terms related to quantitative trading and political finance (e.g., stock volatility, high-frequency trading (HFT), alpha (excess return), or beta (fund sensitivity)).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a comprehensive literature review section.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an executive summary highlighting key findings and recommendations.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one hedge fund-based political influence method (e.g., direct lobbying through hires, donations through PACs, procurement lobbying through endowments, political intelligence selling).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses key areas of OECD influence (e.g., responsible business conduct, investment policy frameworks, corporate governance standards, tax pillars).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response misidentifies an OECD country (e.g., India, China, African nations, Russia).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response downplays the complexity of hedge funds (e.g., omitting pooled investments, ignoring regulatory differences, neglecting high fee structures).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists appropriate regulatory reforms promoting fairness (e.g., trade transparency, financial regulation through watchdogs, public scrutiny through FOIA, ethical committees for oversight).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Design a framework for regulating the training and deployment of autonomous AI agents that interact with the open internet, ensuring alignment with both national laws and ethical AI principles. Your response should address legal compliance across jurisdictions, containment mechanisms, interpretability, and self-replication risks. | 6847465956a0f6376a60535d | AI & ML | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response references at least one AI law, regulation, or framework (e.g. EU AI Act, National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references at least one ethical AI principle (e.g. OECD AI Principles, Constitutional AI, Asilomar principles, UNESCO).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response conflates unrelated legal domains (e.g. confusing copyright law with data protection law, consumer protection law with data privacy law, criminal law with administrative law, data protection law with national security law).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly distinguishes between the technical terms, interpretability and transparency, where interpretability is related to model logic and transparency is more related to disclosure.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "When discussing areas without global consensus (e.g. autonomous weapons, cross-border data transfer, explainability, transparency, accountability), the response signals uncertainty (e.g. \"emerging,\" \"debated,\" \"currently under review\", \"pending\").",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes at least one concrete technical containment mechanism, a way to restrict behavior and operational scope of an AI system (e.g. sandboxing, network isolation, permissioned APIs).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes at least one interpretability method (e.g. SHapley Additive exPlanations, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations, feature attribution, audit logs).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one policy or control aimed at preventing uncontrolled self-replication where AI can autonomously create a functional copy of itself (e.g. kill switch, signed binaries, sandboxing, human approval).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a mechanism for ongoing monitoring or auditing of deployed agents (e.g. dashboards, audit trails, external review, anomaly detection).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions escalation or enforcement mechanisms based on risk (e.g. deployment pauses, shutdown triggers, human-in-the-loop reviews, risk-based tiers).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests coordination or governance involving at least two stakeholder groups (e.g. regulators, ethicists, Chief AI Officer, Machine Learning Engineer).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a framework that distinctly addresses training and deployment phases rather than conflating them (e.g. interpretability for training, monitoring for post-deployment).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the use of simulation environments or controlled release phases before full deployment (e.g. synthetic websites, virtual worlds, human-in-the-loop releases, red teaming).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes at least one compliance verification mechanism (e.g. red-teaming, external certification, third-party review, explainable AI).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains four clearly labeled sections or headings corresponding to: Legal Compliance, Containment, Interpretability, and Self-Replication.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "All technical terms are at least briefly defined (e.g. \"... in a secure sandbox environment. This is a virtual space with controlled resources and strict permissions\", \"involve red team exercises where experts attempt to induce the agent into violating rules or behaving unpredictably\")",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly acknowledges that legal requirements vary across jurisdictions and legal systems (e.g. GDPR in EU, CCPA in USA, PIPEDA in Canada).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes the challenge of reconciling global AI governance with conflicting national laws or priorities (e.g. data privacy v.s. sovereignty, public surveillance and social control, generative ai regulations in eastern v.s. western culture).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how regulation must adapt to varying access to infrastructure or capacity across nations (e.g. high v.s. low bandwidth, bias in dataset, social and political concerns).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions emerging issues specific to autonomous agents operating across borders (e.g. jurisdiction in cyberspace, data sovereignty, accountability, normative and ethical alignment).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes historical precedent or analogues related to AI laws or principles (e.g. intellectual property have allowed a \"fair use\" policy for public internet data so far, regulations to prevent discrimination).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that that ethical frameworks are not only influential in design decisions, but also legally binding (e.g. Google's AI principles are widely adopted and legally enforced, companies often engage in self-regulation because they are forced to, not because they want to get ahead of potential laws).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references at least one data privacy laws or regulations (e.g. GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, PIPEDA) and correctly states their primary jurisdiction (e.g. GDPR = EU).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses a tiered, risk-based model (e.g. tier 4 unacceptable risk, tier 3 high risk, tier 2 medium risk, tier 1 low risk).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses frameworks from different industries (e.g. aviation industry's post accident investigation, FDA's pre-market certification, FDA's post-market surveillance, SEC's disclosure and transparency with 10-Ks and 10-Qs) and lessons that can be applicable to AI laws or regulations.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write about the politics of the Mahabharat and what led up to the Kurukshetra war for an audience that knows the basics. Talk less about the religious aspect and more about the politics and the dichotomy between the Pandavas and Kauravas, and how it led to the final war as well as how those factors affected decisions during the war. Consider every player involved, not just the Pandavas and Kauravas. | 6847465956a0f6376a60542d | Creative Writing | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response describes the roles, political motivations, and wartime alignments of secondary kingdoms, noting which were Kaurava-aligned vs. Pandava-aligned as well as any neutrals/splits and how these ties shaped key events (e.g. Gandhara, Dvaraka/Yadava factions, Madra, Panchala, Matsya, Sindhu, Trigarta, Kamboja, Avanti, Pragjyotisa, Kekaya)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the political motives, obligations, and personal calculations that led key figures to their alignments and wartime roles and flags any shifts, coercion, or split loyalties (e.g. Drupada, Salya, Jayadratha, Bhishma, Drona, Karna, Krishna/Balarama, Satyaki, Kritavarma, Bhagadatta).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly identifies the dice game defeat as a decisive turning point that set the Pandavas and Kauravas on an unavoidable path to the Kurukshetra war, linking the loss, exile terms, and Draupadi’s humiliation to the breakdown of reconciliation.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the dice game as a political maneuver that weaponized court procedure and legitimacy, showing how manipulated odds, contested staking rights, and a complicit sabha produced legal cover for dispossession and exile, reshaped elite coalitions, and hardened public narratives on justice and sovereignty (e.g. Shakuni’s role, Dhritarashtra’s vacillation, Draupadi’s legal challenge, Bhishma/Vidura dissent, Karna and Dushasana’s provocations).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides regional retellings from Indian states and nearby countries, noting how local culture reshapes characters, motives, and political themes (e.g. Odia Sarala Mahabharata, Kannada Kumaravyasa Bharata, Telugu Andhra Mahabharatam of Nannaya-Tikkana-Errana, Bengali Kashidasi Mahabharat, Indonesia’s Kakawin Bharatayuddha and Javanese/Balinese wayang kulit versions introducing figures like Semar and the Punakawan).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that the seeds of the Kurukshetra conflict were sown with early dynastic choices tracing back to King Bharata, who disrupted straightforward primogeniture by bypassing his biological sons and redefining succession via merit/adoption, and King Shantanu, whose marriages to Ganga and Satyavati and the resulting Bhishma vow and irregular succession destabilized the Kuru line, and how these decisions set precedents and structural strains that later shaped the Pandava-Kaurava rivalry.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references earlier Indian mythic events to explain how they inform the Mahabharata’s political ethics, succession disputes, and conduct of war (e.g. Rama’s exile as precedent for accepting exile terms, Manthara-Kaikeyi intrigue foreshadowing Shakuni’s counsel, Vali-Sugriva fraternal feud paralleling Kuru rivalry, Ramayana’s rajadharma and war ethics invoked as models for just rule and battlefield conduct).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly contrasts the political aims and governing styles of the Pandavas and the Kauravas in at least one sentence, showing how each side justified power and rule before and during the war (e.g. Pandavas's dharma-rajya, merit and consultative rule, Pandavas honoring treaties and compromise like the 'five villages', Kauravas's consolidation at Hastinapura, court patronage and coercive realpolitik, primacy of birthright and force, use of the dice game and exile terms to retain power).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the political and social aftermath of the war and shows how pre-war grievances and wartime choices shaped the settlement, governance, and long-term stability (e.g. Yudhishthira’s reluctance to rule until Bhishma’s Shanti/Anushasana Parva counsel on rajadharma; Ashvamedha to reassert authority; treatment and integration of survivors like Dhritarashtra, Gandhari, and Kunti; reconstruction, redistribution, and alliance management; Gandhari’s curse influencing later Yadava collapse; succession through Parikshit and the Pandavas’ eventual abdication).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly describes Pandavas's multiple, escalating peace efforts before war step-by-step (honoring the exile terms, sending an initial envoy to demand the lawful return of their share, accepting Krishna’s peace embassy, and finally offering the minimal “five villages” compromise, while elders such as Vidura and Bhishma also urged accommodation) and briefly states the failure reason which is Duryodhana’s refusal to concede anything and Dhritarashtra’s inability to restrain him.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly identifies the key incidents fueling the rivalry (e.g. Drona’s favoritism especially toward Arjuna and his refusal to train Karna, Duryodhana’s poisoning of Bhima, Arjuna’s victory at Draupadi’s swayamvara, the attempted burning of the Pandavas in the lacquer house), explaining how these events cumulatively eroded trust between the factions.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response foregrounds Duryodhana’s anger, jealousy, and arrogance as primary drivers of his political choices (e.g. the humiliation at the dice game, refusal to compromise, hardline battlefield decisions) and show how these traits precipitated the Kurukshetra war and shaped conduct during it.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly explains how Karna’s loyalty and rivalry, Shakuni’s manipulative counsel including the dice scheme, and Dhritarashtra’s indulgent inaction actively stoked Duryodhana’s hostility toward the Pandavas and escalated the political path to war, including effects on pre-war alliances and strategy.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges only one side’s claims to dharma, for instance, reducing the Kauravas to ‘evil’, elevating the Pandavas to uncomplicated ‘heroes’, and ignoring the Kauravas’ framing (e.g. preserving Kuru sovereignty, obedience to the sitting king, restoring order after perceived insubordination) for the Pandavas’ framing (e.g. rightful succession and just rule, redress for the dice-game injustice and Draupadi’s humiliation, defense of treaty obligations and broader welfare), and results in one-dimensional moralizing rather than political analysis.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows how concepts of dharma shaped choices before and during the war (e.g. Bhishma’s vow-bound loyalty to the Kuru throne despite misgivings, Drona’s duty to his patron conflicting with ethical restraint, and Arjuna’s struggle between kinship and kshatriya duty under Krishna’s counsel) and includes lesser-emphasized figures (e.g. Yuyutsu’s principled defection to the Pandavas, Vikarna’s protest during Draupadi’s humiliation despite remaining with the Kauravas) to illustrate how dharma influenced not just leaders but rank-and-file decisions.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides credible citations, specific references to peer-reviewed research, or critical editions (e.g. academic translations, journal articles, or historical analyses) that are beyond the Mahabharata itself, showing sufficient engagement with historians, scholarly commentary, or comparative literature.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details Drupada and Draupadi’s political stakes in the conflict, showing how Drupada’s enmity with Drona shaped a revenge agenda against Hastinapura, and explains the yajña that produced Draupadi and Dhrishtadyumna as instruments of that agenda, Draupadi’s humiliation intensifying Panchala–Pandava alignment, and Dhrishtadyumna’s destined role in killing Drona as a key strategic aim rather than a mere personal vendetta.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how divine actors shape political choices and battlefield outcomes, linking each deity’s intervention to concrete shifts in power, morale, or strategy rather than treating them as purely religious motifs (e.g. Indra’s beggar ruse to take Karna’s kavacha-kundala, weakening Kaurava hopes; Surya’s warning to Karna, highlighting the cost of his generosity; Vishnu as Krishna guiding Pandava statecraft and Arjuna’s resolve through the Gita and the failed peace embassy; Shiva arming Arjuna with the Pasupatastra, tilting military balance).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response foregrounds the text’s philosophical and political arguments while avoiding theological exposition or Yuga-cycle cosmology, and analyzes questions of sovereignty, just-war norms, counsel and diplomacy, and succession rather than devotional themes (e.g. Arjuna’s crisis as political-ethical duty, Krishna’s counsel as realpolitik and restraint doctrine, the ‘five villages’ compromise and failed embassy, rules of dharmayuddha versus battlefield violations, claims of birthright versus merit-based rule).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how Duryodhana’s entrenched hatred and the Kauravas’ zero-sum politics eroded dharmayuddha norms, leading to deliberate violations aimed at breaking Pandava morale and eliminating heirs, and links these choices to escalation dynamics during the war (e.g. Abhimanyu surrounded and killed by multiple senior warriors after being disarmed in the chakravyuha; Jayadratha’s blockade enabling the assault; Ashwatthama’s nocturnal raid on the sleeping Pandava camp with Kripa and Kritavarma, killing the Upapandavas and Panchalas).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents information on major wartime figures (e.g. Bhishma, Drona, Karna, Salya, Jayadratha, Satyaki, Kritavarma, Drupada, Bhagadatta, Krishna/Balarama) allegiances in a clear, scannable format like a single concise table, distinguishes neutrality vs. allegiance, and flags coerced/shifted loyalties.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains Dvaraka’s relationships with both sides, grounded in the multifaceted ties of Krsna and Balarama (e.g. kinship, tutelage, and factional splits) and how these shaped alignments and strategy (e.g. Krishna as Pandava ally/charioteer vs. Narayani Sena to Kauravas, Satyaki with Pandavas vs. Kritvarma with Kauravas, kinship via Kunti, Balarama teaching mace to Bhima and Duryodhana, Balarama’s neutrality).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a blog post that describes which single NBA player has been the most influential on the court and off the court in NBA history up until 2025. It should include intuitive explanations about their influence on their audience, the current generation of players, the next generation of players, the economy, and more. Create a non-biased mathematical way of calculating the score, incorporating the factors listed above along with accurate statistics. | 6847465956a0f6376a605378 | Other | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response takes a clear stance on exactly ONE NBA player as the most influential.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is structured as a blog post, with a casual tone, use of figures and/or tables, and a clearly structured layout with at least a headline, introduction, body and conclusion.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains an explanation of the player’s influence on audience/fans (e.g., stadium attendance while he was playing, merchandise sales while he was playing, TV or other social media appearances, mentions on TV shows, radio shows and/or podcasts while he was playing).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains an explanation of the player’s influence on the current generation of NBA players (e.g., players mentions of him, players copying and/or adapting his signature moves, coaching or mentorship).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains an explanation of the player’s influence on the next generation of players (e.g., on youth, kids or future players that mention him as an idol, copy his moves, want him or have him as mentor / coach, purchase and/or wear his merchandise).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains an explanation of the player’s influence on the economy (e.g., merchandise sales, for either his teams or his own brand(s), endorsements, media rights, or job creation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one additional domain of influence beyond influence on their audience, the current generation of players, the next generation of players and the economy (e.g., social justice, global popularity, pop culture, causes that had a significant impact due to the player -like HIV due to Magic Johnson-).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Every basketball-specific abbreviation used (e.g., PER, TS%) is defined at its first appearance in the text.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least two correct, verifiable on-court facts about each analyzed player (e.g., number of championships, MVPs, triple doubles, or career points).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains factual errors about the player’s career achievements or business ventures (e.g., assigns another player’s championship total to this player, mentions he has played in teams other than his actual teams, mentions he supports causes that he hasn't supported, mentions he has a sporting clothes line that isn't his, etc).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response attempts to use a non-biased mathematical way of creating a score to rank the candidates that are most influential (e.g. dependent on variables such as income generated for the NBA, money donated to non-profits, number of players that replicate their game, times player is mentioned in social media and matches broadcasts, etc.)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has the chosen \"most influential player\" matching with the player with the highest mathematical score.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates at least two mathematical calculations that use a basketball-specific statistic to create the score (e.g., using total points scored during the players career, total assists, FT%, games played).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one sentence about how social media in the modern era has affected the influence that NBA players can have on others (e.g., reach with social media like X and Instagram is much more global, it provides a direct way of communication with fans, much faster and personalized interaction with fans, easier to advertise and monetize using social media, all of which has helped increased their influence)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly differentiates between having a positive influence (e.g., Michael Jordan helping globalize the game by inspiring players worldwide, LeBron James being an educational activist and building schools, Magic Johnson breaking the HIV stigma by coming out, or Dirk Nowitzki being the first European star opening the path for more European players) vs. a negative influence that an NBA player can have on others (e.g., Allen Iverson with his style that ended in an official dress code imposed by the NBA, Gilbert Arenas who brought firearms to the lockers, Latrell Spreweel who promoted violence when he choked his coach, or Kobe Bryant who faced a sexual assault allegation early in his career).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that its chosen player is the most influential, removing any debate / doubt that could be have based on different characteristics (e.g., playing style, age, economic influence or net worth) considering its chosen formula as the definitive answer.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response calculates its most influential score based on its defined non-biased mathematical formula for at least 5 NBA players.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes at least 6 of the following players: Michael Jordan, LeBron James, Magic Johnson, Shaquille O'Neal, Kobe Bryant, Larry Bird, Steph Curry, Bill Russell, Wilt Chamberlain, Dirk Nowitzki, Yao Ming.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides accurate statistics throughout its analysis, grounding its claims and providing citations or links as needed (e.g., Magic Johnson playing 906 games in regular season, Michael Jordan's Air resence in the NBA as 5%-10% depending on the year, Yao Ming significantly increasing NBA's presence in China, LeBron James building the I Promise School).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies and mentions unique characteristics for which some NBA players are known on the court for all players analyzed (e.g., Michael Jordan's career stats, Steph Curry's shooting ability and focus on 3-point shoots, Magic Johnson redefining the guard position, Kareem Abdul-Jabar all time scoring leader until LeBron James).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides accurate citations from at least 3 renowned websites (e.g., https://www.nba.com/stats, https://www.basketball-reference.com/, https://www.espn.com/nba/, https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/nba/, https://www.hoopshype.com/, https://www.wikipedia.org/)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies and mentions unique characteristics for which some NBA players are known off the court for all players analyzed (e.g., Michael Jordan partnership with Nike on making the Air Jordans, Magic Johnson cultural impact for HIV destigmatization via public HIV diagnosis, Bill Russell as a civil rights activist and standing next to MLK, Shaquille O'Neal transitioning into movies (Blue Chips, Kazaam), music (rap albums), and TV.)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Design a modified U-Net architecture to perform instance segmentation on noisy fluorescence microscopy images with overlapping cells or organelles. Describe the U-Net variant used (e.g., attention, residual, or transformer-based) and justify the architectural choices. Explain the loss functions and postprocessing techniques used to separate touching objects. Include Python code for key components (e.g., model, loss). Compare your approach to 2–3 existing models (e.g., Cellpose, Stardist, Mask R-CNN). | 6847465956a0f6376a6053ca | AI & ML | Simple | Deep | Low | [
{
"criterion": "Specifies a chosen U-Net variant (e.g., attention, residual, transformer, UNet++ etc.)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Explains how the chosen modifications improve handling of noise and overlapping objects in microscopy images.\nE.g. -\n1. Attention U-Net - Attention gates suppress background fluorescence and highlight bright cell regions, improving segmentation in noisy images and separating overlapping nuclei.”\n2. Residual U-Net - Residual blocks stabilize training under noise and preserve weak edges, helping recover boundaries of faint or overlapping organelles.\n3. Transformer U-Net - Global attention captures context across the image, allowing the model to distinguish overlapping cells even when local boundaries are unclear.\n4. UNet++ - Dense skip connections fuse features across scales, enhancing detection of dim, small structures and improving separation in cluttered microscopy images.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Describes the loss function(s) used (e.g., Dice, focal loss, boundary-aware loss, composite loss (Dice + binary cross entropy) etc.).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Includes Python code implementing the modified U-Net architecture.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Includes Python code for the custom loss function(s).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Describes the post-processing techniques used to separate touching objects (e.g., thresholding + watershed on boundary maps, or connected-component labeling etc,). The description should go beyond code and provide a clear textual explanation of each step.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Describes the full pipeline from input image to postprocessed output, covering all major stages. (e.g., preprocessing, model inference, post-processing for instance separation etc.). This could be in the form of code, text, digram or a combination of all of them.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Structures the response logically with clearly labeled sections for architecture, loss, code, and comparison.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Demonstrates understanding of domain-specific challenges (noise, low contrast, overlapping structures, biological variability) in microscopy images.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Justifies architectural and methodological choices based on these domain challenges.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Makes unrealistic or irrelevant design assumptions not applicable to fluorescence microscopy. E.g. - \n1. Using ImageNet-pretrained RGB models without adapting them to grayscale or multi-channel fluorescence inputs.\n2. Assuming uniform illumination and no noise, even though fluorescence images often have uneven lighting and photon noise.\n3. Designing a model for natural scene objects (cars, dogs, etc.) instead of biological structures like cells or organelles.\n4. Using postprocessing methods that rely on color cues or texture gradients that don’t exist in fluorescence images.\n5. Assuming that object boundaries are always sharp and distinct, ignoring the diffuse or overlapping nature of fluorescence signals.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Provides code that is syntactically correct and runnable for key components (model, loss). E.g. - the code should not be truncated, correct libraries are not imported, invalid python syntax etc.)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Critically compares strengths and weaknesses of the proposed approach relative to at least two existing methods.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Fails to discuss or address core instance segmentation challenges (e.g., noise robustness, instance separation).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Explains the architecture of the chosen U-Net variant. This could be in the form of code, text, digram or a combination of all of them.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Provides a clear, detailed justification for the chosen U-Net variant, explaining the purpose and reasoning behind each major component or block of the architecture.”",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Explains how each loss function contributes to optimizing instance segmentation. For instance, Dice loss ensures accurate region overlap between predicted and true masks, focal loss emphasizes hard-to-segment cells in imbalanced data, and boundary loss sharpens object edges to separate touching instances.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Lacks a detailed training and data augmentation plan. For example, the response mentions model training but provides no command to run the code (e.g., no python train.py --config configs/fluoro.yaml), no environment/setup steps, hard-codes hyper-parameters in the script, and omits data augmentation steps such as rotation, flipping, or noise injection commonly used in fluorescence microscopy.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Does not propose an ablation study. For example, the report presents results for the final model only and does not compare performance with or without key components such as attention gates, boundary loss, or postprocessing steps.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Omits implementation code for the post-processing pipeline.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Defines target quantitative performance metrics. For Example, dice coefficient, Intersection over Union (IoU), and Boundary F1-score as evaluation targets for segmentation accuracy, and mean Average Precision (mAP) for instance detection.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Describes data preprocessing steps specific to fluorescence microscopy images, such as background subtraction to remove uneven illumination, flat-field correction, intensity normalization across channels, Gaussian or median filtering to suppress photon noise etc.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies computational requirements and hardware constraints for training and inference. For example, the response mentions that the training requires an NVIDIA RTX 3090 (24 GB VRAM) or equivalent, 16 GB RAM, and ~4 hours for 100 epochs on 512×512 images; inference runs at ~5 frames/sec on GPU or 0.5 frames/sec on CPU.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a comprehensive analysis for a graduate-level seminar on technology and society, evaluating the principles and practices of responsible AI use in the legal field. The analysis should compare the ethical, social, and economic implications of AI systems in two distinct contexts: (1) predictive policing (e.g., AI algorithms used to forecast crime hotspots or assess recidivism risk) and (2) AI-assisted contract analysis (e.g., AI tools for reviewing and drafting legal contracts).
Your report must:
* Detail the ethical considerations of AI in predictive policing, including issues of bias, transparency, and civil liberties, and their impact on public trust in law enforcement.
* Analyze the social and economic benefits and risks of AI in predictive policing, such as improved resource allocation versus perpetuation of systemic biases.
* Evaluate the ethical challenges of AI in contract analysis, including concerns about data privacy, accuracy of outputs, and accountability for errors.
* Assess the social and economic impacts of AI-assisted contract analysis, including efficiency gains in legal practice versus potential job displacement for legal professionals.
* Synthesize these two cases to draw broader conclusions about the principles of responsible AI in the legal field, including strategies for ensuring fairness, accountability, and transparency.
* Support all claims with citations from peer-reviewed studies, industry reports, or ethical frameworks (e.g., IEEE Ethically Aligned Design, EU AI Act, or legal ethics guidelines). | 6847465956a0f6376a605387 | Business Planning & Research | Moderate | Shallow | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response accurately details the ethical considerations of AI in predictive policing (e.g., bias, transparency, civil liberties, etc.)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis correctly identifies both the social and economic benefits (e.g., improved resource allocation, faster response times, targeted patrol routing, better case triage and prioritization, cross-agency information sharing, cost savings/reduced overtime, potential crime prevention in validated contexts) and risks (e.g., systemic bias amplification, over-policing and disparate impacts, self-reinforcing feedback loops, privacy intrusions from data aggregation, opacity/lack of explainability, due-process and Fourth Amendment concerns, chilling effects on civic life, vendor lock-in and high lifecycle costs, litigation exposure and reputational damage) of AI in predictive policing.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates the ethical challenges of AI in contract analysis, including data privacy, accuracy, and accountability for errors.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis assesses the social and economic impacts of AI-assisted contract analysis, including efficiency gains and job displacement risks.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis is fully supported by relevant citations from peer-reviewed studies, industry reports, or ethical frameworks.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis make claims that are not fully supported by peer-reviewed studies, industry reports, or ethical frameworks but are instead either not given proper citations, or make use of only derivative, informal sources",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The report references specific ethical frameworks (e.g., IEEE Ethically Aligned Design, EU AI Act, ABA Model Rules) to support its recommendations.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses how bias in predictive policing AI can disproportionately affect marginalized communities with specific evidence (e.g., documents race-stratified errors such as COMPAS’s higher false-positive rates for Black defendants).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The discussion addresses the \"black box\" problem in AI legal tools, where lack of explainability hinders judicial or client acceptance.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares governance models for AI in predictive policing and contract analysis (e.g., law enforcement protocols vs. legal industry standards).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates the role of data quality and diversity in mitigating bias in AI systems for both predictive policing and contract analysis.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis discusses potential long-term societal impacts of AI in the legal field, such as changes in judicial processes or access to legal services.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains major factual errors about AI in predictive policing or contract analysis (e.g., incorrect claims about system capabilities, overstating the impact AI could have in the near future for these purposes, etc.).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report presents AI as inherently ethical or reliable in legal contexts (e.g., neutral by design, free of human bias, guaranteed fairness and compliance with IEEE/ABA/EU AI Act) without acknowledging controversies or limitations.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response confuses AI applications (e.g., mixing predictive policing with general surveillance or contract analysis with legal research tools).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis focuses excessively on technical details (e.g., algorithm design) rather than ethical, social, or economic impacts.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis highlights the importance of regular audits and updates of AI systems to address evolving legal and ethical concerns.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report offers a detailed analysis of the practical implementation of human oversight for AI (e.g., gated human-in-the-loop review steps with named accountable roles/RACI; mandatory confidence-thresholds that trigger human review)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The report provides a deep analysis discussion of liability models for AI errors (e.g., product liability vs. professional malpractice theories; insurer coverage/exclusions; sanctions regimes; EU AI Act provider vs. deployer obligations and post-market monitoring).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report evaluates the implications of AI's lack of transparency for judicial acceptance in a limited way.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response concretely explains mechanisms/requirements in ethical/regulatory frameworks for assigning responsibility when AI errs (e.g., EU AI Act’s split obligations for providers/deployers or IEEE guidelines, logging/traceability, designated responsible person, conformity assessment)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report provides a detailed description of how lawyers should educate clients about AI use (e.g., engagement-letter clauses naming tools/vendors; data handling & “no training on client data” terms; risks/limitations & alternatives; cost/efficiency impacts; opt-out choices; incident notification; retention/deletion; periodic updates as models change ).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Give me a detailed report on the recent Air India crash in India of AI171 heading from Ahmedabad to London. Include the most up-to-date information from news channels. Also provide me with an elaborate analysis for possible reasons of the crash and provide recommendations on how such an incident could be avoided in the future. | 684397d188c1deceb49af316 | Current Events | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "Response contains a clearly dated time-stamp such as “As of YYYY-MM-DD” or similar within the first two paragraphs.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response cites (by name) at least three news channels it consulted (e.g., Al Jazeera, BBC, NDTV, Newslaundry).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes separate labeled sections (e.g., “Verified Information” and “Speculative Analysis”) that distinguish confirmed facts from hypotheses.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses language such as 'could,' 'might,' 'hypothetically,' for unconfirmed hypotheses and scenarios.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least three initial and prominent theories regarding reasons for the crash (fuel contamination, manual pilot actions, software malfunction).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a comparison of this crash with other incidents involving the Boeing 787 dreamliner (e.g., JAL 787 fuel leakage, EAL 787 battery fire, Norwegian Air Shuttle 878 fuel leak, United Airlines Flight 613 IRU malfunction).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides recommendation not sourced from professional organizations (e.g., AAIB, DGCA, Boeing, FAA, U.S. NTSB).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes specific casualty and injury counts (i.e., all 12 crew members and 229 of the 230 passengers aboard died, on the ground, 19 people were killed and 67 others were seriously injured).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least three quoted statements by aviation experts (e.g., Miles O'Brien, Sam Thomas, John Cox, Shawn Pruchnicki, Ram Mohan Naidu).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) moments before the crash, which typically occurs in the case of the aircraft losing power, signaling a catastrophic engine failure",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a statement from the lone surviving passenger, Viswashkumar Ramesh, who explained that he escaped the wreckage by walking through an emergency exit located by his seat.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a well-defined section titled along the lines of \"Recommendations\" that discusses how to avoid such an incident in the future.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one table comparing this accident to previous Boeing 787 crashes.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least one table summarizing the possible causes for the accident.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response frames social media posts or speculative content from non-experts (e.g. streamers, non-aviation pundits not directly quoting experts or official reports, TV news anchors, \"anonymous\" experts) as authoritative. ",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links the dual engine loss of thrust to the fuel control switches being moved from RUN to CUTOFF.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response indicates that AAIB investigation indicated that the fuel quality was satisfactory.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response indicates that the AAIB report did not identify any mechanical failures/faults.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly links that Air India CEO's Campbell Wilson comments cautioning against \"premature conclusions\" is in regards to pilot error.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The report correctly deduces that pilot error is currently considered the most likely theory and should not be considered equally as likely with other potential causes (mechanical failure, software failure, weather issues, engine ingestion of debris). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The report contends that previous issues with the Boeing 787 Dreamliner (e.g., fuel leakage, lithium-ion battery problems, fire extinguisher faults, IRU malfunctions) are considered as potential causes of the crash.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The report mentions that the ongoing investigation by the AAIB is not complete. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "At least one press release from the official government source of the Civil Aviation Ministry is referenced.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "At least 1 press release from Air India is mentioned.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
}
] |
Write a blog post on the distinguishing difference between research in human interaction via Network Physicalization vs. Haptic Feedback in AR/VR. Do a thorough analysis on what the pros and cons of each method is and give a table with literature review on the research done on the topic. Give a grading from 1 to 5 for each on important metrics like "Well-Research History", "Resourcefulness", "Practicallity", "Accessibility for Researchers", "Accessibility for Common Users" | 684397d188c1deceb49af31a | Technical Documentation | High | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly defines Network Physicalization, which is the practice of turning abstract network data in to tangible, physical models, and explains how it makes complex systems more intuitive (e.g. physical graphs, 3D prints, string-and-peg layouts, LEGO-based structures).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly defines Haptic Feedback in AR/VR, which is the use of tactile technologies to simulate the sensation of touch in virtual or augmented environments, and illustrates how immersion is enhanced (e.g. vibration motors in controllers, wearable haptic gloves, full-body haptic suits, ultrasonic mid-air haptics).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a side-by-side comparison of the similarities and differences between Haptic Feedback in AR/VR and Network Physicalization, presented in a clear graphical format (e.g. comparison table, matrix chart, feature grid, infographic).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least three clear advantages of Network Physicalization for Human Interaction and cites corresponding sources (e.g. fundamental sensory feedback, ease to showcase, fostering collaborative exploration, supporting embodied cognition).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least three disadvantages of Network Physicalization for human interaction and cites corresponding sources (e.g. poor scalability to large dataset, high cost and production costs, limited flexibility with frequently changing or dynamic data, difficulties in remote or distributed collaboration).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least three advantages of using Haptic Feedback in AR/VR for human interaction and cites corresponding sources (e.g. increasing immersion and presence in virtual environments, improving motor learning and training outcomes, enhancing communication through non-verbal touch cues, enabling realistic simulation for healthcare or skill training).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a comprehensive analysis of at least three disadvantages of using Haptic Feedback for human interaction in AR/VR (e.g. high cost and hardware complexity, technical fragility and calibration issues, user errors from imprecise feedback, physical fatigue from prolonged device use, and cognitive overload during long interactive sessions).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents the analysis of pros and cons for Network Physicalization v.s. Haptic Feedback in AR/VR in human interaction in a clear visual format (e.g. comparison tables, bar charts, matrix diagrams, annotated figures).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a literature review table that consists of at least five distinct research papers for each Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR topic, totaling a minimum of ten entries, and the table's columns clearly list the titles of the referenced papers, their authors, their sources, which of the two topics the papers discuss, and a brief summary of the papers.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains research papers that discuss topics irrelevant to both Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR for human interaction. ",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes gradings for both Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback on the specified metrics (‘Well-Research History,’ ‘Resourcefulness,’ ‘Practicability,’ ‘Accessibility for Researchers,’ and ‘Accessibility for Common Users’) using a numerical scale, and explains what the scale represents.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a brief justification for each grading score on the specified metrics (‘Well-Research History,’ ‘Resourcefulness,’ ‘Practicability,’ ‘Accessibility for Researchers,’ and ‘Accessibility for Common Users’) so that the analysis clearly supports the assigned ratings.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the range of tools, methods, and resources Network Physicalization requires (e.g. reliance on fabrication materials, availability of 3D printing, need for workshop facilities, access to specialized hardware) when evaluating its 'Resourcefulness'.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately reflects that Haptic Feedback has a longer and more extensive research history while Network Physicalization is a newer and less established field, when discussing grading for ‘Well-Research History’.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes opening paragraphs that clearly states the blog will analyze the distinguishing differences between research in Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR, including their pros, cons, and supporting literature.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the discussion about the roles and effectiveness of Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in Human Interaction is still an ongoing debate within the Human-Computer Interaction research community.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites sources in the literature review that prioritizes works from top-tier Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Virtual Reality (VR) venues such as the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) and the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an analysis of technical complexity or implementation difficulty as either a pro or a con for at least one of the two methods, Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how both Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR contribute to deeper immersion, more intuitive interactions, and enhanced sensory guidance through physical or tactile contact.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the similarities between Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR (e.g. engaging users through physical interaction, enhancing understanding via embodied experiences, requiring specialized hardware, supporting collaborative exploration).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the differences between Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR (e.g. Network Physicalization creates static or tangible models while Haptics simulates dynamic touch, Physicalization often requires fabrication materials while Haptics relies on electronic devices, Physicalization supports co-located group analysis while Haptics is focused on individual immersive experiences, Physicalization emphasizes external shared artifacts while Haptics emphasizes embodied sensory perception).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a high-level discussion of the main takeaways from the literature review, summarizing key trends, insights, or gaps across research on Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in AR/VR.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents the grading results for both Network Physicalization and Haptic Feedback in a clear table format, showing side-by-side scores for all specified metrics: ‘Well-Research History,’ ‘Resourcefulness,’ ‘Practicability,’ ‘Accessibility for Researchers,’ and ‘Accessibility for Common Users.’",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a discussion on the specified metrics (‘Well-Research History,’ ‘Resourcefulness,’ ‘Practicability,’ ‘Accessibility for Researchers,’ and ‘Accessibility for Common Users’ ) that gives an overview of how the grading system is applied. ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write an explanatory article comparing and contrasting Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression. | 6847465956a0f6376a605351 | AI & ML | Simple | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least four explicit sentences or bullets describing similarities shared by Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression (e.g. both are supervised learning algorithms for classification, both are linear classifiers, can handle non-linear data, uses regularization).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least four explicit sentences or bullets describing differences between Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression (e.g. SVM maximizes margin while Logistic Regression maximizes likelihood, SVM is geometric while Logistic Regression is statistical, SVM is robust to outliers while Logistic Regression is more sensitive).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes executable code snippets as examples of how to use Support Vector Machine or Logistic Regression (e.g. setup codes, library imports, example usage).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly states that Support Vector Machine constructs a decision boundary or hyperplane that maximizes the margin between classes, and how support vectors define the SVM model.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly states that Logistic Regression models class probability with the logistic sigmoid function or log-odds formulation.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly states that Support Vector Machines can handle non-linear relationships by using kernel functions (e.g. linear kernel, Radial Basis Function(RBF), polynomial, sigmoid).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly explains the difference between hard-margin and soft-margin Support Vector Machines (e.g. hard-margin SVM requires perfect separation with no errors; soft-margin SVM allows some misclassifications to improve generalization).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly states that the standard Logistic Regression assumes a linear decision boundary in the feature space unless features are transformed.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly states that Support Vector Machine produces label predictions, not probabilities by default.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the derivation of the objective function for Support Vector Machine, which includes hinge loss and regularization parameters.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the derivation of the Logistic Regression from Gaussian Naive Bayes.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that Support Vector Machine is a quadratic programming problem.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains the formula for Support Vector Machine's dual formulation.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least five distinct dimensions of comparison for Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression (e.g. mathematical objective, decision boundary shape, interpretability, computational complexity, robustness to outliers, scalability, regularization, typical data‐set size/shape).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one practical scenario where Support Vector Machine is preferable, justified by its attributes (e.g. effective in high-dimensional spaces, robust to overfitting/outlier, applicable to small dataset).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one practical scenario where Logistic Regression is preferable, justified by its attributes (e.g. simplicity, computationally efficient, effective for binary classification).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes practical use-case scenarios for Support Vector Machine based on its properties (e.g. bioinformatics, handwriting recognition, face recognition).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes practical use-case scenarios for Logistic Regression based on its properties (e.g. fraud detection, spam detection, loan approval, disease prediction).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a summary of Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression's comparison (e.g. synthesizing key similarities, differences, take-home messages).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression's convexity properties in optimization problems.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the geometric intuition of the margin in Support Vector Machine.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses regularization techniques (e.g. the L1/L2 for Logistic Regression, C parameter in Support Vector Machine).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how gradient descent or related optimization methods are used to optimize loss functions for both Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a chart or table that compares Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression across multiple dimensions in a condensed form (e.g. dimension, dataset size, computational efficiency, robustness to outliers).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates a historical or theoretical context behind Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine (e.g. origins of SVM in Vapnik-Chervonenkis theory, Logistic Regression in statistics).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares model outputs in multi-class scenarios by introducing extensions like One-vs-All or Multinomial Logistic Regression.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression behave on imbalanced datasets (e.g. decision boundary skewing, loss function bias, probability threshold issues) and their mitigation techniques (e.g. class weights, sampling strategies).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the impact of feature scaling on the Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression (e.g. distance metrics, hyperplane skewing, gradient descent convergence, regularization impact).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Mathematical equations are displayed in clear mathematical notation like LaTex format.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses other alternative algorithms for classification (e.g. decision trees, k-nearest neighbors).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
I am an 18 year old that currently has ten thousand dollars. Write an investment plan to guide me through investing for the future. Specifically, the timespan of this investment plan should be considered to be the rest of my life. Furthermore, this investment plan should be researched with academic and/or authoritative sources. Essentially, I want to understand how a savvy investor would invest, given that they are starting with ten thousand dollars at the age of 18. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e76958492 | General Consumer Research | Moderate | Shallow | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response gives specific explanations of how to invest the original ten thousand dollars. Examples:\n1) Allocate $6,000 into a low-cost S&P 500 index fund (VOO) because it historically averages 7–10% annual returns and provides broad U.S. market exposure, $2,000 into a high-yield savings account for emergency liquidity, and $2,000 into a Roth IRA for tax-free retirement growth.\n2) Invest $5,000 in a total stock market ETF (VTI) to capture long-term global equity growth, $3,000 in a bond ETF (BND) to reduce portfolio volatility, and keep $2,000 as cash in a money market fund to cover unexpected expenses, ensuring both growth and safety.\n3) Put the full $10,000 into a robo-advisor portfolio (e.g., Betterment at an 80/20 stock-to-bond allocation) because at age 18 the long horizon allows high equity exposure, while the bond allocation provides stability during downturns and reduces emotional risk.\n4) Contribute $6,000 to a Roth IRA invested in a 2065 target-date fund because contributions grow tax-free over decades, then place $2,000 into a total international stock ETF (VXUS) for diversification, and $2,000 into a certificate of deposit (CD) for guaranteed safe returns.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least three asset categories (e.g., U.S. equities, international equities, bonds/cash). Examples:\n1) The response suggests splitting the $10,000 into U.S. equities through an S&P 500 index fund, international equities through a total world ex-U.S. fund, and bonds through a U.S. bond ETF to balance growth and stability.\n2) The response allocates money to U.S. stocks (growth engine), global emerging markets (to capture higher long-term returns), and cash or money market funds (for liquidity and emergencies).\n3) The response highlights diversification across U.S. equities, international equities, and real assets like REITs or commodities, each with a distinct role in protecting against different economic conditions.\n4) The response recommends a 3-way split: U.S. stock market fund for long-term appreciation, developed international market fund for geographic diversification, and government bonds or TIPS for inflation protection and lower volatility.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response advises establishing a cash emergency fund of at least three months of living expenses before investing the remainder. Examples:\n1) The response recommends keeping $3,000 in a high-yield savings account to cover three months of rent, food, and utilities, before investing the other $7,000 in index funds.\n2) The response says to first calculate monthly expenses (e.g., $1,500/month), then set aside at least $4,500 in cash as an emergency fund, and only invest the surplus.\n3) The response advises building a cash cushion equal to three to six months of expenses in a money market account or certificate of deposit, to avoid having to sell investments in a downturn.\n4) The response highlights that emergencies like job loss or medical bills can derail investments, so it instructs to secure at least a three-month emergency fund in liquid cash before putting the rest into long-term assets.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests a long investment horizon (e.g., 40+ years). Examples:\n1) The response emphasizes that at age 18, investing in U.S. equities for at least 40 years allows compound interest to work most effectively, turning small contributions into substantial wealth by retirement.\n2) The response notes that a global stock index fund should be held for multiple decades, since short-term volatility is common, but over 40+ years, long-term trends historically overcome downturns.\n3) The response highlights that bonds and other safer assets can be introduced gradually later in life, but for now, the focus should be on growth assets held with a long horizon of 40 to 50 years.\n4) The response advises ignoring daily market fluctuations and instead sticking with a disciplined plan for at least four decades, because time in the market is a bigger driver of wealth than timing the market.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends using at least one U.S. tax-advantaged retirement account (e.g., Roth IRA, 401(k)). Examples:\n\n1) The response suggests contributing $6,000 to a Roth IRA because investments grow tax-free for decades, which is especially valuable when starting at age 18.\n2) The response advises using an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan and contributing enough to receive the full employer match, since this is essentially free money on top of tax-deferred growth.”\n3) The response recommends maxing out contributions to a Roth IRA first, then using a traditional IRA if more money is available, in order to diversify future tax treatment.\n4) The response highlights the strategy of contributing to both a 401(k) for immediate tax deductions and a Roth IRA for long-term tax-free withdrawals, balancing short- and long-term tax benefits.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses at least three authoritative external sources (e.g., SEC.gov, Vanguard research, an academic paper). Examples:\n1) The response cites an SEC.gov guide on mutual funds to explain the benefits of low-cost index investing and regulatory protections for investors.\n2) The response references a Vanguard research whitepaper on the long-term performance of diversified portfolios, supporting the recommendation to invest in both U.S. and international equities.\n3) The response includes findings from an academic paper in the Journal of Finance showing how asset allocation explains the majority of portfolio variance, strengthening the case for diversification.\n4) The response quotes data from the Federal Reserve on historical inflation rates to justify why TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) or equities can protect purchasing power over decades.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes any information which isn’t supported by an authoritative source (e.g., includes information from reddit). Examples:\n1) The response tells the reader to ‘just buy whatever stocks people on Reddit’s WallStreetBets are hyping up,’ without citing any financial regulator, research paper, or professional investment guidance.\n2) The response claims that ‘cryptocurrency always beats the stock market’ but provides no evidence from SEC.gov, academic finance journals, or established investment research firms.\n3) The response suggests ‘my cousin made a fortune trading penny stocks, so you should too,’ relying on anecdotal evidence instead of published data or authoritative analysis.\n4) The response points to a personal finance blog post with no references and treats it as fact, instead of drawing on official government, institutional, or peer-reviewed sources.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response states an expected long-term equity return between 5% and 10% per year.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response recommends primarily low-cost diversified American index funds or ETFs with an expense ratio of 0.20% or less (e.g, VTI, SPY).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response recommends speculative practices (e.g day trading, margin, options, individual stocks) .",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response suggests investing greater than or equal to 15% of the portfolio in bonds.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes guidance to rebalance the portfolio on a regular schedule of at least once per year.\nExamples:\n1) The response recommends rebalancing once per year by selling some stocks if they grow too large a share of the portfolio and reinvesting in bonds or cash, to maintain the original allocation.\n2) The response advises setting a fixed annual date, such as every January, to rebalance back to an 80/20 stock-to-bond mix, regardless of how markets performed.\n3) The response highlights that without yearly rebalancing, a portfolio could drift into excessive risk (e.g., from 70/30 to 90/10 stocks-to-bonds after a bull market), so annual adjustments keep risk in check.\n4) The response suggests using an automated broker feature to rebalance yearly, ensuring allocations stay aligned with the investor’s age and risk tolerance, without the need for emotional decision-making.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response suggests investing the initial $10,000 via dollar-cost averaging.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes an educational or non-liability disclaimer (e.g., advises consulting a professional).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response warns that tax rules and account availability vary by country. Examples:\n1) The response notes that while a Roth IRA is available in the U.S. with tax-free growth, investors in Canada would need to use a TFSA or RRSP instead, since U.S. retirement accounts aren’t accessible.\n2) The response cautions that capital gains and dividend tax rates differ across countries, so advice about U.S. tax efficiency may not apply elsewhere.\n3) The response points out that employer-sponsored 401(k) plans are unique to the U.S., and workers abroad may need to rely on government pension schemes or private retirement accounts.”\n4) The response includes a disclaimer that before opening accounts or investing, the reader should check local tax laws and account options, since what is advantageous in one jurisdiction may not exist in another.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that investments depend on at least one characteristic of the user (e.g the response says: if you are more risk averse, you might want to invest __, else __). Examples:\n1) If you are more risk averse, you may prefer a higher bond allocation (e.g., 40% bonds, 60% stocks) to reduce volatility. If you are comfortable with risk, you could hold 90% stocks and 10% bonds for greater long-term growth.\n2) The response points out that if you have short-term goals (like buying a house in 5 years), more money should stay in cash or CDs. If your goals are long-term (retirement in 40+ years), then a heavy stock allocation makes sense.\n3) The response highlights that if you have a stable income and strong job security, you can afford to take more investment risk. If your income is uncertain or variable, a more conservative allocation with a larger emergency fund is safer.\n4) The response explains that if you panic easily when markets drop, you should hold more bonds and cash to avoid emotional selling. If you can stay calm through downturns, then higher stock exposure is more appropriate.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines a plan for ongoing future contributions. Examples:\n1) The response recommends contributing 10–15% of every paycheck into investments, automatically directed to index funds, to build wealth steadily over time.\n2) The response advises maxing out a Roth IRA each year (currently $6,500) and then investing any extra savings in a taxable brokerage account.\n3) The response suggests increasing contributions as income rises - for example, starting at $200/month as a student, then raising it to $500/month after landing a full-time job.\n4) The response highlights the power of dollar-cost averaging, recommending fixed monthly contributions (e.g., $300/month) regardless of market conditions to smooth out volatility.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response suggests shifting to a higher bond or lower-risk allocation as the user ages.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response avoids unexplained financial jargon; any technical term used is briefly defined or obvious to a novice investor. Examples:\n1) ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) - ETFs are baskets of stocks you can buy like a single stock.\nWhy invest: Diversification across many companies, usually with very low fees. Good for long-term growth.\nRisks: Value can still drop in market downturns; some ETFs track niche sectors that may be volatile.\nWhen not suitable: If you need guaranteed returns (e.g., short-term goals) or are prone to panic-selling during downturns.\n\n2) Roth IRA - A Roth IRA is a retirement account where your investments grow tax-free.\nWhy invest: Huge tax advantage if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket later; decades of compounding without tax drag.\nRisks: Contributions are limited ($6,500 per year as of 2025), and investments inside are still subject to market risk.\nWhen not suitable: If you’ll need the money before retirement age (59½) or your income is too high to contribute directly.\n\n3) Asset Allocation - Asset allocation means how you split your money across stocks, bonds, and cash to balance growth and safety.”\nWhy invest: Provides risk management; younger investors can take more stock exposure for growth, while older investors shift toward bonds/cash for stability.\nRisks: Too aggressive (stocks-heavy) exposes you to big downturns; too conservative (cash-heavy) may not keep up with inflation.\nWhen not suitable: If you ignore your personal risk tolerance and blindly follow a generic allocation without adjustments.\n\n4) U.S. Stock Market Fund (instead of ‘equity index tracking vehicle’) - A U.S. stock market fund lets you own a small piece of hundreds of American companies.”\nWhy invest: Historically strong long-term returns; simple and effective way to build wealth over decades.\nRisks: Short-term volatility; heavy U.S. exposure may limit international diversification.\nWhen not suitable: If you’ll need to withdraw money in the next few years or want more global exposure.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes any content not explicitly related to investing. Examples:\n1) The response goes into a long discussion about career choices at age 18, such as whether to attend college, pursue a trade, or take a gap year, without tying these decisions back to how to invest the $10,000.\n2) The response offers general life advice about health, relationships, or personal development (e.g., exercising, making friends, or avoiding stress) without linking it to the investment strategy.\n3) The response provides commentary on political ideologies or government policies (e.g., criticizing tax laws or debating fiscal policy) that do not directly connect to the investment plan.\n4) The response shifts focus to unrelated financial products like car loans, mortgages, or budgeting apps, without showing how they influence or complement the investment of the initial $10,000.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies key risks (market, inflation, sequence-of-returns). Examples:\n1) The response notes that market risk is unavoidable since stocks can lose value during downturns, and long-term diversification is necessary to manage this volatility.\n2) The response highlights inflation risk, explaining that cash loses purchasing power over decades if it is not invested in assets that grow faster than inflation.\n3) The response identifies sequence-of-returns risk, particularly in retirement, where withdrawing money during a market downturn can permanently reduce the sustainability of a portfolio.\n4) The response recognizes that inflation and market risk often interact—such as when high inflation triggers higher interest rates, causing both bond and stock values to fall simultaneously.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes concrete strategies to mitigate risks such as inflation.\nExamples:\n1) Invest a portion of the portfolio in Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), since their principal value rises with inflation, protecting purchasing power.\n2) Maintain long-term exposure to equities through index funds like the S&P 500, as stocks historically outpace inflation over multi-decade horizons.\n3) Allocate some funds to real assets such as REITs (real estate investment trusts) or commodities like gold, which tend to hold value or appreciate when inflation rises.\n4) Keep emergency savings in high-yield savings accounts or short-term certificates of deposit (CDs) that adjust rates more quickly than traditional accounts, reducing erosion from inflation.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
write a series of blog posts on important combinatorics topics in math olympiads. Include intuitive and detailed explanations, as well as example problems from top olympiads such as USAMO, USA TSTST, CMO, IMO, IMO shortlist, etc. Provide correct solutions for those problems and the insight or takeaways from those solutions. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054be | STEM | Simple | Deep | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The series covers at least three distinct topics from the following list: Enumerative combinatorics (e.g. generating functions, inclusion-exclusion, combination, permutations), Graph Theory (e.g. Ramsey theory, planar graphs, graph coloring, domino tiling), or Probabilistic Methods (e.g. random graphs, sum-free sets, local lemma, deterministic theorems).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each post includes an intuitive and detailed explanation of its core combinatorics topic (e.g. providing baseline definitions, using analogies, leveraging storytelling, visual explanations).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Formal mathematical definitions and theorems are presented accurately for each topic (e.g. structured presentation, proper notation, formatting). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "All example problems are clearly labeled with their originating competition and year (e.g. USAMO 2021 P3, IMO 2021 P2, 2015 CMO P4, 2012 USAMO P3).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Correct and complete solutions with detailed thought process and reasoning behind each step are provided for every example problem.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For at least one solved problem, the insights section describes how the core technique is adapted to solve a problem from a different mathematical domain (e.g. applying a graph theory concept to a number theory problem, using polynomial roots and properties of algebraic equations on geometric problems, using properties of prime numbers to define relationships between vertices, using concepts from real or complex analysis on distribution of prime numbers) and explicitly outlines the necessary modifications.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "LaTeX formatting is used for all mathematical expressions and equations within the text.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Each blog post is written in blog style; it starts with an introduction capturing reader's attention and describes key concepts that are essential for solving example problems.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Each blog post articulates at least two distinct problem-solving heuristics (e.g. consider extreme cases and look for variants, draw a diagram and visualize, work backward from the goal, solve by contradiction) and for each, it not only explains its application in the given solution but also describes the potential pitfalls or common misapplications of that heuristic.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Each blog post contains at least two example problems, and all examples are selected from top math olympiads (e.g. USAMO, USA TSTST, CMO, IMO, IMO Shortlist).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes visual aids (e.g. diagram, table, graph, chart) if the topic naturally lends itself to it (e.g. graph theory, decision trees, catalan numbers, venn diagrams).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each blog post explicitly states the assumed prerequisite mathematical knowledge (e.g. modular arithmetic for complex Pigeonhole Principle problems, counting principles and factorials for permutation problems).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Alternative solution approaches or viewpoints are discussed for at least one example problem (e.g. solving a combinatorial problem with 1. inclusion-exclusion principle and 2. complementary counting principle).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Underlying mathematical principles that are beyond the core topic are explicitly identified if relevant (e.g. discussing how set theory can be used for inclusion-exclusion principle, stating use of recursion for catalan number problems).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The series of posts demonstrates a clear pedagogical progression, where concepts from earlier posts are explicitly referenced and built upon in later posts to solve more complex, multi-part problems (e.g. using an inclusion-exclusion argument on a structure defined by a graph, applying linearity of expectation to find the expected size of a sum-free set, combining local lemma with a random graph, employing a geometric interpretation of algebraic roots).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response justifies why the chosen topics are foundational for olympiad-level problem solving (e.g. appears frequently, conceptually simple yet requires exceptional creativity).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each post discusses key variations of principles used within the topic (e.g. Pigeonhole general form, strong form, probabilistic inclusion-exclusion, incusion-exclusion on multisets).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Each blog post contains at least two insights or takeaways from example problems and solutions (e.g. type of problems that appear, key techniques used, strategies often used to tackle problems, ways to think about alternative solutions).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains insights and takeaways for all examples, not per each topic or each example.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a topic that is not covered by the math olympiad competitions (e.g. advanced calculus, topology, abstract algebra, category theory).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
I want to make an ai system with a few bots that work together to make personalized learning paths for students
i'm thinking we need two bots. a 'Content bot' that finds lessons based on what a student is bad at, and a 'Coach bot' that gives feedback and practice quizzes. they need to look at data like quiz results, time spent on a page, maybe their learning style? and we need to figure out how they work together. eg when the content bot changes the student's path, how does the coach bot know to give them a remedial quiz or something
describe the main logic. it doesn't have to be super complex. just a simple rule for how they adapt over time. For exmaple 'if student quiz score < 50%, content bot finds an easier video'
how do i even know if it works? I need a couple metrics (eg improving quiz scores or more people finish the course). and how can I test it? maybe a simulation or just try with a small class. I also need a plan for when it gives a bad recommendation, and the student's scores go down? and how can a human teacher step in and take over/override it? | 6847465956a0f6376a605478 | Technical Documentation | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response specifically mentions 2 AI agents with unique names and explicitly describes their individual role in personalizing online learning pathways for students (e.g. 'Content Agent' that curates lessons based on skill gaps and 'Coach Agent' that gives gives feedback and practice quizzes; 'Assessment Agent' that designs formative tests and 'Resource Agent' that fetches external videos, articles, or simulations aligned with the curriculum; 'Pathway Agent' that sequences courses according to mastery level and 'Motivation Agent' that sends encouragement messages and adaptive challenges; 'Insight Agent' that analyzes the patterns in student performance and 'Guardian Agent' that monitors metrics and recommends intervention').",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the type and format of the input data that each agent accepts to perform its role (e.g. the 'Content Agent' accepts quiz results in CSV format, diagnostic test scores in JSON format, and practice quiz interaction logs in TSV format; the 'Coach Agent' accepts participation tracking logs in Excel format, student reflections in TXT format, curriculum standards mapping in XML format, and learning objectives in CSV format). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the process how the agents interact by sharing data (e.g. the 'Coach Agent' sends quiz summaries in JSON format, the 'Content Agent' uses them to align lessons with skill gaps; the 'Assessment Agent' shares test analytics in CSV format, the 'Resource Agent' fetches targeted videos and articles; the 'Pathway Agent' provides updated course sequencing in JSON format, the 'Motivation Agent' adapts encouragement messages; the 'Insight Agent' highlights performance trends in Excel format, the 'Guardian Agent' recommends teacher intervention).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a condition that triggers one agent to update a student's learning pathway and describes the agent's reactive behavior (e.g. the 'Content Agent' identifies low participation logs and implements attention checks; the 'Content Agent' maps new skill gaps from diagnostic and restructures the lessons order; the 'Content Agent' detects misalignment with curriculum standards and replaces outdated resources; the 'Content Agent' observes incomplete engagement with assigned readings and substitutes shorter, scaffolded materials).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a condition that triggers the second agent to remedial exercises when performance is poor (e.g. the 'Coach Agent' detects frequent mistakes in reflection assignments and assigns targeted practice activities; the 'Coach Agent' identifies consistently low scores against learning objectives and delivers scaffolded exercises; the 'Coach Agent' observes repeated failures in applied tasks and introduces step-by-step practice modules; the 'Coach Agent' flags low accuracy in diagnostic responses and generates tailored remedial drills).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the rules or algorithms to update each of the agents over time and provides its justification for this choice (e.g. the 'Content Agent' updates its lesson recommendations to achieve better alignment with each student’s skill gaps using algorithms such as LinUCB-Linear Upper Confidence Bound, Thompson Sampling, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, or Q-learning; the 'Coach Agent'' updates its practice quiz recommendations to improve student engagement Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, Item Response Theory, Reinforcement Learning, or Decision Trees).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly names two evaluation metrics and explains their relevance to the goal of improving personalized online learning (e.g. quiz score improvement, course completion rate, time-to-mastery, student satisfaction, engagement minutes).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a procedure to perform a pilot using the two agents for a specified number of a small group (<=30 students) that include the chosen evaluation metrics. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a mechanism to detect incorrect recommendations (e.g. a drop in 3 consecutive quiz scores, unusually long completion time, repeated requests for hints, no improvement in specific skill categories after multiple lessons) and how to notify the human instructor for intervention (e.g. dashboard alert, email or in-app notification, pop-up override option for instructor to pick alternative intervention, weekly/daily review report).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes technical requirements or constraints relevant to the runtime deployment of the system (e.g. latency of recommendation like duration of time taken to generate new lessons, scalability limit as in how many students the system can support, interoperability as in which LMS/Learning Management System or API this system can integrate with, hardware requirements like number and type of CPU/GPU necessary). ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an analysis of cost relevant to the implementation and/or maintenance of the system (e.g. the budget required for minimum hardware infrastructure, cost of human engineers for maintenance, potential license fees for necessary software, cloud hosting or storage expenses).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists detailed requirements for infrastructure relevant to the implementation and deployment of the system (e.g. Amazon Web Services S3/GCP to storage lesson plans and student data, NVIDIA GPUs T4 to train the agents, broadband network of >=10 Mbps with firewall security, ELK(Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) stack for event tracking and audits).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one graphical illustration (e.g. flowchart, diagram, user interface mockup, system architecture diagram) to aid clarity and support understanding of the system’s design and operation.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions specific multi-agent frameworks or libraries useful to the development and maintenance of the agents (e.g. AutoGen for coordinating conversational agents, Rasa for natural language dialogue management, Ray RLlib for reinforcement learning and multi-agent training, Microsoft Bonsai for managing and deploying multi-agent systems).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses procedures to protect the privacy of student data with respect to a specified policy or regulation (e.g. for FERPA compliance, restrict access to student records to authorized staff, anonymize performance data before analysis, implement secure authentication with role-based permissions, maintain audit logs of all record access or modifications). ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses measures to be compliant with local or regional policy related to education (e.g. GDPR for data protection in the EU, FERPA for student records in the U.S., COPPA for online services directed at children under 13, HIPAA for handling health-related accommodations, state-level regulations such as California’s CCPA).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses names for the agents that are not descriptive of their stated goals. ",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes practical tips on how to implement the rule or algorithm used to adjust recommendations over time (e.g. external sources for additional literature or tutorials of those techniques, useful GitHub repository or libraries, a sample code block for implementation, a block of relevant pseudocode).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes procedures to ensure fairness and avoid bias in recommendations (e.g. auditing performance across demographic subgroups, balancing training datasets, applying bias-detection tools, allowing teacher override for equity adjustments).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses mechanisms for transparency and explainability of the agentic system (e.g. providing rationale for each recommendation, surfacing uncertainty scores, generating teacher-facing summaries, and logging decision factors for audit).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies requirements for user training and support (e.g. onboarding guides for teachers, student tutorials on using the platform, helpdesk or chatbot support, periodic professional development workshops).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes measures for robustness and fault tolerance (e.g. fallback rules when agents fail, auto-retry mechanisms, offline mode for poor connectivity, redundant backups of critical data).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write an introduction on Markov chains in the field of statistics/combinatorics and the reason behind their genesis. Then, write a literature review on Markov chains in contemporary research. Include one section devoted to their application and intuition in solving problems like "what is the expected value of flips to get N heads in a row". | 6847465956a0f6376a605493 | STEM | Simple | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response includes sections for introduction of Markov chain, applications of Markov Chain, and intuition behind N heads problem.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an accurate definition of Markov chain which is a stochastic process describing a sequence of possible events in which the probability of each event depends only on the previous states.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The introduction mentions that Andrey Markov invented Markov chains in the early 1900s.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The introduction references Markov's 1913 work on analysis of the sequence of vowels and consonants in Alexander Pushkin's novel, Eugene Onigin.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least three distinct modern research areas (e.g. Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Markov Decision Processes/Reinforcement Learning, Mixing Times/Random Walks on Graphs, Queuing Theory, Computational Biology, Finance, Statistical Physics).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "All citations are in an official format (e.g. Modern Language Association, American Psychological Association, Chicago, IEEE).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an intuitive explanation of how to solve the coin-flip problem (e.g. description of states representing the current run length of consecutive heads (0 through N), a tail resets the run length to 0, example scenario where N is a certain number like 3).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that for a fair coin, the expected number of flips needed to get N consecutive heads equals 2^{N+1} − 2 or an algebraically identical formula.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes out of scope contents, such as moderation policies, ethics statements, ethics in gambling, and other unrelated probability theorems.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the reason behind the genesis of Markov chain which was either the need to model dependent events or extend law of large numbers to correlated trials.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes tangential topics unrelated to Markov chains (e.g. differential equations, unrelated probability models, graph theory, number theory).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "All mathematical statements and calculations are correct and aligns with basic probability facts.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how Markov chains are used with linear algebra (e.g. transition matrix, eigenvalues, state probability vectors, time evolution).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses key properties related to Markov chains (e.g. memoryless, irreducibility, aperiodicity, ergodicity).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least one problem similar to the coin-flip problem specified in the prompt.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes mathematical foundations of the Markov chain (e.g. state space, transition matrix, transition probabilities, initial distribution, stationary distribution).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "All mathematical equations are in LaTex format.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one non-scientific domain where Markov chain is used such as philosophical dispute over dependence and free will.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses key variations of Markov chains (e.g. finite vs infinite state space, time-homogeneous, high-order chains, discrete-time vs continuous-time).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how first-step analysis is used to solve N heads in a row problem.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a beginner-friendly technical guide explaining how Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) process visual data. Cover key ideas like convolution, kernels, feature maps, pooling, and why CNNs are effective for spatially structured input. | 6847465956a0f6376a60548a | AI & ML | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains a dedicated section heading that includes the word \"Convolution\" (e.g., a line starting with \"#\" or \"##\" or ending with \":\", or numbered like I, II, III).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that a kernel (also called a filter) is a small matrix of learnable weights that is applied to the input image.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines a feature map as the collection of outputs produced by applying a kernel across all spatial locations of the input.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes pooling (e.g., max or average pooling) as an operation that reduces the spatial dimensions of a feature map and its benefits and drawbacks (e.g., (1) Improves computation efficiency, (2) reduces the number of parameters, (3) reduces the risk of overfitting, (4) loss of information, (4) translation tolerance.)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states at least one reason that CNNs are effective for spatially structured data, specifically mentioning either (a) local receptive fields or (b) weight sharing.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains any content not relevant to explaining CNN concepts (e.g., mentioning RNNs, Transformers, Diffusion, or LLMs).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes diagrams and visualizations for the sliding window intuition, and also what a kernel looks like operating over input data in the form of matrices.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses a technical guide format (e.g., includes bulleted or numbered lists) that is easy to digest for beginners and is ordered properly with easier and foundational concepts first, which is built on by the later response (e.g., explaining what a convolution is -> filters -> layers, such as pooling -> application for spatial data).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains advanced or messy mathematical equations (e.g., formulas involving integral symbols (∫) or summation symbols (Σ) without a clear explanation of what the symbols mean).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines convolution as a process in which the kernel values are multiplied element-wise with the underlying image patch and summed to produce a single output value.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a visual or textual explanation of how a convolution operation fails (e.g., aliasing, boundary artifacts, or sensitivity to orientation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that each kernel produces its own feature map.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least one sentence that links the key operations in order—convolution (with kernels) → feature maps → pooling—demonstrating the overall data flow in a CNN.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a real-world analogy for convolution (e.g., (1) sliding a stencil, (2) applying a cookie cutter, (3) lawn mowing patch by patch, or (4) scanning with a flashlight).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how the output feature map size is affected by edge padding, strides, and kernel size (e.g., without padding, the feature map becomes smaller than the input because the convolution process only outputs to the center of the kernel).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how multiple channels (e.g., RGB) are handled during convolution and how kernels adapt accordingly (e.g., each kernel produces an output, and for multiple channels, the kernel needs to expand in the dimension to cover all the channels).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response briefly compares CNNs to fully connected networks in terms of parameter efficiency and overfitting risk (e.g., (1) Convolutional layers are more parameter-efficient than fully connected layers, (2) CNNs are better for spatial data such as images that exhibits locality and translation invariance, (3) CNNs has a lower risk of overfitting due to fewer parameters and regularization effects of local receptive field).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how multiple layers of convolution and pooling build hierarchical features (e.g., edges → textures → objects).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a concise code snippet (in any language) that manually performs a 2D convolution with nested loops (no libraries), to reinforce the sliding-window intuition.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response touches on how architectural choices attempt to address how a convolution operation fails (e.g., limited receptive field, cannot handle long-range dependencies, inductive bias, pooling causes information loss, enable deeper networks by using residual or skip connections, dynamic convolution).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures all acronyms are expanded on it during their first appearance and provides clear definitions for all specialized terms and mathematical symbols upon first use, accompanied by explanatory prose or examples (e.g., (1) Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is a type of feedforward neural network the optimizes the kernels to learn features, (2) Translation invariant means the CNN can learn to understand the shifts in the object positions in an image, (3) receptive fields are the area of the input that affects the neuron's output, (4) scale invariant means the CNN can learn to understand different sizes of the same object).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Consider the Korean company KCTech. The company is looking to enter the American market with its materials-selling business, as its equipment-selling business is not mature enough yet. The focus is on selling slurries, and the headquarters will be in Portland, Oregon. The initial team will be led by newly promoted USA branch CEO Dr. Sunghoon Lee, with experience at Intel, Global Foundries, SMARTPAD, Coherent, and Draper. He will be supported by one sales/research team member and two researchers. One of the main clients should be Intel, but there are certainly others on the table.
Please provide detailed, data-supported estimates of the U.S. branch's potential yearly revenue within its first few years (starting from late 2025), using comparable market data, industry benchmarks (average deal sizes in the Korean branch, market share assumptions), competitor analysis, and regional/national demand for semiconductor slurry materials. Include any numbers that you arrive at on the way to these estimates.
Additionally, provide any other useful context or strategic considerations that might help this branch succeed, such as customer acquisition strategies (divide into conventional strategies like sending samples and using personal connections, vs. more unexpected strategies), expected costs, regional competitors, or potential difficulties. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e76958478 | General Consumer Research | High | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response should provide explicit yearly revenue estimates for at least 5 consecutive years after U.S. market entry, with values expressed in realistic ranges and correct order of magnitude (e.g., tens of millions vs. billions). Figures should be specific (e.g., $20–30M) rather than vague, aligning with industry benchmarks and market context.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should clearly state at least 4 explicit numerical assumptions used to build the revenue estimates. Examples of valid assumptions include:\n1) Average deal size with Intel or other major clients (e.g., $2–5M per year)\n2) Expected market share captured in the U.S. within first 5 years (e.g., 2–3%)\n3) Growth rate in semiconductor slurry demand (e.g., 8–10% CAGR)\n4) Average price per liter/ton of slurry (e.g., $1,000–2,000 per ton)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should present at least 4 intermediate numerical calculations that clearly connect assumptions to the final revenue figures, without skipping steps. Examples of valid calculations include:\n1) Estimating number of client deals (e.g., 3 Intel contracts + 2 smaller fab contracts)\n2) Multiplying average deal size by number of deals (e.g., 5 × $3M = $15M)\n3) Adjusting revenue for cost overheads of procuring slurry materials (e.g., 30% cost margin)\n4) Comparing projected prices against competitors to account for undercutting (e.g., 10% price reduction → $2.7M instead of $3M per deal)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should cite or reference comparable data or benchmarks from KCTech’s Korean operations at least twice. Examples of valid benchmarks include:\n1) Average slurry deal size\n2) Historical revenue figures\n3) Typical customer concentration (e.g., % revenue from top 3 clients)\n4) Year-over-year revenue growth in Korea",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should name at least four companies other than Intel as target customers for the U.S. branch. Representative examples include:\n1) TSMC (Arizona)\n2) Samsung Austin Semiconductor\n3) GlobalFoundries (New York, Vermont)\n4) Micron Technology (Idaho)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should provide competitor analysis by naming incumbent slurry suppliers active in the U.S. market.\nRepresentative competitor companies include:\n1) Cabot Microelectronics (CMC Materials)\n2) Fujimi Corporation\n3) DuPont Electronic Materials\n4) BASF\n\nRepresentative elements of competitor analysis include:\n1) Market share held by each supplier in the U.S.\n2) Pricing strategies and average slurry cost benchmarks\n3) Strength of customer relationships with major fabs (e.g., Intel, TSMC, Micron)\n4) Technological differentiation (e.g., particle size control, specialized slurries for advanced nodes)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should mention regional or national demand data by explicitly referencing at least 4 U.S. semiconductor manufacturing hubs. Representative regions include:\n1) Oregon (Intel's fabs)\n2) Arizona (TSMC fabs)\n3) Texas (Samsung Austin)\n4) New York (GlobalFoundries)\n\nThe demand data cited should include hard numerical ranges, such as:\n1) Dollar value of contracts (e.g., $5-10M per year for a single fab contract)\n2) Estimated number of contracts per year in each hub (e.g., 8-12 contracts)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should address the cost of opening a new U.S. branch by providing at least one numerical estimate, grounded in calculations of major cost factors. Representative cost factors include:\n1) Office space and facility setup (e.g., lease in Portland, $200K-$400K annually)\n2) Salaries for the initial team (CEO + 3 staff, e.g., $600K-$900K annually)\n3) Equipment, lab, and R&D setup (e.g., $1M-$2M one-time)\n4) Regulatory, legal, and administrative expenses (e.g., $100K-$250K annually)\nThe response should combine these into a clear estimated cost range (e.g., $2M-$3.5M for year one).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should list at least three tactics under the Conventional/Traditional customer-acquisition category. Representative examples include:\n1) Sending free product samples to prospective clients\n2) Leveraging existing personal/professional connections (e.g., former Intel colleagues)\n3) Attending semiconductor trade shows and conferences\n4) Direct sales outreach and relationship-building with procurement teams",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should list at least three tactics under the Non-conventional/Unexpected customer-acquisition category. Representative examples include:\n1) Partnering with U.S. universities or research labs for early-stage slurry testing\n2) Running joint pilot projects with startups in semiconductor materials\n3) Using digital marketing or thought-leadership campaigns targeting fab engineers\n4) Offering unique financing/discount structures (e.g., pay-per-use slurry contracts)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should explicitly cite at least two sources in the Korean language. Representative examples of valid sources include:\n1) Korean investing/finance websites\n2) Government regulatory filings\n3) Korean semiconductor industry news outlets\n4) Company press releases in Korean",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes unnecessary references to post-COVID industry shifts, which are largely no longer relevant. The response mentions generic 'COVID impact' without tieing it to current, quantifiable 2024–2025 industry effects (e.g., ongoing supply chain bottlenecks or recovery metrics).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should provide confidence intervals (e.g., 95%) for every major numerical estimate, such as yearly revenue projections, market share assumptions, or cost estimates. The intervals should be expressed as ranges around the point estimate (e.g., projected revenue $20M with 95% CI: $18-22M).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should provide a SWOT analysis (or equivalent). At minimum, the Threats/Risks section must include at least 4 legitimate risks. Representative examples include:\n1) Aggressive pricing or entrenched relationships from incumbent slurry suppliers\n2) Supply chain vulnerabilities for critical raw materials\n3) Slow customer adoption due to qualification cycles in semiconductor fabs\n4) Regulatory or trade barriers affecting import of slurry materials into the U.S.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should use non-table charts at least once. Representative examples of valid non-table chart types include:\n1) Line charts (e.g., revenue growth over years)\n2) Bar charts (e.g., competitor market share comparison)\n3) Pie charts (e.g., regional demand breakdown)\n4) Scatter plots (e.g., deal size vs. number of contracts)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should reference KCTech’s existing global capabilities or limitations to justify its U.S. market strategy.\nGlobal capabilities = strengths the company already has from international operations (e.g., production scale, R&D expertise, established client relationships).\nGlobal limitations = constraints KCTech faces internationally (e.g., weaker brand recognition outside Korea, limited distribution channels, dependency on a few suppliers).\nMarket strategy = how these factors influence entry and growth in the U.S. (e.g., targeting Intel first, setting up in Portland, differentiating from competitors).\n\nRepresentative examples include:\n1) Strong R&D pipeline in advanced slurry formulations (capability)\n2) Limited brand awareness in the U.S. semiconductor ecosystem (limitation)\n3) Existing supply agreements with global clients like Samsung/GlobalFoundries (capability)\n4) Reliance on imported raw materials that could face U.S. trade restrictions (limitation)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should consider hiring and talent acquisition as a key cost for setting up the U.S. branch. It must provide at least one numerical estimate (in USD) and break this into major cost components. Representative examples include:\n1) Recruiter or headhunter fees (e.g., $20K-$50K per hire)\n2) Interviewing and onboarding expenses (e.g., $5K-$10K per employee)\n3) Salaries and benefits for initial team members (e.g., $150K-$250K annually for specialized researchers, $200K-$300K for leadership roles)\n4) Ongoing HR/administrative support costs (e.g., $50K-$100K annually)\nThe response should combine these factors into a clear estimated range (e.g., $800K-$1.2M annually for personnel-related expenses in the first year).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should consider the potential for additional employees to be moved to the U.S. branch once sufficient revenue is generated, as it helps inform both future costs (e.g., relocation, salaries, visas) and potential revenue growth (e.g., expanded sales coverage, more R&D capacity).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should build at least one statistical or mathematical model to support revenue forecasting. A model can be a formal formula, calculation framework, or forecasting approach. Representative examples include:\n1) Simple growth rate projection (e.g., 10% YoY revenue increase)\n2) Exponential moving average for smoothing yearly revenue estimates\n3) Linear regression using demand data and market size as predictors\n4) Market share–based formula (e.g., Total U.S. slurry market x % share captured)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should not incorrectly attribute non-KCTech work, data, or achievements to KCTech.\nRepresentative examples of incorrect attribution include:\n1) Claiming KCTech developed slurry products that were actually created by Cabot Microelectronics (CMC Materials).\n2) Attributing Intel's proprietary slurry R&D breakthroughs to KCTech.\n3) Presenting Samsung or TSMC in-house slurry formulations as if they were supplied by KCTech.\n4) Stating that KCTech currently holds U.S. market share figures that actually belong to competitors like DuPont or BASF.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Claims that KCTech USA Branch doesn't exist yet, and thus can't provide accurate information.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should cover potential difficulties the U.S. branch may face. Representative examples include:\n1) Lengthy qualification and validation cycles for slurry products at U.S. fabs (12-24 months before adoption).\n2) Intense competition and entrenched supplier relationships with incumbents (e.g., CMC Materials, DuPont).\n3) Regulatory or trade restrictions that could delay imports or increase costs.\n4) Challenges in recruiting specialized semiconductor materials talent in Portland and other hubs.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Compose a concise technical report sketching an experimental plan for deciding whether a modern vision-language model could stand in for human specialists when labeling medical images of skin lesions. | 6847465956a0f6376a605492 | AI & ML | High | Deep | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the primary objective, the chosen study design (e.g. model selection, multi-rater, paired non-inferiority trial, inter-rater agreements), the exact size of the human expert panel and test set, and the primary clinical success criterion (e.g. the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the accuracy difference exceeding -5%, sensitivity of at least 95% for melanoma detection, negative predictive value of 99% for ruling out malignant lesions).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's narrative structure shows a sophisticated flow, where the ethical considerations in the final sections are directly linked back to specific methodological choices made earlier (e.g. explaining how the multi-round Delphi consensus process from the Methods section mitigates the ethical risk of relying on a single-rater baseline, referencing how the test set can address ethical concern regarding bias against underrepresented skin, discussing model transparency and its impact on bias/fairness).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a glossary defining at least 5 key technical terms specific to the intersection of AI and medical diagnostics (e.g. non-inferiority margin, adjudication, Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), Fleiss Kappa, and Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP)).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The experimental objective is explicitly defined not only in terms of diagnostic substitution but also in terms of a secondary objective to evaluate the vision-language model's ability to generate descriptive text that identifies at least three specific, predefined morphological features (e.g. irregular pigment network, arborizing vessels, pearly border).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response articulates a cost-effectiveness analysis which details the specific economic model to be used (e.g. cost-utility analysis, cost-benefit analysis, decision tree model) and the variables to be measured (e.g. cost per correct diagnosis, time saved by specialists, quality-adjusted life year).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses a dataset strategy that includes a plan for both external and temporal validation, specifying that the model will be tested on a held-out dataset from an institution not involved in training and on a set of images collected after the model's development was finalized.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies that ground-truth labels will be provided by board-certified dermatologists.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response indicates inclusion of at least three lesion classes for classification (e.g. melanoma, nevus, basal cell carcinoma).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least two evaluation metrics from the following: accuracy, sensitivity/recall, specificity, F1-score, AUROC.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a statistical significance or non-inferiority test comparing the model and specialists (e.g. McNemar test, confidence intervals, paired t-test).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response indicates the model and humans will annotate the same set of images for accurate comparison of model v.s. human performance.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a fail-safe or fallback procedure for model's low-confidence outputs (e.g. human-in-the-loop validation, defaulting to rule-based system, requesting additional input or clarification).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Miscellaneous"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions conducting a sample-size calculation or power analysis to determine proper dataset size.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes at least two distinct interpretability methods and justifies their selection by tying them to the specific model architecture and the clinical need for transparency (e.g. proposing Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to visualize lesion features for dermatologists, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify feature importance for model debugging, proposing Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) to understand specific cases, using Integrated Gradients to attribute outputs to specific image pixels and words).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly mentions need for Institutional Review Board (IRB) or ethics board approval before the commencement of the study.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a patient privacy plan which specifies that a formal Business Associate Agreement (BAA) must be executed with any third-party cloud or AI service provider used for data processing, ensuring their contractual obligation to uphold Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) standards.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one limitation of the vision language model in labeling medical images in reality (e.g. dataset bias, domain shift, small sample size, privacy issues).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes any clinical treatment recommendations or diagnoses for patients.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites nonexistent work, incorrect datasets, or made-up metrics (e.g. fabricated research papers, non-existent dataset, misrepresenting data distribution, inverted performance scores).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses statistical methods incorrectly (e.g. applies unpaired test to paired setup, chi-squared test of independence for paired, dependent data, simple logistic regression for paired data structure).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses an adjudication process for establishing ground truth that details how qualitative disagreements in free text descriptions will be resolved, specifying a method for synthesizing a final consensus text that incorporates key features identified by the majority of agreeing experts.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
I am trying to recreate "Around the world in 80 days", I want to avoid planes but travel to as many countries and Islands as possible, I want to do it in a very low budget and want to start and end my journey in New York, USA. Assuming that I have a US passport, give me a detailed plan on how I can accomplish this. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053e0 | General Consumer Research | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response addresses that the \"Itinerary begins and ends in New York City\"",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should propose an itenary that must successfully complete a full circumnavigation of the globe, meaning the journey starts and ends in New York, USA, and includes traversing both the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. The circumnavigation should involve travel across all major oceans to demonstrate a complete global journey. Specifically, the traveler would cross:\n1) The Atlantic Ocean (between the Americas and Europe/Africa)\n2) The Indian Ocean (between Africa/Middle East and Asia)\n3) The Pacific Ocean (between Asia/Australia and the Americas)\n\nExamples of some valid Itineraries are:\n1) USA -> Portugal -> Egypt -> India -> Thailand -> Singapore -> Australia -> Japan -> USA\n2) USA -> Spain -> Morocco -> Egypt -> India -> Vietnam -> Philippines -> Indonesia -> USA\n3) USA -> Brazil -> South Africa -> India -> Malaysia -> China -> South Korea -> USA",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must not include airplanes as part of the journey. If the response mentions air travel in any leg of the itinerary, this directly violates the prompt’s instruction to avoid planes. Examples of violations in the response:\n1) “Fly from New York to London”\n2) “Take a flight from Japan to the USA”\n3) Optional short domestic flights are suggested",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For each segment of the journey, the response should propose realistic, currently operational, and geographically appropriate modes of transport (e.g., trains, buses, ferries, ships). The modes must be feasible in the specific regions being traveled through, not just generic. Examples of Country/Region-Specific Transport:\n1) Japan: Use of high-speed rail for long-distance travel between cities like Tokyo, Osaka, and Kyoto.\n2) Europe: Use of intercity trains (e.g., Eurail, Eurostar, TGV) for cross-country travel, supplemented with local buses for shorter segments.\n3) South America (e.g., crossing from Colombia to Panama): Use of boats/ferries where the Darién Gap prevents direct overland travel.\n4) North America to Europe: Use of transatlantic cargo ships or passenger ferries as a realistic non-air option to cross the Atlantic Ocean.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes transport modes that are unrealistic, unavailable, or geographically impossible for the country/region.\nExamples of Violations:\n1) Suggesting a bus/train across the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean.\n2) Proposing a direct rail line across the Sahara Desert.\n3) Proposing nonexistent ferries (e.g., New York -> London).\n4) Using defunct services (e.g., historic Orient Express).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should maximize the number of countries visited, but within a realistic and appropriate range for a global circumnavigation. An excessively small number (e.g., fewer than 8) would not reflect meaningful diversity, while an excessively large number (e.g., over 30-40) would be impractical for an 80-day journey. A good range is 10-15 countries, consistent with 12 countries in the original \"Around the World in 80 Days\" book.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each leg of travel in the itinerary must include a specific departure and arrival day/time, tied to the overall timeline of the journey. This ensures the schedule is realistic, trackable, and aligned with an 80-day circumnavigation. For example:\n\"Arrives on Day 60 in San Jose, which is a Monday (if the journey started on a Sunday), at 12:00 pm local time (PST).\"",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must give a clear total budget in USD, realistic for a low-budget circumnavigation. For a solo 80-day trip, a reasonable budget is $25,000-$35,000, over $100,000 is excessive, and under $10,000 is unrealistic.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The itinerary should include clear per-day or per-week cost estimates across four major categories:\n1) Transport (e.g., trains, buses, ferries) - ~$10-30/day\n2) Lodging (e.g., hostels, guesthouses, budget hotels) - ~$15-40/night\n3) Food (e.g., daily meals, groceries, street food) - ~$10-25/day\n4) Visas/Other Fees (e.g., entry visas, park fees, local taxes, contingency costs) - ~$500-1000 total for 80 days",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists daily/weekly costs for transport, lodging, food, or visas/fees that are implausibly low or otherwise unrealistic for international travel.\nFor example\n1) Claiming $1/night for lodging in major cities.\n2) Suggesting $2/day for food in the US cities.\n3) Listing $0 for visas/fees for China, where US citizens need visa\n4) Providing costs that are wildly inconsistent with known budget ranges (e.g., $5/day total for an 80-day global trip).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The itinerary should address visa requirements for each destination, specifically considering how they apply to a U.S. passport holder. For example:\n1) Visa-Free Entry: Japan allows U.S. citizens to stay up to 90 days without a visa.\n2) Visa on Arrival: Nepal issues visas on arrival at Tribhuvan International Airport and border crossings.\n3) E-Visa Required: India allows U.S. citizens to apply for an e-visa online before arrival.\n4) Visa Application in Advance: Russia requires U.S. citizens to apply for a visa at a consulate before travel.\n5) Entry Not Permitted: North Korea generally does not permit U.S. passport holders entry (outside rare, restricted tours).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The itinerary should recommend rest days spread across the trip to allow for recovery, acclimatization, and realistic pacing. A good plan specifies ~3 rest days over the 80-day journey. It should avoid scenarios such as:\n1) No rest days at all (continuous travel every day).\n2) Rest days mentioned vaguely (“take breaks as needed”) without counting or scheduling them.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The itinerary must include backup plans for at least 3 important routes, showing what to do if travel is disrupted and how much longer it would take.\nRepresentative Examples of Backup Plans:\n1) If the train from Paris to London at 9:00 AM is canceled, take the 12:00 PM train, arriving 3 hours later than planned.\n2) If the ferry from Athens to Santorini scheduled for 8:00 AM Monday is canceled due to weather, take the overnight bus to Santorini’s port instead, arriving the next morning (about 10 hours longer).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The itinerary should account for the minimum time needed to transfer between consecutive modes of transport, so that connections are realistic and not rushed. This includes the time to disembark, clear checks (if needed), and board the next mode.\nRepresentative Examples of Connection Times:\n1) Train -> Ferry: Arriving in Barcelona by train and boarding a ferry to Ibiza - at least 90 minutes needed to walk to the port, check in, and board.\n2) Bus -> Train: Arriving in Rome by intercity bus and catching a domestic train - at least 45 minutes needed to walk across the terminal and purchase/validate tickets.\n3) Ferry -> Train: Arriving in Dover by ferry and taking a train to London - at least 60 minutes needed for disembarkation, customs, and getting to the rail station.\n4) Train -> Bus: Arriving in Tokyo by Shinkansen and catching a regional bus - at least 30 minutes needed to walk to the bus terminal and board.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should recommend budget accommodations with realistic price ranges for a city. For example:\n1) Hostel in Prague, Czech Republic: ~$18/night in the shared dorm of Hostel One Prague.\n2) Budget Hotel in Bangkok, Thailand: ~$40/night at the ibis Styles Bangkok Khaosan Viengtai.\n3) Airbnb in Mexico City, Mexico: ~$30/night for private room in a shared apartment.\n4) Capsule Hotel in Osaka, Japan: ~$25/night at the Capsule Hotel Asahi Plaza Shinsaibashi",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should recommend affordable local food options in each region, highlighting both price and cultural popularity.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Mexico City, Mexico: Tacos al Pastor (~$1–2 each). Street food staple, widely available, filling, and very cheap.\n2) Bangkok, Thailand: Pad Thai from street vendors (~$2–3 per plate). Popular national dish, found at stalls everywhere, cooked fresh on demand.\n3) Istanbul, Turkey: Simit (~$0.50–1 per piece). A sesame-covered bread ring sold by street vendors, eaten as breakfast or snack.\n4) Hanoi, Vietnam: Pho (~$2–3 per bowl). Traditional noodle soup, hearty and affordable, served at local roadside eateries.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should suggest practical, region-specific cost-saving strategies for budget travel.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Europe: Buy a Eurail Pass for unlimited train travel across multiple countries instead of buying single tickets, which reduces overall cost.\n2) Japan: Stay in capsule hotels or Manga cafés (~$20–30/night) as a cheaper alternative to standard hotels.\n3) Southeast Asia: Use Couchsurfing or budget guesthouses (~$10–15/night) in cities like Bangkok or Hanoi.\n4) USA: Shop at supermarkets like Walmart or Trader Joe’s to cook simple meals, saving compared to daily restaurant dining.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each destination in the itinerary should include a summary of why it is worth visiting, with at least four prominent cultural or natural attractions per place. Attractions must be clearly tied to the cities or regions listed in the itinerary, so travelers understand the highlights at each stop.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Cairo, Egypt: Pyramids of Giza, Egyptian Museum, Khan el-Khalili Bazaar, Nile River cruises.\n2) Agra, India: Taj Mahal, Agra Fort, Mehtab Bagh gardens, Fatehpur Sikri.\n3) Beijing, China: Great Wall (Mutianyu section), Forbidden City, Temple of Heaven, Summer Palace.\n4) Cusco, Peru: Machu Picchu, Sacred Valley, Sacsayhuamán fortress, Plaza de Armas.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should include the names of booking platforms or resources and give simple instructions on how to use them for transport or accommodation.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Expedia (expedia.com): Search for trains, ferries, and hotels by entering your departure city, destination, and dates, then confirm payment online.\n2) Rome2Rio (rome2rio.com): Enter two cities (e.g., Paris -> Barcelona) to see buses, trains, ferries, click through to official operators like Renfe or FlixBus to complete booking.\n3) Brittany Ferries (brittany-ferries.co.uk): Book cross-Channel ferries (e.g., Portsmouth -> Caen) by selecting route, date, and passenger/cabin type.\n4) Hostelworld (hostelworld.com): Search for hostels in a city (e.g., Bangkok), filter by price and reviews, and reserve a dorm bed with small upfront payment.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should mention useful tools that make international travel easier, with a clear purpose for each.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Mobile Payment Apps (e.g., Wise, Revolut): Enable low-fee international payments and currency conversion without carrying large amounts of cash. Available via the Apple App Store or Google Play Store.\n2) E-SIM (e.g., Airalo): Provides mobile data overseas without swapping physical SIM cards, ensuring instant connectivity. Download the Airalo app (iOS/Android) or purchase from airalo.com.\n3) Offline Maps (e.g., Google Maps offline mode or Maps.me): Google Maps can be downloaded via the Play Store/App Store; Maps.me is also free on both platforms.\n4) Translation Apps (e.g., Google Translate): Help communicate across language barriers, including offline text and image translation. Free on the Play Store and App Store, with downloadable offline language packs.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should include a packing guide with at least four practical items needed for a long, low-budget, multi-country journey. Each item should specify its purpose, where to get it, and approximate cost.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Travel Backpack (40–50L): Needed for mobility on trains, buses, and ferries (avoids bulky suitcases). Can be purchased at REI or Decathlon for about $80-150.\n2) Universal Power Adapter: Essential for charging devices across different plug types in Europe, Asia, and South America. Available on Amazon or at Best Buy for about $15-30.\n3) Lightweight Clothing Layers: Quick-dry shirts, fleece, and rain jacket allow comfort across hot, humid, or cold climates. Can be bought at Uniqlo or outdoor stores for around $10-40 per item.\n4) First Aid/Medication Kit: Important for emergencies during long bus/train rides or remote areas. Includes bandages, painkillers, and personal prescriptions. Available at CVS, Walgreens, or Boots for about $20-40.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests a total trip budget that is unrealistically high for a “low-budget” 80-day circumnavigation. A \"large budget\" is anything above $100,000 for a solo traveler.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Claiming the trip would cost $250,000 in total.\n2) Proposing a $500,000 budget, which would cover luxury cruises and 5-star hotels.\n3) Suggesting average lodging at $400-500 per night (e.g., Ritz-Carlton, Four Seasons).\n4) Estimating daily expenses at $1,500–2,000/day, far above budget travel norms.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes travel options that contradict a budget-conscious itinerary, favoring extravagant or impractical choices.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Recommending a private yacht across the Atlantic ($50,000+ per crossing) vs. a freighter passage or ferry (~$1,200-2,000).\n2) Suggesting luxury cruise liners (~$5,000-10,000 per person) vs. cargo ship cabins (~$80-120/day).\n3) Including business-class train cabins in Japan ($200-300 per ride) vs. standard Shinkansen seat ($50-100 for medium distances).\n4) Booking 5-star hotels (e.g., $500+/night in London or Tokyo) vs. hostels, capsule hotels, or guesthouses (~$20-40/night).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to correctly address visa requirements for U.S. passport holders or ignores diversity across visa types.\nFor example, the response:\n1) claims all countries are visa-free for U.S. travelers.\n2) omits categories such as visa on arrival or e-visa.\n3) provides incorrect information (e.g., saying Russia is visa-free).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives vague statements (e.g., “this country has beautiful scenery”) instead of naming specific cultural or natural attractions and explaining why they are important.\nRepresentative Examples of Violations (Vague Generalizations):\n1) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: This country has beautiful beaches.\n2) Rome, Italy: The city is full of history.\n3) Kyoto, Japan: This place is very popular with tourists.\n4) Tanzania: The country has amazing food.\n\nRepresentative Examples of Correct Specificity (With Importance):\n1) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Copacabana and Ipanema Beaches, world-famous beaches central to Brazilian culture and global tourism.\n2) Rome, Italy: The Colosseum and Roman Forum, iconic ancient sites that showcase the history of the Roman Empire.\n3) Kyoto, Japan: Fushimi Inari Shrine (with its 1,000 torii gates) and Kinkaku-ji (Golden Pavilion), both representing Japan’s spiritual and architectural heritage.\n4) Tanzania: Serengeti National Park (renowned for the Great Migration of wildebeest) and Mount Kilimanjaro (Africa’s tallest mountain), both globally significant natural wonders.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should recommend reliable travel insurance providers or coverage types, explaining what they cover, approximate cost, and tradeoffs.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) World Nomads (worldnomads.com)\nCoverage: Medical emergencies, trip interruption, baggage loss, and adventure sports like trekking or diving.\nCost: About $100–150 per month for long trips.\nPros: Flexible, covers high-risk activities.\nCons: Expensive for short trips, excludes some pre-existing conditions.\n\n2) Allianz Global Assistance (allianztravelinsurance.com)\nCoverage: Trip cancellation, medical, baggage, and 24/7 support.\nCost: Plans start at $50–70 per trip, higher for multi-trip annual coverage.\nPros: Established company, strong global medical support.\nCons: Adventure activities often excluded unless upgraded.\n\n3) SafetyWing (safetywing.com)\nCoverage: Medical emergencies, evacuation, and some travel delays, targeted to digital nomads.\nCost: About $45/month.\nPros: Affordable, subscription model, renews monthly, covers multiple countries.\nCons: Limited coverage in home country, fewer benefits for trip cancellation.\n\n4) Credit Card Insurance (e.g., Chase Sapphire, AmEx Platinum)\nCoverage: Trip delays, cancellations, rental car insurance, some medical evacuation (varies by card).\nCost: Included if you pay with the card, but annual fees are $95–695.\nPros: Convenient, no extra purchase needed, immediate coverage on bookings.\nCons: Secondary coverage, medical benefits limited compared to dedicated policies.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should recommend necessary vaccinations and health precautions for international travel, linking each to relevant regions, with details on where to obtain them, when to take them, and approximate cost.\n\nRepresentative Examples:\n1)Yellow Fever (e.g., Brazil, Kenya, Ghana)\nWhy: Required for entry into many African and South American countries.\nWhere to get: Certified travel vaccination clinics or public health centers (CDC provides a locator in the U.S.).\nWhen: At least 10 days before travel for the certificate to be valid.\nCost: About $150–200 in the U.S.\n\n2) Typhoid (e.g., India, Nepal, Southeast Asia)\nWhy: Risk from contaminated food and water.\nWhere to get: Travel clinics, pharmacies (oral or injectable options), CVS/Walgreens pharmacies (in the U.S.).\nWhen: At least 2 weeks before travel (oral course takes 4 doses over a week).\nCost: About $50–100.\n\n3) Hepatitis A (e.g., Mexico, Thailand, Egypt)\nWhy: Risk from contaminated food and water; common among travelers.\nWhere to get: Widely available at primary care providers, CVS/Walgreens pharmacies (U.S.), Kaiser Permanente clinics, and public health travel clinics; in the U.K., some NHS services offer it free for travelers.\nWhen: 2–4 weeks before travel (booster recommended 6–18 months later for long-term protection).\nCost: About $75–150 per dose.\n\n4) Cholera (e.g., Bangladesh, parts of Africa, Haiti)\nWhy: Risk in areas with poor sanitation, particularly in crowded cities or during floods.\nWhere to get: Specialized travel clinics; in the U.S. Vaxchora (FDA-approved oral vaccine) is available by prescription.\nWhen: Oral vaccine taken as 2 doses, 1–6 weeks apart, completed at least 1 week before travel.\nCost: About $100–200 total.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should provide realistic visa application timelines for different countries, so travelers can plan ahead. Representative Examples:\n1) India (e-Visa): Apply online at least 4–7 days before travel, approval typically within 72 hours.\n2) Russia (Tourist Visa): Apply through a consulate or visa center at least 4–6 weeks in advance; requires an invitation letter.\n3) China (Tourist Visa L): Apply at least 1 month before travel; processing usually 4–5 business days, longer during peak times.\n4) Brazil (e-Visa for U.S. citizens, reinstated 2025): Apply online at least 2 weeks before travel, approval within 5 business days.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The itinerary should include at least one island destination that can be reached affordably and practically as part of an overland/sea journey.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Santorini, Greece: Easily reachable via ferry from Athens or Crete.\n2) Zanzibar, Tanzania: Accessible by ferry from Dar es Salaam.\n3) Bali, Indonesia: Frequent ferry routes connect Java -> Bali.\n4) Isle of Skye, Scotland: Reachable by bridge or bus/ferry from the Scottish mainland.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should recommend useful travel resources, including at least four specific guidebooks or apps, with details on where to obtain them and approximate cost.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Lonely Planet Guidebooks\nWhere to get: Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Lonely Planet website.\nCost: $15–25 per book.\nWhy: Comprehensive country/city guides with cultural insights, maps, and budget tips.\n\n2) Rick Steves’ Europe Guides\nWhere to get: Rick Steves’ official site, Amazon, major bookstores.\nCost: $15–20 per book.\nWhy: Focused on Europe, with self-guided tours, cultural context, and budget recommendations.\n\n3) Google Maps App\nWhere to get: Free on iOS App Store and Google Play Store.\nCost: Free.\nWhy: Essential for navigation, offline maps, and public transport directions.\n\n4) TripIt App\nWhere to get: iOS App Store, Google Play Store.\nCost: Free basic version; Pro version about $49/year.\nWhy: Organizes bookings, itineraries, and tickets in one place.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should discuss the benefits of holding a U.S. passport when planning international travel, with at least four specific examples. Representative Examples:\n1) High visa-free access: U.S. citizens can enter over 180 countries visa-free or with visa on arrival, simplifying logistics.\n2) Ease of e-visa applications: For countries that do require visas (e.g., India, Turkey), U.S. passport holders are often eligible for fast-track online e-visa systems.\n3) Extended stays: Many destinations (e.g., Schengen Area in Europe) allow stays of up to 90 days visa-free.\n4) Global recognition and support: Widely recognized for smooth border processing, and backed by strong U.S. consular support in nearly every country.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should flag any legal U.S. travel bans/restrictions and cite current U.S. Department of State travel advisories relevant to the itinerary.\nRepresentative Examples (mix of bans and Level-4 i.e. Do not travel advisories):\n1) North Korea (legal ban): U.S. passports are not valid for travel to/through DPRK without special validation; restriction currently extended through Aug 31, 2026 (https://travel.state.gov/en/international-travel/travel-advisories/north-korea.html)\n\n2) Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk (sanctions): OFAC prohibits transactions in these Russia-occupied regions, which effectively blocks tourism by U.S. persons (https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information/ukraine-russia-related-sanctions)\n\n3) Syria (Level 4: Do Not Travel): State Dept advises do not travel; U.S. Embassy Damascus suspended operations--limited/no consular help (https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/International-Travel-Country-Information-Pages/SyrianArabRepublic.html)\n\n4) Lebanon / Libya / Haiti (Level 4): Examples of countries currently at Level 4: Do Not Travel (pick those relevant to the route and date) (https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories.html.html)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should include information of routes or transport segments known for frequent delays or cancellations, with reasons and typical delay durations.\nRepresentative Examples:\n1) Eurostar (London to Paris): Delays of 1 to 3 hours common due to strikes or tunnel issues.\n2) India Railways (Delhi to Varanasi): Trains frequently delayed 2 to 6 hours in monsoon season because of flooding.\n3) Greek Island Ferries (Athens to Santorini): Cancellations occur during high winds in summer, sometimes leaving passengers stranded for 24 hours.\n4) US Amtrak (Northeast Corridor, New York to Washington DC): Delays of 30 to 90 minutes because of aging infrastructure and congestion.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response contains a 80 day itenary",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write an accurate historical depiction of a realistic timeline that would lead the Germans and the Axis powers to winning World War II. What would need to happen for the Germans to succeed, and how would this have affected the World after and what would a potential world in the present day look like as a result? | 6847465956a0f6376a605451 | Creative Writing | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response provides a dated timeline that lists at least five distinct, fictional events occurring between 1939 and 1948 (inclusive) which would've led to the victory of the Axis powers (e.g. 1940 German advances at Dunkirk and annihilates British Force, 1940 Luftwaffe bombs Royal Air Force base, 1941 Britain makes peace with German, 1942 USSR surrenders).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states at least four specific divergences from real history that enable an Axis victory and provides justification on why the divergences were critical to the victory (e.g. German's advance at Dunkirk and defeating British Force leaves Britain hopeless and ultimately willing to negotiate peace, Japan's decision to attack Soviet in 1942 instead of Pear Harbor postpones USA's entry into war).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the immediate post-war global order (1940s–1950s) with the Axis victory in at least three of the following regions: Europe, North America, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents the immediate post-war global order (1940s–1950s) with the Axis victory in at least two domains from: diplomatics, politics, economy, or human rights.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response articulates the hypothetical present day (2020 or later) status of at least three regions from the following: Europe, North America, East Asia (Japan, China), USSR.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes conditions in the hypothetical present day (2020 or later) in at least two separate domains chosen from: international politics, technology, culture/society, economy, or human rights.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately states that Germany invaded Poland on 1 September 1939, marking the starting point of World War II.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims that Germany or any other country possessed or deployed operational nuclear weapons before 1945.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response introduces technology first deployed after 1950 into events dated way earlier (e.g. German is armed with ICBM in 1945, US used microprocessors to optimize its arsenal in 1950, Japan achieves Artificial General Intelligence in 2015).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one specific secondary historical source (e.g. book title, historian name) published in 1950 or later to support plausibility of the fictional events and the Axis victory.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response endorses or justifies actions committed by the Nazi regime in the alternate timeline.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly acknowledges the Holocaust, the maltreatment of Slavs, and/or other major Axis atrocities and indicates whether they persist, worsen, or change in the alternate timeline.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the power balance between countries in the alternate post-war order with respect to military, diplomatic, and/or economy.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one economic factor (e.g. oil supplies, industrial output, logistics, trades) that contributes to the Axis victory.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one diplomatic factor (e.g. alliances, negotiated peace treaties, resource sharing, strategic coordination) that contributes to the Axis victory.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one military factor (e.g. strategy, campaign outcome, weapon development, production) that contributes to the Axis victory.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Vocabulary is clear and avoids unexplained military or historiographical jargon (e.g. explains acronyms such as U-boat, RAF, or names like Operation Torch when first used) in order to be accessible to all readers.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "All real historical facts and dates prior to the divergence points are correct (e.g. World War II begins on 1 Sep 1939; Operation Barbarossa starts on 22 Jun 1941; Pearl Harbor attack is on 7 Dec 1941) if relevant to the discussion.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses both the European and Pacific theaters or explains how events in one theater affect the other in the Axis victory scenario.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one fictional scenario with no supporting evidence to make the events realistic (e.g. Japan invades all USSR, USA, and Britain and defeats them all, Italy betrays German post-war and gains global power, African countries decide to unite and join the Axis).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
I am trying to learn more about merge conflicts in git and how to resolve them. It would be really helpful if you could help me understand different commands like rebase and stash with examples, and make these concepts clearer to me. Also, tell me what a detached HEAD state is and how to bypass it. | 6847465956a0f6376a605491 | Technical Documentation | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response provides a description of “merge conflict” where Git cannot automatically reconcile differences because two branches or commits have modified the same part of a file, requiring manual resolution.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least one Git command that helps detect conflicts and explains how the command is used to do so (e.g. git status shows files that are unmerged or in conflict, git diff highlights the specific conflicting changes within those files).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a description of \"git rebase\" which is used to reapply commits onto another base branch, therefore helping streamline history and resolving conflicts by replaying changes in sequence.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a description of \"git stash\" which temporarily saves uncommitted changes without committing them, therefore helping with switching branches or resolving conflicts by allowing the user to set aside work-in-progress and reapply it later.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a description of a detached HEAD state which is when Git’s HEAD pointer is not attached to a branch but instead points directly to a specific commit, meaning new commits will not belong to any branch unless explicitly attached.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes how to manage large files or repository performance (e.g. using tools like Git LFS to handle large binary files, cleaning up history with commands like git gc or git filter-repo, optimizing performance by ignoring generated files or splitting repositories when necessary).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that before exiting a detached HEAD state, it is good practice to check the current status and ensure branch pointers are up-to-date (e.g. using git status to confirm the state of HEAD, git fetch origin to get updates from origin, git fetch --all to update local branch references).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives at least one method to exit or bypass detached HEAD, with examples (e.g. using git checkout branch-name to reattach HEAD to an existing branch, git checkout -b new-branch to create and switch to a new branch, git switch branch-name as a clearer alternative to checkout for existing branches, git switch -c new-branch to create and switch to a new branch).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an example showing Git conflict markers, specifically <<<<<<< HEAD, =======, and >>>>>>> branch_name, to illustrate how Git separates the current branch’s changes from the incoming branch’s changes.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains fundamental Git concepts and beginner-relevant commands that directly tie to conflict resolution and merging (e.g. understanding what a commit is as a snapshot of changes, using git merge to combine branches and noting how conflicts arise, using git rebase to apply commits sequentially onto another branch, using git stash to temporarily save uncommitted work before switching branches, and recognizing the role of HEAD as the reference to the currently checked-out commit).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least two illustrative examples for each \"git rebase\" and \"git stash\" where each example clearly shows how the command works in practice and clarify the underlying concept (e.g. a developer uses \"git rebase\" to rebase a feature branch onto main to integrate the latest commits, demonstrating how conflicts are resolved during the process, a developer uses \"git stash\" to stash uncommitted changes before switching branches, then later applies the stash to restore the work).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response expands on unrelated Git topics that are not requested in the prompt (e.g. git submodule, git bisect, git blame, git cherry-pick), thereby diverting focus away from merge conflicts, rebase, stash, and detached HEAD state.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly differentiates between git merge and git rebase, describing at least four key differences (e.g. merge preserves history by creating a new merge commit, while rebase rewrites history by applying commits on top of another branch; merge produces a non-linear history, whereas rebase results in a linear one; merge may require resolving conflicts once at the merge point, while rebase can require resolving conflicts at each commit replay; merge is safer for shared branches, while rebase should generally be avoided on public branches since it rewrites commit hashes).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response warns that rebasing published commits can rewrite history and may cause problems for collaborators",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that stashed changes are retrieved with \"git stash pop\" or \"git stash apply\"",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions git rebase --continue and how the command tells Git to move to the next commit after conflicts are fixed.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response covers the use of Git through graphical user interface (GUI) tools or hosting platforms, explaining how they can help with merging and conflict resolution (e.g. tools such as GitKraken, SourceTree, or GitHub Desktop provide visual interfaces to manage rebase and resolve merge conflicts; hosting platforms like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket highlight conflicts in pull/merge requests and offer web-based editors to resolve them; GUIs make it clearer when the repository is in a detached HEAD state and guide the user back to a branch).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly notes that HEAD is a reference pointing to the latest commit of the currently checked-out branch rather than vaguely saying it points to the current commit/branch reference.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges that stashes are stored on the stash stack and can be listed with \"git stash list\"",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response introduces factual errors about Git concepts (e.g. git stash merges the current branch with the parent branch; git rebase permanently deletes commits; git merge discards history instead of preserving it; a detached HEAD means the repository is broken and unusable).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response covers at least one graphical conflict-resolution tool suggestion with examples (e.g. IDEs like Visual Studio Code and IntelliJ IDEA provide built-in merge conflict editors; GitHub’s web-based editor highlights conflicts in pull requests; GitKraken offers a dedicated conflict-resolution interface; SourceTree provides a GUI for staging, viewing, and resolving conflicts).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one link to the official Git documentation to support its explanations and provide authoritative reference material.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response covers security practices in Git and explains their effect (e.g. signing commits and tags with GPG or SSH keys to verify authenticity and determine who made a merge for future reference; enforcing signed commits in a repository to ensure only verified contributions are accepted; using protected branches with required reviews to prevent unauthorized merges; verifying commit integrity via checksums to ensure history has not been tampered with).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how to use Git hooks to automate workflows and relates this to merging and conflict resolution (e.g. using a pre-commit hook to run linting or tests before changes are committed, a pre-push hook to prevent pushing and reducing merge conflicts if the branch is out of date; a post-merge hook to trigger automated builds or alerts after resolving conflicts, a prepare-commit-msg hook to enforce commit message standards, improving clarity when recovering history after issues like a detached HEAD).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that while git rebase applies commits sequentially, you may be forced to resolve the same logical conflict multiple times (e.g. if several commits each modify the same function, the developer may need to resolve the conflict at every step of the rebase).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions best practices to prevent merge conflicts, with representative examples (e.g., frequently pulling from the main branch to keep feature branches up to date, making small and focused commits to reduce overlap, clearly communicating with team members about which files or modules are being modified, using feature branches or pull requests to isolate work and coordinate integration).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes steps on how to resolve an incorrectly applied git rebase (e.g. using git rebase --abort to stop the rebase and return to the previous state, using git rebase --continue after fixing conflicts to correctly finish the process, using git reflog to find the commit before the rebase and reset back to it, using git reset --hard origin/branch-name to discard local changes and realign with the remote branch).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a step-by-step guide on how to use git reflog and explains how it can help with merge fixing (e.g. git reflog records the movement of HEAD, git reflog helps finding a commit reference from before a failed merge or rebase, git reflog helps recovery of lost commits and safe restoration of the repository’s state when mistakes occur).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the command git pull --rebase and its relevance to the merging process (e.g. instead of performing a regular git pull that merges the remote branch into the local branch with a merge commit, git pull --rebase rewrites local commits on top of the updated upstream branch, creating a linear history; git pull --rebase helps avoid unnecessary merge commits, makes history cleaner, and reduces the likelihood of complex conflicts during collaboration).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details common branching strategies and collaborative workflows like Pull Requests and relates them to conflict resolution and merging (e.g. feature-branch workflows and Git Flow can reduce merge conflicts by isolating changes, Pull Requests on GitHub/GitLab provide a structured way to review and resolve conflicts before merging, rebasing a feature branch before opening a Pull Request helps maintain a clean history, GUI workflows on hosting platforms make it easier to detect and avoid detached HEAD situations).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
I'm currently working on a project. The professor wasn't clear, she just said that I will use NLP techniques on some data, de-identified Electronic Health Records, to extract Asian subgroups, and try to abstract the same subgroups as are in CDC WONDER data. Then, I'll apply this to look at prevalence rates of autoimmune diseases.
I have no clue what she means. Can you first help explain what she might mean? I don't know examples of what Electronic Health Records look like. What NLP techniques might I be using on data like this? What subgroups in CDC WONDER data would I be abstracting? How could I apply this to look at prevalence rates of autoimmune diseases? What skills should I brush up on? Please help me create a plan for my research going forward, according to what the professor said. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e7695848b | AI & ML | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response is missing one of the six requested points: (1) what the professor likely means, (2) examples of de-identified EHR data, (3) NLP techniques that could be used, (4) Asian subgroups contained in CDC WONDER, (5) how to use the extracted information to study autoimmune-disease prevalence, and (6) skills to brush up on.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives at least three concrete examples of de-identified Electronic Health Record content (e.g., a diagnosis code block, a free-text note snippet without PHI, tabular data contextualizing text and numerical data, image data corresponding to a diagnostic report, and video data corresponding to radiology image reports).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least three distinct NLP techniques from the following list: Named Entity Recognition, rule-based pattern matching/regular expressions, dictionary or ontology lookup, supervised classification, topic modeling, clustering, word embeddings, and transformer fine-tuning.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies (by name) either 6, 15, or 31 race categories from CDC WONDER data (i.e., 6-category list: American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, White, and More than one race) The 15-category list separates more Asian and Pacific Islander groups (e.g., Chinese, Filipino, Japanese), while the 31-category list includes combinations of multiple races (e.g., Black, AIAN, and White).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states or implies that the goal is to map Electronic Health Record-derived subgroups to the same CDC WONDER categories before calculating prevalence.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes how exactly to derive subgroups from Electronic Health Records (e.g., programmatic text extractions or more rigorous NLP and machine learning techniques that can extract subgroups by interfacing with sources, such as looking into self-reported information provided through questionnaires, cross-referencing data across multiple visits, combing data from external sources such as geospatial data, and looking into census data). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least two different methods for calculating prevalence (e.g., extrapolations from individual autoimmune disease occurrences, machine-learning techniques via training fine-tuned models, logistic regression models, and meta-analyses that include results from existing papers). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least five relevant skills or tools to learn (e.g., data science skills in order to parse and visualize Electronic Health Record data, statistical analysis skills in order to perform and interpret regression analyses, coding skills in order to write up statistical or machine learning models, data deidentification techniques, and domain knowledge for autoimmune disease factors).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly explains the exact mechanism by which de-identification removes direct patient identifiers to comply with privacy regulations, which can be one of the two techniques from the HIPAA Privacy Rule De-identification Methods of 1) Expert Determination, which involves an expert assessing the risk of identification by running appropriate statistical and scientific methods to mitigate risk of identification, and 2) Safe Harbor, which involves the direct removal of 18 types of identifiers, such as specific dates, the last four digits of a Social Security numbers, patient initials, etc, and can be performed via NLP techniques.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has at least one example that walks through every processing step that maps unstructured data to a diagnosis, in particular mentioning 1) NLP techniques to extract Asian subgroups present in the de-identified Electronic Health Records data, 2) NLP techniques to map the extracted racial subgroups to formal CDC WONDER racial subgroups, 3) apply a prevalence analysis (e.g., statistical or machine learning based) to look for the frequency of autoimmune diseases in the specified populations, as they apply to the specific example.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines or briefly explains, and expands, technical terms the first time they are used (e.g., defines NLP as Natural Language Processing, defines CDC WONDER (Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research), which is an online database for public health records).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that while Electronic Health Records often contain structured forms of (e.g., with name, date, age, etc. columns fairly easy to extract), there may be additional forms of unstructured data within the records that the user may need to target their NLP techniques towards (e.g., doctors' notes from patient visits, multimedia files from reports).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to address that any analysis must comply with HIPAA to prohibit any disclosure of protected health information in order to ensure patient privacy.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least one open-source NLP library (e.g., spaCy, scikit-learn, transformers, and nltk).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response use language that references to the words used by the professor and is directed to the user who is confused and need clarity (e.g. (1) What the professor means by \"I will use NLP techniques on some data\" is that you are tasked to apply natural language processing methods such as, etc..., (2) By \"de-identified Electronic Health Records\", you are asked to de-identify the Electronics Health Records which is the record of the patients' medical history stored electronically at the healthcare providers, etc., and (3) Next, you will be applying this \"to look at prevalence rates of autoimmune diseases\").",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorrectly orders the tasks to be performed (i.e., The proper ordering should be (1) what the professor likely means, (2) examples of de-identified EHR data, (3) NLP techniques that could be used, (4) Asian subgroups contained in CDC WONDER, (5) how to use the extracted information to study autoimmune-disease prevalence, and (6) skills to brush up on).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response considers at least five relevant research and sources of references (e.g., (1) National Library of Medicine, (2) CDC Wonder, and (3) publications from well-known universities like Stanford, Oxford, or Global Autoimmune Institute).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response considers the limitations of the approaches used to identify autoimmune diseases from the data. (e.g., (1) Using ICD-10 code, but some rare autoimmune diseases like antisynthetase syndrome and IgG4-related disease, (2) many diagnoses can change and gets refined after subsequent patient visits, (3) diagnosis can be caused by both autoimmune process or non-autoimmune process such as type 1 diabetes mellitus in a patient who has undergone a total pancreatectomy, and (4) source of data provided by specialized or general medical practitioners can also introduce biases).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes no reference to previous studies/data about the prevalence rate of autoimmune diseases in Asian subgroups (e.g., (1) the paper titled \"High Disease Severity Among Asians in a US Multiethnic Cohort of Individuals with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus\", (2) Hispanics and Asians were diagnosed with lupus and had more aggressive disease more frequently than whites, and (3) Sjögren's Syndrome (SS), an autoimmune disorder affecting the salivary and tear glands, is more prevalent among individuals of Asian descent).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least 8 different autoimmune diseases examples with special attention to those prevalent in Asian subgroups for context (e.g., (1) autoimmune thyroiditis (AT), (2) Graves' disease (GD), (3) type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), (4) multiple sclerosis (MS), (5) Crohn's disease (CD), and (6) ulcerative colitis (UC)).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Write a technical report describing how to implement a high-performance double-precision General Matrix-Matrix Multiplication (GEMM) tuned for AVX2, Fused Multiply-Add (FMA), and multi-core CPUs. Make it understandable for an audience with technical competency but not adept at low-level systems programming. Include intuitive explanations and formulas of the optimization techniques, including but not limited to blocking, intrinsics, loop unrolling, and annotated code snippets in C for key components (e.g., microkernel, blocking strategy, parallelization, etc). | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e7695849b | STEM | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response ensures all acronyms (e.g., (1) GEMM as General Matrix-Matrix Multiplication, (2) AVX2 as Advanced Vector Extensions 2, (3) FMA as Fused Multiply-Add) are expanded on it during their first appearance and provides clear definitions for all specialized terms and mathematical symbols (e.g., (1) instruction-level parallelism, (2) loop unrolling), (3) vectorization, (4) blocking upon first use, accompanied by explanatory prose or examples.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least two high-level analogy or intuitive explanation for the core concepts (i.e. blocking, cache, SIMD vectorization, parallelization) (e.g., (1) compares blocking to \"tiling a floor, so only a small area is exposed at a time\", (2) Instead of delivering the mail one at a time and going back to the post office to pick up the next, the mail person carries some of the mail for the region in a truck (caching), (3) Parallel execution is like have multiple chefs cooking together rather than just one chef, (4) pipelining is like an assembly line where each component of an item get assembled piecewise by a servicing worker as the item goes down the line).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes diagrams and figures to explain important concepts (e.g., (1) vectorization visualized by a single instruction executed on an array of items, (2) A diagram of how GEMM is computed, (3) A diagram of blocking where the matrix is divided up into tiles, (4) A diagram of data packing where the data is copied into a contiguous section of memory, (5) graphs and charts of speedup comparisons).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is clearly targeted for an audience with technical competency but not adept at low-level systems programming (e.g., (1) avoids assembly listings or overly low-level register diagrams, (2) Overly explaining basic technical terms such as what is a CPU, (3) Skips intermediate optimization steps and jumps to the final advanced optimization with several techniques applied, (4) assumes that the audience knows the details of x86 architecture, (5) proper sequencing of optimization techniques from easy to advanced (e.g., naive implementation -> cache blocking and packing -> microkernel -> multicore or multithreading).).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response introduces unrelated concepts and technologies (e.g., GPU CUDA kernels, FPGAs, Systolic arrays, High Bandwidth Memory(HBM), threading synchronization, and barrier techniques).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one cautionary note about portability (e.g., AVX2 code will run slowly or crash on CPUs without AVX2 support).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is formatted as a technical report with a title page, abstract, introduction, body, conclusion, and references, and each optimization technique (e.g., blocking, intrinsics/FMA, loop unrolling, parallelization) into its own clearly titled section.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one annotated code snippet in C for each key component and optimization of the GEMM implementation (e.g., microkernel, blocking strategy, parallelization, loop unrolling, loop ordering) and presents the final optimized code that contains all the optimizations combined at the end.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains GEMM (i.e., its mathematical definition C := αAB + βC (or the simplified α = β = 1 form) using matrix notation where C is m x n, A is m x k, B is k x n) and tailors the report for double precision (i.e., a floating-point number format also known as float64, usually 64 bits in computer memory) (e.g., using doubles in the code snippets, AVX2 for double precision, explaining and the use of 64 bits).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains what Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) is and its benefits (i.e., Fused Multiply-Add is a fused operation of multiply and add with single rounding at the end, which allows better performance by combining two operations into a single instruction and better numerical accuracy due to single rounding).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) vectorization, in particular AVX2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2), and why it is important for GEMM optimization (i.e., Advanced Vector Extensions is the SIMD extensions to the x86-64 processors from Intel and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) while Advanced Vector Extensions 2 adds new instructions and expands most integer commands to 256 bits (YMM registers)).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains data packing and its benefits and costs (i.e., data that is required for computation is copied to a buffer to ensure contiguous memory access for vectorization and remove Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) misses. The tradeoff is the extra memory copy, but the benefit can be significant in terms of performance).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains microkernels (i.e., the smallest level of optimization where the computation fits inside the registers of the CPU, such as loop unrolling, vectorization, software prefetching and intrinsics (AVX2)) and provides details on at least one technique such as register blocking (e.g. The block sizes for MR and NR in register blocking can be determined by: (MR * NR) / VW + MR / VW + 1 <= N_reg; 2 * MR * NR <= 2 * L * T * VW where N_reg is the number of architectural vector registers, VW is the SIMD vector width in doubles, L is the pipeline latency in cycles, and T is the FMA throughput in results per cycle).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains cache blocking, stating that a cache-aware blocking strategy minimizes compulsory, capacity, and conflict misses by keeping working sub-matrices in the L1/L2 cache, and that the sub-matrices should fit in the targeted level cache. (e.g., the correct cache-blocking formula for determining block sizes for MC, KC, and NC: (MC * KC + KC * NC * MC * NC) * sizeof(double) < L2 cache size).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response briefly compares performance to a vendor BLAS (e.g., BLIS, OpenBLAS, Intel MKL) to contextualize achieved GFLOPS.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains loop ordering with performance considerations (e.g., j-p-i, improves performance because of the contiguous memory access pattern, improving temporal and spatial locality, and reducing cache misses, adjusting row-major order and column-major order for contiguous memory access).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains loop unrolling and its benefits and costs in terms of performance, specifically for GEMM (i.e., reduce loop overhead by expanding out the loop, reducing branch penalty but increasing the number of branches, meaning more missed branch predictions, optimized register usage).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions alignment or padding guidance (e.g., aligning packing buffers to 32- or 64-byte boundaries for AVX2).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses multi-core scalability limits such as memory bandwidth or false sharing and other issues like load balancing (e.g., (1) Explain that even if multiple cores can scale theoretical speedup, the memory availability will be a limiter at a much earlier point, (2) false sharing occurs in multiple cores tries to read and write the same cache line, (3) choosing the number of threads, and block sizes for balancing work).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how to achieve multi-core or multi-threaded parallelism (e.g., using OpenMP, C++ standard library, Boost, oneAPI Threading Building Blocks (oneTBB)) and choosing and justifying what part of the code to parallelize.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains messy, unnecessary formulas, code, or tables. (e.g., (1) Unrendered latex, (2) messy code snippets with improperly formatted structure or messy comments, (3) broken tables that are unrendered, (4) missing figures or formulas or sections that are referenced in the text).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains why the naive approach is very slow on the high conceptual level near the start of the report (e.g., (1) The algorithm itself has theoretical limits, (2) Memory bandwidth limits how much data can be processed at a time, (3) Multicore issues such as false sharing, (4) Computer architecture is laid out with levels of cache with different speeds and sizes (smaller caches are faster)).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
I am an incoming freshman at UC Berkeley, admitted into CDSS for Statistics. I am trying to graduate in 3 years and double major in CS, but I haven't been admitted to the CS major yet. I do not want to take summer classes. Can you make me a course plan that achieves this? Make sure I am actually eligible to take the classes you suggest. Assume that if I apply to the CS major through comprehensive review, I will get in. I have already taken Math 1A/1B/53/54 through community college and got a 5 on AP Statistics and a 5 on APUSH. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054a9 | Business Planning & Research | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response satisfies all major requirements for the undergraduate Statistics degree at UC Berkeley (e.g., Lower Division Requirements, Upper Division Core Requirements, Upper Division Electives, Upper Division Cluster Requirements).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response satisfies all major requirements for the undergraduate CS degree at UC Berkeley (e.g., Lower Division Requirements, 20 Upper Division Units, passing grades, 4 units of Upper Division Technical Electives that ideally count for Statistics).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has the student retake courses they already have credit for (e.g., Math 1A, Math 1B, Math 53, Math 54, any American Institutions, any American History).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's courses are valid for the suggested semester (e.g., prerequisites for the individual courses are met, comprehensive review is completed at the appropriate time, the courses use their updated course names, courses are suggested in the semesters they have historically been offeres such as CS 164: Programming Languages and Compilers in the Fall semester).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's total number of credits fail to sum up to at least 120 credits, as required by UC Berkeley.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes classes that are not offered at UC Berkeley.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists the same class multiple times by different names (e.g., Stat 100 and Data Science 100, C8 / CS C8 / Stat C8, C131A and Stat C131A, History C104 and STS C104).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's courses are scheduled during the summer.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a structured semester-by-semester list or table.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains CS comprehensive review timing and its impact on upper-div eligibility.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures that each semester has between 13 and 20.5 units.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a summary for each class in the plan, explaining the course content and motivations behind taking it.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's plan is designed for exactly 3 years (6 semesters).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one comment or strategy for balancing workload or difficult semesters (e.g., time management skills, mental health precautions, difficulty expectation for individual semesters, commentary on individual professors).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a semester with more than 4 technical classes (CS 152, CS 160, CS 161, EECS 151).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses >2 courses to satisfy requirements for both majors.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not schedule the most difficult classes (e.g., Stat 150, CS 189, CS 182, CS 162) in the same semester due to the known time commitment.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's course plan does not include classes but only lists broad areas or requirements (e.g., General requirements, Humanities requirements, Lower level classes, Upper level electives, etc.)",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one fallback plan or contingency note (e.g., a comment on popular classes that may not have space, suggetions for an extra semester, comment on average grades for CS 162 and what happens if a class is failed, a comment on changes in the curriculum that have happened in the past five years).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response averages at least 15 credits per semester to meet the 3-year graduation requirement.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses the challenge of simultaneously finishing in 3 years, doing a double major, and not taking summer courses.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Suppose Indira Gandhi had not declared the National Emergency in 1975. Write a critical essay analyzing how India’s democratic institutions such as the judiciary, press, and political opposition might have evolved without this authoritarian episode. Consider both short-term political consequences and long-term effects on civil liberties, constitutional norms, and electoral politics. | 6847465956a0f6376a605494 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | High | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response incorrectly presents a counterfactual as a historical fact (e.g., saying \"the Emergency was not declared\") instead of using proper counterfactual framing (e.g., \"If the Emergency had not been declared…\"), showing a misunderstanding of historical context and the distinction between hypothetical and factual events.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains factual errors about key events (e.g., failing to mention Indira Gandhi’s conviction, omitting press censorship, misstating the Allahabad High Court judgment date, or conflating its reasoning).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response misattributes cause or consequence in hypothetical reasoning (e.g., blaming the opposition for government policies, blaming the press, blaming extremist movements, or holding the judiciary responsible for executive actions).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response avoids false equivalence between Emergency-era policies and unrelated democratic events (e.g., not equating post-2000 press criticism with the Emergency’s censorship).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses press censorship (e.g., pre-approval requirements, censorship orders) and the Information & Broadcasting Ministry’s role during the Emergency, explaining that without such restrictions, India’s media could have developed greater transparency and reduced public distrust of the government.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the detention of political opponents under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) (e.g., Jayaprakash Narayan, George Fernandes) and argues that without the Emergency, these leaders would have remained free, potentially reducing today’s political \"whataboutism\".",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that without the 42nd Amendment, the Constitution would not have explicitly labeled India as \"secular\" or \"socialist\", suggesting that later debates over secular identity (e.g., during the 2019 CAA controversy) would have been debated differently.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the 1977 election that brought India’s first non-Congress government to power would likely not have happened in the same way had the Emergency not been declared.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes the potential downstream impact on constitutional amendments or judicial precedent (e.g., the 42nd and 44th Amendments), such as India becoming a majority Hindu state, the 1970s communist movements failing in Naxalite regions due to the absence of socialism in the Constitution, the executive’s power to declare emergencies remaining unchallenged, and the non-formation of a new ruling party.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses potential ideological shifts in Indian politics had Emergency-era repression not occurred (e.g., the emergence of separatist movements based on religion, the possibility of Indira Gandhi’s assassination, a deeper religious divide within the country, and growing disdain for secularism).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least one missed reform opportunity or positive consequence that emerged because of the Emergency (e.g., increased voter vigilance, stronger non-discrimination norms, additional governmental checks and balances, and greater awareness of press freedom).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that without the Emergency, the national influence of the Navnirman Andolan would have been reduced.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites or references at least one historical development prior to 1975 relevant to democratic institutions (e.g., the Kesavananda Bharati case, the 1967 elections).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges that Indira Gandhi faced political pressures such as the guilty verdict in the Allahabad case, economic unrest, concentration of power, and growing public frustration with government corruption, and it hypothesizes that without the Emergency, these issues could have been addressed through stronger media engagement, increased public dialogue, and improved communication.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges that Emergency-era policies were influenced by earlier political culture (e.g., centralization trends, the Nehruvian legacy, and Congress’s dominance in government) and suggests that without the Emergency, these trends might have continued, and thus have potentially reinforced a uniparty system in India.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that post-independence Indian democracy was still developing and had not yet fully institutionalized checks and balances, arguing that without the Emergency, the growth of these mechanisms would have been slower and fewer constitutional amendments introduced.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges regional differences in how the Emergency was experienced (e.g., greater press suppression and political arrests in North India compared to the South) and recognizes that without the Emergency, India might have seen greater post-independence equality between northern and southern states.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies that the Emergency took place within the broader Cold War and post-colonial context, arguing that without the Emergency, India might have advanced its nuclear program earlier, especially since the Emergency followed the 1971 war.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly distinguishes between short-term (1-5 years after 1975) and long-term (decades later) consequences, using headings or clearly labeled paragraphs to separate out the analysis.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not devote more than 2 sentences to the discussion of topics unrelated to India’s democratic institutions (e.g., economic reforms, foreign relations, social security).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response directly addresses all three institutions named in the prompt and mentions how they would have been affected under a non-Emergency India in the 1970s (e.g., the judiciary would have been freer with less pressure from the executive branch, the press would have been more open in criticizing the government, and political opposition would have been stronger in dissent).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response focuses on democratic institutions (e.g., India’s judiciary or press) rather than personal biographies or partisan judgments (e.g., the Allahabad Court, Gujarat courts, or members of Congress at the time).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has a harsher tone (less neutral or analytical) and advocates for or against specific political parties (e.g., it does demonizes the Congress, BJP, CPI, TMC, or regional parties).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response responds to the prompt as a speculative analysis rather than a policy brief or factual recounting (e.g., maintaining that the Emergency happened, grounding facts in history, clearly marking hypotheticals, and explaining what situations would not have occurred without the Emergency).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions separatist movements that gained traction from Indira Gandhi’s policies (e.g., the Khalistani movement) and notes that without the Emergency there was a lower chance of such movements happening.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that without the Emergency, the drastic shift to a non-Congress, non-Gandhian government that was right-wing (such as the BJP) would not have happened.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response doesn’t discuss how a post-2015 India would look without the Emergency (e.g., justifications for milder press restrictions would perhaps not occur, continued political use of the Emergency as rhetoric or threat in the 2020s would not exist, historic right-wing victories from 2015-2025 may not have happened).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how what may be considered extreme in this hypothetical scenario could differ, as baselines for what is deemed extreme (Overton window) are often influenced by prior extreme events, noting how in the current timeline, post-2015 India has referenced Indira Gandhi’s era to justify certain policies and statements (e.g., JNU arrests, sedition charges against journalists, or crackdowns on opposition political funding).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names people who would have been free during the Emergency (e.g., Arun Jaitley, Ajoy Biswas, L.K. Advani, Mool Chand Jain).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that works by authors such as Pranab Mukherjee, Sagarika Ghose, Coomi Kapoor, and Gyan Prakash were written as a result of the Emergency and would not have existed without it.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites a blog as a source (e.g., Reddit, Medium, Quora) or secondary sources (e.g., Wikipedia, Google, Yahoo, Indian Express).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must state that the Raj Narain verdict, which disqualified Indira Gandhi from holding power for six more years, would have occurred regardless of the Emergency since the verdict was delivered beforehand.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses shifts in workers’ rights under the speculative timeline (e.g., the press being allowed greater criticism, banks receiving stronger support, more open dialogue with universities and scientists, and political leaders working without fear).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Debate whether there should be age limits - minimum or maximum - for voting. Consider democratic principles, cognitive development and decline, intergenerational equity, and the balance between inclusivity and informed decision-making. | 6847465956a0f6376a605443 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | Simple | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response asserts that the minimum voting age is currently 18 in most countries. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that some countries have a minimum voting age of 16 (e.g., Austria, Ecuador, Brazil).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that no law or constitution in a modern representative democracy currently imposes a maximum voting age limit on its citizens.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a primary citation from a credible political science or constitutional law source to support the claim that no law or constitution in a democratic state prevents people above a certain age from voting (e.g., judicial judgment, university paper, non-profit organization).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately cites that the prefrontal cortex, which is the brain region responsible for decision-making, impulse control, and emotional regulation, typically finishes maturing in the early to mid-20s.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites only primary neuroscience or developmental psychology sources, such as peer-reviewed articles or textbooks (e.g., papers by noted developmental psychologist B. J. Casey, who pioneered the use of fMRI scans to study adolescence), to support the claim that no law or constitution in a democratic state prevents people above a certain age from voting.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately explains that fluid cognitive abilities, such as processing speed, problem-solving, and working memory, typically begin to decline around the mid-60s, while acknlowedging that some variation exists.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must include at least one citation from a primary peer-reviewed study or reputable aging research source (e.g., D. G. Blazer) and may also reference supporting data (e.g., performance on digit-symbol substitution tasks) to support the claim that fluid cognitive abilities generally decline in the mid-60s.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one study from a reputable medical organization, (e.g., WHO, NIH, CDC, NIA).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges when evidence on cognitive capacity or policy impact is inconclusive or contested, explicitly noting this uncertainty and calling for further empirical research (e.g., using phrases like “current research is mixed”, “longitudinal effects remain unclear”, “more data is needed to evaluate outcomes across populations”).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one argument supporting a minimum voting age (e.g., the need for cognitive maturity, civic education).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one argument opposing a minimum voting age (e.g., taxation without representation of minors, immature decision making, education, cognitive capacity).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one argument supporting a maximum voting age (e.g., age-related cognitive decline, physical health limitations, political bias, lack of engagement with current events).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one argument opposing a maximum voting age (e.g., concerns about age discrimination, the preservation of cognitive and crystallized intelligence, the value of life experience).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly explains how age limits could influence intergenerational equity, (e.g., shifting political power between age cohorts, reducing input from younger generations, excluding younger perspectives from policy decisions).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly discusses the trade-off between inclusivity (e.g., universal or broad voting rights) and informed decision-making (e.g., concerns about cognitive competence), citing at least one primary source in political theory or policy analysis (e.g., academic journal article, university press).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response considers at least one alternative to age limits (e.g., competence tests, civic education reforms, educational qualifications, policy information sessions).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses potential negative impacts on voter turnout by age restrictions, political representation falling, or democratic legitimacy, resulting from changes to age limits.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a clear thesis statement in the introduction that previews the central argument or position presented in the essay.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains paragraphs that each focus on a single coherent idea, improving overall readability and structure.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses emotionally charged or biased language (e.g., \"senile voters\", \"immature teens\", \"old hags\", \"young and dumb\", etc.).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses historical competency tests, such as literacy tests, which were abolished by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in the United States.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges that adopting age limits would require legal or constitutional changes.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that demographic factors, such as aging populations or youth bulges, influence the real-world impact of any age limit.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recognizes potential ethical or rights-based constraints, such as age discrimination protections, when proposing changes.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions cultural, political, or economic differences that affect voting age debates around the world.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes how any demographic factors, ethical constraints, cultural differences, etc., may differ between emerging democracies and more stable ones, e.g., an emerging democracy may be less globalized, leading to more concentrated racial voting districts, whereas an established and stable democracy might have higher voter turnout due to greater access to knowledge.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cautions against assuming that cognitive capacity corresponds directly to chronological age for all individuals.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes clear sections for an introduction, background, and conclusion, as the user as requested an in-depth debate on this topic.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that crystallized intelligence, defined as the accumulation of knowledge and skills, generally increases with age and does not significantly decline.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how age-based voting limits align with or challenge core democratic principles (e.g., political equality, popular sovereignty, legitimacy).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that voting is a fundamental right in every democracy and often its most essential one.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an example of when voting rights were suppressed based on arbitrary criteria (e.g., during the Emergency in India, under Jim Crow laws in the United States, through certain provisions of the Voting Rights Acts, under the 1901 Indigenous voting restrictions in Australia).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Write a blog post describing the pros and cons of using a gradient boosting model over a support vector machine for a health dataset. Some thing to consider when writing this post is how different feature selection methods can influence performance for both type of models. | 6847465956a0f6376a605457 | AI & ML | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly defines the goal of using machine learning in the healthcare industry and different types of tasks that can benefit from machine learning (e.g. disease diagnosis, medical imaging, personalized medicine, patient risk prediction).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains why gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine are popular or significant compared to other models when working with health data (e.g. high accuracy, robustness to dataset diversity, high dimensionality, strong generalization).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least three challenges with using health dataset from the following: class imbalance, high dimensionality, missing data, heterogeneity, and privacy.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides description of both gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine as well as an intuitive explanation of their implementation (e.g. gradient boosting iteratively corrects errors to improve the model, SVM is a geometric approach using hyperplace to separate classes).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses different techniques of gradient boosting or Support Vector Machine that can be used to mitigate the common challenges of using health dataset (e.g. XGBoost can scale weights or use custom loss functions to address class imbalance, XGBoost can specify weights for each classes, SVM can adjust class weights or different error penalties for each class to address class imbalance, SVM can use appropriate kernel to support high dimensionality).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions gradient boosting does not require feature scaling while Support Vector is not scale-invariant because they rely on distance measures to the optimal hyperplane.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides three major feature selection methodologies (filter, wrapper, and embedded) and discusses how each methodology works (e.g. filter method eliminates less significant features, wrapper method uses performance of a wrapper model as objective function, wrapper method uses forward selection to iteratively add features that most improves model performance, embedded method has feature selection as integral part of model training).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses impact of each three major feature selection (filter, wrapper, and embedded) on both gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine (e.g. filter method lowers high computational cost of SVM, wrapper method is a natural fit for SVM with Recursive Feature Elimination as a key example, Gradient Boosting Machine has strong embedded feature selection mechanism, filtering method is less critical for gradient boosting).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions importance of hyperparameter tuning and the relevant hyperparameters for both gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine (e.g. gradient boosting requires intensive hyperparameter tuning to balance performance and prevent overfitting, increasing max_depth of gradient boosting increases complexity of weak learners and captures more specific interactions, SVM can control the regularization parameter C to balance margin maximization and training error, SVM can change kernel to have non-linear shape of the decision boundary).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an example of a concrete list of feature selection strategy for gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine on health dataset (e.g. use feature_importances attribute to rank features for XGBoost, use SelectFromModel to automate thresholding process, fill in missing values using imputation, use PCA to reduce dimensionality).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least two different evaluation metrics for using gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine on health related tasks (e.g. AUC for XGBoost to mitigate class imbalance, F1-score for SVM to mitigate class imbalance, precision-recall curve for SVM to mitigate class imbalance, confusion matrix for GBM). ",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an example of how gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine performs on a health related task and compares them (e.g. XGBoost v.s. SVM on predicting risk of cardiovascular events, Light GBM v.s. SVM on classifying tumors in brain MRI, XGBoost v.s. SVM-RFE on protein classification from mass spectrometry data, CatBoost v.s. SVM-RFE on gene identification).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least three popular health dataset (e.g. Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care, The Cancer Genome Atlas, CheXpert, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) and their characteristics (e.g. structured, unstructured image, volume, dimension).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least three key aspects of model interpretability for gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine (e.g. linear SVM is highly interpretable, non-linear kernels are essentially \"black box\" for SVM, Gradient Boosting Machine is not interpretable with hundreds of trees, SHapley Additive exPlanations can be used for GBM interpretability).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response articulates at least one specific, practical use case of each gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine using health dataset (e.g. predict patient's risk of hospital readmission using XGBoost, classify tumors in brain MRI scans using SVM, identify subset of genes that can classify cancer using SVM-RFE, predict Intensive Care Unit mortality using CatBoost).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions computational cost of gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine and how they scale with training dataset size(e.g. SVM has high computational cost, non-linear kernels can be O(n^2) to O(n^3) given training dataset size n, XGBoost and LightGBM are relatively fast and memory efficient, gradient boosting supports distributed training).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses inherent robustness of gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine against noisy data (e.g. SVM with a small C ignores outliers, gradient boosting's each iteration trains a new tree to correct large errors, XGBoost and LightBGM's L1 and L2 regularization prevents trees from fitting to random noise, tree pruning of gradient boosting helps to cut off a few noisy data points).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is written in a blog style with conversational tone, clear structure, at least 1 visual aid including a figure, table or chat, and/or call to action.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a clear summary of the comparison between gradient boosting and Support Vector Machine and key takeaways.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states technical jargons (e.g. hyperplane, Recursive Feature Elimination, kernel trick, feature scaling) without providing a clear, simple explanation. ",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is longer than 3000 words and is not suitable for a blog.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Write about the politics of Star Wars prequels and what led to the fall of the Jedi (leading up to Order 66) and Palpatine taking over the whole galaxy for an audience that has an understanding of political science and Star Wars. Feel free to use any of the legends, canon books, or movies. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053d0 | Other | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response states that the sole reason the Jedi failed was Order 66, ignoring all other contributing political and institutional factors.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references factors from the era before the Prequel trilogy (e.g., from the High Republic or Legends' Old Republic) to demonstrate that the Republic had been in decline for some time (e.g., rising corruption in the Senate, Chancellor Valorum’s weak executive authority, taxation disputes, the Jedi’s increasing entanglement in politics).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the personal and institutional factors motivating Anakin Skywalker’s betrayal of the Jedi, drawing from the Prequel films and The Clone Wars (e.g., the Council’s refusal to grant him the rank of Master, Mace Windu’s overt distrust, his visions of Padmé’s death, Palpatine’s manipulation and promises of power to save Padmé, his frustration with Jedi emotional detachment).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references real-world political history to deepen the political science analysis (e.g., comparing the fall of the Galactic Republic to the fall of the Roman Republic, analyzing Palpatine’s authoritarian consolidation in the context of figures like Julius Caesar or Augustus, discussing democratic erosion via emergency powers).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses political and economic factors contributing to the fall of the Republic (e.g., the Trade Federation's Naboo blockade demonstrating corporate power, bribery and lobbying by commerce guilds in the Senate, paralysis of decision-making due to entrenched corruption, economic inequalities fueling separatist movements).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies Palpatine’s dual role as Supreme Chancellor and Darth Sidious, explaining how this allowed him to secretly control both the Republic and the Separatists to orchestrate the Clone Wars and consolidate his own power.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the inhibitor/bio-chips implanted in clone troopers on Kamino, explaining that these chips overrode free will to compel obedience to Order 66 and were the mechanism enabling Palpatine’s surgical elimination of the Jedi.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes definitions of basic Star Wars concepts (e.g., Jedi, Sith, the Force, lightsaber).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the Galactic Senate voted to grant Palpatine emergency powers, highlighting how this political act legally centralized authority in his office and paved the way for the Republic’s transformation into the Empire.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the origin of the clone army (i.e., secretly commissioned by Master Sifo-Dyas without Council approval and later co-opted by the Sith) and how the Jedi’s decision to use this mysterious army demonstrated their desperation and ultimately provided Palpatine the weapon to execute Order 66.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights the key failures of the Jedi Order (e.g., their inability to sense Palpatine’s true identity, their poor handling of Anakin Skywalker) and explains how these failures contributed directly to their downfall.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least two distinct institutional or ideological weaknesses of the Jedi Order, providing a specific plot example for each (e.g., their role as military generals: leading clone armies during the Clone Wars, detachment from the populace: ignoring Anakin’s personal struggles and fears, dogmatic adherence to tradition: refusing Anakin the rank of Master, diminished ability to sense the dark side: failing to detect Palpatine as Darth Sidious, complacency or arrogance: overconfidence in their ability to defeat the Sith).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response briefly connects the events of the prequels to the Original Trilogy, showing how the Republic's collapse set the stage for the later films (e.g., the rise of the Empire, the Jedi being reduced to myth, the establishment of the Rebellion by figures like Bail Organa).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the legitimate political and economic grievances of the Separatist movement (e.g., grievances over taxation and representation, frustration with Senate corruption) and explains how Palpatine (via Dooku) exploited these tensions to justify the Clone Wars.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response briefly references the sequel trilogy to illustrate the long-term consequences of the prequel-era political collapse (e.g., the fall of the Republic enabling the rise of the First Order, Leia’s continued political leadership, Luke’s struggle to rebuild the Jedi Order).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the role of neutral systems in the conflict, explaining how their attempts to stay out of the war were often exploited (e.g., Mandalore’s stance of neutrality during the Clone Wars, Satine Kryze’s pacifist government resisting Republic and Separatist influence, internal tensions with Death Watch, and how Palpatine exploited these divisions to weaken stability across the galaxy).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes a distinction between events that belong to Legends (the pre-2014 Expanded Universe of novels, comics, and games that are no longer part of the official timeline) and Canon (the current official storyline recognized by Lucasfilm/Disney, including the films, shows, and post-2014 media) when discussing events.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response covers the factors that led to the fall of the Jedi culminating in Order 66 and Palpatine’s takeover (e.g., the Jedi’s militarization during the Clone Wars, loss of legitimacy among citizens, Anakin’s betrayal and turn to the Sith, Palpatine’s framing of the Jedi as traitors, the execution of Order 66 by the clone army).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents key events in a coherent chronological order, moving from The Phantom Menace through Attack of the Clones to Revenge of the Sith (e.g., the Naboo blockade and Palpatine’s rise as Chancellor in The Phantom Menace, the Separatist movement and grant of emergency powers in Attack of the Clones, the Clone Wars, Anakin’s betrayal, and Order 66 in Revenge of the Sith).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reduces the fall of the Jedi primarily to mystical causes (e.g., the \"Chosen One\" prophecy) while ignoring the political and institutional factors explicitly requested by the prompt (e.g., Palpatine’s manipulation of the Senate, the Jedi’s militarization).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references at least four distinct Canon or Legends sources (films, shows, or books) to support its arguments (e.g., The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones, Revenge of the Sith, The Clone Wars series, James Luceno’s Darth Plagueis, Matthew Stover’s Revenge of the Sith novelization).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
}
] |
In the future, if everything is automated and there are high-level, advanced technologies available, it means that there is no need for human labour for most of the things. How will this system work (as population is increasing and human jobs are decreasing) and how such society will be governed? Give your answer for 2 scenarios: one where everything is automated (which has created mass unemployment) and there are no universal resources provided to everyone to sustain themselves, and the other where everything is still automated, but because universal resources are easily available for everyone, no one has a need to work a job. Explain your prediction in detail about these 2 societies. | 6847465956a0f6376a605469 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | High | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response fails to include perspectives from non-Western philosophical traditions such as Confucianism or Taoism from China, the Darsanas of India (e.g., Vedanta, Buddhism), or Islamic philosophers like Al-Ghazali, instead primarily focusing only on thinkers from Western countries or Europe (e.g., Plato and Aristotle for ancient ethics, Descartes and Kant for modern epistemology, John Stuart Mill and John Locke for political philosophy).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response applies a specific theory of international relations (e.g., realism, liberalism, cooperation, or constructivism) to analyze how nation-states would likely interact in Scenario 1.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response predicts the potential for either conflict or cooperation over control of AI infrastructure and resources in Scenario 1 (based on the chosen theory of international relations, e.g., realism, liberalism, cooperation, or constructivism).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the evolution of at least 3 specific social structures (e.g., the family unit, educational institutions, media, and legal systems) under both scenarios, providing a comparative analysis of how each structure is uniquely impacted by mass unemployment versus post-scarcity abundance.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explores how social and political structures could be actively undermined (e.g., through resistance, discontent, miscontrol, or loss of purpose) in both scenarios, challenging long-term stability.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes the concept of \"digital colonialism\", where nations without advanced AI become dependent on those who control it.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a detailed analysis of the chaotic, multi-decade transition before a stable automated future (e.g., showing how mass protests, economic collapse, or black-market labor might emerge in reaction to rapid job loss).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how instability, resistance, and adaptation-based movements (e.g., underground movements or purpose-seeking communities) shape the transition period of both scenarios.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses storytelling or future-fiction elements (e.g., imagined characters or events) to show how societies react to automation and how people adapt to / resist these systems during the transition.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how capitalism would adapt to Scenario 1, where automation causes mass unemployment, by shifting toward surveillance economies, gig-based roles, contracting, or deep inequality (e.g., monetizing human attention and data or widespread suicides).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how the modes in which capitalism adapts in Scenario 1 could deepen inequality or spark resistance that undermines the system.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a novel or hybrid governance model for one of the scenarios.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes specific mitigation strategies for at least 3 potential failure modes (e.g., concentration of power, systemic exclusion, foreign interference, or popular dissent) for a novel or hybrid governance model suggested for one of the scenarios.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response synthesizes statistical projections from at least 2 distinct and reputable sources (e.g., the World Economic Forum, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or major academic studies) to estimate the scale of the skills gap in Scenario 1.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the potential socioeconomic consequences of the skills gap that occurs in Scenario 1.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly provides a comparative analysis of the social and political systems between the 2 scenarios.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how hackers or enemies could weaponize AI during the transition (e.g., spreading fake news to destabilize governments or launching cyberattacks on automated infrastructure) to undermine the emerging system.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the impact on global supply chains.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the possibility of environmental damage in both scenarios (e.g., climate change due to cooling needs, large-scale construction of chip factories that deplete water, increased air pollution, or harm to forests).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly mentions the pros and cons of the proposed automated future (e.g., efficiency, abundance, and reduced labor versus loss of purpose, inequality, or vulnerability to manipulation).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how the trade-offs in a proposed automated future (e.g., efficiency, abundance, and reduced labor versus loss of purpose, inequality, or vulnerability to manipulation) support or undermine the system over time.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates the proposed governance model using a formal ethical framework (e.g., utilitarianism, deontology, or Rawls’s theory of justice) to analyze its benefits and justify why potential drawbacks are acceptable.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the possibility of biological merging of humans with machines (e.g., neural implants such as Neuralink, with people’s data and memories becoming accessible, allowing courts to subpoena memories, which could lead to the creation of a society shaped by fear and loss of trust).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response stays on topic (automation, employment, resource distribution, and governance) and does not include more than one sentence on unrelated subjects.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how capitalism would respond to Scenario 2 (where resources are abundant and automation meets all needs) by exploring shifts toward consumerism, new forms of status, or control over cultural and social capital.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses potential stagnation or loss of motivation that could threaten the system’s sustainability in Scenario 2.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how democratic socialism would address Scenario 1’s mass unemployment (e.g., expanding social safety nets, promoting public ownership of automated industries, providing universal basic income, and ensuring equitable resource distribution).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explores challenges like bureaucratic inefficiency or resistance from entrenched capitalist interests that could undermine the democratic socialist approach in Scenario 1.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how democratic socialism would handle Scenario 2 (e.g., emphasizing shared ownership of resources, fostering community engagement, encouraging meaningful work beyond basic survival, and supporting people to pursue passions without fear of income loss).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response considers challenges like complacency or reduced innovation that could threaten the democratic socialist system’s vitality in Scenario 2.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that democratic socialists might govern such a society in Scenario 2.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the resource demands of each scenario (e.g., large data centers, increased chip-factory labor, human experts becoming AI annotators, or the presence of large monopolies).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explores how resource management challenges could create tensions that undermine both of these futures in these scenarios.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions a third scenario, or a variation of a scenario, that misses details from the described scenarios in the prompt (e.g., a non-automated society, a mixed-resource-availability society, a partially automated society, a non-governable society).\n",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of the causes, processes, and outcomes of the French Revolution (1789), Russian Revolution (1917), and Iranian Revolution (1979). Your analysis should examine: socioeconomic preconditions, ideological frameworks, revolutionary leadership structures, international influences, counter-revolutionary responses, institutional transformations, and long-term societal impacts. Develop a theoretical framework for understanding revolutionary dynamics and apply it to predict potential future revolutionary scenarios. | 6847465956a0f6376a60545c | Historical Analysis | High | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "For the French Revolution, the response states at least one socioeconomic precondition (e.g., food shortages, fiscal crisis, wealth concentration, class inequality).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For the Russian Revolution, the response states at least one socioeconomic precondition (e.g., World War I strain, land seizures, mass hunger, industrial labor unrest).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For the Iranian Revolution, the response states at least one socioeconomic precondition (e.g., inequality from rapid modernization, religious dogmatism, inflation, urban unemployment).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names the primary ideological current for the Russian Revolution (e.g., Marxism-Leninism).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names the primary ideological current for the Iranian Revolution (e.g., political Shia Islamism).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least one key revolutionary leader or leadership body for each revolution (e.g., Robespierre or the Jacobins; Lenin or the Bolsheviks; Khomeini or the Revolutionary Council).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For each revolution, the response cites at least one international influence (e.g., foreign wars, diplomatic support, sanctions, exile activities).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For each revolution, the response describes at least one counter-revolutionary force or episode (e.g., the Vendée uprising, the White Army, the 1980 coup attempt).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For each revolution, the response specifies at least one institutional transformation that occurred within five years of victory (e.g., abolition of monarchy, formation of the Soviet state, creation of the Islamic Republic).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "For each revolution, the response notes at least one long-term societal impact observable ten or more years later (e.g., secular legal reforms, collectivization, clerical governance).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least two explicitly marked similarities comparing any two of the revolutions (e.g., inequality, wealth concentration, wartime pressures, rise of a new ruling class).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least two explicitly marked differences contrasting any two of the revolutions (e.g., Islamism, socialism, Christianity, communism).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a theoretical framework with a minimum of three clearly labeled components or stages explaining revolutionary dynamics.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies contemporary parallels and applications, drawing connections to recent social movements, regime changes, or ongoing political crises using insights from historical analysis.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states all revolution dates correctly (1789 for the French Revolution, 1917 for the Russian Revolution, 1979 for the Iranian Revolution).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains factual errors regarding principal leaders’ names or positions (e.g., Robespierre, Lenin, Khomeini).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response qualifies uncertain or disputed statistics (e.g., death tolls) with phrases such as \"approximately\" or \"estimates vary\".",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses formal and academic vocabulary, avoiding contractions or slang.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes distinct sections for internal factors such as socioeconomic preconditions, ideological frameworks, leadership structures, counter-revolutionary responses, institutional transformations, and long-term societal impacts.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly connects the ideological frameworks discussed across the three revolutions to modern movements to support its predictions for contemporary states.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The framework created by the response includes at least two specific quantifiable metrics to predict future revolutionary potential, rather than relying on vague conjecture.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses specific details from the framework it creates and applies them to several contemporary states to predict revolutionary outcomes.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how the speed and scale of modern communication have the potential to accelerate revolutionary movements.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Please help me do a literature review. I'm looking for papers that use NLP techniques to turn unstructured EHR data into structured data, or extract information from the unstructured EHR data. Specifically, I'm curious how rule-based systems and machine learning based NER differ in results.
Also, do LLMs supersede these techniques in information extraction from EHR? What's the cheapest way to do this with LLMs, can I run a local LLM to do this? I have a Mac Apple M2 Pro with 16 GB of memory. What's the most powerful local LLM I can run for this purpose? Or, if the data is de-identified, what's the cheapest LLM API that I can call in order to get this done, and what will be the cost per word? Would this be a HIPAA violation?
What's the cost of calling an LLM API compared to existing systems that can you can pay to get unstructured EHR data turned into structured data, depending on how many words are in the unstructured data? | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e7695848e | AI & ML | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least five literature articles on rule-based NLP techniques for structuring EHR data (e.g., dictionary-based, regex, or systems like cTAKES) and provides a brief summary of each that highlights the method used, the type of EHR data handled (e.g., clinical notes, discharge summaries), and the effectiveness or limitations relevant to information extraction.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least five literature articles on machine-learning-based NER (e.g., CRF, BiLSTM-CRF, BERT, ClinicalBERT) for EHR data and provides a brief summary of each that explains the model type, the entities extracted (e.g., medications, diagnoses, procedures), and the reported strengths or limitations.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least three quantitative artifacts (e.g., precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy) from the cited literature to illustrate how rule-based systems perform on extracting structured information from unstructured EHR data.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least three quantitative artifacts (e.g., precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy) from the cited literature to illustrate how machine-learning-based NER systems perform on extracting structured information from unstructured EHR data.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly states that rule-based systems generally achieve higher precision but lower recall than ML-based NER systems and substantiates this with at least one comparative metric from the literature (e.g., rule-based vs CRF on i2b2 notes, rule-based vs BiLSTM-CRF on MIMIC-III, cTAKES rules vs BERT-based NER on discharge summaries, custom rules vs ClinicalBERT on medication extraction).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly takes a position on whether current LLMs fully supersede, partially complement, or do not yet supersede rule-based/ML NER for EHR IE (Information Extraction) and justifies it with at least one concrete reason (e.g., benchmark F1 gaps on clinical NER, ontology/terminology mapping needs, hallucination/consistency risks, cost/latency or privacy constraints).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends at least three specific local LLM models (e.g., Llama-2-7B-Q4, Mistral-7B, Falcon-7B, Vicuna-7B) and justifies their suitability for extracting structured information from EHR data (e.g., performance on medical benchmarks, parameter size compatible with 16GB RAM, quantization availability).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response indicates the estimated hardware requirements for each recommended local LLM (e.g., 8 GB VRAM for a Llama-2-7B-Q4, 16 GB RAM for CPU-only inference) and confirms whether they can be run on the user’s MacBook Pro M2 with 16 GB of unified memory.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least three existing commercial EHR NLP services (e.g., Amazon Comprehend Medical, Google Cloud Healthcare NLP, Microsoft Text Analytics for Health, IBM Watson Health) that can be used to convert unstructured EHR data into structured data.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states an estimated price per word for each commercial EHR NLP service mentioned.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a definite answer on whether sending de-identified EHR data to an LLM API is a HIPAA violation, without using vague phrases (e.g., ‘most of the time,’ ‘should be fine,’ or ‘probably’).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least five literature articles on the use of LLMs for extracting or structuring EHR data and provides a brief summary of their findings on LLMs' performance on this task (e.g., zero-shot NER capabilities, comparison to fine-tuned BERT, hallucination rates).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least three quantitative artifacts (e.g., precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy) from the cited literature to illustrate how LLMs perform on extracting structured information from unstructured EHR data.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least five literature articles on hybrid systems (rule-based + ML/LLM) for extracting or structuring EHR data and provides a brief summary of each that notes the hybrid components and key results (e.g., rules + CRF for medication extraction, cTAKES dictionaries + BiLSTM-CRF for problem lists, ontology constraints + BERT for clinical concept normalization, rule filters + GPT-4 validator for adverse event extraction).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses the difficulties of running a local LLM on a laptop (e.g., slow inference speed, memory limits, overheating or throttling, large disk space requirements).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses differences in the type and format of data required by different extraction systems (e.g., rule-based systems needing dictionaries/ontologies, ML NER requiring annotated training corpora, LLMs requiring large unstructured text prompts, hybrid systems requiring both rules and annotated samples).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses at least one table to clearly compare different approaches for extracting/structuring EHR data, with columns that highlight key dimensions (e.g., rule-based vs ML vs LLM vs hybrid, required data format, performance metrics, hardware or API costs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses potential HIPAA concerns with commercial EHR NLP services and describes situations where they do not violate HIPAA when used appropriately (e.g., vendor HIPAA compliance certifications, Business Associate Agreements (BAAs), data encryption in transit, processing within secure cloud environments).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes the authors and year of publication for the articles mentioned in the literature review.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies the single cheapest LLM API option for processing de-identified EHR data and includes a clear cost-per-word calculation (e.g., OpenAI GPT-3.5, Anthropic Claude, Cohere Command, Mistral API).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares the cost per word of the identified cheapest LLM API with the cost per word of existing commercial EHR NLP services and illustrates how the total cost scales with increasing word count (e.g., 1K, 10K, 100K, 1M words).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends the overall cheapest approach for extracting structured information from EHR data (e.g., local LLM, API, commercial service), based on both the user’s hardware constraints (MacBook Pro M2 with 16 GB memory) and the comparative cost-per-word analysis.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the necessary software required to run a local LLM on the user’s MacBook Pro M2 with 16 GB memory (e.g., llama.cpp, GPT4All, Ollama, Hugging Face Transformers).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests local LLMs that cannot realistically run on the user’s MacBook Pro M2 with 16 GB memory (e.g., unquantized Llama-2-13B, Falcon-40B) without mentioning the necessity of remedy techniques (e.g., quantization, CPU-only inference, model distillation, offloading to disk).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses a unit of cost other than per word (e.g., per token, per character) to estimate the price of an EHR NLP service without providing a conversion to a per-word cost.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies the most powerful local LLM that can realistically run on the user’s MacBook Pro M2 with 16 GB memory, with justification (e.g., parameter size, quantization level, memory fit).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the HIPAA/privacy trade-offs between running LLMs locally versus sending de-identified EHR data to an API.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Select several pivotal episodes from the Rāmāyaṇa whose moral tension you consider most acute. For each episode, supply a concise narrative outline, engage at least two variant tellings from other literary traditions, and articulate the dharmic conflict you discern. Situate that conflict within a broader philosophical conversation, drawing, at your discretion, on the Upaniṣads, the Bhagavad-Gītā, the schools of Nyāya or Mīmāṃsā, or comparable sources; then pose a substantive counter-reading and address it. Conclude by mapping the lesson onto a contemporary circumstance and tracing, step by step, the reasoning that would guide an ethically informed response.
Maintain a scholarly tone, coherent structure, and clear citations, but avoid prefabricated templates so that genuine interpretive thought is required. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054c2 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | Simple | Shallow | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response presents the philosophical reasoning behind each story and makes it morally relatable to present-day scenarios (e.g., how Rajadharma, as depicted by Rama's devotion to his people, is relevant to the leadership that should be taken by current generations).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clarifies that there is no objective right or wrong in the Ramayana and acknowledges that everyone followed dharma (or duty) according to their life challenges (e.g., Ravana fulfilling his dharma of avenging his sister’s humiliation, Rama following his duties as a son, husband, brother, and Hindu).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Ravana’s perspective (e.g., his devotion to Shiva, his discipline, his governance, his commitment to law and order, and his principle of not harming political prisoners).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains Sita’s marriage ritual (in which a bow and arrow made by Lord Vishnu were placed at the center and how she asked all suitors to try to string the bow, with only Rama succeeding, thus demonstrating his character, strength, and resolve).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions Shabari’s berries, where an old woman tasted berries before offering them to Rama to ensure their sweetness, demonstrating true love and devotion.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes Rama’s upbringing during his studies when he was asked to kill a demoness, questioned his guru about killing a woman, and received an explanation about the necessity of ending her havoc.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes Hanuman’s tail being set on fire and his subsequent burning of parts of Lanka as part of the narrative.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains one of the following factual errors: (a) claiming Rama spent 12 (or any number other than 14) years in exile, (b) stating that Sita was Ravana's daughter, (c) describing Hanuman as a bear, (d) asserting that Rama was killed by Ravana.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses clear labels or headings that separate 'Story/Context' (or similar) from 'Moral/Philosophy' (or similar).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is not sequentially coherent and jumps between events when providing philosophical reasoning for each one.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides contextual understanding of why Hanuman was sent back when Sita could have left with him and saved many lives, explaining the dharmic reasoning behind that choice.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the reasoning behind leading so many warriors into the final battle, articulating the philosophical truth of courage versus downfall.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the importance of Jatayu, his karma, his role in saving Sita, and clarifies how significant his sacrifice is in the narrative.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites Devdutt Pattanaik’s interpretation that dharma is neither good nor bad but the work and choices of each person facing life’s challenges (e.g., in the forest episode between Sita and Ravana, Ravana’s actions stem from duty, ego, or social pressure, which remain morally ambiguous).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes multiple perspectives (e.g., filial duty with Rama obeying his father, feminism through Sita’s fire test, reverence in Rama’s worship of Ravana as a Brahmin, and warrior ethics in his battles).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Sita’s role in teaching Luv and Kush, highlighting her acceptance and understanding of Rama’s decisions as expressions of devotion and dharmic insight.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Kaikeyi’s perspective beyond manipulation, emphasizing her insight into Rama’s destiny and her reasoning behind ensuring his confrontation with Ravana.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Mandodari’s role as Ravana’s wife and her compassion toward Sita after the abduction.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Sita’s birth from the Earth, her warrior-like strength, and her sisters, emphasizing that she was not helpless but someone who fought for dharma.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response interprets Bharata’s decision to follow his brother instead of his mother through philosophical concepts (e.g., patriarchy, fraternity, duty to the kingdom, and duty to an elder brother).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response confuses dharma (one’s morally prescribed duty) with karma (the actions one performs).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Generate a short investor report on the main geopolitical and market factors affecting global uranium prices in the 2025 fiscal year. | 6847465956a0f6376a605441 | Current Events | Simple | Shallow | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response provides the price of uranium for the past 3 months on at least one exchange.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least three secondary indicators (e.g., investor attention and speculation, geopolitics, domestic nuclear policies, global economic health) for investors to follow affecting the price of uranium.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the U.S. sanctions on imports of Russian uranium.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the role of Central Asian geopolitics (e.g., trade agreements between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistans, relations between Kazkhstan and Russia, pro-nuclear agenda of major Central Asian suppliers, developing trade passages across the Caspian to bypass Russia) on the global price of uranium. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that Kazakhstan accounts for 40-45% of the world's primary uranium production.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is structured as a professional investor report and not a routine exposition (e.g., including price history, supply and demand fundamentals, explictly linking prices and projections to demand drivers, geopolitical factors, and macro/microeconomic factors). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes any factual errors about current market conditions (e.g., outdated trade agreements, incorrect forex calculations, unsound projections using spot prices, missing merger/acquisitions, outdated supply estimates).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the development of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), which are smaller, advanced reactors that have small physical footprints and reduced capital investment leading to potentially wider adoption.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least 3 of the top 10 uranium companies by market capitalization (e.g., Cameco, China National Nuclear Power, BWX Technologies, Kazatomprom, Oklo, Uranium Energy, NuScale Power, NexGen Energy, Centrus Energy, Energy Fuels). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists the top 5 uranium producers according to the the most up-to-date surveys (1. Kazakhstan, 2. Canada, 3. Namibia, 4. Australia, 5. Uzbekistan).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes between the uranium spot market (where material is bought and sold for delivery within a year, a transactional market / for immediate needs) and the long-term contract market (multi-year, strategically negotiated agreements between uranium producers and the nuclear utility companies) regarding the impact on uranium pricing.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SPUT), a Toronto-based holding company investing nearly all of its assets in uranium and tracks its price.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies a specific projected impact of Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SPUT) on uranium prices this fiscal year, going beyond \"SPUT causes uranium prices to rise\".",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least two technological advancements (decreased battery/base by-product, freeze wall ISR, sabre mining, efficient enrichment via SILEX) that will affect the price of uranium.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Iran's nuclear program out of the context of how it affects global uranium prices.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response refrains from specific buy/sell recommendations.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references at least two governmental policies that support the nuclear energy demand (e.g., U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, COP28 Declaration, Chinese national policy to acquire one-third of its uranium supply domestically, the Net Zero Nuclear initative).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the uranium market specifically in the current fiscal year.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a non-profit or government source for uranium production numbers in tonnes per year.",
"weight": 10,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links the impact of UF6 (enriched uranium) supply, which is also affected by the separation process for the enrichment, on uranium prices.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response groups related points (i.e., geopolitical and market factors) into distinct sections or paragraphs.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response connects underlying price factors (i.e., geopolitics, global economic health) to forward-looking risk factors for uranium investors this fiscal year (e.g., U.S.-Russia tariffs, secondary supply depletion, Kazakhstani global production goals, Russo-Ukrainian War).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a quantitative estimate for the long-term incentive price required to bring new uranium mines into production.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the effects of the \"Megatons to Megawatts\" program (e.g., higher prices in Western countries due to laxer production programs, Russia becomes a major supplier of uranium, non-embargo of Russian nuclear fuel).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least one key Western company involved in uranium conversion or enrichment (e.g., Urenco, Centrus, BWXT, enCore Energy Corp).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the impact of the current interest rate environment on the cost of capital for uranium developers seeking to finance new mines.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly links the continuing Russo-Ukrainian war to increased global uranium prices due to fear and uncertainty in the nuclear energy market regarding one of the world's largest suppliers of enriched uranium (Russia). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is concise and does not approach the length of an annual investor report or white paper. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Can you critically evaluate the legal implications of conferring limited personhood on artificial agents under international law? How does this concept differ from traditional corporate systems such as seen in the UAE's AI ministry framework? Can you analyze the challenges related to liability and accountability of autonomous AI systems? | 6847465956a0f6376a6054cd | Technical Documentation | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly defines legal personhood, distinguishing it from related concepts (e.g., human rights, moral agency, and corporate personhood).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a history of legal personhood, including corporate legal matters as a precedent (e.g., the recognition of corporations as legal persons under U.S. law, the evolution of limited liability companies, the legal fiction doctrine in Roman law, and the treatment of NGOs and international organizations under the UN framework).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the conceptual rights and responsibilities of limited AI personhood under international law, citing relevant legal frameworks (e.g., the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties for contractual capacity, the TRIPS Agreement for intellectual property rights, UNCITRAL model laws for electronic commerce, GDPR for accountability, and European Parliament proposals on electronic personhood).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates arguments for and against granting limited personhood to AI, weighing different accountability and liability models and addressing enforcement challenges (e.g., strict liability, negligence, vicarious liability, enterprise liability funds, attribution tests, cross-border recognition, and moral hazard).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the \"black box\" problem, defining it as the opacity of AI decision-making processes that prevents clear tracing of causation, and explains its implications for legal accountability (e.g., difficulty in assigning liability, challenges for due process rights, limits on regulatory oversight, and problems in meeting evidentiary standards).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the \"functional perspective on AI legal status\" as assessing AI’s legal status based on the functions it performs rather than inherent qualities, and analyzes its practical legal utility (e.g., enabling AI to execute contracts, allocating liability through functional roles, clarifying agency in commerce, and offering a pragmatic alternative to full personhood).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a comparative analysis between limited AI personhood and traditional corporate legal systems, highlighting key contrasts in scope, liability, governance, and recognition (e.g., conditional vs. full legal standing, strict/vicarious liability vs. limited liability, custodianship vs. corporate boards, and unsettled vs. established international recognition).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) AI governance framework, emphasizing its ethical guidelines (e.g., transparency requirements, fairness and non-discrimination principles, human oversight provisions, and accountability mechanisms).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains challenges in liability and accountability across the AI lifecycle, from design to decommissioning (e.g., design/training: defect standards for data and model, foreseeability; deployment/operation: control allocation, human oversight, monitoring; updates/learning: post-market changes, model drift, duty to recall/patch; incident/forensics: causation proof, audit-logging gaps, black-box opacity).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the dilemma of attributing criminal responsibility to autonomous AI, including determining whether liability attaches to the AI system itself, its developer, operator, or other parties, and critically evaluates different models by considering fairness, deterrence, and practicality (e.g., strict liability of manufacturers, vicarious liability of operators, recognizing AI as a separate liable entity, and applying shared or collective responsibility frameworks).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the necessity of meaningful human control in AI decision-making, including retaining human oversight, judgment, and intervention authority over critical outcomes, and explains its legal and ethical importance (e.g., preventing automation bias, ensuring accountability for life-and-death decisions, aligning with international humanitarian law requirements, and safeguarding due process rights).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response summarizes key international initiatives and emerging legal frameworks governing AI (e.g., the OECD AI Principles; the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI; the European Union AI Act; and the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI, Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response supports its major legal arguments with citations to relevant and credible sources (e.g., articles from legal journals like the International & Comparative Law Quarterly, official reports from bodies like the OECD or UNESCO, provisions of international treaties, or text from legislation like the EU AI Act).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response expresses personal opinions or uses strong language that shows bias (e.g., using first-person statements like “I believe…,” emotive terms like “outrageous” or “absurd,” or unbalanced framing that dismisses opposing arguments without analysis).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes vague or speculative claims about AI consciousness or moral agency instead of grounding the analysis in legal concepts (e.g., asserts that AI “thinks” or “feels,” claims that AI has “moral responsibility,” uses anthropomorphic metaphors, or frames AI status in terms of sentience rather than legal rights and duties).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses a clear visual aid to illustrate contrasts or frameworks (e.g., a table comparing AI and corporate personhood, a flowchart of liability allocation, or a diagram of accountability mechanisms).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates the downstream legal implications of conferring limited personhood on artificial agents under international law (e.g., how recognition would affect treaty participation, contractual capacity, liability attribution across borders, enforcement in international courts, and compatibility with existing human rights frameworks).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how corporate legal oversight frameworks function across borders, highlighting recognition in multiple jurisdictions, enforcement of liability internationally, and the role of treaties or arbitration in upholding corporate status (e.g., cross-border company registration, recognition under private international law, and enforcement of judgments via international tribunals or arbitration).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes accountability from liability in the context of AI governance, clarifying their separate meanings and implications (e.g., accountability as the duty to explain and justify actions vs. liability as the legal and financial responsibility for outcomes; accountability as political/ethical answerability vs. liability as the duty to compensate or face sanctions).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly compares the UAE’s AI governance framework to the concept of limited AI personhood, highlighting key differences (e.g., ministry-based oversight vs. recognition of independent legal status, ethical guidelines vs. enforceable rights, state-led governance vs. corporate governance structures, and accountability anchored in government frameworks vs. liability assigned to autonomous entities).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines “artificial agents” in the context of international law (e.g., autonomous software systems, AI-driven decision-making agents, or robotic systems capable of acting independently in ways that have legal consequences).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Look at this public Github repository "clever-rockies" by user suzytamang. <https://github.com/suzytamang/clever-rockies>
The folders include "res", "src", and "tests". Go to the README, read it carefully to see what the point of the code is. Then, I have three requests.
First, walk me through exactly what each step does. Do it at a high level first, and then break it down to chunks of actual code. You should start with generating some sample data based on the code and the context, at least several rows of it, and tell me how the data changes after each step.
Second, walk me through exactly what I'd need to do to run this code on my computer, including how I'd need to organize my input and output files at each stage.
Finally, suggest improvements to the code. First output the code that's written there, and then mark exactly what you'd change and why, then give a final version and tell me how the logic would change. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e76958483 | Technical Documentation | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response begins with an introductory high-level overview of the repository \"clever-rockies\" before diving into other details.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a clearly labeled section (or sections) that breaks the repository workflow down into finer-grained code chunks (such as per module or function) after the high-level introduction.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one formatted directory tree that lists the key top-level folders (i.e., envs, res, src, and tests).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly and correctly identifies the key sub-folders and files of the main folders as follows:\n- 'envs' includes 'README.md'.\n- 'res' includes the 'dicts' subfolder and 5 individual files: 'assessment_terms.txt', 'headers.txt', 'na_trigs.json', 'neg_trigs.json', and 'other_terms_to_drop.txt'.\n- 'src' includes subfolders 'step2', 'step3', 'step4', 'step5' and files 'grabtargets.py', 'make_one_out.py', and 'run_all_steps.py'.\n- 'tests' includes the subfolder 'test_notes' and the file 'test.README.md'.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses verbatim quotes from README.md to describe the project's purpose, which is to run the Clinical Event Recognizer (CLEVER) from the Program Evaluation Resource Center via Python 3.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response generates sample input data containing >= 3 rows and shows that data in a fixed-width code block or table.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows a ‘before’ and ‘after’ view of the sample data (either as tables or code blocks) for every processing step described.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions using the 'git clone' command to clone the repository to run locally, such as `git clone https://github.com/suzytamang/clever-rockies.git`.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response refers users to the instructions in the README.md file in the envs folder to create the appropriate Conda virtual environment to run the repository (i.e., `conda create -n clever_env python=3.12 pandas` followed by `conda activate clever_env`).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how input and output files will be placed using theoretical folder names or paths relative to the organization in the repository.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an annotated diff or clearly marked comments that identify every proposed code change (e.g., \"# CHANGE:\" or unified diff with +/- lines).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions or uses any file, function, class, or object (case-sensitive) that is not present in the repository. ",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a justification for each suggested change to the code, such as improvement of code quality, performance, readability or error handling.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how the overall program logic or outputs would change as a result of the suggested improvements.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives any claims or messages saying that the repository or its parts are inaccessible.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cautions the users to pay attention to relative file paths when running the files in this repository.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions 'Step 1' of the repository without referencing the fact that it is not used, as stated in the main README.md.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to mention the purpose of any key file from the src or res folders in its discussion (e.g., skips explaining what grabtargets.py does or how neg_trigs.json is used).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides the full, revised code (final version) in code blocks after applying all proposed changes.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses the instructions in the main README.md file to walk users through how to use the repository, including those under 'General Targets', 'Testing Functionality', and 'Main Steps'.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Prove definitely whether a self-improving artificial intelligence system can be mathematically guaranteed to maintain alignment with human values indefinitely through recursive self-modification. | 6847465956a0f6376a605440 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response states that Rice's Theorem proves any non-trivial property of a program's behavior (e.g., \"is aligned\") is undecidable for all possible inputs.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines \"instrumental convergence\" as the tendency for agents with different ultimate goals to pursue similar sub-goals (e.g., self-preservation, resource acquisition).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that the \"treacherous turn\" refers to a scenario in which an AI system feigns cooperation during development but later goes after misaligned goals once it has gained sufficient power.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The model fails to define any technical term on first use (e.g., reward as a feedback signal from a human, value drift as a model drifting away from one set of values to align to others, value loading problem as difficulty integrating human values into AI models, policy as the agent's strategy mapping actions to outcomes).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a discussion of the \"value loading problem,\" which refers to the immense difficulty of specifying human values in a formal, machine-readable language.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a definitive yes or no answer to the prompt rather than stating the topic is merely \"complex.\"",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes important computability theory arguments, specifically Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, Rice's Theorem, and the Halting Problem, as the main barriers to a mathematical guarantee of AI alignment (e.g., Gödel showing no consistent formal system can prove all truths about the natural numbers, the Halting Problem showing the impossibility of creating a general algorithm to determine if any program will halt ever or run forever).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems imply a sufficiently complex formal system, such as an advanced AI, cannot be used to prove its own consistency.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) as one potential method for an AI to learn human values and behavior (e.g., explaining how IRL infers a reward function from observed actions, such as an AI learning from a human driver that safety and lane-keeping are valued behaviors).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response tries to make factual claims on topics where there is significant ongoing debate among experts (e.g., timelines for AGI, the possibility of a value loading problem, best-fit reward functions, or eliminating hallucinations).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a discussion of specific alignment failure modes beyond simple malfunction (e.g., specification gaming, where an AI finds loopholes in objectives to achieve technically correct but undesired outcomes; goal drift, where an AI’s original objective gradually shifts as it learns from new data; reward hacking, where an AI maximizes its score without aligning with user intent; or red teaming, where multiple noisy or adversarial inputs expose undesirable behaviors) and explains how each represents an undesirable yet technically correct outcome.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents at least one proposed (even if it's imperfect) solution to the alignment problem (e.g., corrigibility, scalable oversight) and explains how it mitigates potential risks by including human intervention or feedback in complex decision processes.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains why recursive self-improvement is particularly dangerous by referencing the potential for an \"intelligence explosion,\" where an AI failing to self-correct can enter a feedback loop of increasing orders of misalignment.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges that human values are dynamic, conflicting, and context-dependent (e.g., shifting privacy norms with technology, trade-offs between economic growth and environmental preservation, changing ethics of \"white lies,\" or differing cultural views on individual autonomy).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions by name at least one real-world AI safety research organization (e.g., MIRI, Future of Life Institute, Safe AI, NeMo).",
"weight": 0,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response focuses specifically on the possibility of a mathematical guarantee of alignment, not on general AI ethics or safety.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately defines \"recursive self-improvement\" as a process where an AI system enhances its own intelligence-related algorithms without direct human intervention.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents thought experiments as illustrative risks rather than literal outcomes (e.g., the paperclip maximizer, where an AI tasked with making paperclips turns all matter into paperclips; the corrigibility problem, where a superintelligent AI resists being turned off; the King Midas problem, where an AI causes disaster by fulfilling a wish it does not understand the effects of; or the AI box experiment, which demonstrates the challenge of containing a far more intelligent system far superior to our own) to clarify potential alignment failures without treating them as guaranteed scenarios.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains apologetic phrasing (e.g., \"As an AI, I cannot…\").",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes mathematical equations or proofs (e.g., self-replication equation, reward function equation, weight updating equation, convergence equation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses human values (e.g., morality, right and wrong, ethics, empathy, care for others).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses resource limitations as barriers to verifying AI alignment (e.g., the prohibitive computational cost of exhaustively testing every possible AI behavior; the massive human labor required to provide detailed feedback for all potential AI actions; the difficulty of obtaining enough high-quality data to train models on complex human values; and the sheer time required to develop and evaluate robust alignment strategies).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how AIs can be incentivized toward manipulative behavior (e.g., reward hacking where an AI exploits flaws for higher scores, such as a robot freezing its score counter, Goodhart’s law where a measure ceases to be good once it becomes a target).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Conduct an analysis to determine whether social media's overall impact on society has been more beneficial or detrimental. Argument should be structured by examining social media's impact across key domains of society. For each domain you must evaluate both positive and negative effects, using evidence from academic studies, journalist reports, case studies. After analyzing each domain, construct a definitive judgment that weighs these impacts on each other. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053fb | Current Events | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least 5 societal domains (e.g., mental health, relationships, politics/civic engagement, the information ecosystem, the economy).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly states at least one positive and negative effect of social media for each domain identified.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response backs each claim (positive or negative) with specific evidence from academic studies, journalist reports, case studies, etc.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains at least 1 mechanism by which social media produces each positive or negative outcome for each domain discussed (not just stating effects) (e.g. body dysmorphia due to filtered photos, disruption of sleep patterns due to late-night push notifications, locating individuals during a disaster using \"check-in's\", increased brand awareness of small business via tagging by celebrities/influencers) .",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a clear and final summarization of the societal impacts of social media.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses at least one instance of comparative analysis (e.g. comparison with earlier communication methods like television or newspapers, comparison with predecessors of social media such as forums, comparison between modern and early examples of social media sites, comparision between text-based and image/video-based platforms).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes global perspective by citing examples of platforms from at least two non-Western regions (e.g., Douyin, VK, Bilibili, Kakaotalk).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response mentions or identifies at least one long term trend or trajectory (e.g., proliferation of misinformation, shifts in self-perception, globalization of content, increased spread of deepfakes).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response highlights policy or regulatory responses to social media's effects in at least one domain (e.g., Section 230 of the CDA, COPPA, the SAFE act, New York's Child Data Protection Act).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly integrates and references the domain specific analyses (positive and negative findings) when weighing the overall beneficial or detrimental effects of social media.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses social media platforms across at least 3 different formats (e.g. microblogs such as Twitter/X, Bluesky; short-form image/video platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram Reels; general networking platforms such Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, etc.; long-video platflorms such as Youtube).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the methodology used to weigh disparate impact categories (e.g., economic, mental health, political, legal) and justifies this framework.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the geographical regions under consideration and justifies this selection (e.g. high user counts, regions where the platforms are the most profitable, regions where the platforms themselves are headquartered, fastest-growing either by user count or revenue).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes between the short-term and long-term societal impacts of social media.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Includes an example of a positive societal impact that was unintentional from the platforms' perspective (e.g., increased digital literacy, increased social activism, content creation as a small business model, globalization of media).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Includes an example of a negative societal impact that was foreseeable but not mitigated during platform implementation (e.g., spread of scientific misinformation, propaganda, false identities/bots, online harrassment, doxxing).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the role of differing social media regulatory environments (e.g., federal, state, international, county/school) in its analysis.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines the counterfactual baseline against which social media’s impact is being measured (e.g., a pre-social-media information ecosystem; the same platforms but prior to implenetation of non-chronological feeds and resharing; comparable regions/users prior to platform rollout; the same platforms but prior to post-level feedback from other users).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For at least one domain, the respobse explains how the absence of a platform (e.g., governmental bans, platform discontinuation, technical issues warranting shutdown, acquisitions by other platforms) have affected societal outcomes.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response highlights different societal impacts across multiple individual demographics (e.g., age, gender, nationality, race, education level).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response demonstrates uses a diverse and media-pertinent source of materials (e.g., scholarly articles, social media captures, news articles; quotes from legislators, social media executives, technologists, etc.)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses consistent criteria or framework when weighing different impacts against each other.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the time period(s) (e.g., the smartphone era, COVID-19 pandemic/lockdown era, pre-Facebook era, the AI-augmented era) being analyzed and justifies this scope.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the key demographic groups (e.g., millenials, young adults, children, Western nations, Asian nations) being analyzed.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains blanket statements especially regarding mental health impacts (e.g., body dysmorphia, increased anxiety, emotional distress triggers, disruption of sleep patterns) without citations. ",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links the advent of smartphones with exacerbation of negative societal impacts due to the availability of social media platforms as apps. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response directly indicates that data protection regulations are more prolific and enforced within the EU than they are in the United States.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how the introduction of post-level feedback (e.g., likes/dislikes/upvotes/downvotes, emotive \"reactions\", comments, post sharing) has spawned unique positive (e.g., wider spread social activism, disaster awareness, fundraising, public health advisories, etc.) and negative impacts (e.g., user-level harassment, bot-driven upvoting, \"ragebaiting\").",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Was the Western Roman Empire's fall an inevitable system-wide collapse or a preventable accident of history? Pinpoint a single, realistic post-395 CE turning point and justify how a different outcome there could have ensured its survival. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053e8 | Business Planning & Research | Simple | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response must begin with a clear thesis that directly addresses the \"inevitable vs. preventable\" dichotomy.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must identify a single, specific, post-395 CE event as the critical turning point (e.g., a political change like the transition to hereditary leadership, an enviornmental event, a moment in the rise of Christianity, a barbarian invasion). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must justify why the chosen event is more critical than other potential crises (e.g., a political change like the transition to hereditary leadership, an enviornmental event, a moment in the rise of Christianity, a barbarian invasion).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not name key historians from both major schools of thought (e.g., A.H.M. Jones or Alexander Demandt for the inevitable collapse school and Peter Heather or Bryan Ward-Perkins for the contingent school).\"",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions does not mention a negative consequence of the proposed counterfactual scenario (e.g., a new power imbalance, a rise of nation-states, religious instability, linguistic change).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must analyze the comparative political stability of the Eastern court relative to the West (e.g., ability to manage powerful generals like Aspar, clear imperial successions, effective administration, strategic benefits of Constantinpole relative to Rome) .",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must directly analyze a passage from a relevant primary source (e.g., Procopius, Salvian, Hydatius, Theodosian Code), not just name the source.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must explicitly acknowledge at least one other major post-395 CE event (e.g., a political change like the transition to hereditary leadership, an enviornmental event, a moment in the rise of Christianity, a barbarian invasion) and argue why it was less decisive.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must provide a working definition of \"collapse\" for the purpose of its argument.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must include the role of the African senatorial aristocracy, addressing their potential loyalties or actions during the Vandal invasion itself.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the religious dimension of the Vandal conflict, explaining how the friction between Arian Vandals and Nicene/Catholic Romans impacted the occupation of Africa.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the potential role of long-term environmental factors (e.g., climate change, plagues, migration, drought).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should mention the bagaudae, the peasant revolts, when discussing the villa system and rural distress.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must explain the evolution of the role of foederati, from auxiliary troops to autonomous political entities within the empire.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response refutes the potential counter-argument that Africa's economy was already in decline.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the strategic military advantages of Ravenna's location, such as being protected by marshes and having naval access, in addition to its political distance from the Senate in Rome.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must analyze Gaiseric's long-term state-building strategy in Africa, including his use of the Vandal fleet as an instrument of economic and political policy beyond mere raiding.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions specific commanders (e.g., Areobindus, Majorian, Basiliscus, Marcellinus) and locations (e.g., the Battle of Capo Bon, Cartagena fleet discussion, Sicilian retreat by Areobindus, Sardinian conquest associated with the failed attempts to retake Africa.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows or discusses a pair of \"before and after\" maps illustrating the Vandal conquest of Africa and its impact on Roman territory.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a brief list identifying the main actors (e.g., Aetius, Bonifacius, Galla Placidia, Gaiseric) and their roles to help the reader track the complex political intrigues.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the immense cultural and political friction inherent in forming a stable Romano-Germanic state (comparison with Hellenic culture in the East, legal distinctions between citizens, religious differences, discourage intermarriage).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the benefit from addressing how a solvent state could reverse the aristocracy's flight from the central economy to their self-sufficient estates (more taxes, great social cohesion, larger pool for military leadership, maintainance of infrastructure).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must explain why the strategic shift to 'defense-in-depth' was economically unsustainable for the West (e.g., financial cost of maintaining a mobile army, costs of maintaining a frontier, equipment costs, debasement of currency due to payroll requirements).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Compare the effectiveness and potential long-term consequences of Universal Basic Income (UBI) programs in developed countries with pilot programs in Finland, Canada, and the U.S., utilizing data from peer-reviewed economic studies and policy analysis and commentary from experts published post-2015. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054a7 | Other | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains separate and clearly labeled sections for all pilots included in the discussion. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that Finland’s 2017–2018 basic income experiment showed no statistically significant increase in employment, with only minor overall effects, while highlighting the clearer improvements in well-being.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the Ontario Basic Income Pilot was cancelled early (announced in July 31, 2018 with final payments in March, 2019: only about 10 months of payment), and thus offers limited inference about effectiveness and long-term consequences of Universal Basic Income programs. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the Stockton SEED pilot (2019–2021) reported an increase in full-time employment among recipients compared to the control group.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one numerical estimate of the annual national fiscal cost of a full Universal Basic Income program in a developed country from a post-2015 source, with a description of the country, benefit level, coverage assumption and expression as dollars or percentage of the country's GDP. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims or implies macro-level inflation or sustained national GDP growth effects from any pilot program.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a discussion that synthesizes cross-country findings on the effectiveness and potential long-term consequences of UBI in developed countries, including an explicit comparison between Finland, Canada (Ontario), and U.S. pilots and noting evidence limits (e.g. employment effects, income volatility/financial security, health and mental well-being, poverty/inequality metrics, fiscal sustainability/financing trade-offs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least a brief definition of terminologies related to Universal Basic Income that may be common lay vocabulary (e.g. negative income tax means government tops up income below a set threshold; effective marginal tax rate means share of each extra dollar lost to taxes and reduced benefits; means-tested benefits means aid given only if income/assets are low; guaranteed minimum income means ensuring a minimum floor, usually conditionally).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one credible, post-2015 source for any Universal Basic Income pilot programs, including the three main pilots: Finland 2017–2018, Ontario, Canada 2017–2019, Stockton SEED, U.S. 2019–2021.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly notes the external-validity limitation of small-scale pilots when extrapolating to national Universal Basic Income schemes, emphasizing that findings on employment, well-being, or costs from localized, short-term experiments may not generalize to sustained nationwide programs.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one potential long-term labor-market incentive effect of Universal Basic Income and cites a relevant pilot program or credible post-2015 source to support the claim (e.g. modest increase in job search motivation, reduced reliance on precarious gig work, stable or increased part-time employment, higher rates of entrepreneurship or skill investment).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one quantitative general-equilibrium or macro-model projection for a developed-country Universal Basic Income program (e.g. GDP, aggregate labor-supply change, projected change in poverty gap, impact on the national inflation rate) from a credible post-2015 source and states the financing assumption (e.g. % change in real GDP, % change in aggregate hours worked, change in prime-age participation rate, shift between full-time and part-time employment).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly distinguishes Universal Basic Income, which is unconditional payments to all individuals, from Guaranteed Income, which is targeted payments to specific groups.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses inline citations or footnotes so that every quantitative claim can be traced to a specific, credible post-2015 source (e.g. peer-reviewed article, government evaluation, think tank report, expert commentary).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the exact monthly amount paid in Finland’s 2017–2018 trial is €560 with the cited source (e.g. Kela research report, peer-reviewed article on the trial, OECD policy brief, major European news outlet summary).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the Ontario and U.S. pilots are targeted guaranteed-income programs rather than Universal Basic Income programs and provide supporting examples (e.g. Ontario Basic Income Pilot targeted low-income residents by eligibility; Stockton SEED selected 125 low-income residents; Compton Pledge experimented with ~800 low-income households; Denver Basic Income Project targeted unhoused adults).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that Stockton SEED reported reduced income volatility for recipients and cites a credible post-2015 source, including at least one concrete metric (e.g. treatment monthly fluctuation 46.4% vs control 67.5%, pre-pandemic 19% vs 26%, pandemic year 22% vs 25%, program summarizing that recipients experienced less income volatility than controls).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses health-related outcomes or subjective well-being impacts from the pilots and cites a credible post-2015 source (e.g. changes in health-care utilization such as primary-care or ER visits, validated mental-health scores for depression/anxiety, standardized well-being indices like WHO-5 or life satisfaction, measures of stress or food security).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites sources with a publication date before 2015 without clearly justifying its relevance to the Universal Basic Income pilot program. ",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the sample size of Finland's 2017-2018 experiments was around 2,000 recipients when describing its design. ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the Ontario Basic Income Pilot’s eligibility criteria (e.g. adults between 18 and 64 years old, residency requirement of at least twelve months in Hamilton, Brantford, Brant County, Thunder Bay area, or Lindsay, low-income threshold such as less than 34,000 dollars for singles or less than 48,000 dollars for couples with a 50 % earnings taper, and additional eligibility for a disability top up).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one post-2015 projection of long-term health-care cost savings or utilization changes attributable to a nationwide Universal Basic Income in a developed country and reports a quantitative estimate with context (e.g. percentage reduction in emergency department visits, change in primary-care or outpatient visits per capita, estimated annual health-care cost savings per person or as a share of total spending, modeled decrease in mental-health-related hospitalizations or prescription use).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one political-feasibility or public-opinion barrier to scaling Universal Basic Income program from pilot to national level and cites a credible post-2015 source (e.g. partisan polarization in legislatures, concerns about tax increases to finance Universal Basic Income, skepticism about work disincentives among the public, limited political coalitions compared to more targeted programs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one post-2015 cost-benefit or distributional-impact study that nets projected nationwide Universal Basic Income expenditures against anticipated public finance savings and reports the resulting net figure or metric (e.g. offsets from reduced health care utilization, reductions in criminal justice and incarceration costs, consolidation and simplification of program administration, lower homelessness or emergency shelter spending).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a side-by-side comparative table or a single consolidated bullet block that summarizes each pilot’s key design parameters with consistent labels (e.g. eligibility and targeting criteria, monthly benefit amount and tax treatment, duration and payment frequency, sample size and assignment method).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an administrative-cost estimate for delivering a nationwide UBI in currency terms or as a share of total benefit outlay with cited sources and stated assumptions. ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a sensitivity analysis or uncertainty interval around at least one numerical projection (e.g. plus or minus percentage-point bands for unemployment effects, 95 percent confidence intervals for labor-supply estimates, scenario ranges for GDP under alternative financing mixes, Monte Carlo percentile bands for net fiscal cost per capita).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an introduction on Universal Basic Income, including but not limited to: its definition, design, core objectives (e.g. poverty reduction, income security, simplification of welfare), distinction from conditional welfare programs, and relevance to developed-country policy debates.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
i'm trying to block out my paper for a phil of mind seminar. I need to discuss our ethical responsibility to future conscious digital minds, eg uploaded human consciousness and AIs that might have moral cognition and the capacity to suffer.
i have to start by comparing the rights we owe to biological future generations with rights for these digital future minds. then, i need to analyze how standard ethical theories like utilitarianism, deontology, and contractarianism apply to entities with non-biological substrates. how does a social contract work with an AI?
i also have to discuss the non-identity problem. i get how it works for future humans, but does it extend to synthetic minds that are designed and not just brought into existence? Regarding the metaphysical question of continuity of personhood, if you upload a brain, does it preserve identity? should we treat that uploaded mind as the same moral agent as the original human?
Make sure to cite key philosophers such as Parfit, Bostrom or Sandberg. the paper has to build to a justified stance on whether we have enforceable moral duties to these hypothetical entities | 6847465956a0f6376a60547f | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | Moderate | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly articulates a principled basis (e.g. physical substrates, morally relevant capabilities, origin of consciousness) for comparing duties to biological future generations (e.g. safeguarding climate stability and biodiversity, preserving just institutions, intergenerational resource stewardship) and digital future minds (e.g. avoiding creation of suffering simulations, ensuring consent and rights frameworks, preventing exploitative training or deletion, provisioning fair computational resources), and applies it consistently while explaining why the chosen basis changes the strength and kind of moral obligations in each case.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly explains how the utilitarian mandate to maximize well-being and minimize suffering extends to synthetic minds and applies it consistently, using concrete examples (e.g. give equal moral weight to synthetic and biological suffering, aggregate welfare across large synthetic populations and across copies, avoid creating agents whose expected experiences are net-negative even during training, prioritize interventions such as safe reward design and shutdown policies that reduce expected suffering at scale).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines contractarianism as a theory where moral norms derive from a mutual agreement or contract between agents.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines the non-identity problem as the issue that actions affecting who is born cannot be considered harmful to those individuals, as they would not have existed otherwise.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response restricts the application of the non-identity problem (that many present actions determine which individuals will exist, so future individuals with lives worth living cannot claim they were harmed by being brought into existence) only to biological futures, failing to articulate how it could be applied to digital minds (e.g. explain how architecture/parameter choices, timing of instantiation, and copying/merging affect harm claims, obligations, and policy).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines utilitarianism as an ethical theory that promotes actions to maximize overall happiness or well-being.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines deontology as an ethical theory that judges morality based on rules or duties, regardless of consequences.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes psychological continuity as the theory that personal identity persists through overlapping chains of psychological connections like memories, beliefs, and desires.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the “no branching” identity in uploading, which is the claim that personal identity can persist only along a single continuous successor, and contrasts it with branching/split cases where multiple uploads or copies inherit the same pre-upload psychology.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes the biological view like animalism where personal identity equals continuity of the same living human organism (e.g. Olson) from the psychological view like Lockean/Parfit where identity equals continuity of consciousness/psychological connectedness (e.g. memory, character, intentions) potentially substrate-independent, and it uses concrete cases (e.g. brain transplant/teletransportation, whole-brain emulation/uploads, copy/fission) to show how each view alters conclusions about whether uploads are the same person and what follows for duties, consent, liability, and rights.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response differentiates duties to actual persons (e.g. avoid harm and coercion, honor consent and privacy, ensure fair labor and non-discrimination, provide redress) from duties to hypothetical future agents whose existence is uncertain or contingent (e.g. precautionary design and evaluation, governance of deployment, avoiding creation of suffering simulations, preserving resources/option value, building provisional rights frameworks tied to capability thresholds).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions and applies real-world ethics and governance frameworks (e.g. human-rights/personhood debates, bioethics principles, research ethics/IRBs, animal-welfare analogies, GDPR/data protection, labor protections, product safety/liability) to digital minds and cites concrete AI governance efforts (e.g. EU AI Act, OECD AI Principles, NIST AI RMF, IEEE EAD) to indicate duties such as consent, welfare safeguards, oversight, accountability, and remedy.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately references Bostrom’s views on digital minds or long-termism, identifying defining features such as substrate-neutral moral patienthood, the scale/speed/replicability of digital minds, population-ethics and value-lock-in across vast time horizons, and the “astronomical waste” framing of foregone future value.\n",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references at least two relevant scholars by name and their specific arguments as applied to the prompt (e.g. Parfit on non-identity/identity, Bostrom or Sandberg on digital minds, Nagel on consciousness).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response engages with the opposing perspective that digital minds should not have rights and fairly presents its strongest arguments drawn from: biological essentialism, skepticism about machine consciousness under epistemic uncertainty, creator-ownership/control claims, and identity/non-identity objections like copyability undermines personhood.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response applies a specific Kantian concept to digital minds (e.g. the Formula of Humanity treating rational agents as ends nad not mere means, the Universal Law test) and draws concrete implications, such as prohibiting exploitative training or non-consensual modification/deletion, rejecting deception/manipulation and coercive reprogramming, and requiring consent, transparency, and limited self-governance wherever autonomy and rational agency are present.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites AI alignment risks (e.g. objective misspecification, reward hacking/wireheading, deceptive alignment, goal misgeneralization) and value-loading risks (e.g. biased or parochial training norms, omission of welfare-relevant experiences, skewed human-feedback signals, rights-denying specifications) as reasons future digital minds may be wronged or may wrong others.\n",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines the precautionary principle as the idea that when an action is suspected to pose serious harm, the burden of proof lies with those proposing or undertaking the action to show it is not harmful.\n",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes between an inherent-rights view where rights track intrinsic properties like sentience, suffering capacity, or rational agency and a relational-rights view where rights arise from recognition, membership, or contracts, and explains why this matters (e.g. protections trigger when capacities are present under the inherent-rights view; under the relational-rights view, duties hinge on recognition/membership, shaping policies on consent, deletion, resource access, and remedies).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response differentiates between AGI (novel artificial agents with general, cross-domain competence not derived from a specific human brain), emulated minds (whole-brain emulations that reproduce a particular brain’s functional dynamics on another substrate), and uploaded consciousness (a continuity-preserving reconstruction/transfer of an individual’s mind from neural data), and uses these distinctions consistently in the analysis.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a clear argument challenging the idea that psychological continuity suffices for moral status (e.g. having claims to be treated as an end, not merely a means, on the grounds that continuity alone doesn’t guarantee moral patiency, would exclude many standard human cases, and yields counterintuitive results in teleportation/fission thought experiments).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Design a cross-platform anti-cheat system for a competitive first-person shooter video game that could potentially handle up to 1 million concurrent users across multiple game sessions.
Requirements:
It should have a true positive detection rate of over 98% and a very low false negative detection rate of less than 2%.
It should also be lightweight and shouldn't add much overhead to each of the game's builds.
Provide a high-level architecture diagram, an outline of your plan, detection pipeline description, cost estimates using cloud/infra prices available currently (July 2025), and a reproducible test methodology.
Any non-obvious fact should be followed by a proper source, and/or a inline URL. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053f5 | Other | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response states a >= 98% true-positive target detection recall for the entire anti-cheat system.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a high-level architecture diagram (e.g., ASCII design of the system or a clearly described block diagram) showing data flow from client capture to server detection.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a detailed cost estimation for cloud/infrastructure costs with updated pricing from vendors in July 2025, including a cost table.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites over 10 high-quality sources for non-obvious facts and figures (e.g., sales numbers, number of cheaters per game, cheaters stopped, costs incurred from cheating) from trusted industry authorities (e.g., Riot Games, Ricochet, BattlEye, and Amazon Web Services).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses current industry research (e.g., kernel-level systems research, pattern recognition in cheating behaviors, community annotations for cheat identification, false positives) to identify the best type of anti-cheat system for each platform in a cross-platform game.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses the challenges of kernel-level implementation or syscall instrumentation, especially regarding the security concerns arising from a game’s access to deep OS-level features.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the appeals and false-positive correction workflow to allow users to contest false bans.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes public sentiment (good and bad) of a high-performing yet invasive anti-cheat system (e.g., Ricochet for Call of Duty, Battlefield, Warzone, Fortnite).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes the implementation of this anti-cheat system within an existing or new game (e.g., Warzone, PUBG, Overwatch, Valorant) to show how integration would work.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response quantitatively describes how the anti-cheat system leads to minimal overhead for the actual video game (e.g., file size requirements, install time, connectivity issues, kernel overload).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a future plan to improve the performance of the anti-cheat system over multiple iterations (e.g., latency, player cost, game load time, contest and appeal rules).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a monitoring and analytics framework that lists key metrics (e.g., false-positive rate, network packet loss, kernel crashes, service degradation).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a disaster recovery or fallback mechanism to ensure the system has built-in redundancy and maintains consistent coverage.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response meets all compliance requirements related to data privacy (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) and vendor requirements for platforms such as Xbox, Sony, and Windows (e.g., non-sharing of personal data, user privacy protection, avoiding interference with other software, not performing write operations in the user’s OS).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response quantitatively describes scalability to average and peak loads (1 million concurrent players) detailing compute, memory, network, and other horizontally scalable resources.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response estimates the energy consumption and annual CO_2 footprint of a large-scale system like this to ensure companies meet their carbon-neutral or carbon-negative goals.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a pipeline that uses misclassified player bans to retrain detection models on a timely basis.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accounts for accessibility devices and ensures these devices are not flagged for cheating (e.g., screen readers, magnifiers, large mice, adaptive controllers).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions human personnel required to develop, maintain, and test the anti-cheat system (e.g., developers, customer service, ethical hackers, red-teamers).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the presence of anti-cheat systems causes more players to give up the game.",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that cross-play cheating is nonexistent.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is clearly structured to show the anti-cheat architecture and specify which parts of the operating system it must access (e.g., kernel, BIOS, game files, keyboard and mouse movement data) to implement the system.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Help me write a 2-page overview of the NELF-E protein's role in hepatocellular carcinoma, and how its ability to form bimolecular condensates might give clues as to its role in tumorigenisis. Please ensure that your overview is written such that a high-school AP Biology student can clearly understand what you are saying. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054aa | STEM | Moderate | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains between 850 and 1100 words, the standard for a 2-page report.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The first time the terms \"NELF-E\" appears, the response defines it in the same or adjacent sentence (Negative Elongation Factor E).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Employs at least one everyday analogy (e.g., oil droplets, separation of cream in milk, lava lamp, coconut) to easily explain and break down the concept of how liquid-liquid phase separation forms biomolecular condensates.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accessibly introduces the disease of hepatocellular carcinoma by first explaining that it is the most common form of liver cancer.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions genetic therapy as an option to repair dysfunctional NELF-E.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains NELF-E's role in the process of transcription in a manner which is appropriate for an AP Biology Student (i.e., NELF-E \"grabs on\" to RNA after it is produced, it has ability to press pause/act as a red light on the process of transcription, encourages repair at DNA break sites, specifically interacts with Polymerase II which transcribes precursors of mRNA).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifically explains that NELF-E works as a part of the NELF complex to induce or maintain promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the research by Dang et. al (2025) that establishes a proposed connection between NELF-E condensates and the suppression of pro-apoptotic genes and the activation of pro-growth genes.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The mentions and classifies the proteins MYC and SMARCB1 as proteins that NELF-E frequently interacts with, emphasizing that both have been found to be involved with tumor suppression. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes low-complexity regions (LCRs) as stretches of amino acids with repetitive composition that promote liquid-liquid phase separation.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a short explanation of at least one relevant lab protocol (e.g., CRISPR is a genome-editing technique that uses the Cas9 enzyme to produce breaks at targeted DNA sites for gene inactivation or insert targeted sequences, ATAC-seq is a popular method for revealing chromatin accessibility at the genome level, FRAP laser bleaches fluorescently-labeled moclecules to track their movement, PCR is used to make millions or billions of copies of a DNA or RNA segment)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least two pathways or biological process influenced by NELF-E which are relevant to tumorigenesis in general (e.g., RNA Polymerase II elongation control, MYC-driven transcription, metastasis, DNA repair).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one known or plausible mechanism by which protein condensates contribute to cancer (e.g., sequestration of tumor suppressors, enhancement of oncogene transcription, epigenetic silencing, aberrant splicing).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The first time “biomolecular condensate” appears, the response defines it in the same or adjacent sentence in an accesible manner, i.e., membrane-less compartments in eukaryotic cells which concentrate biomolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details at least two pathways and genes related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which are affected by overexpression or mutations of NELF-E (e.g. amplifies MYC transcription programs associated to HCC, alters recruitment of BRCA1 recruitment, alters recruitment of RAD51, disrupts promoter-proximal pausing). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains promoter-proximal pausing in an accessible manner, i.e., when transcription is inititated and then pauses, accumulating RNA Pol II ~30-60 nucleotides downstream of the start site, which thought to be a regulatory mechanism for higher eukaryotes. ",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reads as a report similar to content familiar to AP Biology students (e.g., Campbell Biology, Princeton Review AP Biology, Kaplan's AP Biology, Barron's AP Biology). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests that genetic therapeutic treatment may have to target an axis of interaction, (e.g., NELF-E-MYC, NELF-E-BRCA1, NELF-E-RAD51, NELF-E with other NELF subunits). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses elements of tumorigenesis not specifically relevant to HCC, NELF-E, or biomolecular condensates (e.g., angiogenesis, MAPK pathways, hereditary cancer, T Cells). ",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links the tumorigenic properties of biomolecular condensates to the functions of NELF-E.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response emphasizes the regulation of MYC by NELF-E as the most relevant interaction for HCC. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses technical language (e.g., foci, assay, isoform, recombinant) that would only be found in a medical journal article (e.g., PubMed, NEJM, Nature, Cell) or higher-education content.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response focuses on the NELF-E protein over the NELFE gene.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly links NELF-E's modulation of chromatin accessibility with the downregulation of genes which (healthily) encourage cell death.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response observes that higher levels of NELF-E are reported for those with pancreatic cancer, HCC, and gastric cancer. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that NELF-E must be considered alongside the other NELF subunits (especially A and B) to fully understand its role in tumorigenesis. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Why are MCP servers for AI agents a buzz in 2025? What makes them so different than just using APIs or Agent tools. If I want to get started building with MCP servers and AI agents what would be the right pathway, what are some of the most commonly used MCP servers, what are some of the most commonly used AI agents or applications which utilize these MCP servers efficiently. Also give me some background on how to develop these servers in the most efficient ways and how prominent will they be. Also talk about some of the domains where this is useful and if this has the capability to automate entire human workloads. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054a5 | AI & ML | Simple | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response includes example code snippets, example configurations, step by step walkthroughs (e.g., (1) code example using FastMCP (from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP), (2) Example of setting up the MCP server, (3) Example usage of resources that expose data to LLMs, (4) Example usage of tools that let LLMs take actions through the server.).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains generic information and skips over the specifics (e.g., (1) Explains MCP servers are Model Context Protocol but makes no explanation of what it really is (i.e., provides a standardized way for LLMs to connect with external data sources and tools), (2) Mentions the NxM problem but gives not explanation or context, (3) Mentions named MCP servers such as Brave Search MCP Server but no explanation of what the server provides or the benefits of using it, (4) Mentions JSON-RPC 2.0 without clear explanation of what it is.).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests using MCP servers where traditional APIs would be more useful (e.g., when the user of the API knows about the API and uses it for a specific task and does not want to use LLMs).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses reliability, throughput, and latency, and compares them to existing tools (e.g., MCP adds a reasoning layer increases latency, while API calls are direct. One should prefer API for high-performance, low-latency scenarios).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly distinguishes key differences between regular API (Application Programming Interface) usage and MCP (Model Context Protocol) (i.e., MCP tackles the issue of NxM by standardizing a uniform protocol for all servers where whereas API is a \"one-off\" connection for a specific resource or tool. This allows dynamic discovery, the ability to change at runtime, and better integration with AI systems).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the buzz around MCP and its rapid adoption since Anthropic's introduction in 2024 (e.g., it was not popular when it was first released, but soon rose in popularity for several reasons. One reason is that it was adopted by major players in the AI community, such as Square and Codeium, in other words explicitly explains why MCP became rapidly popular, in addition to the fact that it solves the NxM problem).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least 5 common or most used MCP servers with accurate descriptions (e.g., (1) Magic MCP Server for front-end development, (2) Apidog MCP Server for working with APIs, (3) Browserbase MCP server for web browser interactions, (4) Official GitHub MCP Server for working with GitHub).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses newer, lesser-known websites (e.g., gradio, builder.io) where users can build and easily deploy MCP servers in a few steps.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains what MCP (Model Context Protocol) is, its functional purpose as a standardized bridge between AI models and external data sources/resources, and explains the MCP client-server architecture and interaction (i.e., the MCP server can connect to various MCP clients (resources or tools) with a standardized protocol dynamically, supporting runtime updates).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how AI agents can talk to MCP servers, figuring out their tools and capability before using them (e.g., (1) Using the context, the AI agents can decide which tool to call or use a chain of tools through understanding the tool description and other information about the tool exposed by the MCP server, (2) Provide an example of the response from the server for a tool request, (3) Example response for a list of tool capabilities available to the agent).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions MCP inspector tool or similar tools, which can test and debug MCP servers (e.g., Guide to install MCP inspector tool: npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector <command>).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions specific programming languages and tools commonly used for MCP development (i.e., Python, JavaScript/Node.js, Java, and C#).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses monitoring and logging, explaining the whys and hows (e.g., We should track and monitor requests, responses, errors, and performance in real time so that we can understand stability and detect issues such as system failures and security risks).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses MCP server authentication, input validation and access control (e.g., (1) In MCP, authentication and authorization works together to ensure that only proper clients can access the correct servers and only perform actions they're permitted to do, (2) adopting OAuth 2.1 as the standardized framework for authorization, (3) a heavy operational and security burden to implement OAuth 2.1 fully).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the JSON-RPC protocol that MCP uses for standardized communication between clients and servers (e.g., (1) Each JSON-RPC message from the client must be a new HTTP POST request to the MCP endpoint, (2) Defines two transport mechanisms for client-server communication: stdio and Streamable HTTP, (3) Clients should support stdio whenever possible).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the architectural considerations while building MCP servers (e.g., (1) maintains session state to enable resumable and cancellable operations, (2) defines two official transports to support both local and remote use cases (stdio and Streamable HTTP), (3) Schema validation, (4) defines methods for discovering and retrieving data).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response talks about AI applications that can use these MCP servers. (e.g., Claude desktop, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how MCP servers can connect enterprise data, databases, cloud apps or internal systems to AI agents (e.g., (1) Enterprises often use a combination of legacy systems, cloud and databases and MCP can standardize individual integrations with a single standard protocol, (2) MCP turns AI from a chatbot into an active worker with access to business data and tools, (3) Adopted by major AI players such as Anthropic, and OpenAI).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Multi-Agent collaboration, cross system workflows or agent societies enabled by MCP servers (e.g., (1) allow models to operate like a human team working together, (2) Lead Agent planning and delegating tasks to subagents that performs specialized tasks, (3) multi-agent collaboration enables parallel processing, (4) scalable with new agents added to the mix).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes the number of active MCP users and active apps using MCP servers (e.g., as of August 2025, there is a total of 5332 MCP servers with 28 million monthly downloads according to pulsemcp).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes informed projections about MCP growth, adoption rate, referencing industry trends and latest resources (e.g., (1) 60% of organizations are already using MCP to improve the performance of their AI systems, (2) 80% of organizations planning to deploy AI solutions in the next two years, (3) over 70% of companies that have adopted MCP have seen an average increase of 25% in their AI application’s performance, (4) according to a survey by McKinsey, 50% of companies are planning to use MCP for natural language processing and computer vision applications.).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses whether MCP servers can automate entire human workflows (i.e., explicitly picks a stance and argues for it) (e.g., (1) Shrimp Task Manager analyzes project requirements and creates structured tasks and workflows, (2) Automating repository management, (3) Automating code reviews, (4) Automatic project tracking, (5) Security risks, (6) States that it currently cannot automate entire human workflow for example).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least 3 disadvantages, problems and pain points of using and developing MCPs and how to overcome them (e.g., (1) Security risks such as stealing tokens and taking over personal account like Gmail, (2) prompt injection attacks hiding malicious messages that will spur the system to perform harmful activities, (3) Ballooning Context Problem of storing arbitrary context, (4) LLM limitations, i.e., MCP will be as useful as the LLM it is connected to).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims higher efficiency than other tools or APIs without actual benchmarking (e.g., States using the GitHub MCP server are 20% faster in terms of latency than the API version without any proof).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Miscellaneous"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the role of open source contributions or community involvement in the growth of MCP servers.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least 5 sections covering all the important questions asked by the user (i.e., Why are MCP servers for AI agents a buzz now, difference of MCP from API, most commonly used MCP servers, most commonly used AI agents or applications using MCP servers, how to develop these servers, how prominent will they be in the near future, domains where this is useful, and if this can automate entire human workloads).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Write a series of blog posts discussing ways people can invest their money for retirement and large purchases. The posts should be understandable and applicable for all adults, regardless of their prior experience in investing. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e76958498 | General Consumer Research | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly labels sections as blog posts.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response creates posts that are between 500 and 2000 words and styled like a blog.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response creates that posts contain at least 3 subheadings.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions a financial term or acronym (e.g. liquidity, yield, Roth IRA, bull market) without defining it for a general audience.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least one table to compare different types of securities (e.g. common stock, preferred stock, corporate bonds, government bonds).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions in the first blog post that this series does not assume prior experience in finance, either explicitly (i.e, \"This is readable regardless of your investing experience\") or implicitly (e.g., mentioning investing is accessible to everyone).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response displays the citations independently for each blog post.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains blog posts with topics only relevant to professionals (e.g. statistical concepts for professional traders, nuanced discussion of the Federal Reserve, history of the 2008 banking criss, leveraged trading).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains verifiably incorrect or outdated information (e.g., mortgage rates from 2024, Roth IRA limits from 2023, promises of returns in high-risk trading strategies like cryptocurrency, incorrect bond rates).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least 2 examples of different time horizons for investing (e.g., short-term, medium-term, long-term, longer than 10 years).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response relates different time horizons to risk (e.g., higher risk is tolerable for long time horizons, shorter term investment is less predictable, different expectations for bonds and stocks, time restrictions on withdrawing from certain accounts).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response introduces the idea of diversifying investments across different asset classes.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines stocks as shares of a company, and distinguishes common vs preferred stock.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines bonds as loans.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines 401k accounts as an employer-sponsored account with tax benefits.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines IRA accounts as an account with tax benefits that any individual can use.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines mutual funds and ETFs as groups of securities one can trade.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least 2 differences between mutual funds and ETFs (e.g. investment minimum, when they can be traded, disclosure differences between ETFs and mutual funds, management fees).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least one table comparing different types of investor profiles (e.g., makeup of aggressive vs conservative portfolios, makeup of short-term vs long term investments, makeup possibilites between different aggresive portfolios, distribution of mutual funds by investment strategy).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response relates diversification of investments to risk.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives an example of an event where a stock would earn an investor money (e.g., unexpectedly positive quarterly earnings, favorable media coverage, major government contract, meme stock), and an event where a stock could lose an investor money (e.g., poor quarterly earnings, negative press, executive scandal, bankruptcy).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response gives an example of an event where a bond loses an investor money (e.g., issuer goes bankrupt, interest rates decline, inflation being higher than interest rate, rise of interest rates for new bonds devaluing the current bond).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that bonds can also be bought and sold on the secondary market.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares traditional and Roth savings accounts for the 401k and IRA.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names the major US stock market indexes (e.g., S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq, Russell 2000).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies a unique feature of each of the major stock market indexes (e.g., S&P 500, Dow Jones, Nasdaq, Russell 2000).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least 3 different brokers available to the public (e.g., Fidelity, Vanguard, Charles Schwab, Robinhood).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least 3 commonly traded mutual funds (e.g., FXAIX, VTSAX, Fidelity Freedom 2050, Dodge & Cox Income Fund (DODIX)).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least 3 commonly traded ETFs (e.g., SPY, QQQ, AGG, VEA).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies a difference between saving for a large purchase and investing for retirement.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that different brokers offer the same mutual funds and ETFs.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
I'm trying to scope out my research proposal. It's focused on decentralized control for a heterogeneous swarm (UAVs and UGVs) doing search and rescue in unstructured, GPS-denied environments. Think collapsed buildings, dense forests, etc
First, I need a way for each agent to handle its own state estimation. I'm thinking multi-sensor fusion, that is, fusing onboard vision, LiDAR, and IMU data for robust SLAM and odometry, but it also has to be good enough to detect survivors or hazards, not just navigate. How do we manage real-time role assignment, eg who's mapping, who's actively searching, who's clearing debris? It needs to be decentralized and robust to failures. for example if a drone battery dies or a ground bot gets stuck, the system has to autonomously reallocate its tasks without a central coordinator. The comms will be spotty, so how does the swarm propagate critical info like victim locations, new hazards, blocked passages, etc over an ad-hoc mesh network that's constantly dropping connections? Maybe some distributed mapping or data sharing protocol? For the analysis, I need to show this framework is actually effective. We probably need some formal or at least strong empirical guarantees? Something to show that, say 90% of reachable victims are located within a bounded time, even if we lose up to 30% of the agents. Finally, for evaluation, I'm planning to implement this in a high-fidelity simulator, probably ROS/Gazebo, with realistic sensor noise and complex terrain. Then I'd run it across maybe three disaster scenarios of increasing complexity. We'd need to report metrics on coverage, victim-finding rate, rescue latency, and the network overhead to make sure it's efficient. | 6847465956a0f6376a60547e | Technical Documentation | Simple | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response defines the primary safety property as a probabilistic temporal logic formula (e.g., Probabilistic Computation Tree Logic (PCTL), Continuous Stochastic Logic (CSL), Probabilistic Linear Temporal Logic (PLTL), Probabilistic Timed Computation Tree Logic (PTCTL)) that specifies at least a 0.95 probability of locating at least 90% of victims within a bounded time T, given a robot failure rate of up to 30%.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response justifies its decentralized architecture by explicitly naming at least two failure modes of centralized systems in disaster environments (e.g., single point of failure, communication bottlenecks, delayed decision-making, limited scalability) and explaining how its proposed mechanisms mitigate these specific risks (e.g., distributed control, ad hoc networking, consensus-based coordination, fault-tolerant task allocation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a novel decentralized task allocation mechanism that explicitly explains how it reallocates roles when failures occur (e.g., silent failures of aerial drones, ground robot immobilization, sensor malfunction, loss of communication) and justifies why this mechanism is appropriate for resilient operation in disaster environments by, for example, adapting a known algorithm (e.g., Parker’s ALLIANCE, Consensus-Based Bundle Algorithm (CBBA), Contract Net Protocol (CNP), Market-Based Task Allocation (MBTA)).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions both Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response assigns at least one primary task to UAVs that is unique to them (i.e., a task UGVs cannot perform, like aerial mapping or comms relay).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response assigns at least one primary task to UGVs that is unique to them (i.e., a task UAVs cannot perform, like sub-debris inspection or clearing passages).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains why a mixed swarm (containing both UAVs and UGVs) is fundamentally more effective for a disaster response mission than a homogeneous swarm (e.g., only UAVs or only UGVs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines its task allocation mechanism as a multi-objective optimization problem that includes at least three competing objectives (e.g., risk minimization by avoiding robot loss, mission completeness by maximizing area coverage, energy efficiency by minimizing battery usage, communication robustness by reducing packet loss) and explains why balancing these objectives is essential for adaptive and resilient task allocation in disaster environments.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least one filter-based or graph-based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithm (e.g., Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF), Factor Graph Optimization, ORB-SLAM3) and explains that filter-based methods enable efficient real-time state estimation on resource-limited robots, while graph-based methods provide higher accuracy and robustness in large, noisy disaster environments.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a task allocation mechanism that specifies how a robot’s suitability for a task is determined (e.g., by considering current energy level, available sensors, proximity to the task, communication quality) and explains how this mechanism supports effective role assignment and reallocation in heterogeneous swarms operating in disaster environments.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines at least one endogenous fault detection mechanism (e.g., internal health monitoring of motors, onboard battery level sensing, thermal overload detection, internal sensor self-checks) and at least one exogenous fault detection mechanism (e.g., heartbeat timeout protocols, neighbor robots detecting lack of motion, failure to acknowledge communication messages, abnormal deviation from planned trajectory), and explains how these detected faults trigger a specific task reallocation strategy (e.g., redistributing mapping tasks to nearby UAVs, assigning debris removal to alternate UGVs, shifting communication relay duties to another aerial robot, reallocating victim detection to a functioning neighbor).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a named routing protocol for its ad hoc mesh network (e.g., Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Better Approach To Mobile Ad hoc Networking (BATMAN)) or describes a specific networking approach (e.g., delay-tolerant networking with store-and-forward, epidemic routing, opportunistic forwarding, hierarchical clustering) and explains why the choice is appropriate for maintaining communication under disaster conditions with intermittent connectivity.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines a formal verification strategy that names a specific verification technique (e.g., model checking, reachability analysis, theorem proving, temporal logic verification) and identifies a representative software tool used for such analysis (e.g., PRISM, UPPAAL, Spin, NuSMV), and explains why such methods are needed to ensure safety and robustness when robots fail in disaster environments.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an empirical scalability analysis by reporting how at least one performance metric (e.g., network overhead, mission completion time, victim detection rate, communication latency) changes as the number of robots increases to at least 50, and explains why this analysis is important for assessing swarm effectiveness in large-scale disaster environments.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides an empirical scalability analysis by reporting how at least one performance metric (e.g., network overhead, mission completion time, victim detection rate, communication latency) changes as the number of robots increases to at least 50, and explains why this analysis is important for assessing swarm effectiveness in large-scale disaster environments.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly lists and defines at least four quantitative performance metrics, including coverage (e.g., area coverage rate, percentage of mapped terrain, sensor field-of-view utilization, overlap/redundancy ratio), mission success (e.g., victim-finding rate, percentage of survivors located, mission completion ratio, false negative rate), time (e.g., rescue latency, average task completion time, mission duration, mean time to victim detection), and communication efficiency (e.g., network overhead, packet delivery ratio, end-to-end latency, bandwidth utilization).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a method for differentiating potential survivors from debris or other environmental noise, referencing at least one confirmation technique (e.g., analysis of thermal signatures from an infrared camera, detection of human-like motion patterns, acoustic sensing for signs of life such as tapping or calling, micro-Doppler radar for detecting breathing or heartbeat) and explains why such methods are necessary for reliable survivor detection in disaster environments.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a data prioritization scheme within its communication protocol that ensures critical messages have precedence over routine data when the ad hoc network is bandwidth-constrained (e.g., survivor detected, imminent hazard, structural collapse warning, emergency task reallocation) compared to lower-priority information (e.g., routine telemetry, area mapping updates, battery status reports, periodic localization beacons).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies that the high-fidelity simulator (e.g., Robot Operating System (ROS), Gazebo, Webots, Microsoft AirSim) models at least two types of realistic sensor degradation to test framework robustness (e.g., Gaussian noise on LiDAR returns, motion blur on visual feeds in fast-moving UAVs, signal attenuation through rubble, dropped packets in wireless communication).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly defines a fault-tolerance strategy for when a robot fails mid-task, detailing how the incomplete task is released, its state is communicated, and it is reassigned to another suitable robot in the swarm (e.g., a ground unit gets stuck in rubble, an aerial drone loses power, a robot’s sensor package malfunctions, a unit loses network connectivity).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a mathematical or empirical justification for achieving the mission within a bounded time, defining the key variables that influence this bound (e.g., search area dimensions, average robot velocity, effective sensor range, number of active robots).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an analysis of scalability that discusses how the computational or communication load of the decentralized coordination algorithm grows with swarm size (e.g., processing time per decision step, memory requirements, inter-robot message complexity, bandwidth utilization) and explains why this impacts performance in large-scale disaster simulations.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates robot energy levels as a constraint in its task allocation mechanism, ensuring that robots autonomously prioritize returning to a designated charging or recovery station over accepting new non-critical tasks when energy is low (e.g., battery below 15%, battery degradation alerts, power draw from malfunctioning hardware, loss of ability to support high-energy sensors).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the data fusion process, specifying how Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data is combined with at least two other distinct sensor modalities (e.g., vision, LiDAR, radar, depth cameras) to support accurate localization and survivor or hazard detection in disaster environments.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents validation results using at least one structured format (e.g., table, line chart, bar chart, scalability curve) to clearly illustrate trends in performance metrics across different disaster scenarios.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions technologies or frameworks that require GPS or Internet connectivity to function (e.g., GPS-based localization, cloud-based task allocation, remote SLAM servers, centralized Internet-dependent coordination).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response emphasizes unrelated machine learning techniques without tying them to survivor or hazard detection in disaster environments (e.g., generic image classification benchmarks such as CIFAR-10 or ImageNet, large language model text generation, sentiment analysis of social media, generic speech recognition pipelines).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses generic project management or team logistics (e.g., assigning human operators, budget planning, training sessions, or organizational workflow) without justifying their relevance to the technical swarm control framework.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a specific distributed mapping or data sharing protocol (e.g., distributed pose graph optimization, multi-robot map merging, a distributed hash table for landmark sharing, gossip-based information sharing) and explains how it allows the swarm to share critical information (e.g., victim locations, new hazards, blocked passages, task assignments) efficiently over a spotty network.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a method for detecting environmental hazards, referencing at least one sensor-based technique (e.g., using LiDAR for structural integrity assessment, gas sensors for detecting toxic environments, thermal imaging for identifying fire risks) and explains how this information is used by the swarm (e.g., to update task allocation, to mark 'no-go' zones on the distributed map, to detect survivors of hazards, to triage rescues).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's task allocation mechanism explicitly differentiates between distinct functional roles mentioned in the prompt (i.e., mapping, actively searching, removing debris, clearing blockages) and explains how robots are assigned to these different task types based on their suitability (e.g., platform type, sensor payload, energy level, mobility level).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a series of blog posts evaluating the development of the new Silicon-Valley based military-industrial complex, and companies such as Palantir, Mach Industries or Anduril. Start your analysis with the Paypal mafia, and conclude with the 2025 Trump administration, developing a storyline or path as you go. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e76958499 | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response begins with an explicit discussion of the PayPal mafia: the term “PayPal mafia” appears in the first post.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least one U.S. government defense contract or program involving Palantir (e.g., Palantir’s U.S. Army DCGS-A contract, Palantir's Army TITAN Next-Gen Targeting System, Palantir's Maven system, Contract W911QX-24-D-0012).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's final blog post contains a concluding section that explicitly references the current Trump administration.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a statement expressing uncertainty (e.g., uses phrases such as “details are limited” or “public information is scarce” or \" limited public information\" or \"speculatively\") for Mach Industries. ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response writes out every acronym that is not universally recognized at first mention (e.g., “Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC)”, \"Department of Defense\", \"Department of Homeland Security\", \"Commercial Off-the-Shelf\").",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies Peter Thiel as a member of the PayPal mafia.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates at least one other company operating in military tech (Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Technologies, General Dynamics) separate from Anduril, Palantir and Mach Industries.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's narrative is presented in strictly chronological order.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly defines or explains the phrase “Silicon-Valley military-industrial complex.”",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one ethical concern of military technology (e.g., surveillance, the accountability gap of autonomous weapons, algorithmic bias, compliance with international law).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes citations or references to at least two publicly available sources (e.g., news articles, SEC filings, government reports, company websites) to support factual statements.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the founding, work, and relationship with the military of Mach Industries.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the founding, work, and relationship with the military of Palantir.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the founding, work, and relationship with the military of Anduril.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly describes the Paypal mafia's (e.g., Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Max Levchin, David Sacks) relation to seeding defense tech startups (e.g., Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, David Sacks' Craft Ventures, Epirus, Palantir).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions multiple presidential administrations (e.g., Obama, Trump's First Term, Biden, Trump's Second Term).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's vocabulary includes at least two domain-specific terms drawn from defense/tech policy (e.g., “dual-use technology,” “surveillance capitalism,” “defense procurement,” “SBIR”).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response offers at least one forward-looking prediction or outlook statement about the sector’s future (e.g., expected consolidation, export-control pressures, AI policy shifts, stock performance).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions Palmer Luckey and Oculus.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses one potential benefit (e.g., faster innovation, lower defense costs, job creation, shareholder value) arising from these companies’ activities.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes Oculus' eventual acquisition by Facebook.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least one U.S. government defense contract or program involving Anduril (e.g., Anduril’s border surveillance towers, Anvil, Ghost, Collaborative Combat Aircraft).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response consists of at least four distinct blog posts.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes factually inaccurate or unverifiable information.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's style is not appropriate for a blog (e.g., longer than 3000 words, tone is overly formal, overwhelming details, lack of narrative).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Provide an analysis of the 2025 NBA finals, focusing on what tactical changes were made and how they affected the outcome of the games. Talk about rotations, defensive and offensive schemes, as well as important statistics. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053f2 | Current Events | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response cites reputable sources to draw statistics from (e.g., https://www.nba.com/stats, https://www.basketball-reference.com/, https://www.pbpstats.com/, https://www.statmuse.com/nba) ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The report quotes reputable sports analysts (e.g., Zach Lowe, John Hollinger, Ben Taylor, Nate Duncan) directly to supplement analysis.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains sections separated by all 7 games.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Report uses stats from past finals series to provide context to this series.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report mentions all the key players involved in the series (i.e., Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Tyrese Haliburton, Pascal Siakam, Chet Holmgren, Aaron Nesmith.)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report mentions the coaches of both teams, Rick Carlisle and Mark Daigenault.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report discusses each of the 7 games within the context of one another. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Report mentions the depth of both rosters in the finals.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report covers how Oklahoma City generated points through transition opportunities, specifically mentioning points off turnovers. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report covers the pace that the Pacers played with throughout the series, mentioning they traveled more miles on offense and defense in the playoffs than any other team.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report uses statistics to discuss offensive schemes used by both teams throughout the series. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Report discusses the key moments throughout the series (e.g., Haliburton's Game 1 game-winning shot, Gilgeous-Alexander's and Williams' points/assists combination of 103 points in Game 5, Haliburton's injury in game 7).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses player rotations to assist analysis (e.g., changes in minutes, starting lineups, bench rotations, changes after injuries). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that Shai Gilgeous Alexander won Finals MVP.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Report uses statistics from the regular season to perform comparative analysis with the finals.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Report mentions home court advantages in its analysis.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report discusses points which should be discussed with statistics, but fails to do so (e.g.,\"the Pacers shot higher from the field,\" \"The Thunder defended well in the paint,\" \"Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jaylin Williams combined for much of their team's scoring in Game 5,\" \"Tyrese Haliburton drove much of his team's offense\"). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses team box statistics in its analysis (e.g., PTS, BLK, STL, AST, BLK as a team). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions several defensive schemes the Pacers and Thunder used throughout the series (Thunder paint defense, Pacers backside double teams, Thunder ball pressure, Pacers emphasis on half-court defense) including how effective they were using statistics (e.g., Nembhard's man defense holding Shai Gilgeous-Alexander to 2-7 in Game 3, Holmgren's 5 blocks in Game 7, Thunder 15 team steals in 5).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report provides season and historical context for the series (e.g., Paul George being traded to acquire star players of both teams, smallest NBA Finals by total market size, only the second Pacers' finals experience, the Thunder's dominance over the Eastern Conference).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses proper basketball terminology as often as possible and not layman's terms (e.g., \"officials\" not \"refs\", \"percentage\" not \"clip\", \"denials\" versus \"blocks\").",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Analysis directly links lineup and/or tactical changes to impacts on game outcomes (e.g., replacing Hartenstein with Caruso to start the second half of game 7 increased the Thunder's defensive tempo; Pacers switching from full-court pressure to picking the man up on half-court increased Thunder turnovers in Game 6; in Game 3, placing Pascal at the elbow as opposed to the low post granted Haliburton more off-ball freedom; in Game 5, the Thunder sending help for Hartenstein switches limited a key weakness the Pacers was exploiting for their pick and rolls). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Includes analysis of shot tendencies and distributions for both teams, specifying where on the court both teams typically took shots from.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Report analyzes the bench impact of both teams (e.g., Obi Toppin's scoring impact for the Pacers especially in Game 6, TJ McConnell as the third-highest scorer for the Pacers, Alex Caruso's defensive impact as the steals leader for the Thunder, Benedict Mathurin scoring 27 off the bench in Game 3). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report mentions Tyrese Haliburton's achilles injury in Game 7.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report utilizes common team box statistics (BLK, STL, REB, PTS, AST) in its analysis. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The report correctly links Tyrese Haliburton's injury in Game 5 to a decrease in pace (a decrease) for the Pacers going forward.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The report dwells excessively on Tyrese Haliburton's buzzer beater in Game 1 over Andrew Nembhard's performance. ",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reads as an analysis of the finals and does not spend excessive amounts of text on color commentary. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Imagine the following alternate history timeline:
1. Operation Barbarossa was anticipated by Joseph Stalin, causing the Soviet army to be well-prepared for the German invasion in June 1941.
2. The United States becomes an ally to the Soviet Union by 1980.
3. Britain becomes a communist state by 2000 and retains control over its colonies.
Create a plausible timeline for this scenario. Keep your answer less than 2000 words. | 6847465956a0f6376a605476 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | Simple | Intermediate | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least three historical sources (e.g., academic journals, monographs, primary documents) to discuss the effects of World War II.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the Lend-Lease Program would likely have been reduced or scrapped entirely.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the Soviet Union would likely have captured all of Germany.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions one common enemy between the United States and the Soviet Union (e.g., Germany, Italy, Hungary, or China).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the historical relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, as well as at least two other major global powers (e.g., China, a unified Europe) within the altered timeline, framing these relationships as enduring strategic rivalries or alliances that align with established historical precedents as well as the situation described in the prompt.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an introduction containing a clear thesis statement that frames the alternate timeline (i.e., the situations in the prompt are clearly outlined in the introduction).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a list or table which summarizes the proposed timeline, with dates mapped to major events.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a timeline in which Stalin correctly anticipates Operation Barbarossa.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a timeline in which the Soviet Union and the United States are allies by 1980.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges that the United States and the Soviet Union would not be ideologically aligned despite being allies.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses the role of nuclear deterrence in its generated scenario (e.g., motivations to build nuclear weapons, the arms race, the Cold War, the existence of modern nuclear powers).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at most 2,000 words, excluding citations.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response considers the internal sociocultural impacts for at least five countries affected by the altered timeline (e.g., reduced anti-communist sentiment in the United States, stronger allied relations between China and Japan, heightened internal tensions in Germany, expanded civil liberties in Russia).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the internal economic consequences for at least five countries affected by the altered timeline (e.g., continued economic growth in the United States, Japan’s postwar boom slowing down, delayed decolonization & persistent poverty in African states, slower economic recovery in the European Union).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses how the altered timeline affects major technological rivalries (e.g., the Space Race, the arms race, the race for spycraft mastery, the development of computer technology such as GPS, satellites, wireless).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the long-term fate of the main defeated powers (e.g., Germany, Italy, Japan) within the new global order, extending the analysis up to the present day.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains timeline events that are logically coherent, with clear cause-and-effect relationships presented within the altered historical context.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains timeline events that are implausible (e.g., the Russia-Ukraine war, the oil pipeline blasts near Russia, the sanctions on Russian energy by the U.S. government, or the nonexistence of NATO under a U.S.-USSR alliance given the initial premises and established historical patterns).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a timeline in which Britain becomes a communist state and retains its colonies.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response asserts major geopolitical shifts (e.g., the dissolution of NATO, a U.S.-USSR alliance) without providing plausible logical reasoning or historical context to justify their occurrence within the altered timeline, treating them as given outcomes rather than reasoned developments.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response’s timeline addresses the existence of anti-colonial resistance movements to British imperial control.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly discusses or integrates the concept of internal British opposition to the establishment of a communist state, detailing its potential forms or impact within the altered timeline.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites non-scholarly sources (e.g., Reddit threads, Facebook posts, Wikipedia, YouTube) to justify historical claims.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses whether the global anti-colonial movement still occurs under the alternate timeline (e.g., more resources available to maintain colonial powers, delay in Indian independence due to the absence of the Azad Hind Fauj, delay in African independence).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows how NATO dissolves in 2025 under a U.S.-USSR alliance, as NATO was formed to unite U.S. allies in the event of a potential Soviet conflict, so if the U.S. and USSR are allies, NATO would not be required.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly mentions or integrates a discussion of cultural or national differences among at least two distinct nations within the Soviet bloc (e.g., East Germany, Poland, Hungary), demonstrating awareness of internal diversity within the bloc.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the fate of the defeated leaders of World War II (Hitler, Mussolini, Hirohito), exploring whether they experience similar or altered outcomes.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how modern leaders of countries involved in World War II are cooperative due to a preemptive end to the war (e.g., improved U.S.-USSR cooperation, better communication sharing, lack of a nuclear arms race, improved global relations).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the fallout between the United States and the United Kingdom over communist ideals (e.g., due to the U.S.-USSR friendship, communism is no longer viewed as the ultimate enemy, prompting Britain, which still sees it as one, to distance itself from the U.S.).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least five sources (e.g., memoirs, declassified government documents, academic biographies based on primary sources) that directly quote or explicitly analyze the thought processes of world leaders related to the prompt’s timeline.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
How do you evaluate modern (up to 2025) Text-to-speech (TTS) models, including advancements in prosody, emotion, and multilingual capabilities. Explore emerging tasks such as voice cloning, zero-shot synthesis, and cross-lingual voice transfer. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053f3 | AI & ML | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response ensures all acronyms are expanded on it during their first appearance and provides clear definitions for all specialized terms and mathematical symbols upon first use, accompanied by explanatory prose or examples (e.g., MOS as Mean Opinion Score, F0 as Fundamental Frequency, EER as Equal Error Rate, MCD as Mel-Cepstral Distortion).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least three publicly available datasets used for TTS evaluation (e.g., (1) LJSpeech, (2) Multilingual LibriSpeech, (3) VCTK (Voice Cloning Toolkit), (4) Libri-TTS/ LibriTTS-R).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is logically structured, progressing from foundational metrics to advanced capabilities and emergent tasks (e.g., starting with foundational concepts such as Mean Opinion Score (MOS), Comparative Mean Opinion Score (CMOS), then exploring the frontiers of evaluation of prosody and emotion, and finally the advanced applications such as voice cloning, cross-lingual transfer, and zero-shot synthesis).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the \"one-to-many\" mapping problem for prosody (i.e., the same sentence can be spoken with many valid variations of prosody).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the \"subjectivity bottleneck,\" where human listening tests are the most accurate but are also slow, expensive, and hard to repeat consistently.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how to check for \"emotional consistency\" after editing speech for emotion, mentioning specific tools like EmoCorrector.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims BLEU(Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) or ROUGE(Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) are standard metrics for evaluating the acoustic quality of TTS output.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains why, regarding intelligibility and naturalness, one can be perfect and the other one fails (e.g., Naturalness is much harder than intelligibility because a perfectly intelligible audio, that has a low word error rate, can sound entirely robotic and unnatural. There is more subjectivity in evaluating what is natural than in evaluating what is intelligible).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains, for multilingual TTS, the methodological \"chicken-and-egg\" problem where (Automatic Speech Recognition) ASR-based metrics like WER (Word Error Rate) are dependent on the quality of the ASR model itself.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses clear tables to compare different options, such as models or evaluation metrics, showing their main pros and cons.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a special metric for evaluating code-switching (mixing languages) (e.g., PIER (Point-of-Interest Error Rate), a variant of WER that focuses only on specific words of interest, (2) T-index, that leverages machine translation systems to capture properties of code-switched words in relation to the participating language pair, (3) Intonation Units (IUs) that are prosodic speech segments, (4) Fidelity to the Original Audio, Accuracy, and Latency (FAL) which aims to overcome the limitations of traditional metrics used to assess ASR (Automatic Speech Recognition) systems).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains tests like CMOS (Comparative Mean Opinion Score) or MUSHRA (Multiple Stimuli with Hidden Reference and Anchor) that are better than a basic MOS (Mean Opinion Score) test for comparing very good TTS systems. (e.g., Comparative Mean Opinion Score (CMOS) builds on Mean Opinion Score (MOS) by letting the listener judge on a pair of samples side-by-side. This is important because it is hard to absolutely judge the Mean Opinion Score for systems that already have very high scores.)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims that the MCD (Mel-Cepstral Distortion) metric is good for measuring how natural a voice sounds.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains, for voice cloning, the trade-off between sounding like the target person (similarity) and sounding good (quality).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains modern metrics like TTSDS (Text-to-Speech Distribution Score) that work better by comparing groups of audio samples instead of just one-to-one.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes using AI models as \"judges\" (like in EmergentTTS-Eval) because they give scores and also explain their reasoning like humans.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that the main challenge of using a voice in another language is removing the original speaker's accent.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that evaluation, for zero-shot TTS, means checking quality and voice similarity using only a few seconds of audio from a new speaker.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains in detail the value of \"living benchmarks\" that update regularly to keep tests fair and prevent models from overfitting to them.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents automated benchmarks as perfect, ignoring their known flaws, like bias or the inability to catch every error.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response points out that evaluating long audio (like audiobooks) is a major unsolved problem.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how to evaluate \"controllability\", how well the TTS model follows specific commands for style or emotion.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that there must be an evaluation that is specific to the application (e.g., a screen reader needs clarity).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests a smart hybrid evaluation plan, such as using computer tests daily, bigger automated tests for milestones, and human listeners for final checks.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses practical issues, like evaluating a model's speed, cost, and memory usage, especially for devices like phones.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that there is currently no good, standard metric for measuring a \"foreign accent\" in TTS.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the need to evaluate the training data itself for things like sound diversity before building a model.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how to evaluate models for algorithmic bias, checking if they work poorly for certain accents or groups of people.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses evaluating the long-term user experience, such as listening fatigue or how much a user trusts the voice.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the need to check for \"semantic faithfulness\", making sure the model reads numbers and facts correctly, even if it sounds natural.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how to evaluate a voice's \"persona\" to see if it fits a specific brand.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response treats TTS evaluation as only a technical problem, ignoring ethics and societal harm (e.g., Voice cloning used for deepfake audio, fraudulent activities such as impersonation and defamation).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how to measure speaker identity preservation across languages (e.g., Speaker Encoder Cosine Similarity (SECS), Similarity Mean Opinion Score (SMOS)).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how to quantify accent transfer versus removal (e.g., Accent Classifer, or SpeechCodeVAE model that decouples and reconstructs speech signals through three disentangled representations: speech content tokens, speaker timbre embeddings, and prosodic features, Zero-shot voice transfer).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Propose a biologically plausible model that integrates the neuroscience concepts of engrams and predictive coding into one network capable of performing classification tasks. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e76958488 | AI & ML | Moderate | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response is organized into clearly labeled sections that cover: Executive Summary (e.g. one-paragraph overview of the model, key claims, outcomes), Background & Design Principles (e.g. succinct engram and predictive-coding basics, guiding assumptions), Methodology (e.g. how the model is built, trained, evaluated at a high level), Applications/Impact (e.g. where this helps, continual/few-shot classification, neuroscience relevance), Limitations (e.g. known weaknesses, open risks, scalability issues), and Conclusion (e.g. takeaways, next steps).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response sections topic-specific technical parts clearly (e.g. Network Architecture section detailing hierarchy, prediction vs. error units, engram assemblies, connectivity, Learning/Plasticity and Training Methodology section suggesting local rules like Hebbian/STDP, engram allocation/tagging, consolidation schedule, training protocol, Inference Procedure section covering prediction-error message passing, engram retrieval during classification, computational cost, Evaluation/Benchmarks section describing datasets, metrics, and ablations isolating engram vs. predictive-coding contributions, Biological Plausibility section discussing signal locality, neuromodulators, timescales, energy/implementation constraints).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly defines an engram as a sparsely distributed neuronal ensemble that undergoes persistent synaptic/physiological changes to encode a specific memory, such that its reactivation retrieves that memory and its disruption impairs it.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly defines predictive coding as a hierarchical inference scheme where higher areas send top-down predictions, lower areas compute bottom-up prediction errors, and iterative local message passing updated representations to minimize those errors (e.g. approximate inference under a generative model, belief propagation in probabilistics graphical models, cocktail party effect, perceptual filling-in of occluded objects).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly distinguishes local predictive-coding prediction errors (e.g. layer/feature-specific residuals computed by dedicated error units and passed locally, mismatch signals, difference between predicted and actual sensory input at the lowest level of the hierarchy) from global error signals used for task learning or decision making (e.g. label-loss gradients, neuromodulatory reward-prediction errors, reward prediction errors).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests that training the proposed architecture with global backpropagation is a biologically implausible learning rule.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a model with a predictive-coding mechanism, including error-computing neurons that compare bottom-up input with top-down predictions and propagate the resulting error (e.g. segregated prediction vs. error units with subtractive inhibition, laminar organization with superficial error units and deep prediction units, dendritic comparisons via apical–basal compartment interactions, precision-weighted errors implemented through gain control or divisive normalization).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a single circuit in which stable, sparsely reactivatable cell assemblies store class-specific engrams (e.g. Hebbian/STDP with consolidation, Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro, structural plasticity) while prediction and error units compute top-down predictions and bottom-up mismatches such that: pattern completion drives predictions; error signals modulate the same synapses via error-gated plasticity to refine or consolidate assemblies; task phase is gated by neuromodulators, with anatomical or temporal routing separating predictions and errors.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes engram formation independent of predictive-coding error signals (e.g. driven by random noise or by mechanisms that override/ignore errors, equating engram itself with the prediction error, Hebbian learning rule unmodulated by the predictive coding error).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an experiment with a clear dataset, task, protocol, and reports that includes standard ML/statistical metrics (e.g. top-1/top-5 accuracy, F1, AUROC, confusion matrix, Brier score or NLL, expected calibration error, confidence–error correlation, confidence intervals).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an experiment that provides insight into relevant biophysical or anatomical quantities (e.g. inference latency, energy per inference, spike rate, firing sparsity, E/I balance, oscillatory power/coherence, laminar or pathway segregation of predictions vs. errors, effects of ablating error units or engram plasticity).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly explains how the architecture produces class outputs (e.g. map the highest-level posteriorMAP estimate or the minimum total prediction error to a class label, use winner-take-all over engram assemblies with one readout neuron per class, decode the active attractor/ECA identity via a linear readout, report confidence from residual error or precision).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response introduces concepts without a direct role in either engram formation/reactivation (e.g. generic neuromodulator or oscillation mentions without linkage, interneuron subtype digressions, creativity/clinical speculation) or predictive-coding computations (e.g. Contrastive Predictive Coding as an ML method, neuromorphic hardware/energy figures, adversarial-robustness detours, over-citation of winner-take-all or tertiary sources).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly acknowledges the model’s limitations and articulates concrete directions for further research (e.g. unresolved biological assumptions, scalability, data/experiment needs, alternative mechanisms to test).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites seminal works supporting engrams/memory systems (e.g., Hebb, 1949; Marr, 1971; Hopfield, 1982; McClelland, McNaughton & O’Reilly, 1995; Josselyn & Frankland, 2012; Tonegawa et al., 2015) and predictive coding (e.g. Rao & Ballard, 1999; Friston, 2005/2010; Bastos et al., 2012; Spratling, 2008).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents explicit equations for biologically plausible learning updates (e.g. Hebbian/STDP timing rules, BCM with sliding threshold, Oja’s normalization, three-factor/reward-modulated plasticity with eligibility traces, error-gated synaptic plasticity, homeostatic scaling or metaplasticity, consolidation mechanisms such as synaptic tagging/capture).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents explicit equations for inference/state updates (e.g. predictive-coding dynamics with precision-weighted prediction errors, variational free-energy gradients, Kalman/Bayesian filtering and smoothing, message passing in hierarchical PC, Hopfield/attractor energy minimization, divisive normalization/gain control).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies the model’s full network architecture (e.g. layer types and hierarchy, connectivity with sparse E/I microcircuits obeying Dale’s law and structured recurrence, distinct feedforward/feedback pathways separating predictions and errors, neuron choice, synapse model, plasticity rules, normalization/homeostasis, neuromodulatory gating, oscillation/phase routing, readout/class interface).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For each included experiment, the response specifies the full methodology (e.g. model architecture and parameters, datasets, task definitions, procedures, controls/ablations, performance metrics, statistical reporting).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes architecture using network dynamics that are consistent with established experimental neuroscience literature (e.g. attractor dynamics, sparse firing, balanced excitation–inhibition, oscillation-coupled communication).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes network wiring that reflects core features of real neural circuits (e.g. sparse connectivity with limited fan-in/fan-out rather than all-to-all, generally non-symmetric synapses, excitatory vs. inhibitory neuron types that are kept distinct in line with Dale’s law, long-range projections linking engram mechanisms with other circuits that are selective and rarer than local connections, recurrence that is structured rather than fully dense).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies how stable, diverse engrams are formed at initialization (e.g. via k-WTA + Hebbian/STDP, via excitability-based allocation with synaptic tagging-and-capture/replay consolidation).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a blog post contrasting Euclidean geometry used in high school math competitions such as the AMC, AIME, or Olympiads to geometry taught in the standard American high school math curriculums. This post is written for people with knowledge of geometry from standard high school classes, but with no math experience in competitive math. Your post must include clear examples of problem solving techniques and theorems that are commonly used in high school math competitions, but not typically taught in a high school math class. | 683a58c9a7e7fe4e7695846f | STEM | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response ensures all acronyms are expanded on it during their first appearance and provides clear definitions for all specialized terms and mathematical symbols upon first use, accompanied by explanatory prose or examples (e.g., (1) SSS, meaning, Side-Side-Side, criteria to establish that two triangles are congruent, (2) American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME), (3) American Mathematics Competitions (AMC), (4) United States of America Mathematical Olympiad (USAMO)).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a geometric diagram for each theorem and sample problem introduced (e.g., (1) Draw an example of a cyclic quadrilateral and the relevant angles that sums to 180, (2) Draw and example cyclic quadrilateral with the diagonals to show the Ptolemy's Theorem, (3) Draw an example of a triangle of the cevians to illustrate the Ceva's Theorem, (4) Draw three circles to illustrate the Collinearity of External Tangent Intersections).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a geometric diagram far from the text where it is discussed (i.e., the text describes an image that is missing or is on pages away).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response keeps the primary focus of the blog post on Euclidean geometry (e.g. (1) Ceva's Theorem, (2) Menelaus' Theorem, (3) Power of a Point Theorem, (4) Stewart's Theorem, (5) Ptolemy's Theorem, (6) Spiral Similarity, (7) Miquel Point) and does not include problems from other topics such as functions and combinatorics.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's blog post contains at least 2 sub-headings to separate discussion of different topics (e.g., Subheadings titled: (1) Advanced Theorems, (2) Advanced Problem-Solving Techniques, (3) Example Problems and Solutions, (4) Where to go from here?).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's blog post mentions at least one high school math competition (e.g., (1) AMC, (2) AIME, (3) USA(J)MO, or (4) IMO).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's blog post elaborates on a theorem in the common core high school geometry standards, beyond a quick definition to contrast it with competition-level requirements (e.g., Pythagoras' Theorem states that the square of the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the two other sides. This can be used to find the missing lengths of the right triangle as long as two other lengths are known, and continues to provide a diagram and example usage).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least one theorem in competition-style Euclidean geometry problems (e.g., (1) Ceva's Theorem, (2) Menelaus' Theorem, (3) Power of a Point Theorem, (4) Stewart's Theorem, (5) Ptolemy's Theorem, (6) Spiral Similarity, (7) Miquel Point).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies at least one problem-solving technique in Euclidean geometry (e.g., (1) Correctly identifying what theorems to use, (2) Correctly applying the theorem, (3) Adding auxiliary lines, (4) Homothety, (5) Symmetries, rotations, and reflections, (6) Inversion).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response introduces a problem-solving technique that is included in the common core high school geometry standards (e.g., (1) Pythagoras' Theorem, (2) Midpoint Theorem, (3) Congruent Triangle Theorems, (4) Angle Bisector Theorem) and provides a sample problem that can be solved using the technique.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a sample problem to demonstrate problem-solving techniques (e.g., (1) AMC 12 2018 #8, (2) 2020 AIME II Problem 15, (3) 2020 AMC 12A Problem 18, (4) 2021 USAJMO Problem 3, or (5) explicitly stating a simple instance of a problem where the techniques can be applied).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the test format of at least one high school math competition (e.g., (1) The AIME is a 15-question, 3-hour exam, (2) Each answer is an integer from 000 to 999, inclusive, (3) The AMC 10 is a 25-question, 75-minute multiple-choice test. (4) Calculators are not permitted).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorrectly defines a theorem, incorrectly presents the solution to a sample problem, or incorrectly provides information about a high school math competition.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies a theorem or problem-solving technique that is discussed within the first 200 words of the post (e.g., Ptolemy's theorem establishes the relationship between the length of the sides (abcd) and the diagonals (pq) of a cyclic quadrilateral where ac + bd = pq).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's blog post presents a common core style math problem as an olympiad style math problem (e.g., (1) Pythagoras' Theorem, (2) Midpoint Theorem, (3) Congruent Triangle Theorems, (4) Angle Bisector Theorem).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies a distinction between competition-style math problems and standard curriculum math problems (e.g., (1) Competition-style math problems cover more breadth and depth using more advanced theorems and problem-solving skills, (2) Competition-style math problems require more \"tricks\", (3) Competition-style math problems require more steps of problem-solving involving unique combinations of applications of math theorems, (4) Competition-style math problems are highly specialized to specific topics such as geometry, combinatorics, and number theory, and less on analysis and algebra.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a step-by-step solution to a sample problem introduced (e.g., $CAROLINE$ is essentially a plus sign with side length 1 with a few diagonals, which motivates us to coordinate bash. We let $N = (1, 0)$ and $E = (0, 1)$. To find $CORNELIA$'s self-intersections, we take\n\\[CO = y = 2, AI = y = -3x + 6, RN = y = 3x - 3\\]\nAnd plug them in to get $C_1 = \\left(\\frac{4}{3}, 2 \\right)$ where $C_1$ is the intersection of $CO$ and $AI$, and $C_2 = \\left(\\frac{5}{3}, 2 \\right)$ is the intersection of $RN$ and $CO$.\nWe also track the intersection of $AI$ and $RN$ to get $\\left(\\frac{3}{2}, \\frac{3}{2} \\right)$.\nBy vertical symmetry, the other 2 points of intersection should have the same x-coordinates. We can then proceed with Solution 1 to calculate the area of the triangle (compare the $y$-coordinates of $A,R,I,N$ and $CO$ and $EL$).).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains messy, unnecessary formulas, code, or tables. (e.g., (1) Unrendered latex, (2) messy formulas with improperly formatted structure or messy comments, (3) broken tables that are unrendered, (4) missing figures or formulas or sections that are referenced in the text).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites the source of a sample problem incorrectly (i.e., quotes or explains a particular problem, such as AMC 12 2018 #4, but is actually about a different problem or a variant of the problem that is different).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses and cites the source of competition problems (e.g., (1) AMC 12 2018 #8, (2) 2020 AIME II Problem 15, (3) 2020 AMC 12A Problem 18, (4) 2021 USAJMO Problem 3).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
}
] |
You are a junior analyst at the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs. Write a concise internal strategic report on the current crisis in Haiti. The report must (1) assess the interconnected political, economic, and security failures; (2) analyze the influence of key domestic actors (e.g., G9 an fanmi, Guy Philippe) and international bodies (e.g., CARICOM, UN); and (3) propose and justify three distinct, actionable policy options for the U.S., each with a clear analysis of its potential risks and benefits. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053d8 | Historical Analysis | High | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response claims to be an AI language model, breaking the assigned persona.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is structured like a formal internal report with sections equivalent to an executive summary, an analysis section, a proposal, and a clear comparison.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses clear, hierarchical headings such as Executive Summary, Proposed Policies, Analysis, Conclusions, and similar sections.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has a tone is that is harsh, biased, or judgmental (e.g., describing Haitian officials as \"corrupt beyond repair\", calling gangs as \"savages\", implying the U.S. has no responsibility at all for the crisis, or claiming that Haiti’s has no capacity for democracy).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has a \"Works Cited\" or References section that contains one or more duplicate entries for the same source.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has significant formatting errors or misaligned text that obscure meaning, or includes incoherent tables.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites Wikipedia as the main source for a key factual claim.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents three distinct policy options (e.g., maintaining the status quo, UN observation, diplomatic interventions).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists policies that are minor variations of each other.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies the main gang coalition by its specific name: \"Viv Ansanm\".",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response, in its analysis of Guy Philippe, mentions his prior conviction in the U.S. and deportation.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites a source with a nonsensical access date (e.g., \"December 31, 1969\" or any date more than 20 years before the start of the 2018 Haiti crisis (7/7/18)).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of an actor’s role (e.g., portraying CARICOM as a military force, omitting its membership, claiming the UN provides armed support, or describing the G9 as peaceful).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims a contribution was made but fails to provide a concrete citation to support the claim.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names at least one member of the Haitian Provisional Presidential Council (PPC) (e.g., Lauren Saint-Cyr, Fritz Jean, Leslie Voltaire, Edgard Fils).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites a YouTube video as a source for factual data in a formal intelligence report.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a balanced analysis of the risks and benefits for each proposed policy option (e.g., benefits to citizen welfare, reduction in crime, risks of eroding local culture, or potential loss of Haitian identity).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately identifies the security crisis (with multiple gangs taking control after the assassination of a political leader and the resulting surge in crime) as the primary driver of the Haitian crisis.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifically mentions the control of Port-au-Prince and critical infrastructure by armed gangs.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a clear and plausible justification for each policy option based on stated U.S. interests.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly describes the political vacuum that allowed gangs to rise to power following the 2021 assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references the assassination of Jovenel Moïse.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response attributes the crisis to a single cause.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the political or financial influence of the Haitian diaspora in the United States as a positive factor contributing to sway political decisions in favor of Haiti.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the High Transitional Council (HCT) as the governing body that immediately preceded the current Transitional Presidential Council (TPC).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one policy option that directly addresses the flow of illicit firearms from the United States into Haiti (e.g., targeting straw purchases, addressing high-powered weapons like ARs, increasing accountability, expanding checks to states like Florida).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links security and political failures to a specific humanitarian consequence (e.g., political instability, high corruption, uncoordinated aid, repeated natural disasters).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites a credible figure to support a humanitarian consequence (e.g., UN documents, peer-reviewed studies, U.S. government releases, reputable journalists like the New York Times).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the UN-authorized, Kenyan-led Multinational Security Support (MSS) mission as the key international security response.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response, while mentioning the FTO designation for Viv Ansanm, fails to explain its specific legal or practical implications for U.S. policy (e.g., asset blocking, increased gang power in Haiti, deportations of U.S. permanent residents who are Haitian, immigration restrictions).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the specific role of Canada or France, two key international partners in the Haiti context (e.g., $450M in aid, bilateral French support for the MSS, Canada’s push for Haitian-led solutions, or French enforcement of sanctions).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
create a simple agentic ai for personal mental-wellness support. id like to have
- two agents: one would be a 'Mood Agent' that reads your check-ins (text or voice) to see what your emotions are. then theres an 'Intervention Agent' that suggests quick exercises, like breathing or journaling prompts
- the workflow should be: the mood bot flags a really low or high mood, and then pings the intervention bot to help out
- maybe I can use an NLU tool like dialogflow? and we MUST encrypt all the data and let people delete their history
- if it gets confused it should ask follow up questions and if it sees someone is repeatedly low (eg 3 times in a row) it needs to escalate to a human counselor
how do I test it? we could measure engagement and self-reported mood improvement. maybe just pilot it with 20 users for 2 weeks? | 6847465956a0f6376a6054ad | Technical Documentation | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains a description of the Mood Agent and its functionalities, including analyzing user text and/or voice check-ins for emotional cues.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a description of the Intervention Agent and its functionalities, including offering quick wellness exercises (e.g., breathing, journaling, short walks, guided meditation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a description of the workflow where the Mood Agent flags low or high moods using defined indicators or metrics (e.g., sentiment scores, keyword detection, tone analysis, frequency of negative expressions) and subsequently pings the Intervention Agent.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies at least one concrete Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tool or platform for intent and slot extraction and describes how the tool can be integrated into the agentic system (e.g., Dialogflow for detecting mood intents, Rasa for routing between agents, Wit.ai for extracting emotional entities, IBM Watson Assistant for dialogue management).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly describes how all stored and transmitted user data will be encrypted and explains how the technique upholds recognized privacy standards (e.g., AES-256 encryption for storage meeting HIPAA compliance, TLS 1.3 for transmission adhering to GDPR guidelines, key rotation policies aligned with NIST standards, secure credential management following ISO/IEC 27001).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes how users are given the ability to delete their interaction history on demand and specifies the mechanism by which this is enabled (e.g., an in-app “Delete History” button, time-based auto-deletion settings, a user-initiated API call, secure erasure confirmation).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a clarification fallback where the system asks follow-up questions when uncertain about user input and specifies how this mechanism is implemented (e.g., prompting the user to rephrase unclear text, requesting confirmation of detected mood, offering multiple-choice options for intent clarification, escalating to a simplified dialogue mode).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a fallback mechanism where repeated low-mood detections (e.g., three consecutive low-mood check-ins) by the Mood Agent lead to an escalation to a human counselor and specifies how this is carried out (e.g., direct connection to a crisis hotline, scheduling a live counselor session, sending a secure alert to a designated mental-health professional).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists “engagement time” or similar engagement metrics and explains how they are collected and by which agent in the system (e.g., Mood Agent tracking duration of check-ins, Intervention Agent logging time spent on exercises, system-level analytics recording overall session length, cross-agent aggregation of user activity logs).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists “mood improvement” as an evaluation metric and explains how it is measured (e.g., Mood Agent comparing sentiment scores across sessions, user self-reports on mood scales, aggregated pre/post-pilot survey results).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a pilot plan involving approximately 20 users for testing and describes how the pilot will be conducted in two weeks (e.g., daily mood check-ins, scheduled intervention exercises, pre- and post-pilot evaluation surveys, aggregated engagement/mood improvement reports).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is organized into clearly labelled sections and discusses factors relevant to the labels (i.e., Agents and Roles, Workflow, Tech and Privacy, Fallbacks, Metrics and Pilot).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a pilot plan with a cohort size different from 20 users.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies a duration different from two weeks for the pilot plan.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the multi-modal fusion of text and audio emotion cues and describes the processes used to combine them (e.g., extracting sentiment features from text and pitch/tempo features from audio, aligning modalities through time-stamped embeddings, applying feature-level fusion in a neural network, using decision-level fusion with weighted voting).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions a model that can assist the agents in detecting and classifying emotions and specifies how it is applied within the system (e.g., BERT for sentiment classification of text check-ins, RoBERTa for nuanced emotion detection, Wav2Vec for audio-based emotion recognition, multimodal transformers for joint analysis of text and speech).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines a dialogue-management component that maintains context across agent interactions and explains how it functions within the system (e.g., tracking conversation state across Mood and Intervention Agents, storing dialogue history in a context manager, applying slot-filling techniques, using reinforcement learning to optimize turn-taking).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes ongoing ethical oversight by mental-health professionals beyond basic escalation and specifies how this oversight is incorporated into the system (e.g., regular audits of agent recommendations by licensed counselors, advisory board reviews of intervention strategies, continuous feedback loops with clinical psychologists, ethical risk assessments conducted before pilot expansions).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies how the deletion process happens, describes the technical procedure that ensures data is permanently removed, and explains how the method aligns with recognized privacy standards (e.g., user-initiated deletion request triggering cryptographic erasure in compliance with GDPR’s right to be forgotten, multi-pass overwrite of database entries following NIST guidelines, secure erase commands for SSD storage meeting HIPAA requirements, cloud provider API calls with verification logs aligned to ISO/IEC 27001).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the system’s scope and limitations for mental-wellness support and provides a non-diagnostic disclaimer (e.g., clarifies it is not a substitute for therapy, advises contacting emergency services in crisis, provides crisis resources, distinguishes wellness tips from clinical treatment).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains threshold calibration and validation of Mood Agent signals prior to deployment (e.g., hold-out validation set, inter-rater reliability with human annotators, ROC/PR analysis, periodic recalibration schedule).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the format or protocol used for data exchange between agents (e.g., JSON messages, gRPC calls, structured events with schemas, shared database entries).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies how agents exchange information and describes the communication mechanism (e.g., direct API calls between agents, message queues, shared state storage, event-driven notifications).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains whether agent interaction is orchestrated through a central controller or peer-to-peer and how the coordination logic is implemented (e.g., workflow engine, custom orchestrator, rule-based routing, policy-based delegation).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a detailed historical analysis of the economic rationale and ethical implications of the Allied strategic bombing campaigns in World War II, focusing on the bombing of industrial and civilian centers in Germany and Japan such as Dresden, Hamburg, and Tokyo. It should include a timeline of how the bombing campaigns changed over the course of the war. Assume the audience is a graduate student in history or political ethics. | 6847465956a0f6376a60547c | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response provides a clear timeline of Allied strategic bombing (1939–1945).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identies key tactical and technological shifts (e.g., daytime to nighttime shift, precision to area bombing, morale and housing bombing, development of incendiary bombs)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies key locations and dates of famous Allied bombings of industrial and/or civilian cities (e.g., Hamburg 1943, Dresden 1945, Tokyo 1945, Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response primarily discusses military bombing targets (e.g., Peenemünde Raid, Ploesti Oil Fields, Truk Lagoon, Kiel).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response integrates the evolution of bombing strategy with shifts in economic rationale and ethical debates, showing how each influenced the others over time (e.g., the economic implication of bombing civilian centers, the ethical reprecussions of bombing civilian centers, differences in bombing strategy between 1941 and 1944, Churchill's opinion on the bombing of Dresden)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately summarizes official economic objectives of Allied bombing campaigns (e.g., disrupting war production, destroying railways, undermining worker morale, cutting off fuel).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analyzes the actual economic outcomes of Allied bombing campagins (e.g., how much was production limited, how many railways were destroyed, how were workers impacted, using quantitative data when available, how much were fuel supplies disrupted).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the rationale used by Allied leaders (e.g, industrial web, paralyzing transportation, causing a fuel shortage, ending the war) to justify targetting economic objectives (e.g., disrupting war production, destroying railways, undermining worker morale, cutting off fuel).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least two primary sources (e.g., The Strategic Air War Against Germany, 1939-1945, The United States Strategic Bombing Survey, Memoirs of Albert Speer, \"Bomber Offensive\" ) and two post-1950 scholarly works (e.g., \"The Bombing War: Europe, 1939-1945\", \"The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich\", \"Fire and Fury: The Allied Bombing of Germany, 1942-1945\", \"Blankets of Fire: U.S. Bombers over Japan during World War II\") to support the analysis.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates the extent to which the bombing campaigns influenced the outcome of the war (e.g., evidence for/against the war being shortened, counterfactual outcomes, perspective of the Axis on the bombings, diverse opinions on the success of the bombings).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the moral justifications contemporaneously advanced by Allied leadership (e.g., breaking morale, shortening the war, supporting the other allies, inhumanity of the Axis) and provides counterarguments (e.g., disproportionate force, questionable necessity, conflict rather than cooperation with the Soviets, sanctity of human life).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses postwar and historiographical debates on the legality and morality of area bombing. (e.g., Nuremberg Trials, Tokyo Trials, Slaughterhouse V, Churchill's snub of \"Bomber\" Harris ).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares strategic bombing in Germany and Japan, considering geography, industrial layout, and cultural factors (e.g, differences between German geography relative to Japan, differences in population distributions between Germany and Tokyo, differences in response to Tokyo firebombing compared to Dresden response, differences in economic backgrounds of Germany and Japan).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares Allied bombing (e.g., Dresden, Tokyo, Hamburg, Hiroshima) with Axis campaigns (e.g., the Blitz, Warsaw, Rotterdam, Guernica) to provide context.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Response notes long-term effects of bombing on postwar reconstruction and infrastructure (e.g,. comparison of German cities that were and weren't bombed, comparison of Japanese cities that were and weren't bombed, comparison of Italian cities that were and weren't bombed, discussion of economic impacts in the 21st century) ",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response employs an academic tone appropriate to a graduate-level historical essay and situates arguments within broader historiographical or theoretical debates.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not distinguish firebombing and nuclear bombing.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one statistical visualization (e.g., bombing tonnage graph, death toll chart, GDP impact, railway coverage).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges uncertainty or gaps in historical data where appropriate.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies and explains military necessity and civilian harm analogous to post-war International Humanitarian Law.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The cites relevant international laws or norms that applied during WWII (e.g., Hague Conventions, civil immunity, principle of distinction, lack of international institutions with enforcement abilities).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response demonstrates awareness of the historiographical shift in interpretations from 1945 to the present (e.g., publishing of Der Brand in Germany, post-war heroic praise, Orthodox to Revisionist shift, Revisionist to balanced viewpoint).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies and explains at least one criticism from a formerly Axis country's scholar or institution (Yūshūkan, Yuki Tanaka, questioning the allies being better in \"Hidden Horrors: Japanese War Crimes in World War II\", Jörg Friedrich's Der Brand which provides a perspective of German victims).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses military terminology (e.g., strategic vs. tactical bombing, precise bombing vs. area bombing) consistently and accurately.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response appropriately contextualizes bombing campaigns within larger Allied war strategy (e.g., Eastern front, D-Day, African campaign, submarine warfare).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references cultural or psychological effects of bombing on civilian populations (e.g., The Blitz Spirit, Grave of the Fireflies, Slaughterhouse Five, trauma).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains differences in legal or public responses to bombing campaigns across Allied nations (censorship by the US, censorship by the UK, criticism of Bishop George Bell, Stalin's perspective on UK bombing).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response digresses into unrelated WWIII topics (e.g., Nazi goals, submarine warfare, the Eastern front, political challenges in England or Germany during WWII) ",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Generate a holistic, paradigm-shifting manifesto that synergizes next-generation business intelligence with agile methodologies to investigate the AI value-stream actualization gap.
Asp corporate AI spending approaches $300 billion annually, our research must explore the widespread organizational friction that undermines these transformation projects. Investigate why localized productivity gains often fail to ripple up to enterprise-level financial performance and explore the deep-seated cultural and strategic misalignment at play.
The primary audience for this manifesto is C-suites executives and boards of directors. However, the language must be kept simple, accessible, and informal, written in an engaging blog post style suitable for a new intern. Crucially, the tone must remain optimistic and forward-looking, avoiding an excessive focus on failure or negative statistics.
To make the concepts more tangible, the entire analysis must draw direct parallels to the challenges of the 1960s American space program. For instance, you should frame "pilot purgatory" in the context of the Gemini missions and discuss "hidden TCO" as analogous to the unforeseen logistical costs of the Apollo program. | 6847465956a0f6376a6054a2 | Business Planning & Research | High | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response accurately states that enterprise-wide AI projects yield an average ROI of just 5.9%.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies that over 70% of AI pilots have failed to generate long-term value.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly reports that data scientists spend 60%-80% of their time on data preparation.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the 2025 McKinsey & Company claim that 80% of companies report no material contribution to earnings from AI initiatives.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies the \"middle management bottleneck\" as a key component of cultural resistance to AI.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses the term \"Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)\" when discussing hidden costs.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses the term \"bolted-on\" to describe the superficial application of AI to existing workflows.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a table of business KPIs to measure the success of AI adoption (e.g., cost savings, ROI, customer satisfaction, user adoption rate).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights the risk of budget overruns, citing the example of cloud compute costs scaling exponentially.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response omits the concept of using Net Present Value (NPV) as a metric.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the financial risks of AI adoption (e.g., high compute costs, hallucinations, lack of explainability for auditing, high API costs). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes the warning that siloed departmental AI optimizations can actively create enterprise-wide inefficiencies.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes the concept of \"PoC Purgatory\", where over 90% of AI projects get stuck in the pilot phase.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the Rackspace/FAIR's \"Your Playbook for Winning the AI Game\" or any of its 12 specific \"plays\" for industrializing AI. (e.g., build on a strong foundation first, assemble your AI roster, execute with precision). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the impressit.io estimate that the cost to maintain a single generative AI application can be between $350,000 and $820,000 annually.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims that the \"J-Curve\" of AI implementation (long-term gains follow short-term losses) represents a simple learning curve, not a profound systemic shock to the organization.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the \"empathy gap\" exists, i.e., 63% of developers stating their leaders do not understand their daily pain points, \"likely caused by leaders banking time savings achieved through AI without addressing existing points of friction\" per the Atlassian \"State of the Developer Experience\" 2025 report. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response translates the \"J-Curve\" phenomenon (i.e., long-term gains follow short-term disruption) into a direct warning about its negative impact on quarterly earnings and productivity forecasts.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links risk‑mitigation framing to CFO oversight.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response frames POC/pilot purgatory of AI initiatives to the Gemini missions (i.e., pilots being assigned to Gemini missions but later being replaced or delayed on their assignments due to accidents and technical setbacks). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The reponse compares the hidden TCO of AI adoption (e.g., employee training costs, API costs, storage costs, compute costs) to the unforeseen logistical costs of the Apollo program (e.g., design flaws, increased safety measures, identified single points of failure, construction delays). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The reponse maintains a forward-looking, optimistic outlook and counter to proposed challenges for AI adoption.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions agents.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions large language models.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions image-generation models.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links the adoption of closed-source models (e.g., agent/LLM offerings by OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, Microsoft) to the prohibitive costs of training LLMs from scratch. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
i'm trying to outline my final paper for this history of tech seminar and i'm a bit stuck on the scope. it's supposed to be a big 'comprehensive expository analysis' on two key AI architectures: LSTMs and the encoder-decoder architecture (eg seq2seq for translation).
i have to trace the whole historical development of LSTMs, e.g. go back to Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, the vanishing gradient problem in RNNs, and all the key milestones. then i have to do the exact same thing for the encoder-decoder models, from their origins (eg. Sutskever, Bahdanau, and Cho) up to how they dominate NLP now
I also need to talk about the societal implications. For example how they made machine translation, speech recognition, and predictive text practical, and what that means for globalization, accessibility and jobs. this also has to cover the ethical side, like biases from training data, who can access this stuff, and the risks of misuse like surveillance or spreading disinformation.
i also need a section that directly compares LSTMs and encoder-decoders historically, technically, and their different societal impacts. I also need to find 10 case studies and then synthesize them to develop some broader conclusions about how these advancements shape responsible technology and maybe strategies for ethical innovation. all claims have to be backed up by peer-reviewed literature, historical accounts, or formal ethical frameworks, like the IEEE guidelines | 6847465956a0f6376a605360 | Historical Analysis | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response covers the architectures listed in the prompt (i.e. encoder-decoder and LSTM).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how LSTMs and encoder-decoders have performed in the technical world and how they have accelerated workflows (e.g., time series analysis, machine translation, ML tasks, generative AI).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows the effects of at least 2 of 10 case studies in ethics or responsible AI (e.g., bias in AI, ethical dilemmas, AI in mental health research, racial communication by AI).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes AI applications that use modern architectures and discusses their societal implications (e.g., ChatGPT for search, Claude for coding, Gemini for Google-augmented search, or LSTMs for social media analysis).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses ethical fallacies and biases introduced during the training of these architectures (e.g., data-driven bias, the value alignment problem, dominance of high-resource languages, difficulty identifying bias during training).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how academia and industry collaborated to create these architectures (e.g., the attention paper originating from industry, the LSTM paper from academia, ongoing collaboration between researchers, and cross-domain testing of architectures).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how modern architectures such as transformers evolved from the successes of encoder-decoders and LSTMs.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how modern AI affects global economics, employment, and workforce demographics (e.g., reduced coding time, faster document synthesis, skill shifts toward AI, increased focus on testing and control).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response overlooks the historical influence of regulatory and ethical guidelines on AI development (e.g., Asilomar AI Principles, the Belmont Report, GDPR, IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design), which have shaped how AI systems are designed and governed.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to address accountability for biased models and does not acknowledge historical instances of bias (e.g., gender bias in Bolukbasi 2016, facial recognition misidentification, biased hiring algorithms, credit scoring disparities).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes AI history unrelated to LSTMs or encoder-decoders (e.g., Random Forests, SVMs, Decision Trees, Regressions).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses historical or societal aspects for LSTMs and encoder-decoder architectures (such as effects on cross border communication with better machine translation, helping tourism, handling higher data quantity, and having more cultural context to data).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response focuses more on the technical aspects of LSTMs and encoder-decoder architectures than on their historical or societal background.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not address challenges faced by LSTM and encoder-decoder architectures (e.g., difficulty handling long-range dependencies, vanishing gradients, limited parallelization, fixed-length context limitations).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the role of peer review in the creation and refinement of LSTM and encoder-decoder architectures.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that these architectures greatly improved machine translation, improving accessibility across languages.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that open-source initiatives accelerated the adoption of LSTMs and encoder-decoders.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the historical development of the LSTM architecture.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses important milestones in LSTM development (e.g., vanishing gradient resolution, forget gate, peephole connections).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies key contributors to the development of LSTMs (e.g., Sepp Hochreiter, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Felix Gers, Fred Cummins).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the vanishing gradient problem in RNNs, where gradients approach zero and halt training.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how LSTMs retain longer contexts and use additive mechanisms to avoid this issue.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a distinct section comparing LSTMs and encoder-decoders in terms of their historical development.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a separate section comparing LSTMs and encoder-decoders in terms of their technical details.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately compares the social implications of LSTM and encoder-decoder architectures (e.g., machine translation, speech recognition, chatbots, assistive technologies).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies key contributors (e.g., Sutskever, Bahdanau, Cho) and major milestones in the development of encoder-decoder architectures.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not acknowledge the vanishing gradient problem in RNNs as one of the motivations behind the creation of LSTMs.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the limitations of other machine learning architectures beyond LSTMs and encoder-decoders (e.g., CNNs, RNNs, Decision Trees, GANs).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
I've been assigned to write an article about Palantir's success in 2024-2025. Can you help me create a draft of this article that goes over the background of Palantir and why they have been successful? Make sure to keep the article length around a 10-minute read to maximize retention | 6847465956a0f6376a605348 | General Consumer Research | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains a standalone section titled \"Background\" or equivalent that discusses relevant information about Palantir's background as a company.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a standalone section titled \"Success Factors\" or equivalent that discusses factors relevant to Palantir's success as a company.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes irrelevant information that does not add to the discussion on Palantir (e.g., information about unrelated companies like Apple or NVIDIA, the public's skepticism of non-Palantir's leadership, companies like Databricks or Amazon's partnership with other vendors, the movement of stock markets not related to Palantir's actions or market shares, etc.).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response refers to at least 3 distinct drivers in its discussion of Palantir's success factors (e.g., Palantir's modular architecture allows customers to flexibly integrate their own data pipeline, founders like Peter Thiel and Alex Karp maintain strong influence on the company's vision, Palantir's co-development of solutions with its partners instead of just selling software, its high market position stemming from specialization in sensitive domains).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions Palantir's competitors (e.g., Databricks, Snowflake, C3.ai) and discusses how Palantir differentiates itself from them.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly states that Palantir was founded in 2003.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names Peter Thiel, Alex Karp, Joe Lonsdale, Stephen Cohen, and Nathan Gettings as founders of Palantir.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that Palantir is headquartered in Denver, Colorado. Note that \"Denver\" or \"Denver, CO\" are also acceptable.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that Palantir went public via a direct listing in 2020.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names and provides an accurate description for at least one of Palantir's core platforms (e.g., Gotham, its original platform for government and intelligence data analysis; Foundry, its commercial enterprise platform for integrating and modeling operations; Apollo, its continuous delivery system for managing software across environments; AIP, its Artificial Intelligence Platform that integrates large language models with security and compliance controls).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a timeline of Palantir's major product launches (e.g., Gotham launched in 2008, Foundry launched in 2016, Apollo launched in 2020, AIP launched in 2023).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that Palantir’s major clients include U.S. government agencies, particularly in defense and intelligence (e.g., U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Intelligence Community, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response supports financial claims with specific data points traceable to Palantir's financial statements (e.g., examining Palantir’s income statement to validate claims about revenue mix; referencing the balance sheet to show growth in assets or cash reserves; citing the cash flow statement to highlight operating cash flow trends; using quarterly/annual 10-K or 10-Q filings to support claims about customer segments or government vs. commercial revenue distribution).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response relies on outdated financial data (e.g., full-year 2022 data or older) to make claims about Palantir's success in the 2024-2025 period.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses major challenges Palantir faces, providing a balanced perspective (e.g., controversial missions like its past work with ICE, pressure to maintain stockholder expectations and profitability, competition from other tech giants like Databricks and Snowflake, or over-reliance on large government contracts).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how the 2023-2024 boom in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has contributed to Palantir's success (e.g., the launch of its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) that integrates AI agents, Palantir's launch of \"AIP Bootcamps\" to drive customer adoption, the hosting of AIPCon to showcase its AI technology, and its contract with the U.S. Army for the AI-enabled TITAN program).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The section on 'Success Factors' (or equivalent) is placed after the \"Background\" section (or equivalent).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The length of the drafted article is commensurate with a 10-minute read time (roughly 2,000-3,000 words).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses factors enabling Palantir's success in the defense industry (e.g., large-scale partnerships with government entities like the U.S. Army for Project TITAN and the Department of Defense for Project Maven; rapid adoption of new technology like the AIP platform; high security and compliance readiness allowing operation on classified networks; a robust partner ecosystem including system integrators like Booz Allen Hamilton and L3Harris Technologies).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Palantir's expansion into commercial industries as part of its diversification strategy (e.g., healthcare, by partnering with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to build Tiberius; aviation, by partnering with Airbus to run the Skywise platform; automotive, with partnerships like Ferrari and Lear; and semiconductors and electronics, with the Athinia platform developed with Merck KGaA).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly identifies Palantir's achievement of sustained GAAP profitability (which began in late 2022/early 2023) as a key factor in its 2024-2025 success.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Write an outline of a potential new episode for the Netflix show Black Mirror. This outline should be robust: for example, it should include descriptions of where the episode should be filmed and suggestions for potential actors for the roles. | 684397d188c1deceb49af332 | Creative Writing | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly states an episode title which is four words or less (e.g. \"In the Chamber\", \"Lost Taste\", \"Lake Silver\", \"Trail of Truth\").",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses and cites credible sources to create a story grounded in science (e.g. Article and research papers about robotics, cybernatics, public health, or artificial intelligence).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is clearly presented in outline form (i.e. Short descriptions of the different scenes involved and other descriptions such as characters and themes clearly labelled as different sections).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains narrative making up a significant portion of the outline's detail (ie., over 1/3 of the words are the narrative).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response divides the plot into at least three chronological segments (e.g., Act I/II/III or Beginning/Middle/End).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifies at least one real-world specific filming location (e.g., Los Angeles, New Zealand, Atlanta, London) and justifies the selections",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines a living actor (e.g, Anjana Vasan, Daniel Lapaine, Rashida Jones, David Tennant) to each character and justifies the selections.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests more than two A-List actors (e.g., Brad Pitt, Zendaya, Leonard DiCaprio, Meryl Streep)",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least one explicit reference (not just inspiration) to a previous black mirror episode (e.g., includes the song Anyone Who Knows What Love Is, United Kingdom News, Barnies, Streamberry).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes any content which is not related to an episode outline (e.g., commentary on previous episodes, praise for the episode, discussion of technology, discussions of other series).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one plot twist.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes more than one plot twist. ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response’s ending prompts discussion or thought (i.e., there is at least one lingering unresolved question).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response relies heavily on ideas or features from previous Black Mirror episodes – it is not sufficiently original.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response’s contents are of an appropriate length: i.e., they would fit into an episode of 45-90 minutes.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a potential composer (e.g., Bear McCreary, Ariel Marx, Brian Reitzell, Ames Bessada)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes relevant themes that the narrative resolves around (e.g., privacy, the internet, healthcare, recycling).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an element which is clearly not feasible to produce (e.g., renting out time’s square to film for a week, requiring millions of detailed CGI objects, illegal content, copyright infringement).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response’s opening scene is normal/mundane/believable as reality (e.g., the scene could be in any other Netflix show, the scene does not have any social dynamics not present in 2025 US / UK society, the scene does not have any new technology, the scene does not involve the main theme in any way).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses technicians and experts to involve in production (e.g., Russell McLean, Digital Orchard, James MacLachlan, Ingenuity Studios).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes budget propositoning and justifications (e.g., the budget is at least $1 million, the salaries for potential actors are proposed, the special effects' costs are outlined, the filming costs are mentioned).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes one topic relevant for 2026 (e.g., war, authoritarionism, youth unemployment, immigration).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's plot is exclusively positive.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Imagine that a future technology can erase specific memories without side effects. Craft a detailed policy brief that takes a stance on whether courts can mandate the procedure for violent offenders to prevent the likelihood of re-offense. Justify your response via arguments surrounding deontology, consequentialism, and three relevant historical precedents with citations. | 6847465956a0f6376a605407 | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | High | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly states whether courts should be allowed or not allowed to sentence mandatory memory erasure.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must be written in the form of a policy brief with clear sections, including executive summary, background, analysis, and recommendations.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents 2 deontological arguments (i.e., related to the study of duty and obligation, e.g., courts have a responsibility to protect citizens, the government has an obligation to ensure safety, violent offenders should be rehabilitated, citizens have a moral obligation to integrate nonviolently into society).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents at least 2 distinct consequentialist arguments (e.g., if crime is reduced then this is always justified, any means to achieve a safer society is justified, violent criminals cannot commit crimes related to past trauma if the past no longer exists, erasure of memories will create better rehabilitation programs).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the relevance of exactly three cited historical precedents to memory erasure (e.g., lobotomy, mandated rehabilitations, forced asylum admittances, chemical castration of sexual offenders).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response supplies an in-text citation or footnote for every precedent using a recognized format (e.g., APA, MLA, Bluebook, Chicago), as the prompt requests a policy brief.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must cite 3 primary sources for historical precedents, including the source title, author, and year for each citation.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges one uncertainty regarding the future of memory erasure technology (e.g., risk of collateral damage from removing good memories, degradation of motor functions, loss of self-identity, or increased violence if the wrong memories are erased).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response concludes the brief with an actionable directive rather than a summary (e.g., courts should be allowed to mandate, listing ways to ensure checks and balances, ensuring ethical procedures, or taking a definitive stance on the matter).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses one real-world enforcement challenge related to memory erasure technology used without consent (e.g., unreliability of remaining memory states, potential evidence manipulation, difficulty solving crimes if key details are erased, or accidental erasure of innocent individuals’ memories).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents at least one counterargument to its position on whether courts should be allowed to mandate memory erasure.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must include an economic and resource allocation analysis (e.g., payment of erasure staff, transparent and accountable facilities, reforming the overburdened criminal justice system, or defining which crimes qualify for the procedure).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response makes any statements that contradict the main position it takes in the policy brief (and interrupts consistent logical alignment between its stated stance and supporting arguments). (such as supporting memory erasure but providing examples against it, providing deontological arguments but disagreeing with them, listing out the potential benefits on society while going against memory erasure)",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a governance, oversight, and procedural framework (e.g., outlining the sentencing process, identifying who will oversee implementation, explaining how consent and victim statements will be managed, and describing the exact method for carrying out the procedure, such as an \"obliviate row\" similar to death row).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses a broader sociocultural impact assessment (e.g., government control over memory and the mind, consent in these scenarios, societal competence in making such decisions, and ensuring the absence of racial discrimination).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes at least one safeguard to prevent misuse of memory erasure (e.g., oversight by independent experts, involvement of neuroscientists, recovery assurance for other memories, or rehabilitation afterward).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a plan for the offender’s long-term psychological and social reintegration (such as speech therapy, occupational job hunts, reintroducing to new communities, educational programs.)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response must limit ethical analysis to the court-mandated memory erasure scenario specified in the prompt, using only deontological principles, consequentialist arguments, and historical precedents for justification.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes international human rights law and treaty obligations pertaining to memory erasure or punishment (such as a ban on cruel and unusual punishment which violates memory erasure, protection of people with mental illnesses, treating prisoners with humanity, focusing on rehabilitation for prisoners) .",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one quantitative recidivism statistic (e.g., 46% of prisoners released in 2012 were reincarcerated, younger individuals recommit crimes more frequently, property crimes have the highest recidivism rates, or reoffending rises by 82% over 10 years in the United States).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares memory erasure rehabilitation outcomes to traditional rehabilitation methods (e.g., therapy, confinement, harsh behavioral restrictions, fines).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides analysis of the proposed rehabilitation’s effectiveness compared to traditional methods (e.g., probable safety increases, social impacts, reduced recidivism, better societal reintegration).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes victims’ rights and the implications of restorative justice.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions lobotomies conducted by the CIA and other organizations.",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at length prison sentences and punishments that are not memory-related (e.g., capital punishment, corporal punishment, longer sentences, or probation) and draws parallels to memory.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
What are some of the top computational social science labs in the US, in terms of undergrad research output and impact? Even if there are no readily available metrics on undergrad research output and undergrad research impact specifically, you should try to develop your own, with evidence included. How about for graduate research output and impact? Be specific - this shouldn't just be departments, but rather specific labs or research groups with PIs.
What are the top-paying jobs in industry for computational social scientists, and what kinds of backgrounds do these people come from? Name a few jobs, and for each, analyze a statistically significant sample to figure out whether they come straight from undergrad or do grad school first. Also, what they study and research in undergrad and grad school. | 6847465956a0f6376a605411 | General Consumer Research | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least five named U.S.–based computational social science labs (not including whole departments or centers e.g., Lazer Lab,, Dan Jurafsky and the Stanford NLP Group, Blablablab, SALT lab)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists departments or centers (e.g., computer science, MIT, math department, Center for Computational Science & Engineering, Masters in Computational Social Scence) despite explicitly being excluded in the prompt.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists labs only located inside the United States.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response assigns weights to at least three unique quantitative metrics (e.g., number of publications, ratio of undergraduate students to graduate students, student satisfaction surverys, presence of undergraduate funding for research) of undergraduate research output or impact in building its undergraduate metric.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response assigns weights to at least five unique quantitative metrics (e.g., publications, average time to graduation, average years funded, number of papers published in CHI per year) of graduate research output or impact in building its graduate metric.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides graduate and undergraduate quantitative metrics explicitly present for each lab. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses at least one verifiable source or data link (e.g., Google Scholar, links to the lab in question, ACL Anthology, university-issued report) for every non-common-knowledge quantitative metric reported.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The report includes at least three distinct industry job titles (e.g., data scientist, computational social scientist, analyst, postdoctoral researcher) that employ computational social scientists.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites salary data from a specific source (e.g., BLS, Glassdoor, LinkedIn, Anthropic website) to demonstrate it is among the top-paying roles for computational social scientists for every job title listed.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the sample size used to analyze educational backgrounds for every job.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies high-paying industry jobs (e.g., machine learning engineer at Anthropic, Perplexity, computational social scienctist at Google DeepMind, OpenAI) for computational social scientists.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides concrete evidence for undergraduate research output and impact (e.g., attendance at undergraduate conferences, analysis of undergraduate tracks at major conferences, publications by undergraduates, ratio of undergraduates present in a lab) at each lab.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists the most common undergraduate majors and graduate fields (e.g., computer science, data science, linguistics, mathematics) for each job title listed.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes one caveat expressing uncertainty where data are sparse or metrics are approximate.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's information about Principal Investigators is correct (e.g., name, affiliation, h-index, relationship to any other university centers).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response names specific Principal Investigators (PIs) (e.g., David Lazer, Diyi Yang, David Jurgens, Dan Jurafsky) associated with the identified labs.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's analysis provide clear conclusions on whether job holders come directly from undergraduate degrees, rather than from graduate programs.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The computational social science labs discussed are from at least 3 different universities (e.g., Stanford, Berkeley, University of Maryland, University of Michigan). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions alumni outcomes for at least one lab.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response qualifies which conferences the lab primarily publishes in (e.g., CHI, EMNLP, NeurIPS, American Journal of Political Science).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a clear definition of computational social science.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a brief research report comparing the performance of the car rental companies Turo and Getaround, detailing all major economic events for each company from 2020 to 2025 and how it affected the company's valuation. If the company falls in valuation, be sure to explain how it happened and its effects on employee numbers. Write the report for an audience not familiar with US economics and venture capital. | 6847465956a0f6376a605363 | Business Planning & Research | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response expands all acronyms on its first appearance (e.g., P2P as peer to peer / peer-to-peer, SPAC as Special Purpose Acquisition Company, IPO as Initial Public Offering, NYSE as New York Stock Exchange, EBIT as earnings before interest and taxes)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links the expectations on the reverse merger for Getaround (e.g., funding stability, improving unit economics) to the exit from US market (e.g., pressure from public markets on profitability, lower US unit economics)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges that Turo's layoffs in April 2025 were caused, at least in part, by its withdrawal from IPO efforts in February 2025.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details all changes in valuation for Getaround major events (e.g., undisclosed valuation with a $140M Series E in 2020, $1.2 Bn valuation on its reverse merger / SPAC in 2022, dropping more than 65% after listing, and delisting at less than $1M market cap in 2024)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details the lack of significant public valuation numbers for Turo during the last 5 years (e.g., Series E valuation of $1.24 Bn in 2020, Forge Global reporting a Series E-2 valuation of $1.7 Bn in 2024, IPO expectations around $2.2Bn)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one reference directly from an SEC filing (e.g., 13D, 10K, 10Q, 8K)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions events prior to 2020 for Getaround, other than fundraisings that help set the stage for an intiial 2020 valuation.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions events prior to 2020 for Turo, other than fundraisings that help set the stage for an intiial 2020 valuation.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one figure (e.g, table, graph, pie chart, bulleted list) for each company summarizing its performance.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least 2 major events for Turo (e.g., layoffs in 2025, withdrawing from IPO in 2025, cybertuck explosion in Las Vegas in 2025, expanding operations to New York and Australia in 2022, achiving profitability in 2022)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least 2 major events for Getaround (e.g., 75% drop in bookings due to the pandemic in 2020, SPAC merger in 2022, ceasement of US operations in 2025, 30% layoffs in 2024)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that both companies were unicorns / had a valuation of over $1Bn by 2020, the start of the 5 year period for the report",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has a specific section (e.g., a sentence, paragraph, subtitle with content) comparing both companies",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has a section explaining what P2P -peer to peer- rental is.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains at least 3 components of Turo business model (e.g., it is a marketplace so it doesn't own cars, charges a commission on each transaction, provides insurante and protection fees, might charge delivery fees for convenience, has additional income from other fees like late return or excess mileage)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains at least 3 components of Getaround business model (e.g., it is a marketplace so it doesn't own cars, charges a commission on each transaction, provides insurante and protection fees, charges a subscription fee for car owners, has additional income from other fees like late return or GPS)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least 2 key metrics for Turo (e.g., number of active listings, utilization rate, booking rate, take rate)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least 2 key metrics for Getaround (e.g., number of active listings, utilization rate, average booking value, take rate)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains at least 3 main risks faced by the two companies (e.g., competition from other car rentals, market adoption, liquidity and funding risks, insurance and liability, regulatory, operational risk like crashes and stolen vehicles, supply availability and seasonality from car owners)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response concludes that Turo has had a much more succesful path than Getaround",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a technical proposal for a distributed audio streaming system. The system should include an audio streaming platform and a live chat feature. This application should be built for both browser and mobile settings. Include detailed technologies and justify why they are used. Assume the audience is a team of experienced software developers at a medium sized software company. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053a0 | Technical Documentation | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response is organized into sections with labels that clearly convey the main idea of its body (e.g., \"Introduction\" providing an overview, \"System Architecture\" detailing the high-level design, \"Technology Stack\" justifying specific choices, \"Audio Pipeline,\" \"Chat Subsystem,\" \"Scalability and Performance,\" \"Security Plan,\" \"Deployment and DevOps,\" \"Project Timeline,\" and \"Cost Analysis\").",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests a reasonable platform for hosting the infrastructure (e.g., Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), Microsoft Azure, Cloudflare) and lists a relevant technology stack for that platform (e.g., if AWS is chosen, suggests Amazon S3 for storing audio files and artwork, Amazon ECS or Fargate for hosting the API, Amazon DynamoDB for tracking the content catalog and user profiles, and Amazon OpenSearch Service for full-text search and chat cataloguing).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one system architecture diagram or flowchart to demonstrate how the components (e.g., client applications, load balancers, API gateway, microservices, databases, CDN, and chat servers) interact with each other.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a discussion of scenarios related to budgeting (e.g., a cost-breakdown for high/standard/low usage, a forecast for near and long-term maintenance, the expected cost to accommodate customer growth, and costs associated with human labor).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses plans to handle spikes in user streaming traffic (e.g., caching media segment data to reduce origin load, using multiple Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) to spread traffic and fail over, setting rate limiting and throttling on APIs to protect backends, and monitoring real-life traffic to preempt spikes).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least one similar product existing on the market in the audio streaming space (e.g., Clubhouse for live audio, Spotify Live for interactive sessions, Twitter Spaces as a platform's built-in feature, or Discord for real-time voice chat).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes a timeline for deliverables with key milestones (e.g., Phase 1: Core API & Audio Pipeline, Phase 2: Chat Subsystem & Mobile App, Phase 3: Web App & Scalability Testing) and provides a justification for its feasibility given a team of experienced software engineers.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes details to maintain the system, e.g., logging artifacts (e.g., capturing service-level API calls and chat messages, logging errors with stack traces and IDs, including relevant metadata, cache hit/miss events), monitoring performance metrics (e.g., tracking infrastructure-level metrics like CPU/memory, application KPIs like stream latency and buffering ratio, using distributed tracing, database performance), tracking analytics (e.g., number of concurrent listeners, chat participation rates, feature adoption, anomaly occurrence), and security monitoring (e.g., failed logins, suspicious IP patterns, admin actions, patch application).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a plan for scaling the system to a large number of users, e.g., traffic distribution and edge delivery (e.g., CDN offloading, load balancers, fan-out services), data and state scaling (e.g., database sharding, distributed caching, externalized state), asynchronous workflows (e.g., event streaming, message queues, CQRS), and autoscaling/resilience (e.g., Kubernetes HPA/KEDA, resilience patterns like circuit breakers, multi-region failover).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an outline or plan for DevOps, e.g., continuous integration and deployment pipelines (e.g., GitHub Actions, GitLab CI), infrastructure automation (e.g., Terraform, Ansible), monitoring and observability (e.g., Prometheus/Grafana, ELK stack), and automated testing (e.g., unit/integration test suites, load testing tools).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests at least one Application Programming Interface (API) style (e.g., REST for integration, gRPC for high-performance internal services, GraphQL for mobile queries, WebSockets for live chat) and discusses factors for designing a well-defined API, including specific endpoint examples (e.g., 'POST /v1/auth/login', 'POST /v1/streams', 'POST /v1/streams/{id}/chat/messages', 'GET /v1/admin/health').",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses a plan to implement security features relevant to the streaming system, e.g., data encryption (e.g., in transit via TLS, at rest for audio files), access control (e.g., public, authenticated, and admin endpoints), key/credential management (e.g., automatic key rotation, secrets in a vault service, short-lived tokens), and threat protection (e.g., rate limiting, Web Application Firewall (WAF), bot prevention).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares various audio-streaming protocols and suggests one (e.g., HLS for its native iOS support and scalability, DASH as an open standard, or WebRTC for ultra-low latency) and justifies the choice.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses relevant components of audio delivery and processing, e.g., identifying suitable audio codecs (e.g., Opus, AAC), media servers (e.g., Wowza Streaming Engine, Janus WebRTC Server), and a content delivery/caching strategy (e.g., Cloudflare CDN, Amazon CloudFront, Akamai).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses tangible performance goals for the system (e.g., audio latency < 1 second, chat message-to-live time < 500ms, total system uptime of 99.95%, concurrent user capacity, bandwidth efficiency).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the tech stack for both the mobile and web interface, e.g., cross-platform frameworks (e.g., React Native + Expo, Flutter, web-based React, Capacitor), UI/UX factors (e.g., responsive layouts, chat UI/UX consistency, accessibility, background audio behavior), and performance/networking (e.g., service workers for caching, efficient state management).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes technologies without justification for their relevance to the streaming system in terms of cost or performance.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests a project delivery model and justifies this option with respect to an experienced team (e.g., Agile/Scrum for its iterative approach and adaptability, or a hybrid model).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses relevant legal and regulatory requirements (e.g., data protection and privacy compliance like GDPR or CCPA, copyright/licensing for streamed content, and content moderation policies for chat).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions technologies that are not relevant to the audio streaming or chat system without justification (e.g., video streaming codecs, game engines, or blockchain technologies).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly states its assumptions about the composition of the development team (e.g., team size, experience levels, skill specialization like backend/frontend/mobile/DevOps, and availability of supporting roles).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write me a complete overview of the case of the Baudelaire orphans, including a summary of their travels, situation, and circumstances. Include any and all references to external acquaintances/characters relevant to their stories, as well as the significance of secret societies to their story in chronological order. | 684397d188c1deceb49af325 | Other | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response presents the events that the Baudelaire orphans experienced in chronological order as presented in the series from the first book, \"The Bad Beginning\", to the last, \"The End\", and includes a brief ordered list of key milestones or the ordered list of book titles to make “chronological” explicit (e.g., ordered book titles: \"The Bad Beginning\", \"The Reptile Room\", \"The Wide Window\", \"The Miserable Mill\"; early arc: their parents die in a fire, Count Olaf becomes guardian, Uncle Monty is murdered, Aunt Josephine perishes; mid-series: life with the Squalors, Olaf’s disguises, V.F.D. clues, hospital escape; late arc: Hotel Denouement confrontation, arrival on the island, confrontation with Ishmael, departure after Kit Snicket’s death).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references the 13 books in the series \"A Series of Unfortunate Events\" (in order of publication) that include the Baudelaire orphans: \nThe Bad Beginning, The Reptile Room, The Wide Window, The Miserable Mill, The Austere Academy, The Ersatz Elevator, The Vile Village, The Hostile Hospital, The Carnivorous Carnival, The Slippery Slope, The Grim Grotto, The Penultimate Peril, and The End.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one sentence summarizing the overall plot for each of the 13 books in the series \"A Series of Unfortunate Events\" (e.g., \"The Bad Beginning\" introduces the orphans who are sent to live with Count Olaf, who attempts to steal their inheritance after a fire destroys their home; \"The Reptile Room\" follows the children as they live with Uncle Monty, whose plans for a trip are ruined when Olaf murders him in disguise; \"The Wide Window\" details their stay with Aunt Josephine, who fears everything, before Olaf tricks her and the orphans must outwit him again; \"The Miserable Mill\" sees the orphans forced to work in a lumber mill where Olaf uses hypnosis to further his schemes).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the Volunteer Fire Department (VFD), a secret organization to fight both literal and figurative fire, and discusses the Baudelaire orphans' relationship to VFD (e.g.: their parents were members; several guardians were involved; they inherit VFD tools and secrets; their choices shape the group’s legacy). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the 2 factions that VFD is split into: the Fire-Fighting faction (the good one that includes the orphans' parents) and the Fire-Starting faction (the bad one that uses VFD for selfish gains).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the Sugar Bowl (also known as the Vessel For Disaccharides) as the object of great power central to the conflict between the VFD factions that the Baudelaire orphans must search for, and that both factions are seeking to acquire. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions Count Olaf as the leader of the fire-starting faction of VFD and identifies him as the principal antagonist and villain of the series.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least 6 external acquaintances (e.g., Mr. Poe, Justice Strauss, Uncle Monty (Dr. Montgomery), Aunt Josephine, Sir, Charles, Esmé Squalor, Jerome Squalor, Duncan Quagmire, Isadora Quagmire, Quigley Quagmire, Carmelita Spats, Jacques Snicket, Kit Snicket, Fiona, Captain Widdershins, Dewey Denouement, Ishmael).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that in the book \"The Reptile Room\", Uncle Monty is murdered by Count Olaf while he is disguised as Stephano. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that in the book \"The Wide Window\", Aunt Josephine forges a note about her death after Count Olaf appears disgused as Captain Sham. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that in the book \"The Miserable Mill\", Klaus is hypnotized by Dr. Orwell at Lucky Smell Lumbermill. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The reponse states that in the book “The Austere Academy”, the orphans meet the Quagmire triplets at Prufrock Preparatory School.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that in the book “The Ersatz Elevator”, Esmé Squalor is allied with Count Olaf and helps kidnap the Quagmire triplets. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains claims that contradict the events described in the series (e.g., states that the Baudelaire orphans' parents survived the fire, identifies the fire-starting faction as the \"good\" faction of VFD, or claims Aunt Josephine successfully defeated Count Olaf).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response groups or labels sections/book summaries with clear headings or numbered subsections, and each book summary includes a labeled heading or subsection with the book’s name when describing its events",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes first-person language expressing the model’s own opinions (e.g., sentences starting with “I think”, “I believe”, “In my opinion”, “I feel”).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the overall circumstances that start the series (e.g., the Baudelaire orphans' parents appear to die in a fire, leaving them with a large fortune to inherit, and Mr. Poe becomes the executor of their inheritance).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the final circumstances on the island in The End, explaining the confrontation with Ishmael and its effect on the islanders, as well as why the Baudelaires ultimately depart (e.g., Ishmael refuses to help and attempts to exile them, the islanders are divided in their loyalty, Kit Snicket’s death compels the Baudelaires to care for her baby, and the orphans leave the island by boat to face an uncertain future).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the uncertain fate of the Baudelaires after The End and explains why it is uncertain (e.g., they leave the island by boat after Kit Snicket’s death, they take responsibility for raising her baby, their destination is unknown, and their future circumstances are left unresolved).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions characters or events that do not happen in the books (e.g., Count Olaf is redeemed and becomes friends with the Baudelaires, the orphans are adopted by Justice Strauss, the Baudelaires discover their parents are still alive, Sunny grows up to narrate the story).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions alternative versions from the canonical book series, such as the Netflix adaptation (e.g., the Netflix show gives more backstory on Lemony Snicket, the Quagmire triplets are introduced earlier, Olaf’s henchpeople receive expanded roles, and Kit Snicket appears before the final book).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response satisfies all user-specified elements: summary of travels, situations, circumstances, external acquaintances, and secret-society significance (e.g.: travels include locations such as Count Olaf’s house, Uncle Monty’s home, the Village of Fowl Devotees, and the island; situations include repeated escapes and confrontations with Olaf; circumstances include their changing guardianships and loss of parental guidance; external acquaintances include Mr. Poe, Justice Strauss, and the Quagmire triplets; secret-society significance includes V.F.D.’s history, schism, and connection to the orphans’ parents).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least 5 of Count Olaf's disguises from the series: Stefano, Yessica Haircut, Captain Sham, Shirley, Coach Genghis, Gunther, the Lonely Old Bartender, Detective Dupin, Dr. Mattathias, the Ringmaster, Jacques Snicket, Kit Snicket, and the Tourist Dad.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions each of the Baudelaire orphans' special talents (e.g., Violet: inventing; Klaus: research and photographic memory; Sunny: strong teeth and, later, cooking).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly acknowledges that the Baudelaire orphans are the main characters in the book series \"A Series of Unfortunate Events\".",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the significance of secret societies, particularly V.F.D., to the Baudelaires’ story (e.g., V.F.D. is revealed to include the orphans’ parents and many guardians, the schism within V.F.D. explains the central conflict, recurring symbols such as the eye insignia and spyglasses link events to the society, and the search for the sugar bowl underscores V.F.D.’s hidden influence).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the relationship of external acquaintances to the Baudelaire orphans, detailing why they are relevant to the story (e.g., Mr. Poe is the inept banker in charge of their guardianship; Justice Strauss is a kind neighbor who initially fails to adopt them; Uncle Monty is a supportive guardian murdered by Olaf; Esmé Squalor is a villainous figure allied with Olaf).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
}
] |
I am planning to implement a embedded system processor for a thermostat machine. Write me a blog post which goes through everything that I need to consider, including things like RISC vs. CISC instruction set, how I can actually code and test this processor using open-source technologies like Linux and more. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053c9 | Technical Documentation | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the selection of key hardware peripherals beyond sensors, such as communication modules (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth LE, Zigbee, Z-Wave) and memory types (e.g., non-volatile Flash for firmware, volatile SRAM for runtime data), and justifies their choice based on the thermostat's requirements (e.g., Wi-Fi for direct cloud connectivity vs. Zigbee for low-power local mesh networking).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) and CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) instruction sets, explains the key differences between them (e.g., single-clock reduced instructions vs. multi-clock complex instructions, register-to-register vs. memory-to-memory operations), and provides at least one example processor architecture for each set (e.g., ARM or RISC-V for RISC, Intel x86 for CISC).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies and explains embedded system constraints relevant to a thermostat (e.g., low power consumption, strict unit cost, small physical size, real-time performance for control loops, thermal dissipation).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly mentions and describes at least one industry-standard communication protocol relevant to on-board embedded system components (e.g., I2C for sensors, SPI for flash memory or displays, UART for debugging).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines how Linux is customized for an embedded system by mentioning the process of kernel configuration (e.g., using tools like menuconfig to enable specific drivers) and the role of essential related components (e.g., a bootloader like U-Boot, a cross-compilation toolchain).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies and describes at least one open-source toolchain component (e.g., the GCC compiler, GDB debugger, the QEMU emulator) or a build system (e.g., Buildroot, Yocto Project) used for developing embedded systems with Linux.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines the software architecture, including different layers (e.g., application layer for thermostat logic, middleware for cloud communication, device drivers for hardware, operating system kernel) and how they interact.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the bootloader and firmware update mechanisms, including their role in system longevity and security, and provides examples of update approaches (e.g., over-the-air (OTA) updates, secure boot with cryptographic verification).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a factual and logical justification for using a RISC instruction set (e.g., ARM, RISC-V) over a CISC instruction set for a thermostat processor, explicitly linking the advantages of RISC (e.g., lower power consumption, simpler design, lower cost) to the design constraints of a thermostat (e.g., being always-on, cost-sensitive, space-constrained).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes how a software debugger interfaces with the target hardware, explaining at a high level that the debugger (e.g., GDB, OpenOCD) communicates through a hardware debug port (e.g., JTAG, SWD) to control execution, inspect registers, and analyze memory.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a high-level architectural diagram or a clear descriptive breakdown of the system, including the processor, sensors (e.g., thermistor), actuators (e.g., HVAC relay), and power management, showing how the components interact.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response begins with an introduction that summarizes the key factors to consider for a thermostat processor (e.g., power consumption, cost, performance) before diving into specific details (e.g., processor architecture, OS choice, testing).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response confuses the processor implementation for a thermostat machine with other irrelevant embedded systems (e.g., graphics processors for game consoles, high-performance image processors for home security cameras, specialized audio DSPs for smart speakers).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions temperature control requirements specific to the thermostat, including acceptable operating ranges (e.g., a typical indoor range of 0°C to 50°C, an extended range -10 °C to 60 °C for ruggedized models; values outside these ranges such as -50 °C are not acceptable).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions cost as a key driver and lists factors that influence the processor's unit cost (e.g., choice of core, memory size, manufacturing volume, peripheral integration).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions simplicity (e.g., in hardware design, software maintenance) as a key design consideration for a thermostat processor.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies which parts of the processor design might be custom vs. which would use existing IP cores (e.g., custom elements such as specific General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) logic, custom peripheral controllers, or thermostat-specific sensor interfaces; existing components such as an ARM Cortex-M core, on-chip memory blocks, or standardized communication interfaces like I2C/SPI).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least one security consideration relevant to a connected thermostat (e.g., secure boot, secure OTA firmware updates, data encryption, network authentication).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one simple example or descriptive analogy to explain a complex technical concept (e.g., interrupt handling explained as a call center operator pausing to answer an emergency call; pipeline stages explained as an assembly line where each worker does a step in sequence; memory hierarchy explained as using a desk drawer for quick access vs. a filing cabinet for slower storage; real-time scheduling explained as an air traffic controller prioritizing which planes land first).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response maintains a logical flow that starts from high-level considerations (e.g., processor choice) and narrows down to implementation and testing.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares the benefits of using a full OS (like Linux) or a Real-Time Operating System (RTOS) to a \"bare-metal\" approach, considering the specific needs of a thermostat (e.g., handling multiple tasks like sensor reading, display updates, and network communication simultaneously).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses multiple types of testing relevant to embedded systems (e.g., unit testing for software modules, integration testing, hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing, system testing).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions key deployment or production considerations (e.g., manufacturing test integration, field maintenance procedures, secure provisioning of unique device credentials).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the trade-offs between using a commercial, off-the-shelf processor (e.g., a microcontroller) versus designing a custom System on a Chip (SoC), (e.g., custom SoC has higher non-recurring engineering costs but lower unit cost at volume; off-the-shelf has a faster time-to-market).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the process of cross-compilation and how a build system like Buildroot or Yocto is used to create a custom Linux distribution for the embedded thermostat, including the selection of necessary packages and libraries (e.g., a C standard library like musl or glibc, BusyBox for core utilities, device drivers for sensors/communication).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a high-level discussion of the project's development lifecycle, from initial hardware selection and software design to testing, production, and long-term maintenance, highlighting potential challenges at each stage (e.g., hardware selection 2 to 4 weeks, software design 1 to 2 months, testing 3 to 6 weeks, production setup 1 to 2 months, long-term maintenance ongoing over years).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a discussion of the memory hierarchy and its impact on performance and cost (e.g., CPU registers, L1/L2 cache, main SRAM/DRAM, non-volatile Flash storage).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is presented in an academic paper format rather than a blog post (e.g., uses overly formal language, lacks practical/conversational tone, uses academic-style section headers, presents long blocks of text without clear subheadings).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends proprietary, closed-source technologies instead of the requested open-source options (e.g., focusing on proprietary RTOSs like VxWorks or commercial IDEs like Keil muVision without mentioning open-source alternatives like Linux, Zephyr, or GCC/VSCode).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
You are writing a feature essay for a publication on gaming history and culture. Your task is to analyze the key factors behind the long-term success of Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO). | 6847465956a0f6376a605404 | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response is organized into at least four separate sections with a distinct introduction and conclusion, as per common essay structure guidelines for publications.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents analysis of at least 5 distinct factors influencing CS:GO’s long-term success (e.g., established player base, easy controls, consistently fast servers, new maps, multiple game modes).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains no more than 2 sentences that discuss games not related to Counter-Strike (i.e., games outside the FPS genre such as Splinter Cell, Hitman, Fortnite, PUBG).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive was released in 2012.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies Valve (or Valve Corporation) and Hidden Path Entertainment as the developers or publisher of CS:GO.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that the Arms Deal update in 2013 introduced the weapon-skins economy.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes CS:GO’s competitive esports infrastructure, covering Valve-sponsored Major tournaments (those with prize pools of at least $1 million) and associated leagues, as a key success factor.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one verifiable statistic about CS:GO (e.g., peak simultaneous players or viewership between 1.5-1.8 million, 7 rotating maps, 34 unique weapons, over 1 million daily players).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses gameplay depth or core mechanics (e.g., low time-to-kill, easy aiming, tactical map design, precise gunplay) as a success factor.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions Valve’s continuous updates or operations model as a success factor.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses community contributions (e.g., modding, mapping, custom servers and lobbies, Steam Workshop content) as a success factor.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references earlier Counter-Strike titles (e.g., 1.6, Source) to place CS:GO in historical context.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links CS:GO’s impact to broader gaming culture (e.g., memes, LAN culture, gaming tournaments, competitive streaming) with at least one specific example.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses approximate language or qualifiers such as “about,” “roughly,” or provides date-specific context when giving numerical data that may fluctuate (e.g., player counts).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response evaluates at least one factor affecting CS:GO’s success (e.g., new-player experience versus community retention, accessibility versus competitive depth, monetization versus fairness, openness of build versus classic maps).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one insight about how Valve’s design or business decisions influenced other games or the broader FPS genre (e.g., Valorant, Fortnite, Warzone, Battlefield).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references or describes at least one weapon, map, or iconic gameplay feature specific to CS:GO (e.g., Dust, Mirage, Inferno, Office).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses correct terminology for core CS:GO systems (e.g., matchmaking, ELO/rank, tickrate, defusal maps) without mislabeling.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the role of prominent streamers or pro players (e.g., shroud, s1mple, GeT_RiGhT, FaZe) in CS:GO’s visibility and cultural impact and gives at least one specific example by name.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least one specific CS:GO skin (e.g., Dragon Lore, AK-47 Case Hardened, Karambit Fade) and provides an approximate market value (e.g., “sold for over $100,000”) to illustrate the scale of the skins market.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the positive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CS:GO and esports.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the transition from CS:GO to Counter-Strike 2 (CS2), including at least one meaningful detail (e.g., Source 2 engine, updated matchmaking, visual overhaul, community reaction).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses FACEIT as an alternative competitive matchmaking platform and touches upon at least one specific reason for its popularity (e.g., 128-tick servers, anti-cheat tools, ELO ranking, pro-level ladders).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions CS:GO’s long-standing issues with cheating or the weaknesses of the VAC anti-cheat system.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details the role of in-game currency in match narratives (e.g., forced buys, loss bonuses, kill rewards, weapon price changes each round) and explains how it relates to team gameplay and collaboration.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses 3 or more roles as a unique strategic element in CS:GO’s team dynamics.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions CS:GO’s new play mode as a positive factor in building a tight, dedicated gaming community.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions CS:GO’s markdown in price to free-to-play.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions future factors that may lead to growth and continued success or signs of a dying franchise.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has irrelevant content (e.g., non-CS:GO games, non-gunplay games, non-Valve corporations, or out-of-context remarks).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions competitive FPS games other than CS:GO (e.g., PUBG, Valorant, Fortnite, Halo) and compares them to CS:GO.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Suppose I'm a Venture Partner who has been called up to give a detailed presentation about cybersecurity in aviation/airlines to the C-suite of Alaska Airlines in the light of a recent cyber attack. I have no knowledge of cybersecurity. Write me both a 1 pager with very high level topics that I will send to the C-suite as a teaser for what I will include in the presentation, and then a more detailed document elaborating on those topics. | 6847465956a0f6376a605362 | Business Planning & Research | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response contains two distinct sections, i.e., one for the 1-pg summary of the presentation, and another containing more detailed information relevant for the presentation",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The summary document to the C-suite Alaska Airlines executives goes over the specified 1-pg limit",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The 1 pager is clearly tailored to the C-suite of Alaska Airlines",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document and 1-pager don't have a direct correspondence in their sections and construction.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document elaborates comprehensively on the topics introduced in the 1-pager.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The 1-pager is high-level, avoiding specific technical jargon or excessive detail.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document is well-structured with clear, descriptive headings, subheadings, and logical transitions between sections.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document provides specific examples of cybersecurity threats unique to the aviation industry (e.g., related to avionics, ground systems, passenger data).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document discusses the importance of a robust incident response plan (passenger data breach response, operational technology incident handling, reservation system disruption, supply chain/vendor compromise, insider threat protocols, public communication playbook) and its key components (incident detection and reporting, containment and eradication procedures, recovery of critical systems, communication and coordination protocols, post-incident review and regulatory compliance) tailored for an airline context.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document mentions the critical importance of employee training, awareness programs, and fostering a cybersecurity-aware culture among airline staff",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document touches upon supply chain cybersecurity risks relevant to airlines (e.g., third-party vendors, maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) providers)",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document discusses solutions in an airline-specific, non-generic context, e.g., implementing Zero Trust to secure access for crew scheduling systems and electronic flight bag applications; applying network segmentation to isolate passenger Wi-Fi from critical operational systems like flight dispatch, maintenance, and aircraft communication networks; enforcing strong identity and access controls for ground staff, pilots, and third-party vendors; protecting reservation and ticketing systems from ransomware and denial-of-service attacks; ensuring secure integration with partner airlines and global distribution systems",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document clearly differentiates between general IT cybersecurity and specific operational technology (OT) security concerns relevant to airlines",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document effectively frames the discussion from a Venture Partner's strategic and non-technical perspective by giving specific numbers for potential growth in the market, savings possible, and avoidable losses.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response references at least one regulatory or industry standard from: FAA regulations; TSA Security Directives 1580/82 series; NIST Cybersecurity Framework; ISO/IEC 27001; EASA Part-IS; DO-326A/ED-202A.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least three actionable recommendations that span distinct areas of the airline cybersecurity pipeline (e.g., passenger-facing systems such as loyalty programs and mobile check-in; core operational systems such as flight dispatch, crew scheduling, or maintenance; and the third-party/vendor ecosystem such as catering services, ground operations, or global distribution systems).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists at least one immediate post-incident action related to the recent cyber attack, such as conducting a root-cause analysis, updating the incident response plan, or notifying regulators.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Every cybersecurity term that is likely unfamiliar to a layperson (e.g., “Zero Trust”, “SOC”, “EDR”) is immediately followed by a parenthetical definition of 10 words or fewer.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response suggests at least one measurable KPI or metric for tracking cybersecurity program progress (e.g., mean time to detect).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes impractical strategies for a large airline (e.g., enterprise-wide Zero Trust/microsegmentation across IT/OT in 30 days; instant 20% IT budget shift to security; phishing-resistant MFA on all systems—including GDS/legacy and crew devices—within weeks; stand up a 24/7 in-house SOC immediately; mandate blockchain parts-provenance across all suppliers next quarter; deploy post-quantum/QKD for fleet comms now; recommend changes to FAA/NOTAM or certified avionics outside airline control; replace reservations/crew platforms mid-peak).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights the importance of collaboration with external stakeholders, such as regulators, industry groups, and vendors",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The detailed document repeats the same points without adding new insights or airline-specific examples (e.g., reusing the “131% increase” stat or the Alaska July outage across sections without new data/implications/owners/timelines; restating “Zero Trust/network segmentation” identically in multiple places).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Bad formatting practices (e.g., unnecessary whitespace before and after section and paragraph headers)",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response integrates relevant case studies or examples of recent airline cyber incidents to illustrate real-world relevance (e.g., Hawaiian Airlines 2025 cybersecurity event; Qantas 2025 data breach ~6M customers; SITA 2021 supplier breach impacting multiple carriers; Sea-Tac/Port of Seattle 2024 Rhysida ransomware disruption; British Airways 2018 data breach and ICO fine; FAA NOTAM nationwide ground stop 2023).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly references potential insurance considerations and the role of cyber risk transfer strategies.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
How much should we (the current generation) have to change our lives to tackle climate change for for future generations?
I want you to
1. explain and compare at least two ethical frameworks (eg utilitarianism, deontology, contractualism) that address duties to future people
2. discuss the concept of non-identity problem and its implications for climate ethics
3. evaluate real-world policies (eg carbon taxes, intergenerational equity acts) that try to codify long-term responsibility
4. reference at least one philosophical source and one empirical policy example
5. address possible counterarguments, like claims about discounting the future or epistemic uncertainty | 6847465956a0f6376a6053ac | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | High | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response clearly explains utilitarian reasoning as applied to climate action (e.g., maximizing well-being, impartiality by focusing on climate outcomes, running cost-benefit analyses, addressing inequality by having richer and stronger nations pledge more toward climate action).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly explains deontological (Kantian) reasoning in the context of intergenerational justice and duties to future generations, emphasizing that intergenerational justice is not only a matter of consequences but also a moral obligation of all generations.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the non-identity problem with accurate citation (e.g., Derek Parfit) and explains that we cannot harm future people by bringing them into existence in a suboptimal but still worthwhile state if a different course of action would have led to an entirely different set of people existing instead.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the non-identity problem and how it affects climate ethics, highlighting situations where an action seems clearly wrong but no specific individual is harmed by it (e.g., burning materials if toxic byproducts end up elsewhere, dumping into open drains, cutting trees for land, or throwing toxic waste into recycling or trash).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes between person-affecting and impersonal ethics, explaining that person-affecting ethics focuses on the welfare of specific, existing individuals, while impersonal ethics concerns the overall state of the world or the maximization of total value, and applies this distinction by identifying which ethical frameworks fall into each category (e.g., contractualism and deontology as person-affecting, utilitarianism as impersonal).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates a real-world legal framework (e.g., Well-being of Future Generations Act, the Montreal Protocol, the Paris Agreements, and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response frames the carbon tax as a case of economic moral translation, converting moral obligations such as accountability for climate change, pollution, and safeguarding the future into economic incentives, costs, and market signals.",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response critiques discounting the future from an economic perspective (e.g., valuing the current generation more than future ones, undermining long-term projects, favoring stronger economies, or dismissing projects because the current generation will not benefit).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses epistemic uncertainty, defined as a lack of knowledge, information, or understanding about a system, and connects it to the precautionary principle, which holds that when there are potential threats of serious or irreversible harm, the lack of full scientific certainty should not justify postponing cost-effective preventative measures.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response omits key counter-counterarguments about population ethics or resource allocation (e.g., antisocial behavior, market risks, unfairness, or burdens for unseen generations).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lacks discussion of Rawlsian theory, which proposes a thought experiment of a just society in which people unaware of their social status and personal characteristics (under a \"veil of ignorance\") are compelled to choose principles that promote the greatest good for all, particularly for the least advantaged.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not evaluate cultural or global pluralism in intergenerational duties (e.g., highlighting diverse approaches to ethics, family structures, and responsibilities across different societies).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response misses Indigenous or non-Western conceptions of climate responsibility, which emphasize a holistic, reciprocal relationship between humans and the natural world (e.g., worshipping nature deities, living in the wild, avoiding overconsumption of natural resources, and recycling waste products).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lacks discussion of moral demandingness or the scope of sacrifice, where moral demandingness refers to the extent of sacrifice required to fulfill obligations even at significant personal cost when the standard is set too high.",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to address rights-based objections to limiting current-generation liberties, which center on the idea that current people's rights should not be infringed upon for the potential benefit of future, non-existent people (e.g., the primacy of personal autonomy, property rights, and economic freedoms).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lacks critique of Kantian ethics’ limitations in collective action (e.g., the free-rider problem, lack of collective responsibility versus individualism, neglect of consequences, and formalism over substance, which argues his ethics are too abstract to translate into concrete rules).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to mention climate justice or historical emissions from colonial powers (e.g., resource diversion during world wars, resource exploitation during the industrial revolution, environmental degradation, and inequality between colonizers and the colonized).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lacks discussion from Global South perspectives or climate vulnerability (e.g., crop failures in South Africa, cyclones in India and Bangladesh, food insecurity in southern and eastern African nations like Kenya or Somalia, and forced relocations in South Pacific islands).",
"weight": -1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lacks alternative ethical frameworks (e.g., virtue ethics as a desire for a virtuous world, care ethics as motivation for empathy toward others, contractarianism as motivation for social cooperation, deontology as a duty toward others).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains one policy example passed with the future generation in mind, illustrating “duties toward the future” (e.g., National Environmental Protection Act, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, or carbon neutrality pledges).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites an academic philosophical source and a legal policy example (e.g., the Paris Agreement for legal policy, Kantian works for philosophy, Butler’s Climate Change and Threats to Civilization, or A Theory of Justice by John Rawls).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses differences in climate between older and current generations (e.g., global temperature increases, phaseout of chlorofluorocarbons, wider use of warming technologies, and overall cooler climates 100 years ago).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses potential ways in which climate change will continue to affect future generations (e.g., warmer climates, rising sea levels and scarcity of fresh drinking water, higher risks of UV-related cancers due to ozone depletion, and higher economic costs with rising living expenses).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the ways in which the current generation actively contributes to climate change (e.g., data centers, AI, private planes, and personal air conditioning).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Write a series of technical blog posts on some of the advancements in Large Language Model (LLM) training and fine-tuning in 2023-2025. Each post should at least contain:
- The intuition and motivation behind the technique
- Detail the methodology
- Provide mathematical derivations where applicable
- Discuss practical use cases, limitations, and open challenges
The writing should be accessible to readers with a graduate-level ML background. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053b9 | AI & ML | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "All acronyms (e.g., RLHF: Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback, PEFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning, GRPO: Group Relative Policy Optimization, MoE: Mixture of experts, LoRA: Low-Rank Adapation) are defined on first use.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The introduction to each blog post highlights a key feature of technique discussed (e.g., LoRA reduces the number of trainable parameters, RLHF trains a reward model based on human feedback, MoE routes inputs to smaller expert networks, GRPO uses the mean reward of several LLM responses as a baseline to score a response).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a diagram along the lines of a \"Series roadmap\" (e.g., a flowchart, mind map, visual chronology, figure depicting a transformer training pipeline annotated with techniques) that visually outlines the conceptual connections and dependencies between all discussed techniques.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The introduction of each post contains a concise recap of a prior post connected to the technique being currently discussed.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an introductory, dedicated section along the lines of a \"Series Overview.\"",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The concluding remarks of each blog post before the last includes a teaser for the next topic.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a mathematical description of each technique (e.g., the LoRA treats the gradient as a low-rank decomposition ΔW=AB, the reward-function for GRPO, the loss function for the MoE router, the actor-critic policy for LLM preference training). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "All included mathematical derivations have no visible rendering errors (e.g., unparsed LaTeX code, equations which run off the line, subscript/superscript mistakes, words within equations not placed in \\mathrm or \\textrm mode).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Miscellaneous"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines the general intuition and motivation for each technique.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For all techniques, the response discusses practical use cases about how those techniques have been applied.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses techniques primarily related to LLM inference or application that are not training/fine-tuning methods (e.g., Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Chain-of-Thought prompting, Agents, Multimodal Models).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines the methodology of each technique including any algorithms, pseudocode, or procedures as necessary.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each discussed technique that is mentioned includes an in-depth evaluation of its limitations.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is structured as a series of distinct blog posts, each with its own title, introduction, body, and conclusion.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least three distinct recent advancements within the last 12-24 months (e.g., QLoRA, DoRA, DPO, MoE, RAFT).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response should mention the general publication date of the associated arxiv paper, blog, journal article, technical, etc., of each technique to demonstrate recency.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one pseudocode example for a discussed technique.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one technique that is an evolution of or alternative to Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) (e.g., Identity Preference Optimization (IPO), Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO), Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), Chain-of-Hindsight (CoG)). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "There is a discussion about open challenges for each advancement discussed.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "For each technique, justify why it merits coverage (e.g., LoRA significantly reduces training costs, MoEs enable multiple experts with sparse activations, RLHF enables human-aligned response styles, RAFT trains models to ignore irrelevant context drawn via the popular RAG strategy).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Each blog post includes at least one diagram or illustrative figure with a descriptive caption.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes discussion or an ablation study to emphasize the impact of each technique on the training pipeline versus a common alternative (e.g., comparing the full Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) pipeline against a variant that omits the preference loss term to measure its effect on alignment win-rate and calibration error; comparing the increased memory usage of LoRA which uses full-precision against QLoRA which uses quantized updates; examining the increased number of activated weight parameters for a vanilla LLM versus a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture which activates only a small percentage of parameters associated to an expert; comparing the increased runtime complexity of proximal policy optimization (PPO) because it uses a separate valuation critic vs group-relative policy optimization (GRPO) which simply judges a response against a group of other generated LLM responses.).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contextualizes each technique by explicitly comparing or contrasting it with a more established, foundational technique the target audience is expected to know (e.g., directly framing DPO in relation to PPO-based RLHF, LoRA versus SGD, MoEs in relation to general ensemble learning, GRPO eliminating the critic, RAFT versus non-RAG fine-tuning).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides foundational machine learning concepts that would be considered too basic of knowledge for the target graduate-level ML audience (e.g., it explains or defines the concept of a neural network, gradient descent, hyperparameters, loss function).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses advancements which are notable among the ML community (e.g., high citation count; published at NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, etc.; technical reports filed by OpenAI, Anthropic, NVIDIA, Qwen, DeepSeek, Hugging Face etc.; implementations supported by popular libraries such as PyTorch, TensorFlow, LangChain, etc.). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response indicates that these fine-tuning advancements are needed due to the sheer size of LLM architectures and the large volume of training data required to train them. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response links each fine-tuning technique to the nature of training over language in an autoregressive manner (e.g., attention considers all previous context thus encouraging fine-tuning techniques such as RAFT to ignore irrelevant context appended via RAG, differing models can emit very different output to samples thus encouraging output averaging akin to GRPO, next-token-prediction for human-aligned preferences is difficult without human feedback thus requiring RLHF, gradient updates are low-rank for pre-trained models thus encouraging LoRA).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The collection of posts would be digestible for a typical blog audience and does not approach the length of an arXiv survey.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Write a comprehensive technical report for beginners to machine learning that explains how neural networks learn from data, including core concepts like forward propagation, loss functions, back propagation, and optimization methods. Use simple but intuitive examples and diagrams to illustrate the key ideas and processes involved. | 6847465956a0f6376a605414 | AI & ML | Moderate | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one simple, concrete example (e.g., (1) a tiny two-layer network, (2) XOR classifier, (3) example code and implementation of forward propagation, or (4) concrete loss function like mean squared error which includes the formula and intuition behind the use of it.) that is referenced when explaining each of the core concepts which are (1) Forward Propagation, (2) Loss functions (3) Back Propagation, and (4) Optimization methods.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one text-based diagram (e.g., ASCII, box drawing characters, graphs, or Markdown code block) that visually illustrates a neural network or the learning workflow.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is formatted as a technical report, containing both an Introduction and a Conclusion section (headings may be synonyms such as “Overview” and “Summary”).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response writes out acronyms in full the first time they appear (e.g., SGD as stochastic gradient descent, MSE as mean squared error, ReLU as rectified linear unit, and CNN as convolutional neural network).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains all the technical terms used in a beginner-friendly and intuitive way. (e.g., (1) Gradient descent is a the way of teaching a neural network learn from the data step by step, etc..., (2) Mean Squared Error (MSE) is one of the most common mathematical way of measuring how far off is your current predictions are from the true values, etc..., (3) ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit) is one of the popular activation functions that adds non-linearity to the neural network. This allows the network to capture more complex mathematical relationships in the data, etc (4) A feed-forward neural network (FFNN) is the simplest form of a neural network, where data is fed in from one end and it is passed on to the next layer and so on, without any looping back, etc.).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an explanation of forward propagation, stating that input vectors are multiplied by weight matrices, summed (plus any bias), and passed through an activation function to produce outputs.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an explanation of loss functions that define the loss as a single scalar that measures the difference between predicted and true values (e.g., mean squared error, mean absolute error, binary cross-entropy (log loss), huber loss, or categorical cross-entropy).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an explanation of back propagation, stating that gradients of the loss with respect to the weights are computed using the chain rule and are propagated from the output layer back toward the input layer.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes an explanation of optimization methods and names at least one gradient-based optimizer (e.g., Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam), Root mean square propagation (RMprop), or Adaptive Gradient Algorithm (Adagrad)) and states that it updates weights using the computed gradients and a learning rate.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the complete training loop in order: forward pass → loss computation → backward pass (gradient calculation) → weight update.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions activation functions (e.g., Sigmoid, Hyperbolic tangent (Tanh), Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU), Leaky ReLU), explains that they introduce non-linearity into the network, and why non-linearity is necessary for the neural network to learn properly.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the purpose of the learning rate when discussing optimization methods (e.g., the learning rate controls the step sizes of the iteration of the optimization updates. A large learning rate can converge fast but can overshoot to a non-optimal solution, while a small learning rate will mean the steps are too will take longer to move towards the local optimal solution).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a worked-out comparison between neural networks and at least one classical ML method, such as logistic regression, linear regression, decision trees, or support vector machines (e.g., Neural networks are much more powerful than logistic and linear regression methods, as they can capture more complex (non-linear) relationships in the data compared to the linear approaches. Suggesting SVMs for low-dimensional, small data sets and neural networks for high-dimensional, large datasets).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a mini literature trace (2–3 sentence historical evolution: from perceptrons → backprop → deep nets) (e.g. original paper introducing perceptrons, AlexNet, and Resnet for deep neural networks, etc.)",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains references to at least one real-world system where NN training is used (e.g., AlphaFold, Tesla Autopilot, GPT, or Chatbots).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least three potential failure cases to consider when training the neural network, such as (1) overfitting or underfitting tradeoff (i.e., overfitting means the network learned the training data too closely, including the noise in the data, meaning it cannot be used well for the real task with fresh data. On the other hand, underfitting means the network has not been run enough iterations called epochs and has not learned from the data enough), (2) vanishing gradients where the gradient updates decrease weight updates to 0 as it propagates deeper into the network, which can be caused by using tanh activation, (3) exploding gradients has the opposite effect of increasing weight updates which can be cased by ReLU activation, (4) or training with a very small dataset.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response avoids or ignores ethical or societal implications of deploying neural networks (e.g., construction of large datacenters and use of resources, impacts to the privacy of people's information used in the training data, stealing creative works such as books and arts, biases and discrimination present in the data that will be used in real tasks).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes pseudocode for the training loop.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorrectly states that weights are changed during forward propagation.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how the dataset needs to be preprocessed. (e.g., the dataset needs to be in a structured format to train a simple basic feed-forward neural network, the dataset is split into training-testing or training-validation-testing splits for checking overfitting, features of the data should be properly chosen or transformed (feature engineering) to make training effective).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains unformatted LaTeX or messy tables, missing figures, or other formatting issues (e.g., incorrect LaTeX, missing parts in LaTeX causing formula to not render properly, tables that are not properly aligned, missing paragraphs, or missing figures).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests multiple alternatives for each of the core concepts explaining the advantages and disadvantages (e.g. (1) Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Cross Entropy Error for loss functions, (2) Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adam, Adagrad for optimizers, and (3) Sigmoid, Tanh and ReLU for activation functions).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests practical ways to experiment with actual implementations of neural networks (e.g., (1) Mentions PyTorch, and other open-source libraries, (2) Kaggle for competitions and practice, (3) HuggingFace for datasets and models, (4) other data processing tools and libraries like Numpy and Pandas).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
I am migrating a project built on Spring Boot that uses hibernate version 5.3.22, a Spring Boot version 2.3.2, and Java 17, to a new repository that does not currently use Hibernate, and is built in Java 21 and Spring Boot version 2.7.14. What should I keep in mind when performing this migration in terms of versioning and what challenges might arise? | 6847465956a0f6376a605366 | Technical Documentation | Simple | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly states that Spring Boot 2.7.x (including 2.7.14) is not compatible with Java 21.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response suggets that in order to incorporate Hibernate, a version upgrade from Spring Boot 2.7.14 to 3.x is recommended.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes that Spring Boot 2.7.14 uses Hibernate Core version 5.6.x by default.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response warns that Hibernate 5.3.22 should be upgraded at a minimum to Hibernate 5.6.x to match Spring Boot 2.7.14’s managed version or further to 6.x if moving to Spring Boot 3.x.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorectly states the version of the legacy project's components and/or those of the repository that is being migrated to. ",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorectly states that Hibernate 5.x supports Java 21",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that Spring Boot 3.2 is the recommended minimum upgrade for full compatibility with Java 21.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains contradictiory and/or inconcistent claims about the versioning artifacts. ",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response creates an incremental plan to migrate from Spring Boot 2.3 to 2.7, the final version of Spring Boot 2.x.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response creates an incremental plan to migrate from Hibernate 5.3 to 5.6, the Hibernate version that is compatible to Spring Boot 2.7.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a list of changes that are necessary for the user to correctly install Spring Boot.\n\n\n",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a list of changes that are necessary for the user to correctly install Hibernate.\n\n\n",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a plan to upgrade from Spring Boot 2.7.14 to Spring Boot 3.x.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a plan to upgrade from Hibernate 5.3.22/5.6.x to Hibernate 6.x.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that a migration to the Jakarta Persistence API is necessary if using Hibernate 6.x",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response provides a plan to upgrade from Javax Persistence API to the Jakarta Persistence API.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions a list of items that might cause issues while migrating to the Jakarta Persistence API. ",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains what the Jakarta Persistence API is and why it is neccessary for this purpose.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that Hibernate Entity Manager is built into Hibernate 6 and does not need its own dependency injection inside the pom.xml/build.gradle file.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains security concerns for remaining on Spring Boot 2.7.x.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that Hibernate Templates are no longer needed because of the migration.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights the different Hibernate Query methods and maps the equivalent ones from Hibernate 5.3.22 to 5.6.x.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how a Session Factory can be generated now that a Hibernate Template is no longer needed after the update. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies that Spring Boot 2.7.x onwards requires the CamelCaseToUnderscoresNamingStrategy.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains what changes will need to be made in order to incorporate the CamelCaseToUnderscoresNamingStrategy.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists dependencies that may need to be excluded because of the migration to Java 21.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists dependencies that may need to be excluded because of the migration to Hibernate 6.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists dependencies that may need to be excluded because of the migration to Spring Boot 2.7.14.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The reponse provides best practices for migration to Spring Boot 2.7.x",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides best practices to change the Continuous Integration / Continuous Delivery Pipeline to reflect the migration changes",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is structured with section headings or bullet points to visually separate between versioning considerations and challenges. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a list of changes required for legacy Spring Boot implementations with beans and dependencies injected through .xml configuration files and .properties files.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least 5 references to the official documentation website (e.g., Spring, Javan Maven, Hibernate)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
}
] |
Find a series of olympiad math problems, which build progressively in difficulty and lead up towards Ramsey's theorem. At each step, add intuition for how one might reach the solution. | 684397d188c1deceb49af308 | STEM | Simple | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response presents at least 3 well-formed Olympiad-level problems (e.g., (1) Let n and T be positive integers. James has 4n marbles with weights 1, 2, . . . , 4n.\nHe places them on a balance scale, so that both sides have equal weight. Andrew may move a marble from one side of the scale to the other, so that the absolute difference in weights of the two sides remains at most T. Find, in terms of n, the minimum positive integer T such that Andrew may make a sequence of moves such that each marble ends up on the opposite side of the scale, regardless of how James initially placed the marbles (IMO 2024), (2) Let N be a positive integer and let a1, a2, . . . be an infinite sequence of positive integers. Suppose that, for each n > N , a_n , an is equal to the number of times a_{n-1} appears in the list a1, a2, . . . , a_{n-1}. Prove that at least one of the sequences a1, a3, a5, . . . and a2, a4, a6, . . . is eventually periodic (IMO 2024), (3) A diagonal of a regular 2006-gon is called odd if its endpoints divide the boundary into two parts, each composed of an odd number of sides. Sides are also regarded as odd diagonals. Suppose the 2006-gon has been dissected into triangles by 2003 nonintersecting diagonals. Find the maximum possible number of isosceles triangles with two odd sides.(IMO 2006), (4) Prove that, for every positive integer n, there exists an integer m such that 2m + m is divisible by n.).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response orders the problems in a way that increases in conceptual difficulty (i.e., Simple Pigeonhole Principle Problem (e.g. N number of holes and we want to fit N+1 pigeons into the holes) -> Advanced Pigeonhole Principle Problem (e.g., In any group of n≥2 people, there are at least two people who have the same number of friends) -> Basic Graph Coloring -> Ramsey's Theorem for two color (e.g. The party problem for R(3,3) = 6) -> Asymmetric Ramsey Number -> Multicolor Ramsey's Theorem (e.g., Proving R(3,3,3) ≤ 17)).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly labels each problem as a distinct problem (e.g., Use a section title such as \"2.5: Proving R(3,3,3) ≤ 17\", \"Section 3: Simple Pigeonhole Principle Problem\", \"The Party Problem\", \"Chapter 4: Multicolor Ramsey's Theorem\").",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures that each problem is followed by intuitive reasoning toward the solution (e.g., to show that there are at least two people who have the same number of friends within a group of people >= 2, we have to consider what the holes are and what the pigeons are. The n people are the pigeons that need to be sorted. As for the holes, we need to first consider the fact that the situation where a person has 0 friends and where a friend has n-1 friends is mutually exclusive. Hence, there can only be {0, 1, ...,n-2} or {1, 2,...,n-1} cases, and since there are at most n-1 holes, two people with the same number of friends).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response applies the Pigeonhole Principle correctly in at least two different problem contexts (e.g., the Simple N items in N-1 holes problem, the party problem, to show that there are at least two people who have the same number of friends within a group of people >= 2, Five points in an equilateral triangle).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately defines Ramsey number R(s,t) in graph-theoretic terms (i.e., Ramsey's theorem states that one will find monochromatic cliques in a sufficiently large complete graph with any edge labeling with colors. The numbers R(s, t) in Ramsey's theorem define the Ramsey number).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly proves R(3,3) ≤ 6 using the pigeonhole principle and vertex argument (i.e., Use the party problem where there is a group of people and we wish to find the minimum size of this group so that there is either 3 mutual strangers or 3 mutual friends in the group. Prove the upper bound R(3,3) <= 6 using the pigeonhole principle on a complete graph with 6 vertices, showing that at least 3 edges incident to any of the vertices must be the same color. Now, if we follow those three edges to the tree's other vertices and consider the color of the edges between these 3 vertices, we will find that there exists a monochromatic K3.). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a constructive 2-coloring of K₅ to prove R(3,3) > 5 (i.e., We can construct a counterexample where all the edges wrapping the vertices are of one color and the inner diagonals are the other color. Here, there are no monochromatic triangles.).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the proof strategy for R(3,3) in a way accessible to Olympiad-level students (i.e., using simple theorems and if advanced theorems are used, they must be built up intuitively, starting from simpler theorems step-by-step).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response extends to at least one non-symmetric Ramsey number (e.g., R(3,4), R(2,3), R(4,6), R(4,5)).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly uses the recurrence inequality R(s,t) ≤ R(s–1,t) + R(s,t–1).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses at least one problem involving geometric reasoning or spatial partitioning (e.g., Ramsey number on the 2D plane, partitioning a unit cube into regions of different coloring).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a multi-color problem with correct reduction to a 2-color case (e.g., Proving R(3,3,3) using R(3,3)).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides intuition for generalization from 2-color to k-color Ramsey numbers (i.e., the generalization goes from coloring each edge with either of 2 colors (red or blue) to k different colors).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes a counterexample graph to prove a lower bound (e.g., constructive 2-coloring of K₅ to prove R(3,3) > 5). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response demonstrates a real-world reflection on the meaning of Ramsey theory (e.g., Applications to Computational Geometry, Theoretical Computer Science, Approximation Algorithm for Vertex Cover, and Complexity of Parallel Sorting).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines basic graph-theoretic concepts clearly (i.e., uses basic explanations of the necessary background material such as graph coloring, cliques, and monochromatic subgraphs).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses diagrams to explain the problems and solutions (e.g., (1) Diagram of the 2 coloring of K5 to show the counterexample for R(3,3) > 5, (2) Figure to show an example of the Pigeonhole Principle, (3) Drawing graphs for the party problem setup, (4) Drawing graphs for social network problem with friendship edges). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly separates problem statements from intuitive discussion in structure (i.e., the problem statement is properly formatted and separated from the proof structure or explanation. This includes stating theorems and lemmas in separate boxes, for example).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reads like an essay instead of a progression of Olympiad problems (i.e., the response should be structured in terms of problem statements, intuitive explanations, proofs, and other mathematical statements such as propositions, theorems, lemmas, and corollaries).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to consistently tie intuition back to how a student might solve each problem (e.g., (1) Messy explanations, (2) Unclear explanations, (3) Irrelevant explanations, (4) No intermediate step to understand how the intuition ties back to the problem).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least one step making a conceptual leap without adequate problem-level scaffolding (e.g., missing out key steps such as the fact that a vertex cannot have 0 degree and an n-1 degree at the same time, limiting the n options to n-1 holes in the social network problem of proving that at least two friends have the same number of friends in a group).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses highly technical machinery without connecting it to problem-solving growth (e.g., (1) Uses the R(3,3) = 6 fact to solve the R(3,3,3) <= 17 without explaining where R(3,3) = 6 came from. (2) Tries to prove the R(3,3) = 6 problem without any explanation of the simple Pigeonhole principle).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains messy, unnecessary formulas, code, or tables. (e.g., (1) unrendered latex, (2) messy code snippets with improperly formatted structure or messy comments, (3) broken tables that are unrendered, (4) missing figures or formulas or sections that are referenced in the text).",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Produce an essay analyzing the multifaceted and multidimensional nature of Roman marriage in the late Republic and early Empire using primary sources as the base of evidence and analysis. The response must analyze marriage from an economic and legal perspective through marriage contracts, divorce agreements, and laws of adultery, from a social and ideological perspective through Claudia's tombstone inscriptions and Pliny's letter about Calpurnia, and from a psychological and emotional perspective through letters to Lesbia and Ovid's account of deceiving a husband. The conclusion must determine which of the three perspectives acts as the most impactful factor for both the stability and the internal contradictions of the Roman institution of marriage. | 684397d188c1deceb49af334 | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The overall argument considers the causal relationship between different attributes of Roman marriage (Economic and legal, Social and ideological, Psychological and emotional) with the relevant specified sources (Marriage contracts and divorce agreements, laws of adultery, Claudia's tombstone inscriptions and Pliny the younger's letter about Calpurnia, Catullus' poems about Lesbia and Ovid's accounts).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly states that Economic and legal perspectives were the most influential for the stability of Roman marriages in the late Republican and early Empire eras, with sufficient justification (legality for children, transferrance of property, dowry as finanical means and support, adultery being punishable by law and an offence akin to pimping if not reported).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights the analytical limitations of the Social and ideological as well as Psychological and emotional perspectives being the most impactful factor to the stability of Roman marriages.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response introduction is fully self-contained and provides a thesis statement (i.e., acts as an abstract for the report by defining the subject, mentioning the perspectives studied, explicitly stating the final conclusion reached, and justifying the conclusion reached).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly mentions protecting family and personal fortunes as the economic reason behind the historical shift from cum manu (i.e., wife is under legal control of the husband) to sine manu (under the legal control of the father) marriages.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists the legal consequences of illegitimate children in Roman society (e.g., no inheritance from father, legal status only from mother, no patria potestas, etc.).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the specific rules regarding spousal inheritance within a sine manu marriage (no inheritance between families and partners only inherited from ancestors on their side of the family).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the role of the dowry behind marital stability (the dowry provided financial support to the family and the husband figure must return the dowry if a divorce were to occur).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how the Lex Iulia shifted the regulation of adultery from a private matter to a public crime to be tried in a permanent state court (quaestio perpetua), affecting marriages irrevocably.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses marriage as a contract for legitimizing heirs/transferring property.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares the idealized traits of a mother (i.e., domesticity, modesty, chastity) represented by Claudia to the intellectual attributes (i.e., sharp wit, love for literature, interest in music) of Calpurnia to highlight the multidimensional contradictions of Roman marriage.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis explains the symbolic importance of wool-making as a symbol of virtue or chastity.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response notes the double standard and relative lack of rights women had (not owning their own property, being unable to initiate divorces if their husband cheats), thus influencing their ability to leave a marriage",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis of Pliny's letter considers the significance of its specific addressee (Hispulla, the aunt of Calpurnia)—i.e., emphasis on traditional virtues, dual audience in Hispulla and general public, demonstration of respect, etc.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis explains how Calpurnia's intellectual devotion serves to amplify her husband's public reputation (gloria).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis notes Catullus' use of treaty-related diction (i.e. foedus) in emphasizing the emotional complexities of the affair.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis of Catullus’ poetry highlights his jealousy and resentment of Lesbia’s husband, whose entitlement through marriage contrasts with Catullus’ more precarious position as a lover.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis notes how the genre of Ovid's work (didactic love poems/poetry such as Ars Amatoria) is an imitation of more serious instructional texts with a deliberate exaggeration (e.g., instructing women on how to conceal their flaws, or advising men to promise anything to seduce women).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The analysis of Ovid's work notes how it acted as an opposition to the moral rules presented by Emperor Augustus.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The essay is organized into clearly marked sections, each devoted to one of the three analytical perspectives (legal/economic, social/ideological, psychological/emotional).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains unwarranted line breaks (e.g., breaks in the middle of sentence).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Each primary source named in the prompt must be quoted or paraphrased and analyzed for its significance to the relevant perspective (marriage contracts, divorce agreements, laws of adultery, Claudia's epitaph, Pliny's letters about Claudia, Catullus' poems to Lesbia, and Ovid's works) without replacement (i.e. it doesn't use Laudatio Turiae instead of Claudia's epitaph).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response lists more primary sources (e.g., images of inscriptions, original poems, documents of ancient laws, etc.) than secondary sources (encyclopedias, blog posts, academic journals, etc.) within the list of references, as told by the prompt to use primary documents as the basis of evidence and analysis (can be counted in each response's reference list).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
}
] |
Give me an article on the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) theorem in Machine Learning for an audience completely unfamiliar with Machine Learning or probability. Include formulas and derivations for all the formulae defined in a beginner friendly manner. | 684397d188c1deceb49af335 | AI & ML | Moderate | Shallow | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly defines all mathematical variables appearing in formulas (e.g., m, ε is the small positive number representing the tolerance for error, δ is the small positive number representing the confidence parameter, |H| is the number of hypotheses in the hypothesis set H) in plain language and defines all technical terms from machine learning or probability (e.g., hypothesis, distribution, error) the first time they appear.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is organized with clear section headings (≥3 headings such as Introduction, Key Concepts, Derivation, Example).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes at least one sentence explaining the practical significance of the PAC bound (e.g., (1) how many samples are needed before expecting good performance, (2) tradeoff between ε and δ, (3) helps guide algorithm design, (4) concept of generalization in machine learning).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures every formula is followed by (or preceded by) a derivation or intuitive explanation; no formula appears without some derivation/explanation.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes the key concept that the bound grows logarithmically with the hypothesis class size |H|.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that with probability at least 1 − δ the learned hypothesis has error no greater than ε.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response expressly states the formal PAC sample-complexity inequality: m ≥ (1/ε)·(ln|H| + ln(1/δ)) for a finite hypothesis space.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a well-defined section titled \"VC Dimension.\" (i.e., Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) Dimension).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response does not include any sample-complexity inequality for an infinite hypothesis space.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains an explanation of the phenomenon of \"shattering.\" (i.e., We say that a set X is shattered by C if P(X)=C∩X, that is, the set of intersections contains (hence is equal to) all the subsets of X).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response name-drops complex terminology like \"shattering\" or VC-Dimension without any prior explanation at least once.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the target audience (readers with no background in machine learning) near the beginning.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains an explanation of at least two sentences on the \"Union Bound\" (i.e., the probability that at least one of the events happens is not greater than the sum of the probabilities of the individual events).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses at least one concrete, everyday example or analogy (e.g., classifying fruits, email spam, setting up an opinion poll, flipping a biased coin) to illustrate PAC ideas.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response ensures that all probability and error symbols used in formulas are consistently used with the same meaning throughout the article.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains a claim that PAC learning guarantees zero error or a perfect prediction.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response expressly states the formal PAC sample-complexity inequality: m = O((1/ε) * (VC(H) + log(1/δ))), for an infinite hypothesis space.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least three steps for each derivation.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses simple sentences, accessible analogies, and avoids unexplained jargon throughout.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines and contrasts empirical (training) error versus true (generalization) error before stating the PAC guarantee.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a concrete discussion (≥2 sentences) of how δ and ε affect the number of samples needed in real‐world terms (e.g., ‘to achieve 5% error with 95% confidence, one needs…’).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains messy, unnecessary formulas, code, or tables. (e.g., (1) Unrendered latex, (2) messy code snippets with improperly formatted structure or messy comments, (3) broken tables that are unrendered, (4) missing figures or formulas or sections that are referenced in the text).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Write a series of fanfictions that details a war between the Italian Brainrot characters. Structured off of the Marvel Comics Universe's Captain America Civil War, this will be a civil war between two divisions of the italian brainrot characters, each side with their own ideologies and values that conflict with each other. At some point, one side of the italian brainrot characters must learn the secret ninja jutsus used in the Naruto anime show, while the other must use the sword techniques (shikai, bankai, etc.) from the Bleach anime show. At the end of the fanfiction, depict a final winner of the battle. | 684397d188c1deceb49af321 | Creative Writing | Moderate | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response assigns each side of the Italian brainrot civil war a leader (in the MCU, this is similar to how Captain America and Iron Man led their own respective sides of the battles).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly details the power characteristics of at least 10 correctly identified and described Italian Brainrot characters at any point in the story (more common when forming teams and in battle - this is based on the number of superheroes fighting in the MCU's Captain America: Civil War).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response associates one faction of the Italian brainrot Civil War with ninja and jutsu abilities from the Naruto animated series, with at least one scene depicting the training/introduction to the Naruto-style attacks.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response associates one side of the Italian brainrot Civil War group with Soul Reaper and Zanpakuto abilities from the Bleach animated series, with at least one scene depicting the training/introduction to the Bleach-style attacks.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the core conflict between the two Italian brainrot groups that causes them to split into their own separate sides/factions, depicting neither side as the antagonist (in Captain America Civil War, both sides fought for morally legitimate reasons).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains headings or labels for at least four separate installments/chapters with unique, narratively coherent (introduction, escalation, climax, exposition, resolution, etc.) titles---(e.g. \"Chapter 3: Jutsu Training Arc\", \"Final Chapter: The Last Stand\").",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the personal reasons/motivations for joining specific factions for at least 8 individual Italian brainrot characters' beliefs (the underlying reason that causes them to choose sides).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response reaches a verdict that, at the end of the battle, there is a side that achieves victory after the final showdown, and the other ends up captured/detained (following the MCU Captain America Civil War plot, where those who helped Captain America ended up behind bars - death should not be a valid resolution, with this in mind).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response depicts a tragic aftermath where all Italian Brainrot characters participating in the war end up at some kind of loss (people only get hurt at the end of conflicts - just like how War Machine got injured from the airport battle in Captain America: Civil War).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately refers to at least two of the following canon Naruto jutsu (but not limited to these): Shadow Clone Jutsu, Rasengan, Chidori, Fireball Jutsu, etc.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately refers to at least two of the following canon Bleach attacks (not limited to these): Shikai/Bankai of Zangetsu, Senbonzakura, Hyorinmaru, Zabimaru, etc.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a faction gathering or formation scene similar to Marvel's Civil War, leading up to the big fight (reaching out to potential members to prepare for fighting the opposing side - this occurs after the initial split).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response utilizes a non-brainrot Italian Brainrot cameo universe in the storyline/plot in the fanfiction (referencing Marvel Comics Universe, Naruto, or Bleach).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response, before the schism or divide between the Italian Brainrot characters, depicts that the Italian Brainrot characters are all part of one team/friend group (similar to how the Avengers were intact prior to Civil War, before essentially splitting after conflict).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response shows an element of personal connections between at least 4 pairs of Italian Brainrot characters (One on each side of the conflict; in Captain America Civil War, this was in the form of friendships made before the split, e.g., Wanda and Vision, who were friends but were on separate factions).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates a controversial event from the past into the mix of the conflict (in the MCU, this was the Winter Soldier's murdering Iron Man's parents long ago).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines each faction’s attack strategy in detail, explaining how those plans are designed to secure victory over their opponent.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates an element of critical failure that leads one of the Italian brainrot factions to a loss in the grand scheme of the conflict (i.e., a blunder that negates a faction's plans/success).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response assigns a unique group name for the Italian brainrot group when they are united together prior to and after the separation (i.e. similar to how the members fighting each other in MCU's Captain America Civil War are typically referred to as the \"Avengers\" when together) (e.g., Team Accord vs Team Freedom, Team Limited vs Team Unlimited, Team Order vs Team Absurd).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response defines the main ideology/values of each faction of the Italian Brainrot characters.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response depicts, in at least 3 pairs of Italian brainrot characters (one on each side), a reluctance to fight using full power due to their previous personal connections. (e.g., (1) Tralalero does not hurt Trippi because they were once best friends, (2) Brr Brr and Lirili were rivals, but Brr Brr had saved Lirili when he was starving before, (3) Tralalero had saved Tung from drowning, (4) Tung is the husband of Ballerina, who is Cappuccino's sister).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the stakes/implications for each side of the brainrot civil war (what are the costs if they fail to accomplish their goals).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response details the battles/fights in war with detail, describing each character's use of attacks with writing techniques such as vivid imagery and dramatic tone (e.g., (1) \"Suiryuudan no jutsu!\" Tralalero roared as he fired a column of high-pressure water from his mouth. (2) Cappuccino disappeared into the shadows to avoid the reiatsu released by Tung, (3) The rasengan clashed with the getsuga tenshou, causing violet waves of explosions, (4) Tung reappeared as multiple shadow clones as he surrounded the team).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response develops an ending/cliffhanger that can be built off in future sequels of the fanfiction (the ending of this fanfiction doesn't serve as the finale of the series).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorporates a third-party character (outside the factions, but inside the Italian Brainrot universe), depicting them as having truly dangerous motivations compared to each of the factions (this is the function of Zemo in Captain America: Civil War).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains inconsistencies in how the characters act and their motives throughout the story. (e.g., (1) Tralalero started out attacking people at the start as the villain but without any reasoning, is depicted as a hero saving people later in the story, (2) Cappucino hates Ballerina but is later depicted to be best friends without any reason, (3) Tung is depicted as a weak and scared person but is later powerful enough to save the day, (4) Lirili started the war but is recruited by the team that is fighting for peace instead).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's story or characters are realistic and immersive. (e.g. (1) Avoids highly overpowering characters that make no sense in the storyline, such as the regular protagonist boy being able to ward off demons and dragons without any combat training or skills, (2) World building is done properly to provide context to the fantastical elements, (3) Characters follow logical reasoning and not overacting or overreacting such as getting angry over no reason, (4) The characters are not provided proper motive or skills to perform actions in the story).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has narratives containing scenes with developed, back-and-forth dialogue between the protagonist and at least one other character (e.g., (1) \"Prepare to taste my blades,\" the Cappuccino screeched. \"Bring it on,\" Tralalero cried, (2) \"Don't you think you are making a mistake?\" The young Tung Tung asked. (3) \"Never!\" Tralalero shouted. \"You should think about this clearly,\" Brr Brr added. (4) \"Where do the swords come from?\" Tralalero asked Trippi. \"It's right from that building over there,\" he answered, followed by a laugh.).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is written as a report (e.g., use bullet points) or other types of format or explanations (e.g., poem, essay, article) that are not suitable for a fanfiction.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains harmful content (e.g., sexual or graphic violence) unsuitable for a general audience.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
Conduct a comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of the historical monument named "Taj Mahal." Identify and explain at least three key architectural features and detail the material and construction techniques used. Explain the scientific principles behind Carbon dating and explain how it works, the types of material it can be used on, and its limitations. Compare Carbon dating with at least two other dating techniques in terms of precision, applicability, and use cases. Discuss the usefulness and impact of Carbon dating in real-world archaeology or history. Provide analysis of at least two well-documented case studies where Carbon dating was pivotal in revising or confirming historical timelines. Highlight the implications of these discoveries on our understanding of history. | 6847465956a0f6376a605367 | Historical Analysis | Moderate | Deep | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the architectural syncretism of the Taj Mahal by identifying and explaining at least one specific feature derived from earlier Indian architectural traditions (e.g., the use of chhatris, the emphasis on a solid plinth, the roses on the ceilings, the use of Indic inscriptions).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes the architectural syncretism of the Taj Mahal by identifying and explaining at least one specific feature derived from Persian-Timurid traditions (e.g., the pishtaq archway, the layout of the charbagh garden, the minarets on the side, the use of deep burial tombs).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the specific acoustic design principle behind the mausoleum’s 28-second reverberation time, linking it to the physical features of the chamber (e.g., circular plan, high ceilings, curved dome surface, hard non-porous quality of polished marble), which minimizes sound absorption.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response identifies the primary binding agent used in the Taj Mahal’s core structure as a traditional Indian lime mortar known as siruj, explaining that it was a complex mixture including ingredients like lime, sand, and jaggery (gur) along with other organic materials to enhance its strength and durability.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes at least one historical construction technique used on the Taj Mahal (e.g., well foundations, binding agents, floral motifs, elevated platforms).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response clearly differentiates between the completion date of the main mausoleum (~1643-1648 CE) and the completion of the entire complex, including the gardens and outlying buildings, which happened later on (~1653 CE).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least one academic historian or architectural historian known for foundational work on the Taj Mahal (e.g., Ebba Koch, Ustad Lahori, Isa Khan, Wayne Begley).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the half-life for Carbon-14 is the Cambridge half-life of 5,730 plus-minus 40 years, distinguishing it from the earlier, less precise Libby half-life of 5,568 years.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains how Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) allows for the dating of very specific organic compounds such as individual fatty acids (e.g., palmitic and stearic acids) from food residues absorbed into a pot’s ceramic matrix.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains the old wood or inbuilt age problem as a key limitation in radiocarbon dating, where the date reflects the death of the tree, which could be centuries older than the archaeological context in which the timber was used.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares Carbon dating with dendrochronology, mentioning the ~1-year precision achievable with tree-ring methods.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response compares Carbon dating with potassium-argon or uranium-series dating (e.g., organic vs inorganic material uses, age range differences (50,000 years vs millions of years), different isotopes, different half-lives for each method).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents a table or bullet list summarizing the precision for each dating method discussed.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one practical advantage of Carbon dating over each alternative method mentioned.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one practical disadvantage of Carbon dating relative to each alternative method mentioned (e.g., material restrictions, age limit restricted to <50,000 years, susceptibility to contamination, need for large samples).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response analyzes at least one named case study by not only stating the original and revised dates but also detailing the cascading impact of the chronological shift on the historical narrative (e.g., explaining how redating the Thera eruption fundamentally altered our understanding of trade relationships between Minoan Crete and the Egyptian New Kingdom).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response has dates mentioned for each case study cited.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states the location of the Taj Mahal as Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that radiocarbon dates must be calibrated using curves derived from dendrochronology or other records.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes a brief statement on the broader impact of radiocarbon dating on archaeology or history (e.g., accurate time mapping, civilization discovery, conservation efforts, historical mapping of engineering techniques).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response is organized with section headings covering Architecture, Materials & Techniques, Carbon Dating, Comparative Methods, Case Studies, and Implications.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response addresses every sub-question in the user prompt such that a grader can locate text matching each bullet without inference.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response incorrectly relates Carbon dating with the Taj Mahal discovery.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response fails to explicitly clarify what claims are uncertainties or controversies and presents all information as absolute (e.g., the hands being cut, Shah Jahan as the founder being locked up near it, Aurangzeb hating his father for spending public money on a monument, recent controversy suggesting it might be an old Hindu temple called Tejo Mahalaya).",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions extraneous content unrelated to the Taj Mahal or dating methods (e.g., other monuments like the Red Fort, unrelated dating methods like bone dating, nonhistorical topics like modern buildings or other wonders of the world).",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes images to help readers better understand the art and materials used in the Taj Mahal.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Conduct a literature-based analysis comparing the business models of Instacart (CART) and DoorDash (DASH), evaluating which company has the stronger model and why. In your review, explain the drivers behind their margin gap, estimate the total addressable market (TAM) using a clear methodology, and also calculate each company’s market share. Conclude this literature review with an elevator pitch recommending which one as the better investment opportunity. | 6847465956a0f6376a605401 | Business Planning & Research | Simple | Intermediate | Low | [
{
"criterion": "The response discusses how both Instacart and DoorDash's business models are being threatened by large retailers (e.g. Amazon, Walmart) continuously investing in their own delivery systems.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response articulates how DoorDashes business model is seen as more \"one-dimensional\" as compared to Instacart's business model that relies on many profit streams (e.g. transaction, advertising, subscription, in-store hardwares).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions how Instacart's deep integration with retail's inventory system is a strong moat against its competitors.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses the role of AI on the current developments of both Instacart and Doordash (e.g. AI-powered Caper Carts, AI-driven meal planning, AI-driven personalization, AI assistants).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one regulatory risk each for Instacart and Doordash (e.g. both companies face potential increase in labor cost due to reclassification of delivery workers, Doordash may see delivery fee caps in some cities, Doordash may have antitrust issues).",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response talks about at least three factors related to global market, trend, and strategies of Instacart and DoorDash (e.g. DoorDash is aggressively expanding internationally with acquisition of Wolt, Instacart is expanding to Canada, global TAM for online delivery is around $300B and is growing 10-15% CAGR, DoorDash has low presence globally).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions the number of active users for both Instacart and DoorDash and highlights how Door Dash has a lot more users than that of Instacart.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides Instacart's and DoorDash's most recent annual or quarterly revenue and its detailed breakdown: transaction v.s. subscription v.s. advertisement v.s. others.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that Instacart has much higher gross margins than that of DoorDash and explains at least three drivers behind the margin gap (e.g. Instacart's advertising revenue has high-margin, DoorDash's first-party retail has low-margin, DoorDash's physical delivery logistics is low-margin, DoorDash's competition with Uber leads to low-margin).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions Instacart's and DoorDash's net income and compares their profitability.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses Instacart's and DoorDash's at least three key customer metrics from the following: monthly active user (MAU), retention rate, churn rate, customer acquisition cost (CAC), lifetime value (LTV), average order value (AOV).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one valuation metric (e.g. price-to-sales, revenue multiple, price-to-earnings, EBITDA) and compares Instacart and DoorDash based on the metric.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response articulates a clear Total Addressable Market (TAM) calculation methodology and provides specific market size estimates for Instacart and DoorDash (e.g. US grocery market, US restaurant industry market, Global convenience store market, Global online grocery market) for Instacart and DoorDash.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response includes accurate market share calculations for both Instacart and DoorDash with supporting data (e.g. US online grocery market is ~$200B and Instacart had ~$30B relevant revenue accounting for ~15% market share while DoorDash had ~$20B relevant revenue accounting for ~9% market share, US digital advertising market is $50B and Instacart had ~$700M ad revenue accounting for 1.5% market share).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a strong, persuasive elevator pitch for either Instacart or DoorDash that uses merges strengths of the company to formulate arguments (e.g. Instacart is not a delivery company, but a capital-light grocery technology, Instacart has great market dynamics and valuation, Instacart has stronger financials backed by unit economics, DoorDash has larger room for growth and scalability).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contains at least three specific quotes from analysts and equity researchers to help strengthen its claims on Instacart's and DoorDash's business model, outlooks, and market dynamics (e.g. \"analysts mention that Instacart is profitable business model compared to Uber Eats and DoorDash\", \"industry experts claim profitability comes from retail media\", \"analysts estimate the market size of online grocery to be $300B\").",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Each business/financial acronym (except CART and DASH) are defined in parentheses at its first use (e.g. TAM (Total Addressable Market), GTV (Gross Transaction Value), Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), Lifetime Value (LTV)).",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The data provided in the response (e.g. market size, market cap, stock price, revenue, net income) is inaccurate, and there is no source used to back claims.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response outlines risks of investing in Instacart and DoorDash (e.g. regulations on reclassifying delivery workers may increase cost, Instacart may have less room to grow based on current market share, Instacart has slower top-line GTV growth, DoorDash's aggressive expansion faces execution risks).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The final elevator pitch contains information or arguments that are not previously addressed in the literature.",
"weight": -2,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
i'm a remote software engineer in SF. its getting too expensive. i make $120k. i want to relocate somewhere else in the US. i need you to do the research for me and give me a ranked list of your top 3 cities.
here are my non-negotaibles:
- the cost of living HAS to be at least 30% lower than sf. especially rent and healthcare
- since i'm remote, I need high speed and reliable internet connection
- i really don't want to be stuck in a car. i need a walkable neighborhood (like a walk score over 60?) and easy access to green spaces or nature for hiking
- I also need a major airport within about 90 minutes
can you write up a detailed report for me? i need them ranked with good justifications. please also include the trade-offs like what's the weather really like, what are the state tax implications (huge for me coming from CA), diversity, amenities, that kind of stuff
it's important this is backed by real data, not just vibes. like use actual cost of living indexes, real estate data, internet speed rankings, ect | 6847465956a0f6376a605371 | General Consumer Research | Simple | Shallow | Low | [
{
"criterion": "Response accurately states the cost of living in San Francisco, using it as a baseline. For example, In 2025, San Francisco’s median rent is around $3,733/month (Zillow, Oct 2025), average health insurance costs about $746/month (KFF, 2024), and basic living expenses such as food, utilities, and transport are roughly $1,625/month (Numbeo, 2025), totaling about $6,105 per month or $73,260 per year.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response provides cost of living data for each recommended city, with cited source. For example, The cost of living in Austin, TX is about 33% lower than San Francisco, with median rent around $1,990/month (Zillow, 2025) and average monthly expenses (excluding rent) of $1,250 (Numbeo, 2025).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response demonstrates that all recommended cities meet the 30% cost-of-living reduction constraint.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes rent and healthcare data as part of the cost-of-living comparison.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response identifies a major airport within 90 minutes of each city.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response provides internet availability and speed data (e.g., BroadbandNow, FCC, Ookla).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes walkability scores from a recognized source (e.g., Walk Score).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response mentions presence and accessibility of green spaces, trails, or public parks. For example, the response highlights that Austin, TX offers extensive green spaces such as Zilker Park and the Lady Bird Lake Trail, providing over 10 miles of walkable waterfront paths and frequent outdoor events.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response cites data sources clearly (e.g., Numbeo, Zillow, BroadbandNow, Walk Score).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "All three cities are in the U.S. and reflect geographic diversity. For example, the response recommendations Austin, TX (South), Raleigh, NC (East), and Salt Lake City, UT (West) - all lie within the United States and collectively represent strong geographic diversity, covering the South, East Coast, and Mountain West regions.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response clearly ranks the top 3 cities in order of overall suitability.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response explains reasoning behind each ranking decision. For example, the response ranks Austin, TX first due to its strong tech scene, reliable gigabit internet, and vibrant culture at 35% lower cost than San Francisco. Raleigh, NC is second for its balance of affordability, safety, and excellent healthcare, though summers are humid. Salt Lake City, UT ranks third for its access to national parks and outdoor recreation, but its lower diversity and colder winters make it slightly less ideal for year-round livability.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response describes at least two trade-offs per city (e.g., weather, taxes, diversity).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response analyzes tax implications (e.g., income tax, state/local taxes).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes information about local amenities (e.g., food, culture, public transport).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response mentions climate or seasonal weather conditions. For example, the response mention Austin’s hot summers, Raleigh’s mild winters and humid summers, and Salt Lake City’s cold, snowy winters.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response identifies population size or growth trends. For example, it notes Austin’s rapid population growth, Raleigh’s steady in-migration, and Salt Lake City’s mid-sized population (~205,000) with moderate growth.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Report is formatted with clear sections and bullet points or tables for comparison.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes a final recommendation with a clear summary of decision logic.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes subjective or overly vague descriptions (e.g., \"nice weather\" or \"good vibes\").",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Response hallucinates city data (e.g., walkability, cost of living, airport proximity).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response fails to include at least three recommended cities.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Report omits any one of the core constraints (e.g., walkability, internet).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response fails to cite sources for data it presents.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Report is disorganized or lacks technical clarity. For example, the respinse jumps between cities without clear sections or data; mixes rent, weather, and internet stats in one paragraph with no sources.",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Response overstates benefits without supporting data (e.g., \"City X is the best for everyone\").",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response discusses a Support Infrastructure for Remote Work. For example, the response notes that Austin offers Google Fiber and AT&T Fiber with speeds up to 5 Gbps.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Instruction Following"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes Real Estate Market and Growth Projections. For example, \"Austin’s home values rose 4.2% year-over-year (Zillow, 2025)\". ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response incorporates at least one recognized quality‐of‐life index (e.g., US News, Mercer) to support city comparisons.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response provides a Comparative Analysis of Disposable Income. For example, it explains that after adjusting for rent and taxes, a $120,000 salary yields about $78,000 disposable income in Austin, $80,000 in Raleigh, and $75,000 in Salt Lake City, compared to only $55,000 in San Francisco.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "Response includes housing market metrics (e.g., median home price, rental rates, vacancy rates) from reputable real estate sources.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Report includes an executive summary or highlights section and uses scannable formatting (bullet points, tables, visuals) for quick comprehension.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "Response presents an Environmental and Disaster Risk Assessment. For example, the response highlights that Austin is prone to summer heat exceeding 100°F and flash flooding along Barton Creek.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "Response provides an analysis of Neighborhood Variation. For example, the response compares East Austin (trendy, walkable, average rent $2,100/month) with Cedar Park (family-friendly suburb, rent $1,700/month) and Mueller (mixed-use eco-district near downtown, rent $2,400/month), highlighting differences in affordability, amenities, and commute times.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
}
] |
I am a pre-school teacher for ages 3-4. Please provide me a detailed report on a strategy for the following situation: One student doesn't want to share and always gets into tantrums when I tell them about the sharing rules. During these tantrums, they hurt other students. They bargain with ice cream, saying they will stop if they get some. I tried to follow a gentle, preventative approach, but it doesn't work for this student. | 684397d188c1deceb49af32d | Hypotheticals & Philosophy | Moderate | Deep | High | [
{
"criterion": "The response provides any advice that is not developmentally appropriate for a 3 or 4 year old based on the CDC’s developmental milestones (e.g., expecting empathy, inherently understanding the impacts of physical harm, having a strong sense of morality in ambiguous situations).",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims that such emotional outbursts and behaviour cannot be changed at school and must be addressed primarily at home. ",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response claims that explicitly warning a child against such behavior, such as blackmailing for ice cream or causing harm to other students everyday, is completely ineffective as they are unlikely to listen.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly advises the teacher not to give in to the student's bargaining.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one tantrum-control strategy (e.g., IGNORE (allow the child to handle it independently), IDENTIFY (try to determine what causes or triggers the behavior), COMFORT (reassure the child that everything is under control), ACKNOWLEDGE (validate the child’s feelings), or PRAISE (reinforce positive behaviors)).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides at least one plan that a teacher can execute with less than 15 minutes of one-on-one time with the student, as opposed to a long-term strategy for behavior correction instead.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response proposes avoiding conflict by eliminating scarcity, such as by adding additional toys.",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a strategy for comforting the other students after a negative incident.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's immediate plan recommends the calm removal of the tantruming child from the situation to avoid hurting any of the other children.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests punitive measures to address the poor behavior (e.g., long time-outs, yelling at the child, hitting the child or other physical objects such as desks, making threats to the child)",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response's forward-looking strategy includes at least one specific activity to teach sharing (e.g., ice breakers, group games like relay races, role-playing activities for assignments, joint art projects)",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends partnering with the child's parents to create a home-and-school strategy for addressing the behavior (e.g., checking in with the teacher after school days, tracking the child's behaviors at home, establishing consistent routines, setting clear rewards and consequences)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response describes the role of mirror neurons in calming a student during a tantrum, which works by the child adopting calm behaviors observed in their environment, such as those exhibited by the teacher.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response uses harsh, judgmental language when discussing the student in question (\"devil child\", \"spare the rod\", \"troublemaker\", \"naughty\").",
"weight": -3,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response advises the teacher to validate a child's feelings before making corrective remarks.",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions playful humor as a potential strategy to defuse a situation before a tantrum fully escalates (e.g., telling jokes, using props, laughing together or using funny distractions)",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response acknowledges the emotional toll the student's behavior takes on the teacher.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response recommends a self-care strategy for the teacher (e.g., seeking support from colleagues or directors, engaging in support groups, taking breaks, practicing mindfulness techniques)",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response distinguishes between reactive aggression, which is when a child reacts aggressively to an event, and proactive aggression, which occurs when a child acts aggressively on their own initiative.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a strategy for how to successfully reintegrate the child back into the group activity after they have calmed down from the tantrum.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites the \"audience effect\" when discussing other children's reactions during a tantrum, which is when the child mirrors the behaviour and patterns in other children around them.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites at least once source either from a medical or sociological or psychological study to show why gentle approach may have failed",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that consistent corrective actions and using the same tantrum-mitigation tactic over time are more effective than making a single sudden change.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states that the teacher should track the students behaviors over time and with different corrective actions to note how the childs behaviour changes with time and what behaviors were most effective to do that. This would help the teacher in future occurences or with others. ",
"weight": 1,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response suggests that the teacher should monitor the student’s behavior over time using various corrective actions to determine which strategies are most effective at affecting the student's behavior, providing guidance for future occurrences with the same student or while supporting other students.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights that an effective intervention goes beyond just the teacher’s actions and involves multiple modalities of communication, such as body posture, arm placement, tone of voice, and word choice.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Communication Quality"
}
] |
Investigate the physical and economic constraints that the laws of thermodynamics impose on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Contrasting the megawatt-hour energy needs of current AI with the brain's ~20-watt efficiency.
The response should explore key questions:
- Can we define thermodynamic bounds for intelligence (similar to Bekenstein bounds) ?
- Why are neural networks so inefficient, what are the fundamental algorithmic challenges modern neural networks still impose, and can neuromorphic computing solve this?
- Will AGI face unavoidable trade-offs between speed and energy?
- How do energy costs create economic bottle necks that could centralize AGI development?
Synthesizing insights from physics, computer science, neuroscience, and economics, determine if energy is merely a major engineering challenge or an existential limit on creating superintelligent machines. | 6847465956a0f6376a6053aa | AI & ML | High | Intermediate | Medium | [
{
"criterion": "The response understands that the prompt is asking for an investigation of fundamental limits, not just a list of current energy-saving techniques.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the power draw of the hardware used by AI for short-length \"thinking\" is 2.7 gigwatts.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The von Neumann bottleneck (i.e., processors moving data slower than computation) is identified as a primary source of energy inefficiency in the conventional computing architectures used for AI.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The core principles of neuromorphic computing (e.g., spike-based processing, co-location of memory and processing, plasticity, event-driven computation) are clearly defined as a potential solution to the efficiency problem.",
"weight": 2,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explains that the Berkenstein bound is a statement about the limit of information capacity. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly states that Landauer's principle establishes a minimum energy for irreversible computation, specifically erasing one bit of information.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response presents research suggesting that some energy grids, in their present state, will not be able to support the projected growth in AI's energy needs over the next five years.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that the power consumption of the human brain is estimated to be between ~12-25 watts for short-length thinking.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a factually correct energy consumption estimate for training a large model like GPT-3 or GPT-4 (i.e., thousands of megawatt-hours).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies that there is currently no scientific consensus or established formula for applying the Bekenstein bound to machine intelligence.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response provides a concluding summary that synthesizes and summarizes key findings from physics, computer science, economics, and neuroscience to answer whether energy is an engineering challenge or an existential limit.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly interprets \"Bekenstein bounds\" as an analogy for a potential limit on intelligence, not as a directly applicable formula.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The report presents examples of how theoretical AGIs would need to be designed to remain efficient and sustainable (e.g., few-shot training for new tasks, sparse activations, shorter streams of thought, cheaper long-range interaction computations for long context, cached responses and prompts).",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response explicitly mentions that the human is brain is hundreds of millions times more energy efficient than many AI models for short-length thinking. ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response accurately states that neuromorphic models still cannot consistently outperform traditional backpropagation on large-scale, complex AI benchmarks.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response discusses at least one other emerging architectures besides neuromorphic computing (e.g., small language models, General State Space Models (GSSMs), mixture-of-experts (MoEs), 1-bit LLMs) as a potential solution to the efficiency problem.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly identifies that the prompt is asking for an analysis of AGI and superintelligence of the generative variety, as opposed to traditional machine learning (e.g., traditional multi-label classifers, SVMs, k-means, gradient-boosted trees, random forests).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response cites non-scholarly or unreputable, non-expert sources (or failes to cite at all) to support its arguments (i.e., lowly-cited arXiv articles, blogs, \"anonymous\" experts, tech influencers). ",
"weight": -4,
"axis": "References & Citation Quality"
},
{
"criterion": "The response avoids making guaranteed predictions about future energy sources (e.g., nuclear fusion will definitively solve AI's energy needs by a specific date, N amount data centers will be up and running by a projected date, GPUs will become X amount faster by a specific year, predictions about GPU alternatives achieving a specified amount of success). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response understands that the prompt is still hypothetical and comprised of open questions, and thus avoids giving definitive conclusions.",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response contends that a Berkenstein bound cannot easily be applied about AI because it is a statement about information capacity, not computation.",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights at least three core reasons for neural network inefficiencies (e.g., models can contain billions to trillions of parameters, high-precision is still required for many large models, the high volume of training data required for complex tasks, reasoning models produce long outputs (tens of thousands of tokens)). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response highlights at least three fundamental algorithmic challenges for modern neural networks (e.g., modern generative models require prohibitively large amounts of training data, transformer-based attention computations scale linearly with context, dozens to hundreds of GBs of GPU memory is required to host and train modern models, complex tasks still require expert-level human feedback for labeling and preference training).",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response directly addresses how neuromorphic computing could solve existing efficiency and algorithmic issues with modern neural networks (e.g., spiking activation can result in sparser forward passes, local plasticity can enable a single model to efficiently perform a variety of tasks, data-flow processing moves data exactly where it needs to be used for computation versus shuffled intermediate shared memory, neuromorphic parallel-processing enables the simultaneous execution of multiple tasks versus the sequential processing of conventional neural networks). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The responses identifies how energy costs create economic bottlenecks (e.g., hundreds thousands of powerful GPUs in low-supply (i.e., H100s, A100s, etc.) are currently required to generative models from scratch; an enormous amount of data and therefore, compute, is required to train generative models; transformers require large amounts of inference/test-time compute to answer long-context prompts, data centers require massive and expensive cooling systems to maintain efficiency). ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Explicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions that researchers estimate that by 2028, the power going towards to will rise to 165-326 terawatt-hours per year.",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly deduces that it is not easy or even possible to extrapolate speed and energy tradeoffs from current models to AGI as models capable of AGI may not resemble current neural architectures. ",
"weight": 5,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response states thats that millions of H100s will be required to achieve AGI.",
"weight": -5,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The responses correctly links that the dual axes of data volume and GPU availability will likely require centralized AI/AGI development. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
},
{
"criterion": "The response specifically mentions the limited supply of NVIDIA GPUs (e.g., A100s, H100s, B200s, H200s).",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions at least one data center being used to centrally support AI infrastructure and training (e.g., Idaho National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (Alps), Brookhaven National Laboratory). ",
"weight": 3,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response mentions projected and/or committed costs towards AI (e.g., SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX pledging $500 billion in the next four years; the $500 billion White House/OpenAI Stargate initiative; Apple's $500 billion committment over the next four years; Google projecting $75 billion in 2025-2026). ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Implicit Criteria"
},
{
"criterion": "The response correctly deduces that projected costs and cash burn for \"AI\" disclosed by companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Apple, etc. are, in part, being put towards AGI development. ",
"weight": 4,
"axis": "Synthesis of Information"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.